Cover not available
Part of
Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 12: Selected papers from the 45th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Campinas, Brazil
Edited by Ruth E.V. Lopes, Juanito Ornelas de Avelar and Sonia M. L. Cyrino
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 12] 2017
► pp. 1–14

Chapter 1
Modality, presupposition and discourse

The meaning of European Portuguese afinal and Italian alla fine

| Indiana University
| CLLE-ERSS (CNRS & Université de Toulouse II)

This paper provides a semantic analysis of the particles afinal (European Portuguese) and alla fine (Italian) in terms of the notion of truth unpersistence, which can be situated at the intersection of epistemic modality and discourse structure. In the analysis proposed, the particles are propositional operators and require that the truth of a proposition p* fail to persist through a temporal succession of epistemic states, this proposition being incompatible with the prejacent, and that the interlocutors share knowledge of a previous epistemic attitude toward p*. We analyze two main cases (plan-related and non plan-related propositions) and also show that these particles are indexical to one (or more) epistemic agent(s) and allow for shifts in perspective.

Keywords: epistemic modality, presupposition, discourse structure, perspective, European Portuguese, Italian
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Empirical data from European Portuguese and Italian
    • 2.1Plan-related propositions
    • 2.2Non plan-related propositions
    • 2.3Temporal uses of alla fine
  • 3.Analysis of the data
  • 4.Perspectival shifts
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
  • Corpora used
Published online: 19 October 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.12.01ama
References (15)
Amaral, Patrícia, Craige Roberts, and E. Allyn Smith
2007 “Review of The Logic of Conventional Implicatures by Chris Potts.” Linguistics and Philosophy 30: 707–749. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Amaral, Patrícia, and Fabio Del Prete
2014 “On Truth Persistence: A comparison between European Portuguese and Italian in relation to sempre .” In Variation within and across Romance Languages. Selected papers from the 41st Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, ed. by Marie-Hélène Côté, and Eric Mathieu, 135–154. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2016 “On truth unpersistence: at the crossroads of epistemic modality and discourse”, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 34 (4): 1135–1165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baroni, Marco, Silvia Bernardini, Federica Comastri, Lorenzo Piccioni, Alessandra Volpi, Guy Aston, and Marco Mazzoleni
2004 “Introducing the “la Repubblica” corpus: A large, annotated, TEI(XML)-compliant corpus of newspaper Italian.” In Proceedings of LREC 2004.Google Scholar
Brito, Ana Maria
2001 “Clause Structure, Subject Positions and Verb Movement. About the Position of Sempre in European Portuguese and Brazilian Portuguese.” In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 1999. Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ 1999, ed. by D’hulst, Yves, Johan Rooryck, and Jan Schroten, 63–85. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro, and Sally McConnell-Ginet
1990 Meaning and Grammar. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fiéis, Alexandra
2010 “On the Position of Sempre in Medieval Portuguese and in Modern European Portuguese.” The Linguistic Review 27: 75–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gonzaga, Manuela
1997 Aspectos da Sintaxe dos Advérbios em Português. M.A. Dissertation, Lisboa: FLUL.Google Scholar
Gutzmann, Daniel
2013 “Expressives and Beyond: An Introduction to Varieties of Use-Conditional Meaning.” In Beyond Expressives. Explorations in Use-Conditional Meaning. Current Research in the Semantics Pragmatics-Interface (CRiSPI) 28, ed. by Gutzmann, Daniel, and Hans-Martin Gärtner, 1–58. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lopes, Ana C. M.
2011 “La polyfonctionnalité du marqueur discursif ‘afinal’ en portugais européen.” In Discourse markers in Romance languages, Oslo Studies in Language 3(1), ed. by E. Khachaturyan, 131–140.Google Scholar
Roberts, Craige
1996 “Information Structure in Discourse: Towards an Integrated Formal Theory of Pragmatics.” In OSU Working Papers in Linguistics, Vol. 49., ed. by Jae-Hak Yoon, and Andreas Kathol, 91–136. Columbus, Ohio.Google Scholar
Santos, Diana, and Paulo Rocha
2001 “Evaluating CETEMPúblico, a free resource for Portuguese.” In Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of Association for Computational Linguistics, 450–457.Google Scholar
Tonhauser, Judith, David I. Beaver, Craige Roberts, and Mandy Simons
2013 “Toward a taxonomy of projective content.” Language 89 (1): 66–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar

Corpora used

La Repubblica corpus, a corpus of Italian newspaper text
[URL])
CETEMPúblico
: Santos, Diana, and Paulo Rocha 2001 CETEMPúblico LDC2001T62. Web Download. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium 2001.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by 1 other publications

Amaral, Patrícia
2018. Expressive meaning. In Handbuch Pragmatik, ► pp. 325 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.