Chapter published in:
Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 12: Selected papers from the 45th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Campinas, Brazil
Edited by Ruth E.V. Lopes, Juanito Ornelas de Avelar and Sonia M. L. Cyrino
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 12] 2017
► pp. 2948
References

References

Belletti, Adriana, and Luiggi Rizzi
1988 “Psych verbs and θ-theory”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6 (3): 291–352. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Campos, Héctor
1999 “Transitividad e intranstividad”. In Gramática Descriptiva de la Lengua Española ed. by Ignacio Bosque and Violeta Demonte, 1519–1574. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
2000 “Minimalist inquiries: the framework”. In Step by step ed. by Roger Martin, David Michaels, and Juan Uriagereka, 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2008 “On Phases”. In Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory. Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud ed by Robert Freidin, Carlos Peregrín Otero, and María Luisa Zubizarreta, 133–166. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cuervo, M. Cristina
2003Datives at large. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
2010 “Some dative subjects are born, some are made”. In Selected Proceedings of the 12th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, ed. by Claudia Borgonovo, Manuel Español-Echevarría, and Philippe Prévost, 26–37. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Dowty, David
1979Word meaning and Montague grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez-Bravo, Rodrigo
2006 “A reinterpretation of quirky-subjects and related phenomena in Spanish”. In New Perspectives in Romance Linguistics ed. by Jean-Pierre Y. Montreuil, and Chiyo Nishida, 127–142. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fábregas, Antonio, and Rafael Marín
2015 “Deriving individual-level and stage-level psych verbs in Spanish”. The Linguistic Review 32 (2): 227–275. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fernández-Soriano, Olga
1999 “Two types of impersonal sentences in Spanish: locatives and dative subjects”. Syntax 2 (2): 101–140. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Folli, Raffaella
2001Constructing telicity in English and Italian. Doctoral dissertation, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Jiménez-Fernández, Ángel L.
2009 “The low periphery of double object constructions in English and Spanish”. Philologia Hispalensis 23: 179–200.Google Scholar
Jiménez-Fernández, Ángel L., and Shigeru Miyagawa
2014 “A feature-inheritance approach to root phenomena and parametric variation”. Lingua 145: 275–302. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jiménez-Fernández, Ángel L., and Bozena Rozwadowska
In press. “The information structure of dative experiencer psych verbs”. In Various Dimensions of Contrastive Studies” ed. by Bozena Cetnarowska, Marcin Kuczok and M. Zabawa University of Silesia Press
Lakoff, George
1966 “Stative adjectives and verbs in English”. Mathematical linguistics and automatic translation; report to the National Science Foundation 17, Computational Laboratory, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Landau, Idan
2010The Locative Syntax of Experiencers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth
1993English Verb Alternations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth, and Malka Rappaport Hovav
2005Argument Realization. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Masullo, Pascual
1992 “Two types of quirky subjects: Spanish vs. Icelandic”. NELS 23: 303–317.Google Scholar
Marín, Rafael
2011 “Casi todos los predicados psicológicos son estativos”. In Sobre Estados y Estatividad ed. by Ángeles Carrasco, 26–44. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Marín, Rafael, and Louise McNally 2011 “Inchoativity, change of state, and telicity: Evidence from Spanish reflexive psychological verbs”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29: 467–502. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pesetsky, David
1995Zero syntax. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pylkkänen, Liina
2002Introducing arguments. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian
2008First Phase Syntax. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Romeu Fernández, Juan
2015Cartografía mínima de las construcciones espaciales. Doctoral Dissertation, Universidad Complutense de Madrid.Google Scholar
Tubino, Mercedes
2007 “Preverbal datives are not quirky subjects”. Ms., University of Arizona.Google Scholar
Uriagereka, Juan
1995 “Aspects of the theory of clitic placement in Western Romance”. Linguistic Inquiry 26: 79–123.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Bondaruk, Anna
2020.  In Beyond Emotions in Language [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 263],  pp. 141 ff. Crossref logo
Jiménez-Fernández, Ángel L.
2020.  In Beyond Emotions in Language [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 263],  pp. 213 ff. Crossref logo
Rozwadowska, Bożena, Arkadiusz Nowak & Anna Bondaruk
2020.  In Beyond Emotions in Language [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 263],  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Willim, Ewa
2020.  In Beyond Emotions in Language [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 263],  pp. 245 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.