Chapter published in:
Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 15: Selected papers from 'Going Romance' 30, Frankfurt
Edited by Ingo Feldhausen, Martin Elsig, Imme Kuchenbrandt and Mareike Neuhaus
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 15] 2019
► pp. 93112
References
Anand, Pranav
2006De De Se. Ph.D. Dissertation: MIT.Google Scholar
Anand, Pranav, and Valentine Hacquard
2013 “Epistemics and Attitudes”. Semantics and Pragmatics 6 (8): 1–59.Google Scholar
Antomo, Mailin
2009 “Interpreting Embedded Verb Second. Causal modifiers in German”. Proceedings of ConSOLE XVII: 27–51.Google Scholar
Charnavel, Isabelle
2017 “Exempt Anaphors and Logophoricity in French”. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 12. Selected papers from the 45th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, Campinas, Brazil, ed. by Ruth E. V. Lopes, Juanito Ornelas de Avelar, and Sonia M. L. Cyrino, 15–28. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2018Perspectives in Causal Clauses. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory: 1–36.Google Scholar
to appear. “French Causal puisque-clauses in the light of (not)-at-issueness.” In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory – Selected papers from the 47th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL47), Newark, Delaware. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Charnavel, Isabelle, and Dominique Sportiche
2016 “Anaphor Binding – What French Inanimate Anaphors Show.” Linguistic Inquiry 47 (1): 35–87. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1999Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-linguistic Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clements, George N.
1975 “The Logophoric Pronoun in Ewe: Its Role in Discourse”. Journal of West African Languages 10: 141–177.Google Scholar
Culy, Christopher
1994 “Aspects of Logophoric Marking”. Linguistics 32: 1055–1094. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dubinsky, Stanley, and Robert Hamilton
1998 “Epithets as Antilogophoric Pronouns”. Linguistic Inquiry 29 (4): 685–693. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ducrot, Oswald
1983 “ Puisque: essai de description polyphonique”. Revue romane 24: 166–185.Google Scholar
Faller, Martina
2002Semantics and Pragmatics of Evidentials in Cuzco Quecha. Ph.D. Dissertation: Stanford University.Google Scholar
Groupe Lambda-1
1975 “ Car, parce que, puisque ”. Revue Romane 10: 248–280.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane
2003 “Conditional Clauses: External and Internal Syntax”. Mind and Language 18 (4): 317–339. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane, and Virginia Hill
2013 “The Syntacticization of Discourse”. In Syntax and its Limits, ed. by Raffaella R. Folli, Christina Sevdali, and Robert Truswell, 370–390. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James, and C.-S. Luther Liu
2001 “Logophoricity, Attitudes, and Ziji at the Interface”. Long-Distance Reflexives 33: 141–195.Google Scholar
Johnston, Michael James Robert
1994The Syntax and Semantics of Adverbial Adjuncts. Ph.D. Dissertation: University of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
Koopman, Hilda, and Dominique Sportiche
1989 “Pronouns, Logical Variables and Logophoricity in Abe”. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 555–589.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
2014 “Embedding Illocutionary Acts”. In Recursion: Complexity in Cognition, ed. by Tom Roeper, and Margaret Speas, 59–87. Cham: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
Lewis, David K.
1973 “Causation”. Journal of Philosophy 70: 556–567. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Murray, Sarah E.
2010Evidentiality and the Structure of Speech acts. PhD Dissertation: Rutgers University-Graduate School-New Brunswick.Google Scholar
Oshima, David Y.
2007 “Motion Deixis, Indexicality, and Presupposition”. In Proceedings of SALT 16: 172–189. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, William
1970 “Some Observations concerning Subordinate Clauses in English”. Language 46: 97–115. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ruwet, Nicolas
1990 “ En et y: deux clitiques pronominaux antilogophoriques”. Langages 97: 51–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sæbø, Kjell Johan
1991 “Causal and Purposive Clauses”. In Semantik –Semantics. Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung – An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, ed. by Armin von Stechow, and Dieter Wunderlich, 623–631. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sells, Peter
1987 “Aspects of Logophoricity”. Linguistic Inquiry 18: 445–79.Google Scholar
Sheffler, Tatjana
2008Semantic operators in different dimensions. PhD Dissertation: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Speas, Margaret, and Carol L. Tenny
2003 “Configurational Properties of Point of View Roles”. In Asymmetry in Grammar. Volume 1: Syntax and Semantics, ed. by Anna Maria Di Sciullo, 315–344. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Speas, Margaret
2004 “Evidentiality, Logophoricity and the Syntactic Representation of Pragmatic Features”. Lingua 114: 255–276. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stephenson, Tamina
2007 “Judge Dependence, Epistemic Modals, and Predicates of Personal Taste”. Linguistics and Philosophy 30: 487–525. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur
1976 “Reflexives and Subjunctives in Icelandic”. Sixth Annual Meeting of the North Eastern Linguistics Society: 225–239.Google Scholar