Chapter 5
Point of view on causal clauses
The case of French parce que and
puisque
This paper uses the case study of French clauses
introduced by parce que ‘because’ and
puisque ‘since’ to argue that causal clauses
are intrinsically perspectival: the causal relation that they
express is established by a causal judge. Perspectival effects in
causal clauses indicate that the referential possibilities of this
judge depend on the structural level of attachment of causal
clauses, which can modify Verb Phrases, Evidential Phrases or Speech
Act Phrases. This supports the hypothesis that the causal judge is
syntactically represented as a silent argument of the causal
subordinator that must be bound within its clause. The presence of
this judge argument explains why logophoric elements can appear in
causal clauses.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Three types of causal clauses
- 2.1Distinguishing between eventive and evidential causal
clauses
- 2.2Distinguishing between evidential and speech act causal
clauses
- 3.Perspectival effects in causal clauses
- 3.1Perspective in parce que-clauses
- 3.2Perspective in puisque-clauses
- 3.3Analysis
- 4.Causal clauses in attitude contexts
- 4.1Embedded parce que-clauses
- 4.2Embedded puisque-clauses
- 5.Conclusion
-
Acknowledgements
-
Notes
-
References