Cover not available
Part of
Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 15: Selected papers from 'Going Romance' 30, Frankfurt
Edited by Ingo Feldhausen, Martin Elsig, Imme Kuchenbrandt and Mareike Neuhaus
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 15] 2019
► pp. 333–351

Chapter 17
Non-verbal predication and clitics in Aromanian

| University of Cambridge
ORCID logo | University of Cambridge
This paper discusses predicational structures in some Aromanian varieties which involve PP or AP predicates combining with the copula be. In these structures the internal argument and subject of be is cross-referenced by an accusative clitic, as long as it is 3rd person and a topic. However, Individual-Level APs typically resist cliticisation. We propose that the clitic is the spell-out of topic and gender/number features available in Stage-Level predicates only (a spatio-temporal argument à la Kratzer 1995), with which the subject agrees, before agreeing with T. We argue that this structural property captures the restriction to Stage-Level predicate subject topics, the person restriction, and also the fact that the clitic behaves like a direct object clitic morphosyntactically.
Keywords: nonverbal predication, clitics, stage level predicates, individual level predicates, subject topics, split-person ergative marking, Aromanian, Romance, differential object marking
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Socio-linguistic background and methodology
  • 3.The phenomenon and its distribution
    • 3.1The general picture
    • 3.2Environments in which the ia-clitic is found
    • 3.3Further restrictions: The DP subject is a topic
  • 4.The analysis
    • 4.1The structural properties of ia-clitics
    • 4.2Implications
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 9 October 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.15.17mav
References (24)
References
Bakalis, Evangelos and Alexandra Galani. 2012. “Modeling language evolution: Aromanian, an endangered language in Greece.” Physica A 391: 4963–4969. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowers, John. 1993. “The Syntax of Predication”. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 591–656.Google Scholar
Carlson, Gregory. 1977. Reference to kinds in English. PhD dissertation, UMass Amherst.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. “Derivation by Phase”. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, ed. by Michael Kenstowicz, 1–52. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
D’Alessandro, Roberta and Adam Ledgeway. 2010. “The Abruzzese T-v system: feature spreading and the double auxiliary construction”. In Syntactic Variation: The Dialects of Italy, ed. by Roberta D’Alessandro, Adam Ledgeway, and Ian Roberts, 201–209. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
De Hoop, Helen. 2002. Case Configuration and Noun Phrase Interpretation. PhD Dissertation, University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Diesing, Molly. 1992. Indefinites. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dinas, Konstantinos and Nikolaos Katsanis. 1990. Γραμματική της Kοινής Kουτσο-βλαχικής [Grammar of the Common Kutsovlach]. Thessaloniki: Archives of Macedonian studies.Google Scholar
Dowty, David. 1991. “Thematic-Proto-Roles and Argument Selection”. Language 67 (3): 547–619. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enç, Mürvet. 1991. “The Semantics of Specificity”. Linguistic Inquiry 22 (1): 1–25.Google Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara. 2007. “Subjects, topics and the interpretation of referential pro: an interface approach to the linking of (null) pronouns.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25: 691–734. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gallego, Ángel and Juan Uriagereka. 2016. “ESTAR = SER + X.” Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 5 (1): 123–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hallmann, Peter. 2004. “NP Interpretation and the Structure of Predicates.” Language 80 (4): 707–747. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jiménez-Fernández, Ángel Luis. 2012. “What Information Structure tells us about Individual/Stage-Level Predicates.” Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 1 (1): 1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jiménez-Fernández, Ángel Luis and Vasilios Spyropoulos. 2013. “Feature inheritance, vP phases and the information structure of small clauses.” Studia Linguistica 67(2): 185–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 1995. “Stage-Level and Individual Level Predicates.” In The Generic Book, ed. by Gregory Carlson, and Francis Pelletier, 125–175. Chicago: The University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Landau, Idan. 2004. “The Scale of Finiteness and the Calculus of Control.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22: 811–877. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maienborn, Claudia. 2005. “A discourse-based account of Spanish ser/estar.” Linguistics 43 (1): 155–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marantz, Alec. 1991. “Case and Licensing.” In Proceedings of ESCOL ’91, ed. by German Westphal, Benjamin Ao, and Hee-Rahk Chae, 234–253. Cornell Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Mavrogiorgos, Marios. 2010. Clitics in Greek: A Minimalist Account of Proclisis and Enclisis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pesetsky, David. 1987. “Wh-in-Situ: Movement and Unselective Binding.” In The Representation of (In)definiteness, ed. by Eric J. Reuland, and Alice G. B. ter Meulen, 98–129. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian. 1997. Aspect and Predication: The Semantics of Argument Structure. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Roy, Isabelle. 2013. Nonverbal Predication: Copular Sentences at the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Oxford: University of Oxford. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1976. “Hierarchy of features and ergativity.” In Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages, ed. by R. M. W. Dixon, 112–171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Tsimpli, Ianthi Maria, Alexandra Prentza & Maria Kaltsa
2022. Bidirectional Language Contact Effects at the DP Domain: The Case of Greek and Vlach Aromanian Speakers. Languages 7:2 ► pp. 150 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.