Cover not available
Part of
Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 16: Selected papers from the 47th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Newark, Delaware
Edited by Irene Vogel
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 16] 2020
► pp. 37–48

Person/Number exponents in imperative-enclitic contexts

| Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
| Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
The goal of this paper is to analyse the partial or total deletion of the Person/Number exponents in imperative-enclitic contexts in Catalan and Spanish. Both languages lose phonological material in a specific context, but Spanish deletes the right-edge segment from the verb whereas Barcelona Catalan loses the left-edge segment of the clitic. Our aim is to account for the contrasting solutions shown by these two neighbouring languages using the same constraints but ranked differently in the Optimality Theory framework. OT allows us to put together different types of grammatical requirements, including distinctness requirements, particularly a positional OCP constraint on Person/Number features, and faithfulness conditions, specifically the condition related with morpheme realization, all of which interact with alignment and markedness constraints.
Keywords: P/N exponent, enclisis, reflexive, markedness, deixis
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Morphological structure of imperatives and reflexive clitics
    • 2.1Imperatives
    • 2.2Reflexive enclitics
    • 2.3Imperative-enclitic context resolutions
  • 3.OT account
  • 4.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgment
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 21 August 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.16.03cab
References (20)
References
Alcoba, Santiago. 1999. “La Flexión Verbal.” In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, ed. by I. Bosque, and V. Demonte, 4916–4991. Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar
Bonet, Eulàlia, and Maria-Rosa Lloret. 2005. “More on Alignment as an Alternative to Domains: The Syllabification of Catalan Clitics.” PROBUS 17: 37–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
D’Alessandro, Roberta, and Marc van Oostendorp. 2013. “Phi Features for Phonology; Edge Features for Prosody. Insights into the Syntax-PF interface.” Ms., Leiden University.Google Scholar
de Lacy, Paul. 1999. “Morphological Haplology and Correspondence.” In University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 25, ed. by P. de Lacy, and A. Nowak, 51–88. Amherst, MA: Graduate Linguistics Students Association.Google Scholar
Fabra, Pompeu. 1913–1914. “Els mots àtons en el parlar de Barcelona.” Butlletí de Dialectologia Catalana, I (1913): 7–17; II (1914): 1–6.Google Scholar
Harris, James. 1987. “The Accentual Patterns of Verb Paradigm in Spanish.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5: 61–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, James, and Morris Halle. 2005. “Unexpected Plural Inflections in Spanish: Reduplication and Metathesis”. Linguistic Inquiry 36: 195–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kager, Réné. 1994. “Ternary Rhythm in Alignment Theory.” Ms., Utrecht University.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1985. “Some Consequences of Lexical Phonology”. Phonology Yearbook, 85–138. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mascaró, Joan. 1986. Morfologia. Barcelona: Enciclopèdia Catalana.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John. 1986. “OCP Effects: Gemination and Antigemination.” Linguistic Inquiry 17: 207–263.Google Scholar
. 1995. “Extensions of Faithfulness: Rotuman Revisited.” Ms., UMass-Amherst.Google Scholar
van Oostendorp, Marc. 2005. “Expressing Inflection Tonally.” Catalan Journal of Linguistics 4: 107–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prince, Alan, and Paul Smolensky. 1993/2004. Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Malden, MA, & Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Real Academia Española. 2009. “La flexión verbal.” In Nueva gramática de la lengua española, 181–336. Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar
Richards, Norvin. 2010. Uttering Trees (LI Monograph 56). Cambridge: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sadock, Jerrold, and Arnold Zwicky. 1985. “Speech Act Distinctions in Syntax.” In Language Typology and Syntactic Structure, Vol. 1: Clause Structure, ed. by T. Shopen, 155–196. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van der Wurff, Wim. 2007. “Introduction.” Imperative Clauses in Generative Grammar, 1–94. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yip, Moira. 1998. “Identity Avoidance in Phonology and Morphology.” In Morphology and its Relation to Phonology and Syntax, ed. by S. Lapointe, D. Brentari, and P. Farrel, 216–246. Stanford: CLSI Publication.Google Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaella. 2008. “Encoding the Addressee in the Syntax. Evidence from English Imperative Subjects.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 26: 185–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar