This paper examines the discourse status of French causal clauses introduced by puisque ‘since’. Puisque-clauses are associated with two implications: the relation expressed by puisque and the content of their clause. Several diagnostics show that neither implication is at-issue and that the two implications belong to two different types of projective content (cf. Tonhauser et al. 2013). This is due to syntactic and lexical reasons: the relation expressed by puisque is not at-issue because puisque-clauses modify high (evidential and speech act) phrases that are not at-issue; the content of the puisque-clause is not at-issue because puisque is lexically factive, i.e. selects true facts. Puisque thus exemplifies an unrecognized type of double presuppositional trigger.
Abrusan, Márta. 2016. “Presupposition Cancellation: Explaining the ‘Soft–Hard’ Trigger Distinction.” Natural Language Semantics 24: 165–202.
Amaral, Patrícia, Craige Roberts, and E. Allyn Smith. 2007. “Review of The Logic of Conventional Implicatures by Chris Potts.” Linguistics and Philosophy 30: 707–749.
Anand, Pranav, and Valentine Hacquard. 2013. “Epistemics and Attitudes.” Semantics and Pragmatics 6 (8): 1–59.
Beaver, David. 2010. “Have you Noticed that Your Belly Button Lint Colour is Related to the Colour of Your Clothing?” In Presuppositions and Discourse: Essays Offered to Hans Kamp, ed. by R. Bäuerleet al., 65–99. Bingley: Emerald.
Chierchia, Gennaro, and Sally McConnell-Ginet. 1990. Meaning and Grammar: An Introduction to Semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
Faller, Martina. 2002. “Semantics and Pragmatics of Evidentials in Cuzco Quecha.” PhD dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford.
Groupe λ-1. 1975. “Car, parce que, puisque.” Revue Romane 10: 248–280.
Haegeman, Liliane, and Virginia Hill. 2013. “The Syntacticization of Discourse.” In Syntax and its Limits, ed. by Raffaella Folli, Robert Truswell, and Christina Sevdali, 370–390. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Johnston, Michael James Robert. 1994. “The Syntax and Semantics of Adverbial Adjuncts.” PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.
Karttunen, Lauri. 1974. “Presuppositions and Linguistic Context.” Theoretical Linguistics 1: 181–194.
Karttunen, Lauri. 2016. “Presupposition: What Went Wrong?.” In Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 26, ed. by M. Moroneyet al., 705–731. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
Kratzer, Angelika. 2006. “Decomposing Attitude Verbs.” Talk given at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
Krifka, Manfred. 2014. “Embedding Illocutionary Acts.” In Recursion: Complexity in Cognition, 59–87. Springer International Publishing.
Murray, Sarah. 2010. “Evidentiality and the Structure of Speech Acts”. PhD dissertation, Rutgers University, New Brunswick.
Roberts, Craige. 1996. “Information Structure in Discourse: Towards an Integrated Formal Theory of Pragmatics.” Working Papers in Linguistics 49: Papers in Semantics. Ohio State University.
Rutherford, William. 1970. “Some Observations Concerning Subordinate Clauses in English.” Language 46: 97–115.
Sæbø, Kjell Johan. 1991. “Causal and Purposive Clauses.” In Semantik – Semantics. Ein Internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung – An International Handbook of Contemporary Research (HSK 6), ed. by Arnim von Stechow, and Dieter Wunderlich, 623–631. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Sæbø, Kjell Johan. 2016. “Information Structure and Presupposition.” In The Oxford Handbook of Information Structure, Chapter 7.
Scheffler, Tatjana. 2008. “Semantic Operators in Different Dimensions.” PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Simons, Mandy, Judith Tonhauser, David Beaver, and Craige Roberts. 2010. “What Projects and Why.” In Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 20, ed. by Nan Li, and David Lutz, 309–327. Ithaca, NY: CLC.
Speas, Margaret. 2004. “Evidentiality, Logophoricity and the Syntactic Representation of Pragmatic Features.” Lingua 114: 255–276.
Tonhauser, Judith. 2012. “Diagnosing (not-)at-Issue Content.” Semantics of Under-represented Languages in the Americas (SULA) 6: 239–254.
Tonhauser, Judith, David Beaver, Craige Roberts, and Mandy Simons. 2013. “Toward a Taxonomy of Projective Content.” Language 89 (1): 66–109.
von Fintel, Kai. 2004. “Would You Believe it? The King of France is Back! Presuppositions and Truth Value Intuitions.” In Descriptions and Beyond, ed. by Marga Reimer, and Anne Bezuidenhout, 315–341. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
von Fintel, Kai, and Anthony S. Gillies. 2010. “Must… Stay… Strong!.” Natural Language Semantics 18 (4): 351–383.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.