Geminates and vowel laxing in Quebec French
Laxing and harmony in Quebec French (QF) high vowels shows dialectal, register and perhaps even lexical variation. A recent proposal to handle some of the data (Poliquin 2006) contains a radical innovation to phonological theory concerning long-distance segment interactions. We question the necessity of such an account by pointing out that recognition of geminate sonorants in QF can explain some puzzling forms without recourse to new devices. Our account is supported by phonetic considerations, as well as by recognizing that the alternative both under and overgenerates lax vowels in surface forms.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Basics of Quebec French +High vowels
- 3.Three strikes against NLNIVH in illicite
- 3.1‘Long-distance’ is not ‘non-local’
- 3.2NLNIVH overgenerates and undergenerates
- 3.3Geminates to the rescue
- 4.Conclusion
-
Acknowledgment
-
Notes
-
References
References (16)
References
Bale, Alan, and Charles Reiss. 2018. Phonology: A Formal Introduction. MIT Press.
Bale, Alan, Maxime Papillon, and Charles Reiss. 2014. “Targeting Underspecified Segments: A Formal Analysis of Feature Changing and Feature Filling Rules.” Lingua 148: 240–253.
Bosworth, Yulia. 2011. “Weight and Feet in Québécois.” Doctoral Dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
Chandlee, Jane, and Jeffrey Heinz. 2018. “Strict Locality and Phonological Maps.” Linguistic Inquiry 49: 23–60.
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. “Language as a Natural Object.” In New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind, 106–133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 2007. “Approaching UG from Below.” In Interfaces + re-cursion = Language?: Chomsky’s Minimalism and the View from Syntax-Semantics, ed. by Uli Sauerland, and Hans-Martin Gärtner, 1–24. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Cohn, Abigail C., William H. Ham, and Robert J. Podesva. 1999. “The Phonetic Realization of Singleton-Geminate Contrasts in Three Languages of Indonesia”. Proceedings of ICPhS 14: 587–590.
Hammarberg, Robert. 1981. “The Cooked and the Raw”. Journal of Information Science 3: 261–267.
Lai, Regine. 2015. “Learnable vs. Unlearnable Harmony Patterns”. Linguistic Inquiry 46: 425–451.
Local, John, and Adrian P. Simpson. 1999. “Phonetic Implemenation of Geminates in Malayalam Nouns”. ICPhS 595–599.
Morin, Annick. 2010. “Diachrony and Synchrony of/l/Gemination in Québec French.” In Proceedings of the 2010 annual conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association, ed. by Melinda Heijl, Online Proceedings: Canadian Linguistic Association.
Poliquin, Gabriel Christophe. 2006. “Canadian French Vowel Harmony.” Doctoral Dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge.
Pullum, Geoffrey K. 1976. “The Duke of York Gambit”. Journal of Linguistics 12: 83–102.
Rose, Sharon, and Rachel Walker. 2004. “A Typology of Consonant Agreement as Correspondence”. Language 80: 475–531.
Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 2007. The Syntax of Icelandic. Cambridge University Press.
Walker, Douglas C. 2001. French Sound Structure, Volume 1. University of Calgary Press.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Harry van der Hulst & Nancy A. Ritter
2024.
The Oxford Handbook of Vowel Harmony,
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.