Cover not available
Part of
Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 16: Selected papers from the 47th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Newark, Delaware
Edited by Irene Vogel
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 16] 2020
► pp. 187–202

On recomplementation, high adverbs and V-movement in Spanish

| University of Connecticut
I address the structure of the Spanish left periphery regarding recomplementation, i.e., double-complementizer constructions. I establish a contrast between Latin American Spanish (LAS) and European Spanish (ES): while there is an overt low complementizer que in ES, there is a null low complementizer in LAS – this is a novel empirical observation. The latter is different from the construction where low que is absent in ES: the null low complementizer in LAS patterns with the overt low complementizer in ES with respect to the phenomena discussed in this paper. I further tie this difference to the height of V-movement and adverb placement in LAS and ES. I then propose a phase-based account of the contrast.
Keywords: complementizer, left periphery, phases, adverbs, Spanish
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Contrast between ES and LAS
  • 3.High adverbs and height of V-movement
  • 4.Analysis
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgement
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 21 August 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.16.12mar
References (28)
References
Benincà, Paola. 1988. “L’ordine degli elementi della frase e le costruzioni marcate.” In Grande Grammatica Italiana di Consultazione, Vol. 1, ed. by Lorenzo Renzi, 129–194. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Bošković, Željko. 2001. On the Nature of the Syntax-Phonology Interface. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
. 2004. “Topicalization, Focalization, Lexical Insertion, and Scrambling.” Linguistic Inquiry 35: 613–638. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. “From the Complex NP Constraint to Everything.” The Linguistic Review 32: 603–669. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. “On the Timing of Labeling.” The Linguistic Review 33: 17–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric. 2007. Understanding Minimalist Syntax. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2013. “Problems of Projection.” Lingua 130: 33–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2004. “Issues in Adverbial Syntax.” Lingua 114: 683–710. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demonte, Violeta, and Olga Fernández-Soriano. 2007. “La periferia izquierda oracional y los complementantes del español.” In Vernetzungen: Kognition, Bedeutung, (kontrastive) Pragmatik, ed. by Juan Cuartero, and Martine Emsel, Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
den Dikken, Marcel. 2007. “Phase Extension.” Theoretical Linguistics 33: 1–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erlewine, Michael. 2016. “Anti-Locality and Optimality in Kaqchikel Agent Focus.” Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 34: 429–479. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gallego, Ángel, and Juan. Uriagereka. 2007. “Sub-Extraction from Subjects.” In Romance Linguistics 2006, ed. by José Camacho, Nydia Flores-Ferrán, Liliana Sánchez, Viviane Déprez, and Marí José Cabrera, 149–162. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane, and Zanuttini Raffaella. 1996. “Negative Concord in West Flemish.” In Parameters and Functional Heads: Essays in Comparative Syntax, ed. by Adriana Belletti, and Luigi Rizzi, 117–179. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders. 2001. “The Syntax of Yes and No in Finnish.” Studia Linguistica 55: 140–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
López, Luis. 1995. “The Hierarchy of Negation and Tense.” In Proceedings of the Eastern States Conference on Linguistics X: 186–197.Google Scholar
. 2009a. “Ranking the Linear Correspondence Axiom.” Linguistic Inquiry 40: 239–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009b. A Derivational Syntax for Information Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paoli, Sandra. 2007. “The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery: COMPs and Subjects: Evidence from Romance.” Lingua 117: 1057–1079. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. “The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery.” In Elements of Grammar: A Handbook of Generative Syntax, ed. by Liliane Haegeman, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. “On the position “Int(errogative)” in the Left Periphery of the Clause.” In Current Studies in Italian Syntax, ed. by Guglielmo Cinque, and Giampaolo Salvi, 287–296. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Ramalle, Teresa. 2003. La gramática de los adverbios en -mente o cómo expresar maneras, opiniones y actitudes a través de la lengua. Madrid: Ediciones de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.Google Scholar
Suñer, Margarita, 1994. “V-Movement and the Licensing of Argumental Wh-Phrases in Spanish.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 12: 335–372. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torrego, Esther. 1984. “On Inversion in Spanish and Some of its Effects.” Linguistic Inquiry 15: 103–129.Google Scholar
Villa-García, Julio. 2012. “Recomplementation and Locality of Movement in Spanish.” Probus 24: 257–314. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. The Syntax of Multiple-que Sentences in Spanish. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaella. 1997. Negation and Clausal Structure: A Comparative Study of Romance Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zeiljsta, Hedde. 2007. “Negation in Natural Language: On the Form and Meaning of Negative Elements.” Language and Linguistics Compass 1: 498–518. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Bonke, Max & Sophie Repp
2022. Complementizer deletion in embedded gapping in Spanish. The Linguistic Review 39:3 ► pp. 525 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.