Cover not available
Part of
Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2012: Selected papers from 'Going Romance' Leuven 2012
Edited by Karen Lahousse and Stefania Marzo
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 6] 2014
► pp. 65–90

The interpretation of clefting (a)symmetries between Italian and German

This paper proposes a comparative investigation of clefts in German and Italian. Assuming a specificational copular analysis, the properties of clefts in these languages are argued to rely on independent properties of relative clauses and nominal predicates. The major morpho-syntactic (a)symmetries are therefore discussed, and semantic, discourse and prosodic evidence supports a derivational analysis in which the clefted Focus is a predicate and the relative DP is a right-hand Topic connected with a non-expletive resumptive pronoun. As for post-copular agreement, the conditions on null subject licensing are considered: though they are very restricted in German and combine with V2 requirements, clefts represent a type of impersonal construction in which this option applies. Finally, data concerning quantifier scope and connectedness are discussed, providing further support for the present analysis.
Published online: 18 December 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.6.03fra
References (54)
References
Abraham, Werner. 1991. “Null Subjects: From Gothic, Old High German and Middle High German to Modern German. From pro-drop to semi-pro-drop.” Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik 34: 1–28.Google Scholar
Akmajian, Adrian. 1970. Aspects of the Grammar of Focus in English. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Atlas, Jay David, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1981. “It-Clefts, Informativeness, and Logical Form: Radical Pragmatics (Revised Standard Version).” In Radical Pragmatics, ed. by Peter Cole, 1–61. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Axel, Katrin, and Helmut Weiss. 2005. “Pro-drop in the History of German. From Old High German to the Modern Dialects.” In Empty Pronouns, ed. by Peter Gallmann, and Melanie Wratil, 21–51. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Beerman, Dorothee, David LeBlanc, and Henk C. van Riemsdijk (eds). 1997. Rightward Movement. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belletti, Adriana. 2005. “Answering with a ‘Cleft’: the Role of the Null Subject Parameter and the VP Periphery.” In Contributions to the Thirtieth Incontro di Grammatica Generativa, ed. by Laura Brugè, Giuliana Giusti, Nicola Munaro, Walter Schweikert, and Giuseppina Turano, 63–82. Venezia: Cafoscarina.Google Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa. 2009. “Semi Null-Subject Languages, Expletives and Expletive pro Reconsidered.” In Parametric Variation. Null Subjects in Minimalist Theory, ed. by Theresa Biberauer, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts, and Michelle Sheehan, 153–199. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Büring, Daniel. 2003. “On D-Trees, Beans, and B-Accents.” Linguistics & Philosophy 26 (5): 511–545. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna. 1990. “Subject/Object Asymmetries in German Null-Topic Constructions and the Status of SpecCP.” In Grammar in Progress, ed by. Joan Mascaró, and Marina Nespor, 75–84. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. “Against Optional and Null Clitics. Right Dislocation vs. Marginalization.” Studia Linguistica 56 (1): 29–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf. 1958. Introduction to Symbolic Logic and its Applications. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1977. “On Wh-Movement.” In Formal Syntax, ed. by Peter Culicover, Thomas Wasow, and Adrian Akmajian, 71–132. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 1986. Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Delahunty, Gerald P. 1982. Topics in the Syntax and Semantics of English Cleft Sentences. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Den Dikken, Marcel. 2006. Relators and Linkers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Den Dikken, Marcel, André Meinunger, and Chris Wilder. 2000. “Pseudoclefts and Ellipsis.” Studia Linguistica 54 (1): 41–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dufter, Andreas. 2009. “Clefting and Discourse Organization: Comparing Germanic and Romance.” In Focus and Background in Romance Languages, ed. by Andreas Dufter, and Daniel Jacob, 83–121. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Embick, David, and Rolf Noyer. 2007. “Distributed Morphology and the Syntax-Morphology Interface.” In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces, ed. by Gilliand Ramchand, and Charles Reis, 289–324. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Emonds, Joseph. 1976. A Transformational Approach to English Syntax. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Fiengo, Robert, and Robert May. 1994. Indices and Identity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara. 2000. “Frasi Scisse e ‘Small Clauses’: un’analisi dell’inglese [Cleft Sentences and Small Clauses: An analysis of English].” Lingua e Stile 35 (3): 417–446.Google Scholar
. 2007. “Subjects, Topics and the Interpretation of Referential pro. An Interface Approach to the Linking of (Null) Pronouns.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25 (4): 691–734. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. “Narrow Focus, clefting and predicate inversion.” Lingua 120 (9): 2121–2147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara, and Roland Hinterhölzl. 2007. “Types of Topics in German and Italian.” In On Information Structure, Meaning and Form, ed. by Kerstin Schwabe, and Susanne Winkler, 87–116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara, and Francesca Ramaglia. 2013a. “(Pseudo)clefts at the Syntax-Prosody-Discourse Interface.” In Cleft Structures, ed. by Katharina Hartmann, and Tonjes Veenstra, 97–137. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013b. “‘Phasing’ Contrast at the Interfaces: A Feature-compositional Approach to Topics.” In Information Structure and Agreement, ed. by Victoria Camacho-Taboada, Ángel Jiménez-Fernández, Javier Martín-González, and Mariano Reyes-Tejedor, 55–81. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gazdar, Gerald. 1979. Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition, and Logical Form. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Grewendorf, Günter, and Cecilia Poletto. 1989. “La costruzione scissa: un’analisi contrastiva. [The cleft construction: A contrastive analysis].” Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 14: 105–142.Google Scholar
Haider, Hubert. 1991. “Null Subjects and Expletives in Romance and Germanic Languages.” In Issues in Germanic Syntax, ed. by Werner Abraham, Wim Kosmeijer, and Eric Reuland, 49–66. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hasselgård, Hilde. 2004. “Adverbials in it-cleft Constructions.” In Advances in Corpus Linguistics: Papers from the 23rd International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora, ed. by Karin Aijmer, and Bengt Altenberg, 195–211. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Hedberg, Nancy. 1990. Discourse Pragmatics and Cleft Sentences in English. PhD dissertation, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
. 2000. “The Referential Status of Clefts.” Language 76 (4): 891–920. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heggie, Lorie. 1993. “The Range of Null Operators: Evidence from Clefting.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11 (1): 45–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huber, Stefan. 2002. Es-Clefts und det-Clefts: Zur Syntax, Semantik und Informationsstruktur von Spaltsätzen im Deutschen und Schwedischen. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1983. Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kallulli, Dalina. 2006. “Triggering Factivity: Prosodic Evidence for Syntactic Structure.” In Proceedings of 25th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, ed. by Donald Baumer, David Montero, and Michael Scanlon, 211–219. Sommerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Kiss, É. Katalin. 1999. “The English Cleft Construction as a Focus Phrase.” In Boundaries of Morphology and Syntax, ed. by Lunella Mereu, 217–229. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 2001. “Quantifying into Question Acts.” Natural Language Semantics 9: 1–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. “Basic Notions of Information Structure.” In Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure, Vol. 6, ed. by Caroline Féry, Gisbert Fanselow, and Manfred Krifka, 13–55. University of Potsdam.Google Scholar
Lenerz, Jürgen. 1985. “Zur Theorie syntaktischen Wandels: Das expletive es in der Geschichte des Deutschen.” In Erklärende Syntax des Deutschen, ed. by Werner Abraham, 99–136. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Lutz, Uli, and Jürgen Pafel (eds). 1996. On Extraction and Extraposition in German. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moro, Andrea. 1997. The Raising of Predicates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, Gereon. 2006. “Pro-Drop and Impoverishment.” In Form, Structure, and Grammar. A Festschrift Presented to Günther Grewendorf on Occasion of his 60th Birthday, ed. by Patrick Brandt, and Eric Fuss, 93–115. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Partee, Barbara H. 1987. “Noun Phrase Interpretation and Type-shifting Principles.” In Studies in Discourse Representation Theory and the Theory of Generalized Quantifiers, ed. by Jeroen Groenendijk, Dick de Jongh, and Martin Stokhof, 115–143. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Percus, Orin. 1997. “Prying Open the Cleft.” In Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistics Society, ed. by Kiyomi Kusumoto, 337–351. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia, and Jean-Yves Pollock. 2004. “On the Left Periphery of some Romance Wh-Questions.” In The Structure of CP and IP, ed. by Luigi Rizzi, 251–296. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen F. 1978. “A Comparison on Wh-Clefts and It-Clefts in Discourse.” Language 54 (4): 883–906. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Risa, Federica. 2012. Sintassi e interpretazione della frase scissa in tedesco [ Syntax and interpretation of cleft sentences in German ]. MA dissertation, University of Roma Tre.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1994. “Early Null Subjects and Root Null Subjects.” In Language Acquisition Studies in Generative Grammar, ed. by Teun Hoekstra, and Bonnie D. Schwartz, 151–176. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Safir, Ken. 1999. “Vehicle Change and Reconstruction in A'-chains.” Linguistic Inquiry 30 (4): 587–620. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Samek-Lodovici, Vieri. 2006. “When Right Dislocation Meets the Left-Periphery. A Unified Analysis of Italian Non-final Focus.” Lingua 116 (6): 836–873. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Á. 2011. “Conditions on Argument Drop.” Linguistic Inquiry 42 (2): 267–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stowell, Timothy A. 1981. Origins of Phrase Structure. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Trutkowski, Ewa. 2011. “Referential Null Subjects in German.” In Proceedings of the Sixth Cambridge Postgraduate Conference in Linguistics (CamLing), ed by Chris Cummins, Chi-Hé Elder, Thomas Godard, Morgan Macleod, Elaine Schmidt, and George Walkden, 206–217. Cambridge: Cambridge Institute of Language Research.Google Scholar