A pragmatic analysis of the differences between NPIs and FCIs

Margot Colinet

The paper presents an analysis for a systematic distinction between NPIs and FCIs cross-linguistically. It first relates to a range of analyses that treat NPIs and FCIs as indefinites (in the sense of Kamp (1981) and Heim (1982)) that obey a particular semantic/pragmatic constraint that distinguishes them from plain indefinites. For example, Jayez and Tovena (2005) analyse this constraint as an "equity" constraint which demands that all the entities in the referential domain of the indefinite are equally likely referents for this indefinite. The new contribution of this paper consists in proposing that NPIs and FCIs differ on the fact that this "equity" constraint has a different informational status whether it enters the semantic composition of NPIs or FCIs. This is supported by evidence based on the study of three ways of coercing the interpretation of this kind of items.

Published online: 18 December 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.6.05col

References

Geurts, Bart, and Rob van der Sandt

2004 “Interpreting focus.” Theoretical Linguistics 30: 1-44.

Giannakidou, Anastasia

2006 “Only, emotive factive verbs, and the dual nature of polarity dependency.” Language 82 (3): 575-603.

Grice, Paul

1989 Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Horn, Larry

2005 “Airport ‘86 revisited: Toward a unified indefinite any.” In The Partee Effect, ed. by G. Carlson, and F.J. Pelletier, 179-205. CA: CSLI.

Jayez, Jacques, and Lucia Tovena

2005 “Free choiceness and non-individuation.” Linguistics and Philosophy 28:1-71.

Kratzer, Angelika

1989 “An investigation of the lumps of thought.” Linguistics and Philosophy 12: 607-653.

Potts, Christopher

2005 “Conventional implicatures, a distinguished class of meanings”. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces, ed. by Gillian Ramchand, and Charles Reiss, Oxford University Press.

Simons, Mandy, David Beaver, Craige Roberts and Judith Tonhauser

2011 “What projects and why.” Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 20: 309-327. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.

Zeevat, Henk

2009 “Only as a mirative particle.” In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on formal and experimental approaches to discourse particles and modal adverbs at ESSLLI 2008, 179-196. Bonn: Institut für Kommunikationsforschung und Phonetik der Universität Bonn.

Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Nkollo, Mikolaj

2020. Cumbersome paths to indefiniteness. Evidence from an Old Occitan customary. Verba: Anuario Galego de Filoloxía 47 ► pp. 245 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 02 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.