Cover not available
Part of
Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2012: Selected papers from 'Going Romance' Leuven 2012
Edited by Karen Lahousse and Stefania Marzo
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 6] 2014
► pp. 123–140

What lies behind dative/accusative alternations in Romance

This paper accounts for dative/accusative alternations in several Romance languages with verbs with one complement of person, such as Catalan telefonar [DAT a la Roser]/telefonar [ACC la Roser] ‘to phone Roser’. Although the paper focuses on Catalan and Spanish, reference is also made to Italian Southern dialects and Asturian. Regardless of their case-marking, these complements are always Goals of unergative verbs: if dative-marked, they behave as expected; if accusative-marked, they instantiate what we call Differential Indirect Object Marking (following Bilous 2011). The two options of case-assignment are due to two different sorts of Low Applicatives, one Romance-like (the dative-assigning one) and the other English-like (the accusative-assigning one). The postulation of an Applicative Head with our apparently unergative verbs follows from analysing them as hidden transitive verbs (light verb + cognate noun).
Published online: 18 December 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.6.06pin
References (28)
References
D’Alessandro, Roberta. 2013. “Microvariation and Syntactic Theory. What Dialects Can Tell Us about Language.” Ms, The Syntactic Variation of Catalan and Spanish Dialects , Barcelona July 2013.
Andriani, Luigi. 2011. Differential Object marking, Clitic Doubling and Argument Structure in Barese. Research Master Thesis, Leiden University.Google Scholar
Arad, Maya. 1998. VP-structure and the Syntax-Lexicon Interface. PhD Dissertation, University College London.Google Scholar
Bilous, Rostyslav. 2011. Transitivité et marquage d’objet différentiel. PhD Dissertation, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Blume, Kerstin. 1998. “A Contrastive Analysis of Interaction Verbs with Dative Complements.” Linguistics 36 (2): 253-280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cabré, Teresa, and Jaume Mateu. 1998. “Estructura gramatical i normativa lingüística: a propòsit dels verbs psicològics en català.” Quaderns. Revista de Traducció 2: 65-81.Google Scholar
Chung, Sandra. 1978. Case Marking and Grammatical Relations in Polynesian. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Cuervo, María Cristina. 2003a. Datives at Large. PhD Dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
. 2003b. “Structural Asymmetries but Same Word Order: the Dative Alternation in Spanish.” In Asymmetry in Grammar. Volume 1: Syntax and semantics, ed. by Anna Maria Di Sciullo, 117-144. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diccionari de l’Institut Catalans. Available at [URL].
Doggett, Teal Bissell. 2004. All things being unequal: Locality in movement. PhD Dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
DPD = Diccionario Panhispánico de Dudas. Available at [URL].
DRAE = Diccionario de la Lengua Española. Available at [URL].
Fernández, Beatriz, and Jon Ortiz de Urbina. 2009. Datibo alternatiboak hiztegian eta hizkeretan. Ms, Euskararen sintaxia XXVII. Donostiako Uda ikastaroak / XXI Europar ikastaroak, 2009 -ko uztailaren 2-3.Google Scholar
Fournier, David H. 2010. La structure du prédicat verbal: une étude de la construction à double objet en français. PhD Dissertation, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth, and Samuel Jay Keyser. 2002. Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli. 2010. Dative/Accusative Variation and Event Structure in Icelandic. Ms, 4th European Dialect Syntax Meeting.Google Scholar
McGinnis, Martha J. 1998. Locality in A-Movement. PhD Dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Morant, Marc. 2008. L’alternança datiu/acusatiu en la recció verbal catalana. PhD Dissertation, Universitat de València.Google Scholar
NGLE = Real Academia española i Asociación de Academias de la Lengua Española. 2009. Nueva Gramática de la Lengua Española. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
Pérez-Saldanya, Manuel. 2004. Gramaticalització i reanàlisi: funció i estructura del canvi sintàctic. Ms, Xarxa Telemàtica de Lingüística Teòrica.Google Scholar
Pineda, Anna. 2013. “Double Object Constructions in Spanish (and Catalan) Revisited.” In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2011, ed. by S. Baauw, F.A.C. Drijkoningen, L. Meroni and M. Pinto, 193-216. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pylkkänen, Liina. 2002. Introducing Arguments. PhD Dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Ramos, Joan Rafel. 2005. “El Complement indirecte: l’alternança datiu / acusatiu.” Estudis romànics / publicats a cura de A.M. Badia i Margarit i Joan Veny 27: 94-111.Google Scholar
Solà, Joan. 1994. Sintaxi normativa: estat de la qüestió. Barcelona: Empúries.Google Scholar
Svenonius, Peter. 2002. “Icelandic Case and the Structure of Events.” Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 6: 223-245.Google Scholar
Torrego, Esther. 2010. “Variability in the Case Patterns of Causative Formation in Romance and Its Implications.” Linguistic Inquiry, 41 (3): 445-470. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Troberg, Michelle Ann. 2008. Dynamic Two-place Indirect Verbs in French: a Synchronic and Diachronic Study in Variation and Change of Valence. PhD Dissertation, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Corr, Alice
2022. Numeral Reduplication and Clausal Syntax: Grammaticalized Distributivity in Medieval Iberia. Probus 34:2 ► pp. 317 ff. DOI logo
Pineda, Anna
2015. Katalanaren bariazio sintaktikoa : ikuspegi orokorra eta kasu zehatzak. Lapurdum :Numéro spécial 3 ► pp. 207 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2023. Auxiliary Selection in Italo-Romance [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 281], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.