Cover not available
Part of
Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2012: Selected papers from 'Going Romance' Leuven 2012
Edited by Karen Lahousse and Stefania Marzo
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 6] 2014
► pp. 181–198

Partial Control in Romance Languages

The covert comitative analysis

This article considers the availability of partial Control in European Portuguese, French, Spanish and Italian and argues that many apparent examples of partial Control actually involve exhaustive control with a covert comitative, along the lines proposed by Boeckx, Hornstein & Nunes (2010) for English. The low level differences between French, Spanish, Italian and European Portuguese are argued to reduce to lexical differences concerning which verbs happen to be comitative in these varieties. This is the case even though the covert comitative approach is actually problematic as an analysis of partial Control in English. The implication for theories of Control is that surface instances of partial Control can have different underlying analyses.
Published online: 18 December 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.6.09she
References (24)
References
Alboiu, Gabriela. 2007. “Moving Forward with Romanian Backward Control and Raising.” In New Horizons in the Analysis of Control and Raising, ed. by Stanley Dubinsky, and William Davies, 187-211. New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, Elena Anagnostopoulou, Gianina Iordachioaia, and Mihaela Marchis. 2010. “No Objections to Backwards Control.” In Movement Theory of Control, ed. by Norbert Hornstein, and Maria Polinsky, 89-118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric, and Norbert Hornstein. 2004. “Movement Under Control.” Linguistic Inquiry 35: 431–452. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006a. “Control in Icelandic and Theories of Control.” Linguistic Inquiry 37: 591–606. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006b. “The Virtues of Control as Movement.” Syntax 9: 118–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric, Norbert Hornstein, and Jairo Nunes. 2010. Control as Movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hornstein, Norbert. 1999. “Movement and Control.” Linguistic Inquiry 30: 69-96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Landau, Idan. 1999. Elements of Control. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
. 2000. Elements of Control: Structure and Meaning in Infinitival Constructions: Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. Dordrecht; Boston, Mass.: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. “Movement Out of Control.” Linguistic Inquiry 34 (3): 471-498. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. “The Scale of Finiteness and the Calculus of Control.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22 (4): 811-877. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. “Movement Resistant Aspects of Control.” NLLT 71: 293-325.Google Scholar
. 2013. “Agreement at PF: An Argument from Partial Control.” Unpublished ms. Available at [URL].
Lawler, John. 1972. “A Problem in Participatory Democracy.” Studies in Generative Semantics II.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations: a Preliminary Investigation. Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Roger Andrew. 1996. A Minimalist Theory of PRO and Control. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Modesto, Marcello. 2010. “What Brazilian Portuguese Says about Control: Remarks on Boeckx & Hornstein.” Syntax 13: 78-96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pesetsky, David, and Esther Torrego. 2004. “Tense, Case, and the Nature of Syntactic Categories.” In The Syntax of Time, ed. by Jacqueline Gueron, and Jacqueline Lecarme, 495-537. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, Cilene, and Norbert Hornstein. 2013. “Epicene Agreement and Inflected Infinitives When the Data is “Under Control”: a Reply to Modesto (2010).” Syntax 16 (3): 292-309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sauerland, Uli, and Elbourne, Paul. 2002. “Total Reconstruction, PF Movement, and Derivational Order.” Linguistic Inquiry 33: 283-319. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sheehan, Michelle. 2012. “A New Take on Partial Control: Defective Thematic Intervention.” Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics 6: 1-47.Google Scholar
. 2014. “Portuguese, Russian and the Theory of Control.” In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society 43 (NELS 43), volume 2, ed. by Hsin-Lun Huang, Ethan Poole, and Amanda Rysling, 115-126. Amherst, Mass.: GLSA.Google Scholar
Varlokosta, Spyridoula. 1994. Issues on Modern Greek Sentential Complementation. PhD dissertation, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin. 1980. “Predication.” Linguistic Inquiry 11: 203-238.Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Authier, J.-Marc & Lisa Reed
2018. Symmetric Reciprocal Semantics as a Predictor of Partial Control. Linguistic Inquiry 49:2 ► pp. 379 ff. DOI logo
Gonçalves, Anabela & Ana Lúcia Santos
2018. Complement clauses in Portuguese. In Complement Clauses in Portuguese [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 17], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Pitteroff, Marcel, Artemis Alexiadou, Jeannique Darby & Silke Fischer
2017. On partial control in German. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 20:2 ► pp. 139 ff. DOI logo
Landau, Idan
2016. Against The Null Comitative Analysis of Partial Control. Linguistic Inquiry 47:3 ► pp. 572 ff. DOI logo
Landau, Idan
2024. Noncanonical Obligatory Control. Language and Linguistics Compass 18:3 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.