References
Allen, W. Sidney
1973Accent and Rhythm. Prosodic Features of Latin and Greek: A Study in Theory and Reconstruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bullock, Barbara
2001 “Double prosody and stress shift in Proto-Romance”. Probus 13.173–192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Corssen, Wilhelm
1870Uber Aussprache, Vokalismus und Betonung der lateinischen Sprache. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, Eduard
1928Iktus und Akzent im lateinischen Sprechvers. Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Haike
2002 “Why preantepenultimate stress in Latin requires an OT-account”. Development in Prosodic Systems ed. by Paula Fikkert & Haike Jacobs, 395–418. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2006 “Proto-Romance stress shift revisited”. New Perspectives on Romance Linguistics ed. by Jean-Pierre Montreuil, 141–154. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 “Sympathy, comparative markedness, OT-CC and Latin syncope”. Probus 20:2.235–255. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keil, Heinrich
1857–1880Grammatici latini. Vol. 1–7. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Lindsay, Wallace
1894 [1963]The Latin language. New York/London: Hafner.Google Scholar
1922Early Latin Verse. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John
2007Hidden Generalizations. Phonological Opacity in OT. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
2008 “The serial interaction of stress and syncope”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 26. 499–546 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sen, Ranjan
2010 “Synchrony, Diachrony and Early Latin Feet”. Paper presented at the LAGB Meeting, Leeds.
Thierfelder, Andreas
1928 ‘Iktierungen des Typus facilius’ in Eduard Fraenkel (1928).