French presents a challenge to single feature gender analyses. For animate nouns natural sex is often realized instead of grammatical gender. Also, the sex and gender of epicene nouns – animates with fixed gender that allow no morphological representation of sex – can conflict. I argue for a two feature analysis, following Kramer’s (2009) proposal for Amharic: one feature on n that represents natural sex and another on the root that represents grammatical gender. Utilizing elements from Distributed Morphology (DM) including licensing conditions and a version of agree (Pesetsky & Torrego 2007), this analysis is shown to account for all of the problematic French data.
2004 “Inflection Class, Gender and DP-internal Structure”. Explorations in Nominal Inflection ed. by Gereon Müller, Lutz Gunkel & Gisela Zifonum, 21–50. Berlin: Mouton.
Badecker, William
2007 “A Feature Principle for Partial Agreement”. Lingua 117.1541–1565.
Byrne, Lionel S.R. & Ernest L. Churchill
1986A Comprehensive French Grammar. Oxford & New York: Basil Blackwell.
Chomsky, Noam
1995The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam
2001 “Derivation by Phase”. Ken Hale: A Life in Language ed. by Michael Kenstowicz, 1–52. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Corbett, Greville G
1991Gender. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Embick, David & Rolf Noyer
2007 “Distributed Morphology and the Syntax-morphology Interface”. The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces ed. by Gillian Ramchand & Charles Reiss, 289–325. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz
1994 “Some Key Features of Distributed Morphology”. Papers on Phonology and Morphology ed. by Andrew Carnie & Heidi Harley. 275–288.
Jones, Michael Allan
1996Foundations of French Syntax. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kihm, Alain
2005 “Noun Class, Gender, and the Lexicon-syntax-morphology Interfaces: A Comparative Study of Niger-Congo and Romance Languages”. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Syntax ed. by Guglielmo Cinque & Richard S. Kayne, 459–512. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kramer, Ruth
2009Definite Markers, Phi-feature, and Agreement: A Morphosyntactic Investigation of the Amharic DP. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.
Legate, Julie Anne
2002 “Phases in ‘Beyond Explanatory Adequacy’”. Ms., MIT.
Lowenstamm, Jean
2008 “On Little N, √, and Types of Nouns”. Sounds of Silence: Empty Elements in Syntax and Phonology ed. by Jutta Hartmann, Veronika Hegedüs & Henk C. van Riemsdijk, 105–143. Oxford & Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Pesetsky, David & Esther Torrego
2007 “The Syntax of Valuation and the Interpretability of Features”. Phrasal and Clausal Architecture: Syntactic Derivation and Interpretation ed. by Simin Karimi, Vida Samiian & Wendy K. Wilkins, 262–294. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Picallo, M. Carme
1991 “Nominals and Nominalizations in Catalan”. Probus 3:3.279–316.
Picallo, M. Carme
2008 “Gender and Number in Romance”. Lingue e Linguaggio VII:1.47–66.
Ritter, Elizabeth
1993 “Where’s Gender?” Linguistic Inquiry 24:4.795–803.
2021. A morphosyntactic analysis of nominal expressive suffixes in Russian and Greek. The Linguistic Review 38:4 ► pp. 645 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.
