Article published in:
Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2013: Selected papers from 'Going Romance' Amsterdam 2013Edited by Enoch O. Aboh, Jeannette Schaeffer and Petra Sleeman
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 8] 2015
► pp. 1–20
Focus fronting and its implicatures
Valentina Bianchi | University of Siena
Giuliano Bocci | University of Geneva
In this paper we investigate the essential semantic and pragmatic features associated with Focus Fronting (FF) in Italian, with the ultimate aim of identifying the actual trigger of this syntactic operation. After introducing the different contexts that could in principle be compatible with FF, we present the results of a syntactic experiment which show that FF is possible in corrective and mirative contexts, but not in merely contrastive contexts. This distribution proves that, contrary to claims that are dominant in the literature, contrast and/or givenness of the background are not necessary conditions for Italian FF. Our second experiment highlights a systematic prosodic difference between the two focus types, showing that the corrective and mirative interpretations are grammatically distinct. We claim that these special interpretations associated with FF are conventional implicatures which are syntactically encoded and which trigger syntactic fronting.
Published online: 02 December 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.8.01bia
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.8.01bia
References
Baayen, R.H
2008 Analyzing Linguistic Data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 
Beaver, David, and Brady Clark
2008 Sense and Sensitivity: How Focus Determines Meaning. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Bianchi, Valentina
2013 “On focus movement in Italian.” In Information Structure and Agreement, ed. by María Victoria Camacho-Taboada, Ángel Jiménez-Fernández, Javier Martín-Gonzáles, and Mariano Reyes-Tejedor, 193–216. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bianchi, Valentina, and Giuliano Bocci
2012 “Should I Stay or Should I Go? Optional Focus Movement in Italian.” In Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 9, ed. by Christopher Piñon, 1–18. Available online at http://www.cssp.cnrs.fr/eiss9/eiss9_bianchi-and-bocci.pdf.
Bianchi, Valentina, Giuliano Bocci, and Silvio Cruschina
2015 “Focus Fronting, Unexpectedness, and Evaluative Implicatures.” To appear in Semantics & Pragmatics.
Bobaljik, Jonathan, and Susi Wurmbrand
2012 “Word Order and Scope: Transparent Interfaces and the 3/4 Signature.” Linguistic Inquiry 43 (3): 371–421.
Bocci, Giuliano
2013 The Syntax-Prosody Interface from a Cartographic Perspective: Evidence from Italian. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Brunetti, Lisa
2004 A Unification of Focus. Padua: Unipress.
Cruschina, Silvio
2012 Discourse-Related Features and Functional Projections. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DeLancey, Scott
1997 “Mirativity: The Grammatical Marking of Unexpected Information.” Linguistic Typology 1: 33–52.
Fanselow, Gisbert, and Denisa Lenertová
2011 “Left Peripheral Focus: Mismatches between Syntax and Information Structure.” Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 29: 169–209.
Farkas, Donka, and Kim B. Bruce
2010 “On Reacting to Assertions and Polar Questions.” Journal of Semantics 27: 81–118.
Féry, Caroline, and Vieri Samek-Lodovici
2006 “Focus Projection and Prosodic Prominence in Nested Foci.” Language 82: 131–150.
Frey, Werner
2010 “A'-Movement and Conventional Implicatures: About the Grammatical Encoding of Emphasis in German.” Lingua 120 (6): 1416–1435.
Grosz, Patrick
2011 On the Grammar of Optative Constructions. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Kratzer, Angelika
2012 “The Notional Category of Modality.” In Modals and Conditionals. New and Revised Perspectives, 27–69. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Krifka, Manfred
2007 “Basic Notions of Information Structure.” In The Notions of Information Structure [Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure 6], ed. by Caroline Féry, Gisbert Fanselow, and Manfred Krifka, 13–55. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam.
Potts, Christopher
2005 The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2007 “Conventional Implicatures, a Distinguished Class of Meanings.” In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces, ed. by Gillian Ramchand, and Charles Reiss, 475–501. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rizzi, Luigi
1997 “The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery.” In Elements of grammar. Handbook in Generative Syntax, ed. by Liliane Haegeman, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
2006 “On the Form of Chains: Criterial Positions and ECP Effects.” In Wh-Movement. Moving On, ed. by Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng, and Norbert Corver, 97–133. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rooth, Mats
1992 “A Theory of Focus Interpretation.” Natural Language Semantics 1: 75–116.
Samek-Lodovici, Vieri
2006 “When Right Dislocation Meets the Left-periphery: A Unified Analysis of Italian Non-final Focus.” Lingua 116: 836–873.
van Leusen, Noor
2004 “Incompatibility in Context: A Diagnosis of Correction.” Journal of Semantics 21: 415–442.
Zimmermann, Malte
2007 “Contrastive Focus.” In The Notions of Information Structure [Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure 6], ed. by Caroline Féry, Gisbert Fanselow, and Manfred Krifka, 147–159. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam.
Cited by
Cited by 29 other publications
No author info given
2019. .
In A Criterial Approach to the Cartography of V2 [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 257],
Belletti, Adriana & Luigi Rizzi
2017. On the Syntax and Pragmatics of Some Clause-Peripheral Positions.
In Formal Models in the Study of Language,
► pp. 33 ff.
Beltrame, Francesco & Cristiano Chesi
2021. Why-questions and focus in Italian.
The Linguistic Review 38:4 ► pp. 687 ff.
Bianchi, Valentina, Giuliano Bocci & Silvio Cruschina
2016. Focus fronting, unexpectedness, and evaluative implicatures.
Semantics and Pragmatics
Bianchi, Valentina & Silvio Cruschina
2016. The derivation and interpretation of polar questions with a fronted focus.
Lingua 170 ► pp. 47 ff.
Castroviejo, Elena, Olga Fernández-Soriano & Isabel Pérez-Jiménez
2017. Introduction.
In Boundaries, Phases and Interfaces [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 239],
► pp. 2 ff.
Cruschina, Silvio
2015. Some notes on clefting and fronting*.
In Structures, Strategies and Beyond [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 223],
► pp. 181 ff.
Cruschina, Silvio
2018. Setting the boundaries.
Belgian Journal of Linguistics 32 ► pp. 53 ff.
Cruschina, Silvio
2022. Chapter 5. Gone unexpectedly.
In Pseudo-Coordination and Multiple Agreement Constructions [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 274],
► pp. 130 ff.
Cruschina, Silvio, Adam Ledgeway & Eva-Maria Remberger
2019. The dialects of Italy at the interfaces.
In Italian Dialectology at the Interfaces [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 251],
► pp. 1 ff.
De Cia, Simone
2020. Apparent wh-in-situ in Bellunese: Microparametric variation in the locus of subject clitic inversion.
Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 5:1
Frascarelli, Mara & Giorgio Carella
2019. Topic chains and the interpretation of null subjects. The acquisition of discourse-related strategies in Italian children.
The Linguistic Review 36:4 ► pp. 637 ff.
Frascarelli, Mara & Ángel L. Jiménez-Fernández
2017. Subextraction at the Discourse-Grammar interface.
In Boundaries, Phases and Interfaces [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 239],
► pp. 224 ff.
Frascarelli, Mara & Ángel L. Jiménez‐Fernández
2021.
How Much Room for Discourse in Imperative? The Lens of Interface on English, Italian and Spanish
*
.
Studia Linguistica 75:3 ► pp. 375 ff.
Garassino, Davide & Daniel Jacob
2022. Introduction. When data challenges theory.
In When Data Challenges Theory [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 273],
► pp. 2 ff.
Jaque, Matías, Carlos González, Verónica Orqueda, Silvana Guerrero, Felipe Hasler & Magdalena Covarrubias
2022. A la altura de las expectativas: interacciones entre la negación y construcciones multiverbales del tipo llegar y + VF.
Verba: Anuario Galego de Filoloxía ► pp. 1 ff.
Jiménez-Fernández, Ángel L.
2020. Chapter 6. The information structure of high and low datives and their psychological import.
In Beyond Emotions in Language [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 263],
► pp. 213 ff.
Jiménez-Fernández, Ángel L. & Mercedes Tubino-Blanco
2022. Chapter 8. On the interpretation of the Spanish 1st person plural pronoun.
In Points of Convergence in Romance Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 360],
► pp. 144 ff.
Lahousse, Karen
2022. Is focus a root phenomenon?.
In When Data Challenges Theory [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 273],
► pp. 148 ff.
Mensching, Guido
2016. Yes/no interrogatives and focus in Sardinian.
In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 10 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, 10],
► pp. 139 ff.
Rizzi, Luigi & Guglielmo Cinque
2016. Functional Categories and Syntactic Theory.
Annual Review of Linguistics 2:1 ► pp. 139 ff.
Samo, Giuseppe
2022. Criterial V2: ModP as a Locus of Microvariation in Swiss Romansh Varieties.
Probus 34:1 ► pp. 143 ff.
Samo, Giuseppe & Massimiliano Canuti
2021. Chapter 5. Uncovering the left periphery of Etruscan.
In Current Issues in Syntactic Cartography [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 267],
► pp. 112 ff.
Samo, Giuseppe & Massimiliano Canuti
2022. Note su infiniti flessi in chianino: un approccio cartografico
.
Annali di Ca’ Foscari. Serie occidentale :56
Smeets, Liz
2022. Feature reconfiguration at the syntax-discourse interface.
In Generative SLA in the Age of Minimalism [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders, 67],
► pp. 213 ff.
Squartini, Mario
2017. Chapter 7. Italian non-canonical negations as modal particles.
In Pragmatic Markers, Discourse Markers and Modal Particles [Studies in Language Companion Series, 186],
► pp. 203 ff.
Trotzke, Andreas
2017. Mirative fronting in German.
Review of Cognitive Linguistics 15:2 ► pp. 460 ff.
van der Wal, Jenneke
2016. Diagnosing focus.
Studies in Language 40:2 ► pp. 259 ff.
Wang, Yuyun Iris & Wei‐wen Roger Liao
2021. Against the Low Periphery as Phrase Markers: Two Types of Contrastive Dislocations in Mandarin Chinese*.
Studia Linguistica 75:1 ► pp. 97 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 09 january 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.