Article published in:
Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2013: Selected papers from 'Going Romance' Amsterdam 2013
Edited by Enoch Oladé Aboh, Jeannette Schaeffer and Petra Sleeman
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 8] 2015
► pp. 1–20

Focus fronting and its implicatures

| University of Siena
| University of Geneva
| University of Vienna
In this paper we investigate the essential semantic and pragmatic features associated with Focus Fronting (FF) in Italian, with the ultimate aim of identifying the actual trigger of this syntactic operation. After introducing the different contexts that could in principle be compatible with FF, we present the results of a syntactic experiment which show that FF is possible in corrective and mirative contexts, but not in merely contrastive contexts. This distribution proves that, contrary to claims that are dominant in the literature, contrast and/or givenness of the background are not necessary conditions for Italian FF. Our second experiment highlights a systematic prosodic difference between the two focus types, showing that the corrective and mirative interpretations are grammatically distinct. We claim that these special interpretations associated with FF are conventional implicatures which are syntactically encoded and which trigger syntactic fronting.
Published online: 02 December 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.8.01bia
References

References

Baayen, R.H.
2008 Analyzing Linguistic Data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beaver, David, and Brady Clark
2008 Sense and Sensitivity: How Focus Determines Meaning. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina
2013 “On focus movement in Italian.” In Information Structure and Agreement, ed. by María Victoria Camacho-Taboada, Ángel Jiménez-Fernández, Javier Martín-Gonzáles, and Mariano Reyes-Tejedor, 193–216. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina, and Giuliano Bocci
2012 “Should I Stay or Should I Go? Optional Focus Movement in Italian.” In Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 9, ed. by Christopher Piñon, 1–18. Available online at http://​www​.cssp​.cnrs​.fr​/eiss9​/eiss9​_bianchi​-and​-bocci​.pdf.Google Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina, Giuliano Bocci, and Silvio Cruschina
2015 “Focus Fronting, Unexpectedness, and Evaluative Implicatures.” To appear in Semantics & Pragmatics.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan, and Susi Wurmbrand
2012 “Word Order and Scope: Transparent Interfaces and the 3/4 Signature.” Linguistic Inquiry 43 (3): 371–421. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bocci, Giuliano
2013 The Syntax-Prosody Interface from a Cartographic Perspective: Evidence from Italian. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brunetti, Lisa
2004 A Unification of Focus. Padua: Unipress.Google Scholar
Cruschina, Silvio
2012 Discourse-Related Features and Functional Projections. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, Scott
1997 “Mirativity: The Grammatical Marking of Unexpected Information.” Linguistic Typology 1: 33–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fanselow, Gisbert, and Denisa Lenertová
2011 “Left Peripheral Focus: Mismatches between Syntax and Information Structure.” Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 29: 169–209. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Farkas, Donka, and Kim B. Bruce
2010 “On Reacting to Assertions and Polar Questions.” Journal of Semantics 27: 81–118. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Féry, Caroline, and Vieri Samek-Lodovici
2006 “Focus Projection and Prosodic Prominence in Nested Foci.” Language 82: 131–150. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frey, Werner
2010 “A'-Movement and Conventional Implicatures: About the Grammatical Encoding of Emphasis in German.” Lingua 120 (6): 1416–1435. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grosz, Patrick
2011 On the Grammar of Optative Constructions. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika
2012 “The Notional Category of Modality.” In Modals and Conditionals. New and Revised Perspectives, 27–69. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
2007 “Basic Notions of Information Structure.” In The Notions of Information Structure [Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure 6], ed. by Caroline Féry, Gisbert Fanselow, and Manfred Krifka, 13–55. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam.Google Scholar
Potts, Christopher
2005 The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2007 “Conventional Implicatures, a Distinguished Class of Meanings.” In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces, ed. by Gillian Ramchand, and Charles Reiss, 475–501. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1997 “The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery.” In Elements of grammar. Handbook in Generative Syntax, ed. by Liliane Haegeman, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
2006 “On the Form of Chains: Criterial Positions and ECP Effects.” In Wh-Movement. Moving On, ed. by Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng, and Norbert Corver, 97–133. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rooth, Mats
1992 “A Theory of Focus Interpretation.” Natural Language Semantics 1: 75–116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Samek-Lodovici, Vieri
2006 “When Right Dislocation Meets the Left-periphery: A Unified Analysis of Italian Non-final Focus.” Lingua 116: 836–873. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Leusen, Noor
2004 “Incompatibility in Context: A Diagnosis of Correction.” Journal of Semantics 21: 415–442. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, Malte
2007 “Contrastive Focus.” In The Notions of Information Structure [Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure 6], ed. by Caroline Féry, Gisbert Fanselow, and Manfred Krifka, 147–159. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

No author info given
2019.  In A Criterial Approach to the Cartography of V2 [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 257], Crossref logo
Belletti, Adriana & Luigi Rizzi
2017.  In Formal Models in the Study of Language, ► pp. 33 ff. Crossref logo
Bianchi, Valentina, Giuliano Bocci & Silvio Cruschina
2016. Focus fronting, unexpectedness, and evaluative implicatures. Semantics and Pragmatics Crossref logo
Bianchi, Valentina & Silvio Cruschina
2016. The derivation and interpretation of polar questions with a fronted focus. Lingua 170 ► pp. 47 ff. Crossref logo
Castroviejo, Elena, Olga Fernández-Soriano & Isabel Pérez-Jiménez
2017.  In Boundaries, Phases and Interfaces [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 239], ► pp. 2 ff. Crossref logo
Cruschina, Silvio
2015.  In Structures, Strategies and Beyond [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 223], ► pp. 181 ff. Crossref logo
Cruschina, Silvio
2018. Setting the boundaries. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 32 ► pp. 53 ff. Crossref logo
Cruschina, Silvio, Adam Ledgeway & Eva-Maria Remberger
2019.  In Italian Dialectology at the Interfaces [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 251], ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Frascarelli, Mara & Ángel L. Jiménez-Fernández
2017.  In Boundaries, Phases and Interfaces [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 239], ► pp. 224 ff. Crossref logo
Jiménez Fernández, Ángel L.
2020.  In Beyond Emotions in Language [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 263], Crossref logo
Mensching, Guido
2016.  In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 10 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, 10], ► pp. 139 ff. Crossref logo
Rizzi, Luigi & Guglielmo Cinque
2016. Functional Categories and Syntactic Theory. Annual Review of Linguistics 2:1 ► pp. 139 ff. Crossref logo
Squartini, Mario
2017.  In Pragmatic Markers, Discourse Markers and Modal Particles [Studies in Language Companion Series, 186], ► pp. 203 ff. Crossref logo
Trotzke, Andreas
2017. Mirative fronting in German. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 15:2 ► pp. 460 ff. Crossref logo
van der Wal, Jenneke
2016. Diagnosing focus. Studies in Language 40:2 ► pp. 259 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 august 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.