Adams, Marianne
1988 “Les effets V2 en ancien et en moyen français.” Revue Québécoise de Linguistique Théorique et Appliquée 7, 13–39.Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana
2004 “Aspects of the Low IP Area.” In The Structure of CP and IP, ed. by Luigi Rizzi, 16–51. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana, and Ur Shlonsky
1995 “The Order of Verbal Complements: A Comparative Study.” Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 13, 489–526. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benincà, Paola
1983-1984“Un’ipotesi sulla sintassi delle lingue romanze medievali.” Quaderni Patavini Di Linguistica 4, 3–19.Google Scholar
1995 “Complement Clitics in Medieval Romance: The Tobler Mussafia Law.” In Clause Structure and Language Change, ed. by Adrian Battye, and Ian Roberts, 325–44. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2004 “The Left Periphery of Medieval Romance.” Studi linguistici e filologici online 2 (2), 243–97.Google Scholar
2006 “A Detailed Map of the Left Periphery of Medieval Romance.” In Crosslinguistic Research in Syntax and Semantics: Negation, Tense and Clausal Architecture, ed. by Adriana Belletti, 53–86. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola, and Cecilia Poletto
2004 “Topic, Focus, and V2.” In Luigi Rizzi (ed.), 52–75.Google Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina, and Mara Frascarelli
2010 “Is Topic a Root Phenomenon?Iberia 2(1), 43–88.Google Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa
2002 “Verb Second in Afrikaans: Is This a Unitary Phenomenon?Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics 34, 19–68.Google Scholar
Campulu, Iohanni
1989Libru de lu dialagu di Sanctu Gregoriu. Volgarizzamento siciliano del sec. XIV. Rubbettino: University of Catania.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna
2010 “On a (wh-) Moved Topic in Italian, Compared to Germanic.” In Advances in Comparative Germanic Syntax, ed. by Artemis Alexiadou, Jorge Hankamer, Thomas McFadden, Thomas Nuger, and Florian Schaeffer, 3–40. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna, and Ian Roberts
2002 “Clause Structure and X Second.” In Functional Structure in DP and IP, ed. by Guglielmo Cinque (ed.), 123–66. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
2000 “Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework.” In Step by Step, Essays in Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, ed. by Roger Martin, David Michaels, and Juan Uriagereka, 89-155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2008 “On Phases”. In Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory, ed. by Robert Freidin, Carlos Otero, and Maria-Luisa Zubizarreta, 133-166. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1999Adverbs and Functional Heads: a Cross- Linguistic Approach. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cruschina, Silvio
2011 “Focalization and Word Order in Old Italo-Romance.” Catalan Journal of Linguistics 10, 95–132.Google Scholar
Den Besten, Hans
1983 “On the Interaction of Root Transformations and Lexical Deletive Rules.” In On the Formal Syntax of the Westgermania, ed. by Werner Abraham, 47–61. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fontana, Josep
1993Phrase Structure and the Syntax of Clitics in the History of Spanish. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane
1996 “Verb Second, the Split CP and Null Subjects in Early Dutch Finite Clauses.” GenGenP 4 (2), 135–75.Google Scholar
2012Adverbial Clauses, Main Clause Phenomena, and Composition of the Left Periphery. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haider, Hubert
2010The Syntax of German. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haiman, John, and Paola Benincà
1992The Rhaeto-Romance Languages. Romance Linguistics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hinterhölzl, Roland, and Svetlana Petrova
2010 “From V1 to V2 in West Germanic.” Lingua 120 (2), 315–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, Anders
2015 “Verb Second.” In Syntax - Theory and Analysis, ed. by Tibor Kiss, and Artemis Alexiadou. 242–83. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders, and Christer Platzack
1995The Role of Inflection in Scandinavian Syntax. New York: OUP.Google Scholar
Hopper, Joan, and Sandra Thompson
1973 “On the Applicability of Root Transformations.” Linguistic Inquiry 4: 465–97.Google Scholar
Kaiser, Georg A
2002Verbstellung und Verbstellungswandel in den Romanischen Sprachen. Max Niemeyer Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koster, Jan
1978Locality Principles in Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
1975 “Dutch as an SOV Language.” Linguistic Analysis 1: 111–36.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud
1994Information Structure and Sentence Form. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam
2007 “Old Neapolitan Word Order: Some Initial Observations.” Histories and Dictionaries of the Languages of Italy, Anna Laura Lepschy, and Arturo Tosi. 121–49. Ravenna: Longo.Google Scholar
2008 “Satisfying V2 in Early Romance: Merge vs Move.” Journal of Linguistics 44: 437–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012From Latin to Romance : Morphosyntactic Typology and Change. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
In Press. “The Verb Phrase.” In The Syntax of Italian ed. by Giuseppe Longobardi Cambridge CUP
Lightfoot, David
1995 “Why UG Needs a Learning Theory: Triggering Verb Movement.” In Clause Structure and Language Change, ed. by Adrian Battye, and Ian Roberts, 31–52. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
1999The Development of Language: Acquisition, Change, and Evolution. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lombardi, Alessandra
2007 “Posizione dei clitici e ordine dei constituenti della lingua sarda medievale.” In Sui dialetti italoromanzi: saggi in onore di Nigel B. Vincent, ed. by Adam Ledgeway, and Delia Bentley, 133–48. Norfolk: Biddles.Google Scholar
Ouali, Hamid
2008 “On C-to-T Phi-Feature Transfer: the nature of Agreement and Anti-Agreement in Berber.” Agreement Restrictions, ed. by Roberta Alessandra, Hrafn Hrafnbjar Gunnar, and Susann Fischer, 159-180. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia
2002 “The Left-Periphery of V2-Rhaetoromance Dialects: A New View on V2 and V3.” In Syntactic Microvariation, ed. by Sjef Barbiers, Leonie Cornips, and Susanne van der Kleij, 214–42. Meertens Institute Electronic Publications in Linguistics 2. Amsterdam: Meertens Institute.Google Scholar
2014Word Order in Old Italian. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ribeiro, Ilza
1995 “Evidence for a Verb-Second Phase in Old Portuguese.” in Clause Structure and Language Change, ed. by Adrian Battye, and Ian Roberts, 110-139. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Rinke, Esther, and Martin Elsig
2010 “Quantitative Evidence and Diachronic Syntax.” Lingua 120: 2557–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1997 “The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery.” In Elements of Grammar: Handbook of Generative Grammar, ed. by Liliane Haegeman, 281–338. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian
1993Verbs and Diachronic Syntax : A Comparative History of English and French. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
2012 “Phases, Head Movement and Second-Position Effects.” In Phases: Developing the Framework, ed. by Angel J Gallego, 385 440. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, John R
1973 “The Penthouse Principle and the Order of Constituents.” In You Take the High Node and I’ll Take the Low Node, ed. by Claudia Corum, Thomas Cedric Smith-Stark, and Ann Weiser, 397–422. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Salvi, Giampaolo
2004La formazione della struttura di frase romanza : ordine delle parole e clitici dal latino alle lingue romanze antiche. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann
1990 “V1 Declaratives and Verb Raising in Icelandic.” Syntax and Semantics 24: 41–69.Google Scholar
Sitaridou, Ioanna
2011Word Order and Information Structure in Old Spanish. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 10: 159–184.Google Scholar
2012 “A Comparative Study of Word Order in Old Romance.” Folia Linguistica 46: 1–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skopteas, Stavros
2012 “The Empirical Investigation of Information Structure.” In The Expression of Information Structure, ed. by Manfred Krifka, 217–48. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur
2007The Syntax of Icelandic. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomaselli, Alessandra
1995“Cases of Verb Third in Old High German. In Clause Structure and Language Change, ed. by Adrian Battye, and Ian Roberts, 345-369. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Vance, Barbara
1997Syntactic Change in Medieval French : Verb- Second and Null Subjects. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vanelli, Laura
1986 “Strutture tematiche in italiano antico.” In Tema- Rema in Italiano, ed. by Harro Stammerjohann, 249–73. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
1999 “Ordine delle parole e articolazione pragmatica dell’italiano antico: la ‘prominenza’ pragmatica della prima posizione nella frase.” Medioevo romanzo 23 (2), 229–46.Google Scholar
Vikner, Sten
1995Verb Movement and Expletive Subjects in the Germanic Languages. New York: OUP.Google Scholar
Westergaard, Marit
Wolfe, Sam
2015 “The Old Sardinian Condaghes: A Syntactic Study”. Transactions of the Philological Society 113 (2): 177–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa
1998Prosody, Focus, and Word Order. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Karen De Clercq, Liliane Haegeman, Terje Lohndal & Christine Meklenborg
2023. Adverbial Resumption in Verb Second Languages, DOI logo
Wolfe, Sam
2018. Occitan, verb second and the Medieval Romance word order debate. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 13 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, 13],  pp. 315 ff. DOI logo
Wolfe, Sam
2019. Redefining the typology of V2 languages. Linguistic Variation 19:1  pp. 16 ff. DOI logo
Wolfe, Sam
2022. Microvariation and Change in the Romance Left Periphery. Probus 34:1  pp. 235 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.