Cover not available
Part of
Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2013: Selected papers from 'Going Romance' Amsterdam 2013
Edited by Enoch O. Aboh, Jeannette Schaeffer and Petra Sleeman
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 8] 2015
► pp. 51–66

Microparametric variation in Old ItaloRomance syntax

The view from Old Sicilian and Old Sardinian

ORCID logo | University of Cambridge
New evidence is presented from two under-studied Old Romance varieties, Old Sicilian and Old Sardinian, to assess whether they instantiate V2 systems, as predicted under Benincà’s (1983–4) account of Old Romance word order. We suggest that Old Sicilian is a V2 system, evidenced by strong matrix/embedded asymmetries in word order, the limited distribution of V1 clauses and the makeup of the matrix left periphery. A significant finding, however, is that Old Sardinian is a form of verb-initial system, which differs in certain key areas of the syntax from other Old Romance varieties. Our central claim is that both varieties share the microparametric property of a uPhi feature on a C-head in matrix clauses, whilst the locus of this feature in embedded contexts, the position occupied by subjects and the parametric makeup of the left periphery is subject to microvariation across varieties. This leads to a re-evaluation of Benincà’s (2004, 245) definition of an “abstract Medieval Romance” word order.
Published online: 2 December 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.8.04wol
References (62)
References
Adams, Marianne. 1988. “Les effets V2 en ancien et en moyen français.” Revue Québécoise de Linguistique Théorique et Appliquée 7, 13–39.Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana. 2004. “Aspects of the Low IP Area.” In The Structure of CP and IP, ed. by Luigi Rizzi, 16–51. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana, and Ur Shlonsky. 1995. “The Order of Verbal Complements: A Comparative Study.” Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 13, 489–526. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benincà, Paola. 1983-1984. “Un’ipotesi sulla sintassi delle lingue romanze medievali.” Quaderni Patavini Di Linguistica 4, 3–19.Google Scholar
. 1995. “Complement Clitics in Medieval Romance: The Tobler Mussafia Law.” In Clause Structure and Language Change, ed. by Adrian Battye, and Ian Roberts, 325–44. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2004. “The Left Periphery of Medieval Romance.” Studi linguistici e filologici online 2 (2), 243–97.Google Scholar
. 2006. “A Detailed Map of the Left Periphery of Medieval Romance.” In Crosslinguistic Research in Syntax and Semantics: Negation, Tense and Clausal Architecture, ed. by Adriana Belletti, 53–86. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola, and Cecilia Poletto. 2004. “Topic, Focus, and V2.” In Luigi Rizzi (ed.), 52–75.Google Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina, and Mara Frascarelli. 2010. “Is Topic a Root Phenomenon?” Iberia 2(1), 43–88.Google Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa. 2002. “Verb Second in Afrikaans: Is This a Unitary Phenomenon?” Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics 34, 19–68.Google Scholar
Campulu, Iohanni. 1989. Libru de lu dialagu di Sanctu Gregoriu. Volgarizzamento siciliano del sec. XIV. Rubbettino: University of Catania.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna. 2010. “On a (wh-) Moved Topic in Italian, Compared to Germanic.” In Advances in Comparative Germanic Syntax, ed. by Artemis Alexiadou, Jorge Hankamer, Thomas McFadden, Thomas Nuger, and Florian Schaeffer, 3–40. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna, and Ian Roberts. 2002. “Clause Structure and X Second.” In Functional Structure in DP and IP, ed. by Guglielmo Cinque (ed.), 123–66. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. “Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework.” In Step by Step, Essays in Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, ed. by Roger Martin, David Michaels, and Juan Uriagereka, 89-155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2008. “On Phases”. In Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory, ed. by Robert Freidin, Carlos Otero, and Maria-Luisa Zubizarreta, 133-166. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads: a Cross- Linguistic Approach. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cruschina, Silvio. 2011. “Focalization and Word Order in Old Italo-Romance.” Catalan Journal of Linguistics 10, 95–132.Google Scholar
Den Besten, Hans. 1983. “On the Interaction of Root Transformations and Lexical Deletive Rules.” In On the Formal Syntax of the Westgermania, ed. by Werner Abraham, 47–61. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fontana, Josep. 1993. Phrase Structure and the Syntax of Clitics in the History of Spanish. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 1996. “Verb Second, the Split CP and Null Subjects in Early Dutch Finite Clauses.” GenGenP 4 (2), 135–75.Google Scholar
. 2012. Adverbial Clauses, Main Clause Phenomena, and Composition of the Left Periphery. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haider, Hubert. 2010. The Syntax of German. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haiman, John, and Paola Benincà. 1992. The Rhaeto-Romance Languages. Romance Linguistics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hinterhölzl, Roland, and Svetlana Petrova. 2010. “From V1 to V2 in West Germanic.” Lingua 120 (2), 315–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, Anders. 2015. “Verb Second.” In Syntax - Theory and Analysis, ed. by Tibor Kiss, and Artemis Alexiadou. 242–83. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders, and Christer Platzack. 1995. The Role of Inflection in Scandinavian Syntax. New York: OUP.Google Scholar
Hopper, Joan, and Sandra Thompson. 1973. “On the Applicability of Root Transformations.” Linguistic Inquiry 4: 465–97.Google Scholar
Kaiser, Georg A. 2002. Verbstellung und Verbstellungswandel in den Romanischen Sprachen. Max Niemeyer Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koster, Jan. 1978. Locality Principles in Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
. 1975. “Dutch as an SOV Language.” Linguistic Analysis 1: 111–36.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam. 2007. “Old Neapolitan Word Order: Some Initial Observations.” Histories and Dictionaries of the Languages of Italy, Anna Laura Lepschy, and Arturo Tosi. 121–49. Ravenna: Longo.Google Scholar
. 2008. “Satisfying V2 in Early Romance: Merge vs Move.” Journal of Linguistics 44: 437–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. From Latin to Romance : Morphosyntactic Typology and Change. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. In Press. “The Verb Phrase.” In The Syntax of Italian, ed. by Giuseppe Longobardi. Cambridge: CUP.
Lightfoot, David. 1995. “Why UG Needs a Learning Theory: Triggering Verb Movement.” In Clause Structure and Language Change, ed. by Adrian Battye, and Ian Roberts, 31–52. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 1999. The Development of Language: Acquisition, Change, and Evolution. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lombardi, Alessandra. 2007. “Posizione dei clitici e ordine dei constituenti della lingua sarda medievale.” In Sui dialetti italoromanzi: saggi in onore di Nigel B. Vincent, ed. by Adam Ledgeway, and Delia Bentley, 133–48. Norfolk: Biddles.Google Scholar
Ouali, Hamid. 2008. “On C-to-T Phi-Feature Transfer: the nature of Agreement and Anti-Agreement in Berber.” Agreement Restrictions, ed. by Roberta Alessandra, Hrafn Hrafnbjar Gunnar, and Susann Fischer, 159-180. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia. 2002. “The Left-Periphery of V2-Rhaetoromance Dialects: A New View on V2 and V3.” In Syntactic Microvariation, ed. by Sjef Barbiers, Leonie Cornips, and Susanne van der Kleij, 214–42. Meertens Institute Electronic Publications in Linguistics 2. Amsterdam: Meertens Institute.Google Scholar
. 2014. Word Order in Old Italian. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ribeiro, Ilza. 1995. “Evidence for a Verb-Second Phase in Old Portuguese.” in Clause Structure and Language Change, ed. by Adrian Battye, and Ian Roberts, 110-139. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Rinke, Esther, and Martin Elsig. 2010. “Quantitative Evidence and Diachronic Syntax.” Lingua 120: 2557–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. “The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery.” In Elements of Grammar: Handbook of Generative Grammar, ed. by Liliane Haegeman, 281–338. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian. 1993. Verbs and Diachronic Syntax : A Comparative History of English and French. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
. 2012. “Phases, Head Movement and Second-Position Effects.” In Phases: Developing the Framework, ed. by Angel J Gallego, 385 440. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, John R. 1973. “The Penthouse Principle and the Order of Constituents.” In You Take the High Node and I’ll Take the Low Node, ed. by Claudia Corum, Thomas Cedric Smith-Stark, and Ann Weiser, 397–422. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Salvi, Giampaolo. 2004. La formazione della struttura di frase romanza : ordine delle parole e clitici dal latino alle lingue romanze antiche. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 1990. “V1 Declaratives and Verb Raising in Icelandic.” Syntax and Semantics 24: 41–69.Google Scholar
Sitaridou, Ioanna. 2011. Word Order and Information Structure in Old Spanish. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 10: 159–184.Google Scholar
. 2012. “A Comparative Study of Word Order in Old Romance.” Folia Linguistica 46: 1–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skopteas, Stavros. 2012. “The Empirical Investigation of Information Structure.” In The Expression of Information Structure, ed. by Manfred Krifka, 217–48. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 2007. The Syntax of Icelandic. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomaselli, Alessandra. 1995. “Cases of Verb Third in Old High German. In Clause Structure and Language Change, ed. by Adrian Battye, and Ian Roberts, 345-369. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Vance, Barbara. 1997. Syntactic Change in Medieval French : Verb- Second and Null Subjects. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vanelli, Laura. 1986. “Strutture tematiche in italiano antico.” In Tema- Rema in Italiano, ed. by Harro Stammerjohann, 249–73. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
. 1999. “Ordine delle parole e articolazione pragmatica dell’italiano antico: la ‘prominenza’ pragmatica della prima posizione nella frase.” Medioevo romanzo 23 (2), 229–46.Google Scholar
Vikner, Sten. 1995. Verb Movement and Expletive Subjects in the Germanic Languages. New York: OUP.Google Scholar
Westergaard, Marit. 2009. The Acquisition of Word Order: Micro-Cues, Information Structure, and Economy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, Sam. 2015. “The Old Sardinian Condaghes: A Syntactic Study”. Transactions of the Philological Society 113 (2): 177–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa. 1998. Prosody, Focus, and Word Order. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Karen De Clercq, Liliane Haegeman, Terje Lohndal & Christine Meklenborg
2023. Adverbial Resumption in Verb Second Languages, DOI logo
Wolfe, Sam
2018. Occitan, verb second and the Medieval Romance word order debate. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 13 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, 13], ► pp. 315 ff. DOI logo
Wolfe, Sam
2019. Redefining the typology of V2 languages. Linguistic Variation 19:1 ► pp. 16 ff. DOI logo
Wolfe, Sam
2022. Microvariation and Change in the Romance Left Periphery. Probus 34:1 ► pp. 235 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.