Part of
Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2013: Selected papers from 'Going Romance' Amsterdam 2013Edited by Enoch O. Aboh, Jeannette Schaeffer and Petra Sleeman
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 8] 2015
► pp. 85–102
Edited by Enoch O. Aboh, Jeannette Schaeffer and Petra Sleeman
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 8] 2015
► pp. 85–102
The paradigmatic instantiation of TAM
A novel approach to Romance verb-movement
The aim of the present article is to explore the placement of the finite lexical verb across Romance and to show that, once a rich clausal structure is adopted, as mapped by the cartography, at least four different typologies of verb-movement can be identified. The novel approach developed here shows that the attested patterns are not accidental choices of these languages, but rather stem from a compensatory mechanism between syntax and morphology in the licensing of the Tense, Aspect and Mood (TAM) interpretation of the verb and can be successfully predicted by looking at the properties of the verb paradigms devoted to the expression of TAM.
References (41)
Belletti, Adriana. 1990. Generalized Verb Movement. Aspects of Verb Syntax. Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier.
Bentzen, Kristine. 2007. Order and Structure in Embedded Clauses in Northern Norwegian. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Tromsø.
Bertinetto, Pier Marco. 1991. “Il verbo.” In Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione, ed. by Luigi Renzi, and Giampaolo Salvi, 13-161. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Biberauer, Theresa, and Ian Roberts. 2010. “Subjects, Tense and Verb-Movement.” In Parametric Variation: Null Subjects in Minimalist Theory, ed. by Theresa Biberauer, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts, and Michelle Sheehan, 263-302. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chung, Sandra, and Alan Timberlake. 1985. “Tense, Aspect, Mood.” In Language Typology and Syntactic Description V. 3, ed. by Timothy Schopen, 202-258. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cinque, Gugliemo. 2004. “Issues in Adverbial Syntax.” Lingua 114: 683-710. 
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cornilescu, Alexandra. 2000. “The Double Subject Construction in Romanian.” In Comparative Studies in Romanian Syntax, ed. by Virgina Motapanyane, 83-133. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Fedele, Emily. 2010. Verb Movement and Functional Heads in Standard Italian and the Dialects of Italy. MA dissertation, University of Cambridge.
Fleischman, Suzanne. 1982. The Future in Thought and Language: Diachronic Evidence from Romance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. 1983. “From Pragmatics to Grammar. Diachronic Reflections on Complex Pasts and Futures in Romance.” Lingua 60: 183-214.
Giorgi, Alessandra, and Fabio Pianesi. 1997. Tense and Aspect: From Semantics to Morphosyntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Green, John N. 1988. “Spanish.” In The Romance Languages, ed. by Martin Harris, and Nigel Vincent, 79-130. London: Routledge.
Harris, Martin. 1982. “The ‘Past Simple’ and the ‘Present Perfect’ in Romance.” In Studies in the Romance Verb, ed. by Nigel Vincent, and Martin Harris, 42-70. London: Croom Helm.
Holmberg, Anders, and Ian Roberts. 2013. “The Syntax-Morphology Relation.” In Syntax and Cognition: Core Ideas and Results in Syntax, ed. by Luigi Rizzi. Lingua Special Issue 130: 111-131.
Ledgeway, Adam. 2012. From Latin to Romance: Morphosyntactic Typology and Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
. 2014. “Romance Auxiliary Selection in Light of Romanian Evidence.” In Diachronic Variation in Romanian, ed. by Gabriela P. Dindelegan, Rodica Zafiu, Adina Dragomirescu, Irina Nicula, and Alexandru Nicolae, 3-35. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
. forthcoming. “VP-related Functional Projections.” In The Syntax of Italian, ed. by Giuseppe Longobardi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ledgeway, Adam, and Alessandra Lombardi. 2005. “Verb Movement, Adverbs and Clitic Positions in Romance.” Probus 17 (1): 79–113.
. 2014. “The Development of the Southern Subjunctive: Morphological Loss and Syntactic Gain.” In Diachrony and Dialects. Grammatical Change in the Dialects of Italy, ed. by Paola Benincà, Adam Ledgeway, and Nigel Vincent, 25-47. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mallinson, Graham. 1988. “Rumanian.” In The Romance Languages, ed. by Martin Harris, and Nigel Vincent, 391-419. London: Routledge.
Nicolae, Alexandru. 2013. Types of Ellipsis in Romanian. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Bucharest.
Nordström, Jackie. 2010. Modality and Subordinators. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Parkinson, Stephen. 1988. “Portuguese.” In The Romance Languages, ed. by Martin Harris, and Nigel Vincent, 131-169. London: Routledge.
Pollock, Jean-Yves. 1989. “Verb Movement, Universal Grammar, and the Structure of IP.” Linguistic Inquiry 20 (3): 365–424.
Roberts, Ian. 2010. Agreement and Head Movement: Clitics, Incorporation, and Defective Goals. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Rowlett, Paul. 2007. The Syntax of French. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schifano, Norma. 2011. Verb-movement in Italian, French and Spanish: A survey from written sources. MA dissertation, University of Venice.
. 2014. “(Un)marked Patterns of Verb-movement: The Case of Romanian.” In Diacronie și sincronie în studiul limbii române, ed. by Rodica Zafiu, Adina Dragomirescu, and Alexandru Nicolae, 191-201. Bucharest: Editura Universității din București.
. 2015a. “Il posizionamento del verbo nei dialetti romanzi d’Italia.” The Italianist 35 (1): 121-138.
. 2015b. Verb-movement: A Pan-Romance Investigation. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Cambridge.
. forthcoming. “Le lingue romanze: Verso una cartografia del movimento del verbo.” In Actes du XXVIIe Congrès international de linguistique et de philologie romanes (Nancy, juillet 2013), ed. by Éva Buchi, Jean-Paul Cheveau, and Jean-Marie Pierrel. Strasbourg: Société de linguistique romane/ÉliPhi.
Squartini, Mario. 1998. Verbal Periphrasis in Romance: Aspect, Actionality, and Grammaticalization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Squartini, Mario, and Pier Marco Bertinetto. 2000. “The Simple and Compound Past in Romance Languages.” In Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe, ed. by Östen Dahl, 403-439. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Stump, Gregory T. 2001. Inflectional Morphology: A Theory of Paradigm Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tescari Neto, Aquiles. 2013. On Verb Movement in Brazilian Portuguese: A Cartographic Study. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Venice.
Tortora, Christina. 2002. “Romance Enclisis, Prepositions, and Aspect.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20 (4): 725–758.
Vikner, Sten. 1995. Verb movement and expletive subjects in the Germanic languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
. 1997. “V-to-I movement and Inflection for Person in All Tenses.” In The New Comparative Syntax, ed. by Liliane Haegeman, 187-213. London: Longman.
Zafiu, Rodica. 2013. “Mood, Tense, and Aspect.” In The Grammar of Romanian, ed. by Gabriela P. Dindelegan, 24-64. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cited by (21)
Cited by 21 other publications
Ledgeway, Adam & Norma Schifano
2023. Negation and Verb-Movement in Romance: New Perspectives on Jespersen’s Cycle. Probus 35:1 ► pp. 151 ff. 
Bar-Asher Siegal, Elitzur A. & Karen De Clercq
2019. From negative cleft to external negator. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. 228 ff.
Batllori, Montserrat, Elisabeth Gibert-Sotelo & Isabel Pujol
2019. Changes in the argument and event structure of psych verbs in the history of Spanish. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. 249 ff.
Bernstein, Judy, Francisco Ordóñez & Francesc Roca
2019. On the emergence of personal articles in the history of Catalan. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. 88 ff.
Blümel, Andreas & Marco Coniglio
2019. What kind of constructions yield what kind of constructions?. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. 131 ff.
Miriam Bouzouita, Anne Breitbarth, Lieven Danckaert & Elisabeth Witzenhausen
2019. Cycles in Language Change,
Breitbarth, Anne, Lieven Danckaert, Elisabeth Witzenhausen & Miriam Bouzouita
2019. Cycling through diachrony. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. 1 ff.
De Clercq, Karen
2019. French negation, the Superset Principle, and Feature Conservation. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. 199 ff.
Fischer, Susann, Mario Navarro & Jorge Vega Vilanova
2019. The clitic doubling parameter. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. 52 ff.
Fuß, Eric
2019. When morphological and syntactic change are not in sync. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. 33 ff.
Garzonio, Jacopo & Silvia Rossi
2019. Weak elements in cycles. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. 71 ff.
Kinn, Kari
2019. Bare singular nouns in Middle Norwegian. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. 109 ff.
Moreno, Mitrović
2019. Quantificational cycles and shifts. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. 155 ff.
Poletto, Cecilia & Emanuela Sanfelici
2019. On the relative cycle. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. 177 ff.
van Gelderen, Elly
2019. Cyclical change and problems of projection. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. 13 ff.
Ledgeway, Adam, Norma Schifano & Giuseppina Silvestri
2018. The Expression Of Progressive Aspect In Grico: Mapping Morphosyntactic Isoglosses In An Endangered Italo‐Greek Variety. Transactions of the Philological Society 116:2 ► pp. 179 ff.
Haeberli, Eric
2017. When English Meets French: A Case Study in Comparative Diachronic Syntax. In Formal Models in the Study of Language, ► pp. 431 ff.
Haeberli, Eric & Tabea Ihsane
2016. Revisiting the loss of verb movement in the history of English. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 34:2 ► pp. 497 ff.
[no author supplied]
2019. Copyright Page. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. iv ff.
[no author supplied]
2019. List of abbreviations. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. ix ff.
[no author supplied]
2019. Series preface. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. vii ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.