Cover not available
Part of
Romance Linguistics 2013: Selected papers from the 43rd Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), New York, 17-19 April, 2013
Edited by Christina Tortora, Marcel den Dikken, Ignacio L. Montoya and Teresa O'Neill
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 9] 2016
► pp. 21–38

Old French possessives and ellipsis

| University of Nevada
ORCID logo | University of Washington
Sáez (2011), to account for Spanish definite articles in ellipsis contexts, such as mi libro y el [e] de Juan ‘my book and that of John’, proposes the Stress Condition on Remnants (SCR), which disallows unstressed syntactic elements to be anaphoric, while allowing definite articles to license empty categories. The focus of our paper is Old French (OF) possessive constructions and their elliptical expressions, such as le mien livre ‘my book’ and le [e] de Jean ‘that of Jean’. OF had a more extensive inventory of possessive constructions than Modern French (MF): lexical genitives, prenominal possessives, and lexical and possessive ellipsis constructions. Adopting Arteaga & Herschensohn’s (2010, 2013) proposal for lexical genitives, Sáez’s (2011) SCR, and Lobeck’s (1995) conditions on ellipsis, we argue that two major diachronic changes led to a difference in licensing of possessives from OF to MF: one, the erosion of morphological marking that led to a loss of the OF two case system, reducing feature strength to license ellipsis (Lobeck 1995), and two, the fact that definite articles became clitics and Phase Heads and thus became subject to the SCR as the prenominal nP domain (Carstens 2003) became a clitic zone prohibiting prenominal stressed possessives.
Published online: 3 February 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.9.02art
References (35)
References
Abney, Steven Paul. 1987. The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect (Doctoral Dissertation), MIT.
Anglade, Joseph. 1965. Grammaire élémentaire de l'ancien français. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Arteaga, Deborah. 1995. “On Old French Genitive Constructions.” In Contemporary research in Romance linguistics, ed. by John Amastae, Grant Goodall, Mario Montalbetti, and Marianne Phinney, 79-90. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arteaga, Deborah, and Julia Herschensohn. 2013. “A Diachronic View of Old French Genitive Constructions.” In Research on Old French: The State of the Art, ed. by Deborah Arteaga, 19-44. Dordrecht: Springer DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arteaga, Deborah and J. Herschensohn. 2010. “A Phase-based Analysis of Old French Genitive Constructions.” In Romance Linguistics 2009, ed. by Sonia Colina, Antxon Olarrea, and Ana Maria Carvalho, 285-300. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: J. Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Judy. 1991. “DPs in French and Walloon: Evidence for Parametric Variation in Nominal Head Movement.” Probus 3: 101-126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna, and Michal Starke 1999. “The Typology of Structural Deficiency: A Case Study of the Three Classes of Pronouns.” In Clitics in the Languages of Europe, ed. by H. Van Riemsdijk, 145-233. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Carstens, Vicki. 2000. “Concord in Minimalist Theory.” Linguistic Inquiry 31: 319-355. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. “Rethinking Complementizer Agreement: Agree with a Case–checked Goal.” Linguistic Inquiry 34: 393–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. “Derivation by Phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language,” ed. by Michael Kenstowicz, 1-52. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2008. “On Phases.” In Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory, ed. by Robert Freidin, Carlos Peregrín Otero, and Maria Luisa Zubizarreta, 133-166. Cambridge MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Delfitto, Denis and Paola Paradisi. 2009. “Towards a Diachronic Theory of Genitive Assignment in Romance.” Historical Syntax and Linguistic Theory, 292-310. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Einhorn, Elsabe. 1974. Old French: A Concise Handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Foulet, Lucien. 1982. Petite syntaxe de l'ancien français. Paris: Librairie Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
Gamillscheg, E. 1957. Historische französiche Syntax. Tübingen: Max Niewmeyer Verlag.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris and Alec Marantz. 1993. “Distributed Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection.” In The View from Building 20, ed. by Kenneth Locke Hale, Samuel Jay Keyser, and Sylvain Bromberger, 53-110. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi and Rolf Noyer. 1999. “State-of-the-article: Distributed Morphology.” Glot International, 4(4): 3-9.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi and Elizabeth Ritter. 2002. “Person and Number in Pronouns: A Feature Geometric Analysis.” Language 78: 482-526. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herslund, Michael. 1980. Problèmes de syntaxe de l’ancien français. Compléments datifs et génitifs. Uppsala: Akademisk Forlag.Google Scholar
Jensen, Frede. 1990. Old French and Comparative Gallo-Romance Syntax. Tubingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lin, Yi-An. 2008. “A Probe-Goal Approach to Parametric Variation in English and Mandarin Chinese Nominal Phrases.” In Proceedings of the 20th North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics (NACCL-20) , 775-784.
Lobeck, Anne C. 1995. Ellipsis: Functional Heads, Licensing, and Identification. New York / Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Longobardi, Giuseppe. 1994. “Reference and Proper Names: A Theory of N-movement in Syntax and Logical Form.” Linguistic Inquiry 25: 609-665.Google Scholar
Mallén, Enrique. 1997. “A Minimalist Approach to Concord in Noun Phrases.” Theoretical Linguistics 23: 49-77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ménard, Philippe. 1988. Syntaxe de l’ancien français. Paris: Bordeaux Éditions Bière.Google Scholar
Moignet, Gérard. 1988. Grammaire de l’ancien français. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Nussenbaum, Jonathan W. 2000. Investigations of Covert Phrase Movement. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Palm, Lars. 1977. "La construction li filz le rei et les constructions concurrentes avec à et de étudiées dans des oeuvres littéraires de la second moitié du XIIe siècle et du premier quart du XIIIe siècle." Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Peraltsvaig, Asya. 2007. “The Universality of DP: A View from Russian.” Studia Linguistica 6: 59-94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parodi, Claudia. 1994. “On Case and Agreement in Spanish and English NPs.” In Issues and Theory in Romance Linguistics, ed. by Michael Lee Mazzola, 403-416. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Picallo, M. Carme. 1994. “Catalan Possessive Pronouns.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 12: 259-299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sáez, Luis. 2011. “Peninsular Spanish Prenominal Possessives in Ellipsis Contexts: A Phase-based Account.” In Romance Linguistics 2010, ed. by Julia Herschensohn, 155-175. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: J. Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Old French texts consulted
Paris, Gaston. (Ed). 1924. La vie de St. Alexis. Paris: Ancienne Edouard ChampionGoogle Scholar
Pauphilet, Albert. (Ed). 1949. La queste del Saint Graal. Paris: Champion,Google Scholar
Walter, Philippe. (Ed). Yvain, le chevalier au lion de Chrétien de Troyes. Paris: Folio Classique.