Article published in:
Romance Linguistics 2013: Selected papers from the 43rd Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), New York, 17-19 April, 2013
Edited by Christina Tortora, Marcel den Dikken, Ignacio L. Montoya and Teresa O'Neill
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 9] 2016
► pp. 21–38

Old French possessives and ellipsis

| University of Nevada
| University of Washington
Sáez (2011), to account for Spanish definite articles in ellipsis contexts, such as mi libro y el [e] de Juan ‘my book and that of John’, proposes the Stress Condition on Remnants (SCR), which disallows unstressed syntactic elements to be anaphoric, while allowing definite articles to license empty categories. The focus of our paper is Old French (OF) possessive constructions and their elliptical expressions, such as le mien livre ‘my book’ and le [e] de Jean ‘that of Jean’. OF had a more extensive inventory of possessive constructions than Modern French (MF): lexical genitives, prenominal possessives, and lexical and possessive ellipsis constructions. Adopting Arteaga & Herschensohn’s (2010, 2013) proposal for lexical genitives, Sáez’s (2011) SCR, and Lobeck’s (1995) conditions on ellipsis, we argue that two major diachronic changes led to a difference in licensing of possessives from OF to MF: one, the erosion of morphological marking that led to a loss of the OF two case system, reducing feature strength to license ellipsis (Lobeck 1995), and two, the fact that definite articles became clitics and Phase Heads and thus became subject to the SCR as the prenominal nP domain (Carstens 2003) became a clitic zone prohibiting prenominal stressed possessives.
Published online: 03 February 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.9.02art
References

References

Abney, Steven Paul
1987 The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect (Doctoral Dissertation), MIT.
Anglade, Joseph
1965 Grammaire élémentaire de l'ancien français. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Arteaga, Deborah
1995 “On Old French Genitive Constructions.” In Contemporary research in Romance linguistics, ed. by John Amastae, Grant Goodall, Mario Montalbetti, and Marianne Phinney, 79-90. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arteaga, Deborah, and Julia Herschensohn
2013 “A Diachronic View of Old French Genitive Constructions.” In Research on Old French: The State of the Art, ed. by Deborah Arteaga, 19-44. Dordrecht: Springer CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arteaga, Deborah and J. Herschensohn
2010 “A Phase-based Analysis of Old French Genitive Constructions.” In Romance Linguistics 2009, ed. by Sonia Colina, Antxon Olarrea, and Ana Maria Carvalho, 285-300. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: J. Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Judy
1991 “DPs in French and Walloon: Evidence for Parametric Variation in Nominal Head Movement.” Probus 3: 101-126. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna, and Michal Starke
1999 “The Typology of Structural Deficiency: A Case Study of the Three Classes of Pronouns.” In Clitics in the Languages of Europe, ed. by H. Van Riemsdijk, 145-233. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Carstens, Vicki
2000 “Concord in Minimalist Theory.” Linguistic Inquiry 31: 319-355. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003 “Rethinking Complementizer Agreement: Agree with a Case–checked Goal.” Linguistic Inquiry 34: 393–412. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
2001 “Derivation by Phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language,” ed. by Michael Kenstowicz, 1-52. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2008 “On Phases.” In Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory, ed. by Robert Freidin, Carlos Peregrín Otero, and Maria Luisa Zubizarreta, 133-166. Cambridge MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Delfitto, Denis and Paola Paradisi
2009 “Towards a Diachronic Theory of Genitive Assignment in Romance.” Historical Syntax and Linguistic Theory, 292-310. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Einhorn, Elsabe
1974 Old French: A Concise Handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Foulet, Lucien
1982 Petite syntaxe de l'ancien français. Paris: Librairie Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
Gamillscheg, E.
1957 Historische französiche Syntax. Tübingen: Max Niewmeyer Verlag.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris and Alec Marantz
1993 “Distributed Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection.” In The View from Building 20, ed. by Kenneth Locke Hale, Samuel Jay Keyser, and Sylvain Bromberger, 53-110. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi and Rolf Noyer
1999 “State-of-the-article: Distributed Morphology.” Glot International, 4(4): 3-9.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi and Elizabeth Ritter
2002 “Person and Number in Pronouns: A Feature Geometric Analysis.” Language 78: 482-526. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Herslund, Michael
1980 Problèmes de syntaxe de l’ancien français. Compléments datifs et génitifs. Uppsala: Akademisk Forlag.Google Scholar
Jensen, Frede
1990 Old French and Comparative Gallo-Romance Syntax. Tubingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lin, Yi-An
2008 “A Probe-Goal Approach to Parametric Variation in English and Mandarin Chinese Nominal Phrases.” In Proceedings of the 20th North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics (NACCL-20) , 775-784.
Lobeck, Anne C.
1995 Ellipsis: Functional Heads, Licensing, and Identification. New York / Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Longobardi, Giuseppe
1994 “Reference and Proper Names: A Theory of N-movement in Syntax and Logical Form.” Linguistic Inquiry 25: 609-665.Google Scholar
Mallén, Enrique
1997 “A Minimalist Approach to Concord in Noun Phrases.” Theoretical Linguistics 23: 49-77. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ménard, Philippe
1988 Syntaxe de l’ancien français. Paris: Bordeaux Éditions Bière.Google Scholar
Moignet, Gérard
1988 Grammaire de l’ancien français. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Nussenbaum, Jonathan W.
2000 Investigations of Covert Phrase Movement. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Palm, Lars
1977 "La construction li filz le rei et les constructions concurrentes avec à et de étudiées dans des oeuvres littéraires de la second moitié du XIIe siècle et du premier quart du XIIIe siècle." Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Peraltsvaig, Asya
2007 “The Universality of DP: A View from Russian.” Studia Linguistica 6: 59-94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Parodi, Claudia
1994 “On Case and Agreement in Spanish and English NPs.” In Issues and Theory in Romance Linguistics, ed. by Michael Lee Mazzola, 403-416. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Picallo, M. Carme
1994 “Catalan Possessive Pronouns.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 12: 259-299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sáez, Luis
2011 “Peninsular Spanish Prenominal Possessives in Ellipsis Contexts: A Phase-based Account.” In Romance Linguistics 2010, ed. by Julia Herschensohn, 155-175. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: J. Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Old French texts consulted

Paris, Gaston
(Ed) 1924 La vie de St. Alexis. Paris: Ancienne Edouard ChampionGoogle Scholar
Pauphilet, Albert
(Ed) 1949 La queste del Saint Graal. Paris: Champion,Google Scholar
Walter, Philippe
(Ed) Yvain, le chevalier au lion de Chrétien de Troyes. Paris: Folio Classique.