Chapter published in:
Ethnographies of Academic Writing Research: Theory, methods, and interpretation
Edited by Ignacio Guillén-Galve and Ana Bocanegra-Valle
[Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 1] 2021
► pp. 6182
Androutsopoulos, J.
(2008) Potentials and limitations of discourse-centred online ethnography. Language@Internet, 5, article 9. Retrieved on 2 June 2021 from http://​www​.languageatinternet​.org​/articles​/2008​/1610​/androutsopoulos​.pdf
Androutsopoulos, J., & Stæhr, A. C.
(2018) Moving methods online: Researching digital language practices. In A. Creese & A. Blackledge. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language and superdiversity (pp. 118–132). Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bardakcı, S., Arslan, Ö., & Ünver, T. K.
(2017) How scholars use academic social networking services. Information Development, 34(4), 334–345. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barton, D., & McCulloch, S.
(2018) Negotiating tensions around new forms of academic writing. Discourse, Context & Media, 24, 8–15. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berger, R.
(2013) Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 15(2), 219–234. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berthod, O., Grothe-Hammer, M., & Sydow, J.
(2017) Network ethnography: A mixed-method approach for the study of practices in interorganizational settings. Organizational Research Methods, 20(2), 299–323. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Borgman, C. L.
(2007) Scholarship in the digital age: Information, infrastructure and the internet. The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
boyd, d.
(2008) Taken out of context: American teen sociality in networked publics (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of California-Berkeley. Crossref
(2014) It’s complicated. The social lives of networked teens. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bukvova, H.
(2011) Scientists online: A framework for the analysis of internet profiles. First Monday, 16(10). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chikoore, L., Probets, S., Fry, J., & Creaser, C.
(2016) How are UK academics engaging the public with their research? A cross-disciplinary perspective. Higher Education Quarterly, 70(2), 145–169. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Collins, K., Shiffman, D., & Rock, J.
(2016) How are scientists using social media in the workplace? PLoS ONE, 11(10). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Colson, V.
(2011) Science blogs as competing channels for the dissemination of science news. Journalism, 12(7), 889–902. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Costa, C.
(2015) Outcasts on the inside: Academics reinventing themselves online. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 34(2), 194–210. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Côté, I. M., & Darling, E. S.
(2018) Scientists on Twitter: Preaching to the choir or singing from the rooftops? FACETS, 3, 682–694. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Esposito, A.
(2013) Neither digital or open. Just researchers: Views on digital/open scholarship practices in an Italian university. First Monday, 18(1). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evans, L.
(2010) Authenticity online: Using webnography to address phenomenological concerns. In A. Mousoutzanis & D. Riha. (Eds.), New media and the politics of online communities (pp. 11–17). Inter-Disciplinary Press.Google Scholar
Ferris, S. P.
(2011) Millenials, social networking and social responsibility. In Management Association, Information Resources (Ed.), Virtual communities: Concepts, methodologies, tools and applications (pp. 277–291). IGI Global. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garcia, A. C., Standlee, A. I., Bechkoff, J., & Cui, Y.
(2009) Ethnographic approaches to the internet and computer-mediated communication. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 38(1), 52–84. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geertz, C.
(1973) The interpretation of cultures. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gillen, J., & Merchant, G.
(2013) Contact calls: Twitter as a dialogic social and linguistic practice. Language Sciences, 35, 47–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Green, J., & Bloome, D.
(1997) Ethnography and ethnographers of and in education: A situated perspective. In J. Flood, S. Heath, & D. Lapp. (Eds.), A Handbook of research on teaching literacy through the communicative and visual arts (pp. 181–202). Simon & Schuster Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gruzd, A., Staves, K., & Wilk, A.
(2012) Connected scholars: Examining the role of social media in research practices of faculty using the UTAUT model. The Internet and Higher Education, 28(6), 43–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hafner, C. A.
(2018) Genre innovation and multimodal expression in scholarly communication: Video methods articles in experimental biology. Ibérica, 36, 15–41.Google Scholar
Hallett, R. E., & Barber, K.
(2014) Ethnographic research in a cyber era. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 43(3), 306–330. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heap, T., & Minocha, S.
(2012) An empirically grounded framework to guide blogging for digital scholarship. Research in Learning Technology, 20, 176–188. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hine, C.
(2000) Virtual ethnography. Sage. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jarreau, P.
(2015) ‘Science bloggers’ self-perceived communication roles. JCOM, 14(4). Retrieved on 2 June 2021 from https://​jcom​.sissa​.it​/sites​/default​/files​/documents​/JCOM​_1404​_2015​_A02​.pdf
Jordan, K.
(2014) Academics and their online networks: Exploring the role of academic social networking sites. First Monday, 19(11). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kozinets, R. V.
(2009) Netnography: Doing ethnographic research online. Sage.Google Scholar
LaPoe, V. L., Olson, C. C., & Eckert, S.
(2017) “Linkedin is my office, Facebook my living room, Twitter the neighbourhood bar”: Media scholars liminal use of social media for peer and public communication. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 41(3), 185–206. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Latzko-Toth, G., Bonneau, C., & Millette, M.
(2017) Small data, thick data: Thickening strategies for trace-based social media research. In A. Quan-Haase, & L. Sloan. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social media research methods (pp. 199–214). Sage.Google Scholar
Lemon, N., & McPherson, M.
(2017) Intersections online: Academics who tweet. In D. Lupton, I. Mewburn, & P. Thomson. (Eds.), The digital academic: Critical perspectives on digital technologies in higher education (pp. 78–90). Routledge.Google Scholar
Lillis, T.
(2008) Ethnography as method, methodology, and “deep theorizing”: Closing the gap between text and context in academic writing research. Written Communication, 25(3), 353–388. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lupton, D.
(2014) ‘Feeling better connected’: Academics’ use of social media. News & Media Research Centre, University of Canberra.Google Scholar
Luzón, M. J.
(2019) “Meet our group!” Addressing multiple audiences on the websites of Spanish research groups. IJES: International Journal of English Studies, 19(2), 37–59. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lyman, P., & Wakeford, N.
(1999) Introduction: Going into the (virtual) field. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(3), 359–376. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mahrt, M., & Puschmann, C.
(2014) Science blogging: An exploratory study of motives, styles, and audience reactions. JCOM, 13(03). Retrieved on 2 June 2021 from https://​jcom​.sissa​.it​/sites​/default​/files​/documents​/JCOM​_1303​_2014​_A05​.pdf. Crossref
McGrath, L.
(2016) Open-access writing: An investigation into the online drafting and revision of a research article in pure mathematics. English for Specific Purposes, 43, 25–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mkono, M., & Markwell, K.
(2014) The application of ethnography in tourism studies. Annals of Tourism Research, 48, 289–291. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mohammadi, E., Thelwall, M., Kwasny, M., & Holmes, K. L.
(2018) Academic information on Twitter: A user survey. PLoS ONE, 13(5). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Murthy, D.
(2008) Digital ethnography: An examination of the use of new technologies for social research. Sociology, 42(5), 837–855. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pink, S., Horst, H. A., Postill, J., Hjorth, L., Lewis, T., & Tacchi, J.
(2016) Digital ethnography: Principles and practice. Sage.Google Scholar
Reid, G., & Anson, C. M.
(2019) Public- and expert-facing communication: A case study of polycontextuality and context collapse in Internet-mediated citizen science. In M. J. Luzón, & C. Pérez-Llantada. (Eds.), Science communication on the Internet: Old genres meet new genres (pp. 219–238). John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Riesch, H., & Mendel, J.
(2014) Science blogging: Networks, boundaries and limitations. Science as Culture, 23(1), 51–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Riva, G.
(2002) The sociocognitive psychology of computer-mediated communication: The present and future of technology-based interactions. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 5(6), 581–598. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, L., & Schulz, J.
(2009) New avenues for sociological inquiry. Sociology – The Journal of The British Sociological Association, 43, 685–698. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ruhleder, K.
(2000) The virtual ethnographer: Fieldwork in distributed electronic environments. Field Methods, 12(1), 3–17. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, M. E., Duffy, M. A., Heard, S. B., Kosmala, M., Leather, S. R., McGlynn, T. P., Ollerton, J., & Parachnowitsch, A. L.
(2017) Bringing ecology blogging into the scientific fold: Measuring reach and impact of science community blogs. Royal Society Open Science, 4(10). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scanlon, E.
(2014) Scholarship in the digital age. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(1), 12–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scheliga, K., Friesike, S., Puschmann, C., & Fecher, B.
(2018) Setting up crowd science projects. Public Understanding of Science, 27(5), 515–534. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A.
(2015) “Wow, I didn’t know that before; thank you”: How scientists use Twitter for public engagement. Journal of Promotional Communications, 3(3), 320–339.Google Scholar
Stewart, B.
(2015) In abundance: Networked participatory practices as scholarship. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3), 318–340. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016a) Collapsed publics: Orality, literacy, and vulnerability in academic Twitter. Journal of Applied Social Theory, 1(1), 61–86.Google Scholar
(2016b) Twitter as method: Using twitter as a tool to conduct research. In L. Sloan & A. Quan-Haase. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social media research methods (pp. 251–265). Sage. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sveningsson, M.
(2004) Ethics in Internet ethnography. In E. A. Buchanan. (Ed.), Readings in virtual research ethics (pp. 45–61). Information Science. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thorsen, E.
(2013) Blogging on the ice: Connecting audiences with climate-change sciences. International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics, 9(1), 87–101. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Varis, P.
(2016) Digital ethnography. In A. Georgakopoulou & T. Spiloti. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language and digital communication (pp. 55–68). Routledge.Google Scholar
Veletsianos, G.
(2013) Open practices and identity. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(4), 639–651. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Veletsianos, G., & Kimmons, R.
(2013) Scholars and faculty members’ lived experiences in online social networks. The Internet and Higher Education, 16, 43–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Veletsianos, G., & Stewart, B.
(2016) Discreet openness: Scholars’ selective and intentional self-disclosures online. Social Media + Society, 2(3). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Walter, S., Lörcher, I., & Brüggemann, M.
(2019) Scientific networks on Twitter: Analyzing scientists’ interactions in the climate change debate. Public Understanding of Science, 28(6), 696–712. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weller, M.
(2011) The digital scholar: How technology is transforming scholarly practice. Bloomsbury Academic. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yang, G.
(2003) The Internet and the rise of a transnational Chinese cultural sphere. Media, Culture & Society, 25(4), 469–490. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, Y., & Purdam, K.
(2017) Social media, science communication and the academic super user in the United Kingdom. First Monday, 22(11). CrossrefGoogle Scholar