Cover not available
Part of
Instructed Second Language Acquisition Research Methods
Edited by Laura Gurzynski-Weiss and YouJin Kim
[Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 3] 2022
► pp. 31–54

Chapter 2
Quantitative research methods in ISLA

| Florida State University
This chapter provides a comprehensive, in-depth discussion of quantitative research methods in ISLA. It starts by informing the reader of the basic elements and principles of quantitative ISLA research and the major research questions examined. It then identifies three categories of ISLA research: experimental, correlational, and observational, followed by a discussion of the methods for evaluating the quality of quantitative research from the perspectives of construct validity, internal validity, external validity, and statistical conclusion validity. The chapter proceeds to offer advice for future researchers on how to carry out original and robust quantitative research and propose strategies to address common methodological issues. A conclusion is offered at the end.
Keywords: quantitative research methods, instructed second language acquisition, experimental research, correlational research, observational research
Article outline
  • 1.The fundamentals of quantitative ISLA research
    • 1.1Nature
    • 1.2Variables
    • 1.3Statistics
    • 1.4Sampling
  • 2.Typical research questions in quantitative ISLA studies
    • 2.1Which types of instructional intervention are effective or more effective in enhancing L2 learning gains, behaviors, and processes?
    • 2.2What teaching/learning behaviors or activities, or what relationships between teaching/learning behaviors/phenomena, can be observed?
    • 2.3How can L2 proficiency, achievements, or learner traits be effectively assessed?
  • 3.Most common options for investigation using quantitative research methods
    • 3.1Experimental research
      • 3.1.1Design
      • 3.1.2Treatment
        • Treatment length
        • Selection of the target structure
        • Data elicitation
        • Instruction type
      • 3.1.3Assessments
      • 3.1.4Analysis
    • 3.2Correlational research
    • 3.3Observational research
    • 3.4Study quality
      • 3.4.1Construct validity
      • 3.4.2Internal validity
      • 3.4.3External validity
      • 3.4.4Statistical conclusion validity
  • 4.Advice for future researchers
  • 5.Troubleshooting quantitative methods
    • 5.1Sampling
    • 5.2Assessments
    • 5.3Data collection, coding, and analysis
  • 6.Conclusions
  • 7.Further reading
  • References
Published online: 8 December 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.3.02li
References (11)
References
Cooper, H. (2010). Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step-by-step approach. Sage.Google Scholar
Draheim, C., Mashburn, C., Martin, J., & Engle, R. (2019). Reaction time in differential and development research: A review and commentary on the problems and alternatives. Psychological Bulletin, 145 (5), 508–535. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, S. (2017). Cognitive differences and ISLA. In S. Loewen & M. Sato (Eds.), Handbook of instructed second language learning (pp. 396–417). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, S., & DeKeyser, R. (2021). Implicit aptitude: Conceptualizing the construct, validating the measures, and examining the evidence. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43 (3), 473–493. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, S., & Fu, M. (2018). Strategic and unpressured within-task planning and their associations with working memory. Language Teaching Research, 22 (2), 230–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, S., Hiver, P., & Papi, M. (2022). Individual differences in second language acquisition: Theory, research, and practice. In S. Li, P. Hiver, & M. Papi (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of SLA and individual differences (pp. 3–34). Routledge.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, P., & Gardner, R. (1994). The subtle effects of language anxiety on cognitive processing in the second language. Language Learning, 44 (2), 283–305. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A., & Philp, J. (1998). Conversational interaction and second language development: recasts, responses, and red herrings? Modern Language Journal, 82 (3), 338–356. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50 (3), 417–528. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Révész, A. (2014). Towards a fuller assessment of cognitive models of task-based learning: Investigating task-generated cognitive demands and processes. Applied Linguistics, 35 (1), 87–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sok, S., Kang, E. Y., & Han, Z. H. (2019). Thirty-five years of ISLA on form-focused instruction: A methodological synthesis. Language Teaching Research, 23 (4), 403–427. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Mao, Zhicheng, Icy Lee & Shaofeng Li
2024. Written corrective feedback in second language writing: A synthesis of naturalistic classroom studies. Language Teaching ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.