Cover not available
Part of
Less Frequently Used Research Methodologies in Applied Linguistics
Edited by A. Mehdi Riazi
[Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 6] 2024
► pp. 30–48

Chapter 3
Implementing the Multiperspectival Approach (MPA)

A study of art and design communication

| Auckland University of Technology
| University of South Australia
This chapter provides a detailed account of the researcher’s journey as they employ the Multiperspectival Approach (MPA) to investigate the interplay between communicative and creative practices within a university art and design studio. The chapter identifies the key reasons that attracted the researcher to MPA, the advantages it offered, its impact on their project, its design and findings, and how MPA was implemented. It concludes by considering the issues and challenges that arose in the researcher’s use of MPA and how these were addressed. Ultimately, the chapter serves to illustrate the implementation of MPA as a practical ontology and research heuristic for both traditional Applied Linguistic studies and those that go beyond the focus on language education and acquisition.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.An overview of the study: The journey to MPA
  • 3.Why was MPA used?
  • 4.How was the MPA implemented?
  • 5.What were the challenges of MPA, how were they addressed, and what insights emerged?
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 5 January 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.6.03hoc
References (37)
References
Baker, P. (2006). Using corpora in discourse analysis. Continuum. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bhatia, V. K. (2004). Worlds of written discourse: A genre-based view. Continuum.Google Scholar
Candlin, C. N., & Crichton, J. (2011a). Introduction. In C. N. Candlin & J. Crichton (Eds.), Discourses of deficit (pp. 1–22). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011b). Emergent themes and research challenges: Reconceptualising LSP. In M. Petersen & J. Engberg (Eds.), Current trends in LSP research: Aims and methods (pp. 277–316). Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Cicourel, A. V. (1982). Interviews, surveys, and the problem of ecological validity. American-Sociologist, 17(1), 11–20.Google Scholar
Candlin, C. N., & Crichton, J. (2013). From ontology to methodology: Exploring the discursive landscape of trust. In C. N. Candlin & J. Crichton (Eds.), Discourses of trust (pp. 1–18). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Copland, F., & Creese, A. (2015). Linguistic ethnography: Collecting, analysing and presenting data. Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. L. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crichton, J. (2010). The discourse of commercialisation: A multi-perspectived analysis. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Findeli, A. (2001). Rethinking design education for the 21st century: Theoretical, methodological, and ethical discussion. Design Issues, 17(1), 5–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Polity Press.Google Scholar
Goatly, A., & Hiradhar, P. (2016). Critical reading and writing in the digital age: An introductory coursebook. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice. Tavistock.Google Scholar
Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (1988). The conditions of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 11–38). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hocking, D. (2003). The genre of the postgraduate exegesis in art and design: An ethnographic examination. Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(2), 54–77.Google Scholar
(2011). The discursive construction of creativity as work in a tertiary art and design environment. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice 7(2) 235–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014). The brief in art and design education: A multi-perspectival and mixed-methodological study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Macquarie University.
(2015). The use of corpus analysis in a multi-perspectival study of creative practice. In P. Baker & T. McEnery (Eds.), Corpora and discourse studies: Integrating discourse and corpora (pp. 192–219). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016). Motivation in the tertiary art and design studio: A multi-perspectival discourse analysis. Text & Talk, 36(2) 155–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018a). Communicating creativity: The discursive facilitation of creative activity in arts. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018b). Conversation words in art and design practice: A corpus-based ethnography. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice, 13(1–3), 196–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jeanes, E. L. (2006). ‘Resisting creativity, creating the new’: A Deleuzian perspective on creativity. Creativity and Innovation Management, 15(2), 127–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johns, A. M. (1997). Text, role, and context: Developing academic literacies. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003). Genre and ESL/EFL composition instruction. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Exploring the dynamics of second language writing (pp. 195–217). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Layder, D. (1993). New strategies in social research. Polity Press.Google Scholar
McEnery, T., Xiao, R., & Yukio, T. (2006). Corpus-based language studies: An advanced resource book. Routledge.Google Scholar
Molesworth, H. (2003). Work ethic. In H. Molesworth (Ed.), Work ethic (pp. 25–51). Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Rampton, B. (2007). Neo-Hymesian linguistic ethnography in the United Kingdom. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 11(5), 584–607. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, C., & Sarangi, S. (1999). Hybridity in gatekeeping discourse: Issues of practical relevance for the researcher. In S. Sarangi & C. Roberts (Eds.), Talk, work and institutional order: Discourse in medical, mediation and management settings (pp. 473–504). Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sarangi, S., & Candlin, C. N. (2001). ‘Motivational relevancies’: Some methodological reflections on social theoretical and sociolinguistic practice. In N. Coupland, S. Sarangi, & C. N. Candlin (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and social theory (pp. 350–387). Longman.Google Scholar
(2003). Introduction. Trading between reflexivity and relevance: New challenges for applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 24(3), 271–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scott, M., & Tribble, C. (2006). Textual patterns: Key words and corpus analysis in language education. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, L. (1972). Other criteria: Confrontations with twentieth-century art. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1998). Other floors, other voices: A textography of a small university building. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Turner, J., & Hocking, D. (2004). Synergy in art and language: Positioning the language specialist in contemporary fine arts study. Art, Design and Communication in Higher Education 3(3), 149–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, R. (2001). The discourse-historical approach. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 63–94). Sage.Google Scholar