Numa Markee |
University of Illinois at
Urbana-Champaign
Avoidance is one of the oldest strategies
identified in cognitive second language acquisition. Since
participants are hiding that they are avoiding using a
particular item of language, behavioral methodologies that
normally do not use introspection might seem ill-equipped to
identify dissimulation. However (based on Markee, 2011), I show here how
avoidance can be respecified and productively re-analyzed by
using a longitudinal CA methodology (see Markee, 2008) to trace how: (1)
ethnographic data that are “talked into relevance” by
participants can be used to demonstrate how avoidance is
verbally achieved in real time over time; and (2) based on
feedback from an anonymous reviewer, how CA methods can also
identify how different participants can simultaneously pursue
conflicting agendas.
Article outline
1.Introduction
2.An overview of the present study
2.1Communication strategies
2.2Learning behavior tracking
2.3Participants
2.4Data and analysis
2.4.1Analysis
3.Why was Conversation Analysis (CA) used? And how was it
implemented?
4.What challenges did the researchers face? How were the
challenges addressed?
5.Insights gained using the conversation analysis
6.Conclusions
Notes
References
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
(1986) On
formal structures of practical
actions. In H. Garfinkel (Ed.), Ethnomethodological
studies of
work, (pp. 160–193). Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Goodwin, C.
(2003a) Pointing
as situated
practice. In S. Kita (Ed.), Pointing:
Where language, culture and cognition
meet, (pp. 217–241). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Goodwin, C.
(2003b) The
body in
action. In J. Coupland & R. Gwyn (Eds.), Discourse,
the body, and
identity, (pp. 19–42). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Guerrettaz, A-M., & Johnston, B.
(2013) Materials
in the classroom
ecology. The Modern
Language
Journal, 97, 779–796.
Guerrettaz, A-M., Engman, M. M., & Matsumoto, Y.
(2021) Introduction:
Classroom discourse at the intersection of language
education and
materiality. Classroom
Discourse, 105(S1), 3–20.
Hatch, E.
(1978) Apply
with caution. Studies
in Second Language
Acquisition, 2, 123–143.
Markee, N.
(2008) Toward
a learning behavior tracking methodology for
CA-for-second language
acquisition. Applied
Linguistics, 29, 404–427.
Markee, N.
(2011) Doing,
and justifying doing,
avoidance. Journal of
Pragmatics, 43, 602–615.
Markee, N., & Kunitz, S.
(2013) Doing
planning and task performance in second language
acquisition: An ethnomethodological
respecification. Language
Learning, 63, 629–664.
Mathieu, C. S., Miguel, N. M., & Jakonen, T.
(2021) Introduction:
Classroom discourse at the intersection of language
education and
materiality. Classroom
Discourse, 12, 1–14.
Maynard, D.
(2003) Bad
news, good news: Conversational order in everyday
talk and clinical
settings. The Chicago University Press.
Sacks, H.
(1984) Notes
on
methodology. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds), Structures
of social action: Studies in conversation
analysis (pp. 21–27). Cambridge University Press.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G.
(1974) A
simplest systematics for the organization of
turn-taking for
conversation. Language, 50, 696–735.
Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H.
(1977) The
preference for self-correction in the organization
of repair in
conversation. Language, 53, 361–382.
Shintani, N., & Ellis, R.
(2014) Tracking
‘learning behaviours’ in the incidental acquisition
of two dimensional adjectives by Japanese beginner
learners of L2
English. Language
Teaching
Research, 18, 521–542.
Tarone, E.
(1978) Conscious
communication strategies in interlanguage: A
progress
report. In H. D. Brown, C. A. Yorio, & R. C. Crymes (Eds.), On
TESOL ’77: Teaching and learning English as a second
language: Trends in research and
practice (pp. 194–203). TESOL.
Tarone, E.
(1981) Some
thoughts on the notion of communication
strategy. TESOL
Quarterly, 15, 285–295.