Cover not available
Part of
Less Frequently Used Research Methodologies in Applied Linguistics
Edited by A. Mehdi Riazi
[Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 6] 2024
► pp. 111–126

Chapter 7
Doing conversation analysis

Investigating Avoidance Strategy

| University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Avoidance is one of the oldest strategies identified in cognitive second language acquisition. Since participants are hiding that they are avoiding using a particular item of language, behavioral methodologies that normally do not use introspection might seem ill-equipped to identify dissimulation. However (based on Markee, 2011), I show here how avoidance can be respecified and productively re-analyzed by using a longitudinal CA methodology (see Markee, 2008) to trace how: (1) ethnographic data that are “talked into relevance” by participants can be used to demonstrate how avoidance is verbally achieved in real time over time; and (2) based on feedback from an anonymous reviewer, how CA methods can also identify how different participants can simultaneously pursue conflicting agendas.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.An overview of the present study
    • 2.1Communication strategies
    • 2.2Learning behavior tracking
    • 2.3Participants
    • 2.4Data and analysis
      • 2.4.1Analysis
  • 3.Why was Conversation Analysis (CA) used? And how was it implemented?
  • 4.What challenges did the researchers face? How were the challenges addressed?
  • 5.Insights gained using the conversation analysis
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 5 January 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.6.07mar
References (18)
References
Eskildsen, S., & Markee, N. (2018). L2 talk as social accomplishment. In R. Alonso Alonso (Ed.), Speaking in a second language, (pp. 69–10). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, H., & Sacks, H. (1986). On formal structures of practical actions. In H. Garfinkel (Ed.), Ethnomethodological studies of work, (pp. 160–193). Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. (2003a). Pointing as situated practice. In S. Kita (Ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture and cognition meet, (pp. 217–241). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(2003b). The body in action. In J. Coupland & R. Gwyn (Eds.), Discourse, the body, and identity, (pp. 19–42). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guerrettaz, A-M., & Johnston, B. (2013). Materials in the classroom ecology. The Modern Language Journal, 97, 779–796. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guerrettaz, A-M., Engman, M. M., & Matsumoto, Y. (2021). Introduction: Classroom discourse at the intersection of language education and materiality. Classroom Discourse, 105(S1), 3–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hatch, E. (1978). Apply with caution. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 2, 123–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Markee, N. (2008). Toward a learning behavior tracking methodology for CA-for-second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 29, 404–427. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). Doing, and justifying doing, avoidance. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 602–615. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Markee, N., & Kunitz, S. (2013). Doing planning and task performance in second language acquisition: An ethnomethodological respecification. Language Learning, 63, 629–664. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mathieu, C. S., Miguel, N. M., & Jakonen, T. (2021). Introduction: Classroom discourse at the intersection of language education and materiality. Classroom Discourse, 12, 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maynard, D. (2003). Bad news, good news: Conversational order in everyday talk and clinical settings. The Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Sacks, H. (1984). Notes on methodology. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 21–27). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shintani, N., & Ellis, R. (2014). Tracking ‘learning behaviours’ in the incidental acquisition of two dimensional adjectives by Japanese beginner learners of L2 English. Language Teaching Research, 18, 521–542. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tarone, E. (1978). Conscious communication strategies in interlanguage: A progress report. In H. D. Brown, C. A. Yorio, & R. C. Crymes (Eds.), On TESOL ’77: Teaching and learning English as a second language: Trends in research and practice (pp. 194–203). TESOL.Google Scholar
(1981). Some thoughts on the notion of communication strategy. TESOL Quarterly, 15, 285–295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar