Cover not available
Article published In:
Models of Discourse Units in Romance Languages
Edited by Margarita Borreguero Zuloaga, Vahram Atayan and Sybille Große
[Revue Romane 53:1] 2018
► pp. 121–158

The combination of discourse markers in spontaneous conversations

Keys to untying a Gordian knot

| Valencia University
This paper attempts to establish some basis for the combination of discourse markers in conversations. The analysis presented here will be based on Spanish spontaneous conversations and will make use of the Val.Es.Co model of discourse units developed in the last ten years (Briz et al. 2003; Grupo Val.Es.Co 2014) and a corpus of spontaneous conversations. As a result, patterns of combination of DMs will be established; some types of combinations will be described, and a distinction will be drawn between lexicalization of DMs, adjacency of DMs in two neighboring discourse units, and combination proper. In addition, some places are favored for the combination of discourse markers: the initial positions of the discourse units act and intervention. Binary combinations are preferred to ternary or 4-ary combinations. Finally, DMs with textual functions are preferred in the combinations studied when compared to modal or interpersonal DMs.
Keywords: discourse markers combination, discourse segmentation, Val.Es.Co., conversation analysis, act, intervention, turn
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • 1.The issue of a non-issue
  • 2.Models of discourse segmentation: Disassembling conversation
  • 3.An introduction to the VAM
    • 3.1.Discourse units
  • 3.2.Discourse markers as discourse units
  • 3.3.Discourse positions
  • 4.Previous issues in the analysis
    • 4.1.On the notion of DMs
    • 4.2.On the combination of DMs
      • 4.2.1.Adjacence
      • 4.2.2.Conversational idioms
      • 4.2.3.Combinations in reported speech
      • 4.2.4.Syntax / discourse relationships
      • 4.2.5.Repeated DMs
  • 5.Results of the analysis
    • 5.1.Kinds of DMs in combinations
    • 5.2.Combinations in positions
      • 5.2.1.Unsurprisingly, initial positions of discourse units are the privileged locus for combinations
      • 5.2.2.Medial positions – as defined in this model – are not a preferred place for the combination of DMs
      • 5.2.3.In the corpus, final positions seem specialized for the expression of modal values related to the speaker’s stance
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 10 August 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rro.00008.pon
References (49)
References
Benavent Payá, E. (2015): Decir y discurso directo en los relatos de la conversación coloquial. Valencia: Universidad. PhD, unpublished.Google Scholar
Blanche-Benveniste, C. y C. Jeanjean. (1987). Le français parlé. Edition et transcription. Paris: Didier-Erudition.Google Scholar
Blanche-Benveniste, C., M. Bilger et al. (1990). Le français parlé: études grammaticales. Paris: Éditions du CNRS.Google Scholar
Borreguero Zuloaga, M. (2017): Los relatos coloquiales: partículas discursivas y polifonía. Pragmalingüística 251, 62–88 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Briz Gómez, A. and M. P. Montañez. (2008): La forma ¿eh? en el Diccionario de partículas discursivas del español (DPDE), in: A. Á. Tejedor (coord.): Lengua viva: estudios ofrecidos a César Hernández Alonso, pp. 625–642Google Scholar
Briz Gómez, A. (2007): La unidad superior del discurso conversacional: El diálogo. L. Cortés et al. (eds.): Discurso y oralidad. Homenaje al profesor José Jesús de Bustos Tovar. Madrid: Arco, vol. I1, pp. 23–38.Google Scholar
(2016): El relato coloquial desde una teoría de unidades de la conversación, in: L. Serena, Araceli, A. N., S. del Rey Quesada (eds.): El español a través del tiempo: estudios ofrecidos a Rafael Cano Aguilar. Vol II1. Sevilla: Universidad, pp. 719–739.Google Scholar
Briz Gómez, A. et al. (1995): La conversación coloquial. Materiales para su estudio. Cuadernos De Filología. Vol. XV1. València: Universidad.Google Scholar
Briz Gómez, A. and Grupo, Val.Es.Co. (2002): Corpus de conversaciones coloquiales. Anejo I de la revista Oralia. Madrid: Arco/Libros.Google Scholar
Briz, A. and Grupo, Val.Es.Co. 2003. Un Sistema De Unidades Para El Estudio Del Español Coloquial. Oralia 61, pp. 7–63.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H., & Schaefer, E. F. (1989): Contributing to discourse. Cognitive Science, 131, pp. 259–294 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cresti, E. y P. Gramigni. (2003): Per una linguistica corpus based dell’italiano parlato: le unità di riferimento. LABLITA, 71, pp. 128–156.Google Scholar
Cresti, E. and M. Moneglia (eds.) (2005): C-ORAL-ROM: integrated reference corpora for spoken Romance languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Degand, L. & Simon, A.-C. (2009): Minimal discourse units in spoken French: On the role of syntactic and prosodic units in discourse segmentation. Discours 41. Retrieved from: [URL]
Cuenca, M. J. (2006): Connexió i connectors. Vic: Eumo.Google Scholar
Cuenca, M. J., M. J. Marin. (2008): Co-occurrence of discourse markers in Catalan and Spanish oral narrative. Journal of Pragmatics 411, pp. 899–914. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Espinosa Guerri, G. (2016): Hacia una visualización sistemática de la conversación coloquial. Nuevas investigaciones lingüísticas: XXX Congreso internacional de la Asociación de Jóvenes Lingüistas. Cantabria: Universidad,Google Scholar
Estellés Arguedas, M. (2009): Gramaticalización y Paradigmas. Berna: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Estellés Arguedas, M. and S. Pons Bordería. (2014): Absolute Initial Position, in: Pons Bordería, S. (ed.) (2014): Discourse Segmentation in Romance Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ferrari, A., L. Cignetti, A.-M. De Cesare et al. (2008): L’interfaccia lingua-testo. Natura e funzioni dell’articolazione informativa dell’enunciato. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
Fraser, B. (2013): Combinations of Contrastive Discourse Markers in English. International Review of Pragmatics 51, pp. 318–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1999): What are Discourse Markers? Journal of Pragmatics 311, pp. 931–952. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fuentes Rodríguez, C. (2009): Diccionario de conectores y operadores del español. Madrid: Arco/Libros.Google Scholar
Grupo, Val.Es.Co. (2014): Las unidades del discurso oral. La propuesta Val.Es.Co de segmentación de la conversación (coloquial). L. Cortés (coord.): Estudios de Lingüística del español/Infoling, 35/1, pp. 13–73.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez Ordóñez, S. (2005): De Semántica y Pragmática. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Hidalgo Navarro, A. and X. Padilla. (2005): Bases para el análisis de las unidades menores del discurso oral: los subactos. Oralia 91, pp. 109–143.Google Scholar
Koops, C. and A. Lohmann (2016): Aspects of Discourse Marker Sequencing: Empirical Challenges and Theoretical Implications, in: Keizer, E., G. Kaltenböck and A. Lohmann (eds.): Outside the Clause, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 417–446.
. (2015): A Quantitative Approach to the Grammaticalization of Discourse Markers: Evidence from their Sequencing Behavior. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 201, pp. 232–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morel, M.-A. and L. Danon-Boileau. (1998): Grammaire de l’intonation. L’exemple du français. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Montañez Mesas, M. P. (2007): Marcadores del discurso y posición final: La forma ‘¿eh?’ en la conversación coloquial española. ELUA 211, 261–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Narbona Jiménez, A. (1990): Las subordinadas adverbiales impropias en español. Málaga: Ágora.Google Scholar
(1979): Problemas de sintaxis andaluza. Analecta Malacitana II, 2, pp. 245–286.Google Scholar
(1986): Problemas de sintaxis coloquial andaluza. Rsel 16, 2, pp. 229–275.Google Scholar
Ochs, E. (1979): Planned and Unplanned Discourse, in: Cole, P. and Morgan (eds.): Syntax and Semantics, 121, New York: Academic Press, pp. 51–80.Google Scholar
Pons Bordería, S. (1998): Conexión y conectores: estudio de su relación en el registro informal de la lengua. Vol. XXVII1. Valencia: Cuadernos de Filología.Google Scholar
. 2001. Connectives/Discourse Markers: An Overview, in: Ferrer Mora, H. and S. Pons Bordería (eds.): La pragmática de los conectores y las partículas modales, Valencia: Universidad, pp. 219–243.Google Scholar
. 2006. A Functional Approach for the Study of Discourse Markers, in: Ferrer, K.Approaches to Discourse Particles, edited by K. Fischer. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
(2009): La combinación de los marcadores del discurso: bases para su estudio. Coloquio internacional Marcadores del discurso en las lenguas románicas: un enfoque contrastivo. Unpublished.Google Scholar
(ed.) (2014): Discourse Segmentation in Romance Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016): Cómo dividir una conversación en actos y subacio, in: Bañón Hernández, A. M., M.ª M. Espejo Muriel, B. Herrero Muñoz-Cobo y J. L. López Cruces (eds.): Oralidad y análisis del discurso. Homenaje a Luis Cortés Rodríguez. Almería: Editorial Universidad de Almería, pp. 545–566Google Scholar
Pons Bordería, S. and M. E. Arguedas. (2008): Expressing Digression Linguistically: Do Digressive Markers Exist? Journal of Pragmatics 40, 11, pp. 921–936.Google Scholar
Roulet, E. et al. (1985): L’Articulation Du Discours En Français Contemporain. Berna, Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Roulet, E., L. Fillietaz, A. Grobet, and M. Burger. (2001): Un modèle et un instrument d’analyse de l’organisation du discours. Berna: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Ruiz Gurillo, L. (2001): Las locuciones en español actual. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Sacks, H. (1984): Notes on methodology, in: Heritage, J., J. M. Atkinson, (eds.): Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 2–27Google Scholar
Schiffrin, D. (1987): Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sornicola, R. (1981): Sul Parlato. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Tarannilla, R. (2008): A lo que iba: evolución y uso de un marcador de regresión, in: Neuman, C.-P., R. P. Alastrué, C. P.-L. Auría (eds.): Actas del V Congreso Internacional AELFE, Zaragoza: Universidad de Zaragozapp. 825–836.Google Scholar
Vicher, A., D. Sankoff. (1989): The emergent syntax of pre-sentential turn openings. Journal of Pragmatics 131, pp. 81–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (15)

Cited by 15 other publications

Alfano, Iolanda & Loredana Schettino
2023. Segnali discorsivi in italiano. Funzioni e posizioni . Cuadernos de Filología Italiana 30 ► pp. 207 ff. DOI logo
Koops, Christian & Arne Lohmann
2022. Explaining reversible discourse marker sequences: A case study of and and so. Journal of Pragmatics 191 ► pp. 156 ff. DOI logo
Van Olmen, Daniël & Vittorio Tantucci
2022. Getting attention in different languages: A usage-based approach to parenthetical look in Chinese, Dutch, English, and Italian. Intercultural Pragmatics 19:2 ► pp. 141 ff. DOI logo
Venegas, René, Iris Viviana Bosio & Constanza Cerda-Canales
2022. Los corpus sincrónicos del español. Descripción y potencialidades para la investigación teórica y aplicada de la lengua. Journal of Spanish Language Teaching 9:2 ► pp. 116 ff. DOI logo
Crible, Ludivine & Liesbeth Degand
2021. Co-occurrence and ordering of discourse markers in sequences: A multifactorial study in spoken French. Journal of Pragmatics 177 ► pp. 18 ff. DOI logo
Izutsu, Katsunobu & Mitsuko Narita Izutsu
2021. Chapter 3. Presentation followed by negotiation. In Pragmatic Markers and Peripheries [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 325], ► pp. 77 ff. DOI logo
Izutsu, Mitsuko Narita & Katsunobu Izutsu
2021. Very simple, though, isn't it? Pragmatic marker sequencing at the right periphery. Journal of Pragmatics 182 ► pp. 118 ff. DOI logo
Jarrah, Marwan, Sharif Alghazo & Yousef Bader
2021. Two Types of Concession: Evidence From Discourse Markers. Sage Open 11:3 DOI logo
Pons Bordería, Salvador & Kerstin Fischer
2021. Using discourse segmentation to account for the polyfunctionality of discourse markers: The case of well. Journal of Pragmatics 173 ► pp. 101 ff. DOI logo
Pinto, Derrin & Donny Vigil
2020. Spanish clicks in discourse marker combinations. Journal of Pragmatics 159 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Cuenca, Maria Josep & Ludivine Crible
2019. Co-occurrence of discourse markers in English: From juxtaposition to composition. Journal of Pragmatics 140 ► pp. 171 ff. DOI logo
Haselow, Alexander
2019. Discourse marker sequences: Insights into the serial order of communicative tasks in real-time turn production. Journal of Pragmatics 146 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Haselow, Alexander
2020. Chapter 8. Local and global structures in discourse and interaction. In Grammar and Cognition [Human Cognitive Processing, 70], ► pp. 267 ff. DOI logo
Haselow, Alexander
2021. Chapter 6. Discourse markers and brain lateralization. In Studies at the Grammar-Discourse Interface [Studies in Language Companion Series, 219], ► pp. 158 ff. DOI logo
Mohammadi, Ariana N.
2019. Meaning potentials and discourse markers: The case of focus management markers in Persian. Lingua 229 ► pp. 102706 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.