Article published in:
Models of Discourse Units in Romance Languages
Edited by Margarita Borreguero Zuloaga, Vahram Atayan and Sybille Grosse
[Revue Romane 53:1] 2018
► pp. 159179
References

References

Atkinson, J. M./Heritage, J.
(eds.) (1984): Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Auer, P.
(1996): The Pre-front Field in Spoken German and its Relevance as a Grammaticalization Position. Pragmatics, 6, 1, pp. 295–322.Crossref link
(2000): On-line-Syntax – oder: Was es bedeuten könnte, die Zeitlichkeit der mündlichen Sprache ernst zu nehmen. Sprache und Literatur, 85, pp. 43–56.
(2005): Projection in interaction and projection in grammar. Text, 25, 1, pp. 7–36.Crossref link
(2007a): Syntax als Prozess, in: Hausendorf, H. (ed.): Gespräch als Prozess. Linguistische Aspekte der Zeitlichkeit verbaler Interaktion. Tübingen: Narr, pp. 95–124.
(2007b): Projection and minimalistic syntax in interaction, Manuskript. Cited from Günthner S. (2011).
(2009): Online-syntax: thoughts on the temporality od spoken language. Language Sciences, 31, pp. 1–13.Crossref link
(2010): Zum Segmentierungsproblem in der Gesprochenen Sprache. InLiSt, 49. Retrieved from: http://​www​.inlist​.uni​-bayreuth​.de/
(2014): The temporality of language in interaction: Projection and latency. InLiSt, 54, pp. 1–25. Retrieved from: http://​www​.inlist​.uni​-bayreuth​.de​/issues​/54​/inlist54​.pdf.
Auer, P./Pfänder, S.
(2011): Constructions: emergent or emerging?, in: Auer, P./Pfänder, S. (eds.): Constructions: emerging and emergent. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, (= linguae & litterae 6), pp. 1–21.Crossref link
Barden, B./Elstermann, M./Fiehler, R.
(2001): Operator-Skopus-Strukturen in gesprochener Sprache, in: Liedtke, F./Hundsnurscher, F. (eds.): Pragmatische Syntax. Tübingen: Niemeyer, pp. 197–233.
Barth-Weingarten, D.
(2006): Fuzzy boundaries – Überlegungen zu einer Grammatik der gesprochenen Sprache nach konversationsanalytischen Kriterien, in: Deppermann, A./Fiehler, R./Spranz-Fogasy, T. (eds.): Grammatik und Interaktion. Untersuchungen zum Zusammenhang von grammatischen Strukturen und Gesprächsprozessen. Radolfzell: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung, pp. 67–93.
(2011): The fuzziness of intonation units: Some theoretical considerations and a practical solution. InLiSt, 51. Retrieved from: http://​www​.inlist​.uni​-bayreuth​.de​/issues​/51​/InLiSt51​.pdf.
Blakemore, D.
(1987): Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.
Du Bois, J. W.
(1991): Transcription design principles for spoken discourse research. Pragmatics, 1, 1, pp. 71–106.Crossref link
Brinton, L.
(1996): Pragmatic markers in English. Grammaticalization and discourse functions. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.Crossref link
Chafe, W. L.
(1994): Discourse, Consciousness and Time. The fow and displacement of Conscious experience in Speaking and writing. Chicago/London: University of Chicago.
Chevalier, F. H. G./Clift, R.
(2008): Unfinished turns in French conversation: Projectability, syntax and action. Journal of Pragmatics, 40, pp. 1731–1752.Crossref link
Degand, L./Simon, A. C.
(2009a): Mapping prosody and syntax as a strategic choice, in: Barth-Weingarten, D./Dehé, N./Wichmann, A. (eds.): Where Prosody Meets Pragmatics. Bangalore: Emerald, pp. 79–105.Crossref link
(2009b): On identifying basic discourse units in speech: theoretical and empirical issues. Discours, 4. Retrieved from: http://​discours​.revues​.org​/index54​.html.
Deppermann, A.
(2013): Turn-design at turn-beginnings: Multimodal resources to deal with tasks of turn-construction in German. Journal of Pragmatics, 46, 1, pp. 91–121.Crossref link
Fiehler, R.
(2012): Wo fängt der Satz an? Operator-Skopus-Strukturen in gesprochener und geschriebener Sprache, in: Cortès, C. (ed.): Satzeröffnung. Formen, Funktionen, Strategien. Tübingen: Stauffenburg, pp. 31–44.
Fiehler, R./Barden, B./Elstermann, M./Kraft, B.
(2004): Eigenschaften gesprochener Sprache. Tübingen: Narr.
Fischer, K.
(2000): Discourse Particles, Turn-taking, and the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface. Revue Semantique et Pragmatique. 8, pp. 111–137.
(2006): Frames, constructions and invariant meanings: the functional polysemy of discourse particles, in: Fischer, K. (ed.): Approaches to Discourse Particles. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 427–447.
Ford, C./Thompson, S.
(1996): Interactional units in conversation: syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns, in: Ochs, E./Schegloff, E. A./Thompson, S. A. (eds.): Interaction and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 134–184.Crossref link
Ford, C. E./Fox, B. A./Thompson, S.
(1996): Practices in the construction of turns. The “TCU” revisited. Pragmatics, 6, 3, pp. 427–454.Crossref link
Ford, C. E.
(2004): Contingency and units in interaction. Discourse Studies, 6, 1, pp. 27–52.Crossref link
Fox, B./Thompson, S./Ford, C./Couper-Kuhlen, E.
(2013): Conversation Analysis in Linguistics, in: Sidnell, J./Stivers, T. (eds.): Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Chichester: Blackwell, pp. 726–740.
Fraser, B.
(1990): An approach to discourse markers. Journal of Pragmatics, 14, pp. 383–395.Crossref link
(1996): Pragmatic markers. Pragmatics, 6, pp. 167–190.Crossref link
(1999): What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics, 31, pp. 931–953.Crossref link
(2006): Towards a theory of dicourse markers, in: Fischer, K. (ed.): Approaches to Discourse Particles. Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 189–204.
Gohl, C./Günthner, S.
(1999): Grammatikalisierung von weil als Diskursmarker in der gesprochenen Sprache. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 18, pp. 39–75.Crossref link
Günthner, S.
(2000): Grammatik im Gespräch: Zur Verwendung von ‘wobei’ im gesprochenen Deutsch. Sprache und Literatur, 85, 31, pp. 57–74.
(2008): Projektorkonstruktionen im Gespräch: Pseudoclefts, die Sache ist-Konstruktionen und Extrapositionen mit es . Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion, 9, pp. 86–114.
(2011): Between emergence and sedimentation. Projecting constructions in German interactions, in: Auer, P./Pfänder, S. (eds.): Constructions: emerging and emergent. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, (= linguae & litterae 6), pp. 156–185.Crossref link
Halford, B. K.
(1996): Talk Units: The structure of Spoken Canadian English. Tübingen: Narr.
Hopper, P.
(1987): Emergent Grammar. Berkeley Linguistics society, 13, pp. 139–157.
(1998): Emergence of grammar, in: Bright, W. (ed.): International Encyclopedia of Linguistics, Vol. I. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 364–367.
(2004): The openness of grammatical constructions. 40th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 153–175.
Imo, W.
(2012): Wortart Diskursmarker?, in: Rothstein, B. (ed.): Nicht-flektierende Wortarten. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 48–88.Crossref link
(2016): Diskursmarker: grammatischer Status – Funktionen in monologischen und dialogischen Kontexten – historische Kontinuität, in: Blühdorn, H./Deppermann, A. (eds.): Diskursmarker. Retrieved from: arbeitspapiere​.sprache​-interaktion​.de​/arbeitspapiere​/arbeitspapier65​.pdf.
Kroon, C.
(1998): A framework for the description of Latin discourse markers. Journal of Pragmatics, 30, pp. 205–223.Crossref link
Lenk, U.
(1998): Marking Discourse Coherence: Functions of Discourse Markers in Spoken English. Tübingen: Narr.
Lerner, G. H.
(1991): On the Syntax of Sentences in Progress. Language In Society, 20, pp. 441–458.Crossref link
(1996): On the “semi-permeable” character of grammatical units in conversation: Conditional entry into the turn space of another speaker. In Ochs, E./Schegloff, E. A./Thompson, S. (eds.): Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 238–276.Crossref link
(2002): Collaborative turn sequences, in: Lerner, G. H. (ed.): Conversation Analysis. Studies from the first generation. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 225–256.
Lindström, J.
(2014): On the place of turn and sequence in grammar: Verb-first clausal constructions in Swedish talk-in-interaction. Pragmatics, 24, 3, pp. 507–532.Crossref link
Martín Zorraquino, M.ª A./Portolés, J.
(1999): Los marcadores del discurso, in: Bosque, I./Demonte, V. (eds.): Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa Calpe, pp. 4051–4213.
Mazeland, H.
(2013): Grammar in Conversation, in: Sidnell, J./Stivers, T. (eds.): The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Chichester: Blackwell, pp. 475–491.
Mosegaard Hansen, M. -B.
(1998): The Function of Discourse Particles. A Study with Special Reference to Spoken Standard French. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Crossref link
Portolés, J.
(1998): Marcadores del discurso. Barcelona: Ariel.
Sacks, H./Schegloff, E. A./Jefferson, G.
(1974): A simplest systematics for the organisation of turn-taking in conversation. Language, 50, 4, pp. 696–735.Crossref link
Sacks, H.
(1992): Lectures on conversation, Vol. 1&2. Oxford/Cambridge: Blackwell.
Schegloff, E. A.
(1996): Turn organization: one intersection of grammar and interaction, in: Ochs, E./Schegloff, E. A./Thompson, S. A. (eds.): Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 53–133.Crossref link
Schiffrin, D.
(1987): Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Crossref link
Selting, M./Couper-Kuhlen, E.
(2000): Argumente für die Entwicklung einer interaktionalen Linguistik. Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion, 1, pp. 76–95. Retrieved from: http://​www​.gespraechsforschung​-ozs​.de​/heft2000​/ga​-selting​.pdf.
(2001): Introducing Interactional Linguistics, in: Selting, M./Couper-Kuhlen, E. (eds.): Studies in Interactional Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 1–22.Crossref link
Selting, M.
(1995): Der ‘mögliche Satz’ als interaktiv relevante syntaktische Kategorie. Linguistische Berichte, 158, pp. 298–325.
(1996): On the interplay of syntax and prosody in the constitution of turn-constructional units and turns in conversation. Pragmatics, 6, 3, pp. 357–388.Crossref link
(1998): TCUs and TRPs: the construction of ‘units’ in conversational talk. InLiSt, 4, pp. 1–48. Retrieved from: http://​inlist​.uni​-konstanz​.de​/issues​/4.
(2000): The Construction of Units in Conversational Talk. Language in Society, 29, 4, pp. 477–517.Crossref link
(2001): Fragments of units as deviant cases of unit-production in conversational talk, in: Selting, M./Couper-Kuhlen, E. (eds.): Studies in Interactional Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 229–258.Crossref link
(2005): Syntax and prosody as methods for the construction and identification of turn-constructional units in conversation, in: Hakulinen, A./Selting, M. (eds.): Syntax and Lexis in Conversation. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 17–44.Crossref link
Szczepek Reed, B. B.
(2009): Units of interaction: “intonation phrases” or “turn constructional phrases?, Paper presented at the Interface Discours & Prosodie Conference, September 9–11, Paris, p. 351–363. Retrieved from: makino​.linguist​.jussieu​.fr​/idp09​/docs​/IDP​_actes​/Articles​/szczepek​-reed​.pdf
Vicher, A./Sankoff, D.
(1989): The emergent syntax of pre-sentential openings. Journal of Pragmatics, 13, pp. 81–97.Crossref link