References

References

Andersen, H.
(1973): Abductive and deductive change. Language 49, pp. 765–793. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1987): From auxiliary to desinence, in Harris, M. & P. Ramat (eds.): The historical development of auxiliaries. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 21–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2001): Markedness and the theory of linguistic change, in H. Andersen (ed.): Actualization (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 219). Amsterdam &Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 21–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006): Synchrony, diachrony and evolution, in Nedergaard Thomsen, O. (ed.): Competing Models of Linguistic Change. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 59–90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010): From morphologization to demorphologization, in: Bubenik, V. & S. Luraghi (eds.): Companion to Historical Linguistics. London: Continuum Companions in Linguistics, pp. 117–146.Google Scholar
(2012): The new Russian vocative: Synchrony, diachrony, typology. Scando-Slavica 51, pp. 122–167. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Juul Nielsen, Peter
(2016): Functional Structure in Morphology and the Case of Nonfinite Verbs. Theoretical Issues and the Description of the Danish Verb System (Empirical Approaches to Linguistic Theory (EALT), Vol. 9). Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nørgård-Sørensen, J., L. Heltoft & L. Schøsler
(eds.) (2011): Connecting Grammaticalization. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Olander, T.
(2006): Accentual mobility: The prehistory of the Balto-Slavic mobile accent paradigms. PhD thesis, University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Sun, C. & E. Closs Traugott
(2011): Grammaticalization and Word Order Change, in Narrog, H. & B. Heine (eds.): The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 378–388.Google Scholar