Cover not available
Article published In:
Revue Romane
Vol. 58:1 (2023) ► pp.88–127
articles linguistiques

Present/future tense variation in contemporary Italian

The role of settledness

ORCID logo | Universiteit Gent
According to normative descriptions of Italian future-framed adverbial clauses, the future tense is the only option (Quando verrai [F], ti presterò il libro ‘When you come, I’ll lend you the book’). However, the present tense may also be used (Quando vieni [P], ti presto il libro). I demonstrate that choice and acceptance of the present in future-framed adverbials are conditioned by the speaker’s presumption of settledness; that is, in every future world compatible with the speaker’s beliefs the eventuality necessarily occurs. The data come from an online questionnaire consisting of a forced-choice and an acceptability judgment task completed by 429 native speakers of Italian, and were analyzed using mixed-effects regression. Results show that the present is chosen most and rated highest when the future eventuality is presumed settled ([+certain, +immediate, +temporally specific]). These findings demonstrate that speakers use the present to express confidence in the realization of future eventualities.
Keywords: Italian, pragmatics, present, future, subordinate clauses, settledness
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Previous literature
    • 2.1The Italian present & future tenses
    • 2.2Settledness
  • 3.Research questions & hypotheses
  • 4.Methods
  • 5.Results
  • 6.Discussion
  • 7.Conclusions & future directions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 25 May 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rro.19022.hof
References (45)
References
Aaron, J. (2014): A certain future: Epistemicity, prediction, and assertion in Iberian Spanish future expression. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 7,2, pp. 215–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aski, J. & D. Musumeci. (2014): Avanti: Beginning Italian, 3rd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Bates, D., M. Maechler, B. Bolker, & S. Walker. (2015): Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67,1, pp. 1–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Battaglia, S. & V. Pernicone. (1957): La grammatica italiana, 2nd edn. Torino: Loescher editore.Google Scholar
Bazzanella, C. (1994): Le facce del parlare. Un approccio pragmatico all’italiano parlato. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.Google Scholar
Berretta, M. (1990): Il futuro in italiano L2. Quaderni di Dipartimento di Linguistica e Letterature Comparate dell’Università di Bergamo, 61, pp. 147–188.Google Scholar
(1994): Il futuro italiano nella varietà colloquiale e nella varietà di apprendimento. Zeitschrift für romanische philologie, 110,1/2, pp. 1–36. Tubingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.Google Scholar
Berruto, G. (2000): Sociolingustica dell’italiano contemporaneo, 9th edn. Rome: Carocci editore.Google Scholar
Bertinetto, P. M. (1986): Tempo, aspetto e azione nel verbo italiano: Il sistema dell’indicativo. Florence: Presso L’accademia della Crusca.Google Scholar
Bonomi, A. & F. Del Prete. (2008): Evaluating future-tensed sentences in changing contexts. Unpublished manuscript, University of Milan.Google Scholar
Calboli, G. & G. Moroni. (1989): Grammatica italiana. Bologna: Edizioni Calderini.Google Scholar
Comrie, B. (1985): Tense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Copley, B. (2002): The semantics of the future. PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
D’Achille, P. (2003): L’italiano contemporaneo. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
D’Agostino, M. (2007): Sociolinguistica dell’Italia contemporanea. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Danesi, M. (2006): Complete Italian Grammar Review. : Barron.Google Scholar
Dahl, Ö. (1985): Tense and aspect systems. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
De Rôme, D. & P. Tite. (2003): Soluzioni! A practical guide to Italian grammar. Malta: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Fleischman, S. (1982): The future in thought and language: Diachronic evidence from Romance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gravano, A., S. Benus, J. Hirschberg, E. Sneed German, & G. Ward. (2008): The effect of contour type and epistemic modality on the assessment of speaker certainty, in Barbosa, P., S. Madureira, & C. Reis (eds.), Proceedings of speech prosody 2008. Campinas, pp. 401–404.Google Scholar
Giannakidou, A. & A. Mari. (2018): A unified analysis of the future as epistemic modality: The view from Greek and Italian. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 36,1, pp. 85–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graziano, C. (2008): Italian verbs and essentials ofgrammar, 2nd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Hoff, M. (2019): Settledness & mood alternation: A semantic-pragmatic analysis of Spanish future-framed adverbials. The Ohio State University: PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Hoff, M. & S. Schwenter. (2019): Settledness and morphosyntactic variation across Romance. Presented at the Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), University of Georgia, May 1–4.
Hothorn, T., K. Hornik, & A. Zeilis. (2006): Unbiased recursive partitioning: A conditional inference framework. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 15,3, pp. 651–674. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, S. (2002): The presumption of settledness. CLS, 381, pp. 313–328.Google Scholar
(2005): Conditional truth and future reference. Journal of Semantics, 221, pp. 231–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
King, R. & T. Nadasdi. (2003): Back to the future in Acadian French. Journal of French Language Studies, 131, pp. 323–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuznetsova, A., P. B. Brockhoff, & R. H. B. Christensen. (2017): lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82,13, pp. 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lepschy, A. & G. Lepschy. (1977): The Italian language today. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Maiden, M. & C. Robustelli. (2007): A reference grammar of modern Italian, 2nd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Nanni-Tate, P. (2012): Italian Grammar Drills, 2nd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Peyronnel, S. & I. Higgins. (2005): Basic Italian: A grammar and workbook. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poplack, S. & N. Dion. (2009): Prescription vs. praxis: The evolution of future temporal reference in French. Language, 85,3, pp. 557–587. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poplack, S. & E. Malvar. (2006): Elucidating the transition period in linguistic change: The expression of the future in Brazilian Portuguese. Probus, 191, pp. 121–169.Google Scholar
Proudfoot, A. & F. Cardo. (2005): Modern Italian grammar: A practical guide, 2nd edn. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
R Core Team (2017): R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Renzi, L. & G. Salvi (eds.) (1991): Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione, vol. 21. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Rohlfs, G. (1969): Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti: Sintassi e formazione delle parole. Torino: Giulio Einaudi Editore.Google Scholar
Sabatini, F. (1985): “L’italiano dell’uso medio”: una realtà tra le varietà linguistiche italiane, in Holtus, G. & E. Radtke (eds.), Gesprochenes Italienisch in Geschichte und Gegenwart. Tübingen: G. Narr, pp. 154–184.Google Scholar
Schütze, C. & J. Sprouse. (2014): Judgment data, in Podesva, R. & D. Sharma (eds.), Research methods in linguistics. New York: Cambridge Univeristy Press, pp. 27-50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwenter, S. (1999): Pragmatics of conditional marking: Implicature, Scalarity, & Exclusivity. New York/London: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
Serianni, L. (1988): Grammatica italiana: Italiano comune e lingua letteraria. Torino: Utet Libreria.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, S. & H. Baayen. (2012): Models, forests, and trees of York English: Was-were variation as a case study for statistical practice. Language Variation and Change 24,2, pp. 135–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiberg, E. (2002): Information structure in dialogic future plans: A study of Italian native speakers and Swedish preadvanced and advanced learners of Italian, in Salaberry, M. R. & Y. Shirai (eds.): The L2 Acquisition of Tense-Aspect Morphology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 285–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Schwenter, Scott A. & Mark R. Hoff
2023. The role of context in imperative form choice. In Verb and Context [IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature, 34], ► pp. 327 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.