Cover not available
Article published In:
Revue Romane
Vol. 49:1 (2014) ► pp.32–52

Two suppletive adjectives in Megleno-Romanian

| Research Centre for Romance Linguistics, University of Oxford
This study involves the existence in Megleno-Romanian dialects of a lexically suppletive distinction between singular and plural forms of the adjectives meaning ‘small’ and ‘big’. The phenomenon has gone largely unnoticed both by comparative Romance linguists and by morphological theorists yet it is both typologically surprising and theoretically significant. Analysis of a remarkably similar phenomenon in mainland Scandinavian languages led Börjars and Vincent (2011) to propose a considerably attenuated version of Maiden’s claim (2004) that lexical synonymy can drive the diachronic emergence of suppletion. My close investigation of the the source of the suppletion in Megleno-Romanian, and consideration of the Scandinavian facts in the light of the Megleno-Romanian data, will show that in fact the emergence of suppletion in just these adjectives constitutes excellent evidence for the claim that lexical synonymy favours suppletion.
Keywords: size adjectives, plurals, Megleno-Romanian, synonymy, suppletion, Romanian dialects
Published online: 27 May 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rro.49.1.02mai
References (53)
Acquaviva, P. (2008): Lexical plurals. A morphosemantic approach. OUP, Oxford.Google Scholar
Aski, J. (1995): Verbal suppletion: An analysis of Italian, French, and Spanish to go . Linguistics, 331, pp. 403-432. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Atanasov, P. (1990): Le Méglénoroumain de nos jours. Une approche linguistique. Buske, Hamburg.Google Scholar
. (2002): Meglenoromâna astăzi. Editura Academiei, Bucharest.Google Scholar
. (2009): Atlasul lingvistic al dialectului meglenoromân. Editura Academiei, Bucharest.Google Scholar
Avram, A. (2000): Probleme de etimologie. Univers Enciclopedic, Bucharest.Google Scholar
Börjars, K. & N. Vincent (2011): The pre-conditions for suppletion, in: Galani, A., G. Hicks & G. Toulas (eds.) Morphology and its interfaces. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 239-265. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. (1985): Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Candrea, I.-A. (1924): Texte meglenite. Grai şi Suflet, 1,2, pp. 261-285.Google Scholar
. (1925): Texte meglenite. Grai şi Suflet, 2,1, pp. 100-128.Google Scholar
. (1928): Glosar meglenoromân. Grai şi Suflet, 3,3, pp. 381-412.Google Scholar
. (1934): Glosar meglenoromân. Grai şi Suflet, 61, pp. 163-192.Google Scholar
Candrea, I.-A., O. Densuşianu & T. Sperantia (eds.) (1908): Graiul nostru. Texte din toate părţile locuite de români. II. Socec, Bucharest.Google Scholar
Capidan, T. (1925): Meglenoromânii. Istoria si graiul lor. Cultura naţională, Bucharest.Google Scholar
. (1928): Meglenoromânii. Literatura populară meglenoromână. Cultura naţională, Bucharest.Google Scholar
. (1935): Dicţionar meglenoromân. Cultura naţională, Bucharest.Google Scholar
Cappellaro, C. (2011): History and development of third person pronouns in Italo-Romance. D. Phil. Thesis, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Cinque, G. (2005): The dual source of adjectives and phrasal movement in the Romance DP. MS, University of Venice.Google Scholar
Ciorănescu, A. (1958): Diccionario etimológico rumano. Universidad de la Laguna, La Laguna.Google Scholar
Clark, E. (1993): The lexicon in acquisition. CUP, Cambridge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corbett, G. (2007): Canonical typology, suppletion, and possible words. Language, 831, pp. 8-42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corbett, G., A. Hippisley, D. Brown & Marriott, P. (2001): Frequency, regularity and the paradigm: A perspective from Russian on a complex relation, in: Bybee, J. & P. Hopper (eds.): Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure [Typological Studies in Language 45]. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 201–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DEX = (1998): Dicţionarul explicativ al limbii române (2nd ed.). Univers Enciclopedic, Bucharest.Google Scholar
DLR = Iordan, Iorgu, Coteanu, Ion, Graur, Alexandru (eds.) (1965): Dicţionarul limbii române. Academia Republicii Populare Romîne, Institutul de Lingvistică din Bucureti, Bucharest.Google Scholar
Foulet, L. (1965): Petite Syntaxe de l’ancien français. Champion, Paris.Google Scholar
Heath, J. (1981): Basic materials in Mara: Grammar, texts and dictionary. Department of Linguistics, Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University, Canberra.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, A.R. (2011): The plural of bihan, byhan ‘little, small’ in Breton and Cornish. Handout from conference Indo-European Matters Even More , University of Copenhagen, October, 2011.
. (2012): The plural of middle and early modern Breton bihan . Handout from conference Building Blocks of Breton Grammar , Philipps University of Marburg, April, 2012.
Juge, M. (1999): On the rise of suppletion in verbal paradigms, in: Chang, S., L. Liaw & Ruppenhofer, J. (eds.): Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society . BLS, Berkeley, pp. 183-94.
Kahl, T. (2006): Islamizarea vlahilor megleniţi meglenoromâni. Satul Nânti (Notia) şi “nântinets” în Turcia de azi, in: Istoria aromânilor. Tritonic, Bucharest, pp. 183-210.Google Scholar
Krecz, C. (1986): Parts and pieces. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 461, pp. 381-400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ledgeway, A. (2011): Syntactic and morphosyntactic typology and change, in: Maiden, M., J.C. Smith & Ledgeway, A. (eds.): The Cambrige history of the romance languages I. Structures. CUP, Cambridge, pp. 382-471.Google Scholar
Maiden, M. (2001): A strange affinity: perfecto y tiempos afines. Bulletin of Hispanic Studies, 581, pp. 441-464. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2004): When lexemes become allomorphs: on the genesis of suppletion. Folia Linguistica, 381, pp. 227-256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2006): Accommodating synonymy. How some Italo-Romance verbs react to lexical and morphological borrowings, in: Tosi, A. & A.-L. Lepschy (eds.): Rethinking languages in contact: The case of Italian. Legenda, Oxford, pp. 87-98.Google Scholar
Maiden, M. & C. Robustelli (2007): A reference grammar of modern Italian. (2nd ed.). Hodder, London.Google Scholar
Mărgărit, I. (2000): Probleme de etimologie dialectală. Univers Enciclopedic, Bucharest.Google Scholar
Mel’čuk, I. (1976): On suppletion. Linguistics, 1701, pp. 45–90.Google Scholar
Meyer-Lübke, W. (1935): Romanisches Etymologisches Wörterbuch. Winter, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
OLD = Glare, P. (ed.) (2012): Oxford Latin Dictionary. (2nd ed.). OUP, Oxford.
Papahagi, P. (1900): Românii din Meglen. Bucharest.Google Scholar
. (1902): Meglenoromânii, studiu etnografico-filologic I-II. Bucharest.Google Scholar
Papahagi, T. (1974): Dicționarul dialectului aromân general și etimologic. Editura Academiei Republicii Socialiste România, Bucharest.Google Scholar
Rothe, W. (1957): Einführung in die historische Laut- und Formenlehre des Rumänischen. Niemeyer, Halle.Google Scholar
Rudes, B. (1980): On the nature of verbal suppletion. Linguistics, 181, pp. 655-676. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sala, M. (2005): Introducere în etimologia limbii române. Editura Academiei, Bucharest.Google Scholar
. (2006): Aventurile unor cuvinte românești. I. Univers Enciclopedic, Bucharest.Google Scholar
Saramandu, N. (2005): Atlasul lingvistic român pe regiuni: sinteză. Editura Academiei Române, Bucharest.Google Scholar
Stolz, T., Otsuka, O., Urdze, A. and Van der Auwera, J. (eds.) (2012): Irregularity in Morphology (and beyond). Berlin: Akademik Verlag. DOI logo
Stump, G. (2006): Heteroclisis and paradigm linkage. Language, 821, pp. 279-322. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tiktin, H. (1903-1925): Rumänisch-deutsches Wörterbuch. Staatsdruckerei, Bucharest.Google Scholar
Ullmann, S. (1962): Semantics. An introduction to the science of meaning. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Weigand, G. (1892): Vlacho-Meglen. Eine ethnographisch-philologische Untersuchung. Barth, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Hippisley, Andrew
2023. Suppletion. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Morphology, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Bach, Xavier
2022. Overlapping suppletion and periphrasis: On HAVE, BE, and GO in Gallo-Romance. Word Structure 15:2 ► pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Kim, Ronald I.
2019. Suppletive Stem Distribution: A Diachronic Perspective. Transactions of the Philological Society 117:3 ► pp. 455 ff. DOI logo
Nurmio, Silva
2017. The development and typology of number suppletion in adjectives. Diachronica 34:2 ► pp. 127 ff. DOI logo
NAGANO, AKIKO & MASAHARU SHIMADA
2014. Morphological theory and orthography:Kanjias a representation of lexemes. Journal of Linguistics 50:2 ► pp. 323 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.