Article published in:
Register Studies
Vol. 1:1 (2019) ► pp. 168198
References
Atkinson, D.
(1992) The evolution of medical research writing from 1735 to 1985: The case of the Edinburgh Medical Journal . Applied Linguistics, 13(4), 337–374. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1996) The philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675–1975: A sociohistorical discourse analysis. Language in Society, 25(3), 333–371. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baffy, M.
(2017) Shifting frames to construct a Legal English class. English for Academic Purposes, 251, 58–70. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Banks, D.
(2008) The development of scientific writing: Linguistic features and historical context. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Banset, E., & Parsons, G.
(1989) Communications failure in Hyatt Regency disaster. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering, 115(3), 273–288. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barber, C.
(1962) Some measurable characteristics of modern scientific prose. In F. Behre (Ed.), Contributions to English syntax and philology (pp. 21–43). Gothenborg: Almquist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Beer, D., & McMurrey, D.
(2014) A guide to writing as an engineer, 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Bhatia, V.
(1993) Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Bhatia, V., & Bremner, S.
(2012) English for business communication. Language Teaching, 45(4), 410–445. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D.
(1986) Spoken and written textual dimensions in English: Resolving the contradictory findings. Language 62(2), 384–414. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1988) Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1995) Dimensions of register variation: A cross-linguistic comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Register as a predictor of linguistic variation. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 8(1), 9–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Connor, U., & Upton, T.
(2007) Discourse on the move: Using corpus analysis to describe discourse structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., & Conrad, S.
(2009) Register, genre, style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
in press). Register, genre, style, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Cortes, V.
(2004)  If you look at…: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistic, 25(3), 371–405. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., & Egbert, J.
(2016) Register variation on the searchable web. Journal of English Linguistics, 44(2), 95–137. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., & Finegan, E.
(1989) Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect. Text, 9(1), 93–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2001) Diachronic relations among speech-based and written registers in English. In S. Conrad & D. Biber (Eds.), Variation in English: Multi-dimensional studies (pp. 66–83). Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar
Biber, D., & Gray, B.
(2010) Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(1), 2–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Gray, B., & Poonpon, K.
(2011) Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development? TESOL Quarterly, 45(1), 5–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E.
(1999) The Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Cao, Y., & Xiao, R.
(2013) A multi-dimensional contrastive study of English abstracts by native and non-native writers. Corpora, 8(2), 209–234. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Charles, M.
(2006) Phraseological patterns in reporting clauses used in citation: A corpus-based study of theses in two disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 25(3), 310–331. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Charles, M., & Pecorari, D.
(2016) Introducing English for academic purposes. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chen, S., Boyajian, D., & Inyang, H.
(2011) SLSE damage detection technique for foundation strengthening using plates. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 29(3), 237–248. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Y., & Baker, P.
(2010) Lexical bundles in L1 and L2 academic writing. Language Learning & Technology, 14(2), 30–49.Google Scholar
Cheng, W., Greaves, C., & Warren, M.
(2008) A corpus-driven study of discourse intonation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Conrad, S.
(2015) Register variation. In D. Biber & R. Reppen (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of English corpus linguistics (pp. 309–329). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017) A comparison of practitioner and student writing in civil engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(2), 191–217. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2018) The use of passives and impersonal style in civil engineering writing. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 32(1), 38–76. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Conrad, S., & Biber, D.
(2001) Multi-dimensional methodology and the dimensions of register variation in English. In S. Conrad & D. Biber (Eds.), Variation in English: Multi-dimensional studies (pp. 13–42). Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar
Conrad, S. & Biber, D.
(2009) Real grammar: A corpus-based approach to English. Harlow: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
Conrad, S., Kitch, W., Pfeiffer, T., Smith, T., & Tocco, J.
(2015) Students writing for professional practice: A model for collaboration among faculty, practitioners and writing specialists. Proceedings of the 2015 American Society for Engineering Education Conference, Seattle, Washington. https://​peer​.asee​.org​/24769 Crossref
Conrad, S., Lamb, K., & Pfeiffer, T.
(2018) Where grammar, content, and professional practice meet: The case of the passive voice. Proceedings of the 2018 American Society for Engineering Education Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT. https://​peer​.asee​.org​/31240 Crossref
Cortes, V.
(2004) Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: Examples from history and biology. English for Specific Purposes, 23(4), 397–423. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) The purpose of this study is to: Connecting lexical bundles and moves in research article introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12(1), 33–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Couture, B.
(1992) Categorizing professional discourse: Engineering, administrative, and technical/professional writing. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 6(1), 5–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coxhead, A.
(2000) A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 213–238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Csomay, E., & Prades, A.
(2018) Academic vocabulary in ESL student papers: A corpus-based study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 331, 100–118. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ding, D.
(2002) The passive voice and social values in science. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 32(2), 137–154.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, S., Humphrey, S., Mahboob, A., & Martin, J.
(2016) Genre pedagogy in higher education. London: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Egbert, J.
(2014) Student perceptions of stylistic variation in introductory university textbooks. Linguistics and Education, 251, 64–77. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Publication type and discipline variation in published academic writing: Investigating statistical interaction in corpus data. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 20(1), 1–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
English for Specific Purposes: An international research journal
Ferguson, C.
(1983) Sports announcer talk: Syntactic aspects of register variation. Language in Society, 12(2), 153–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fouché, I., van Dyk, T., & Butler, G.
(2017) An “enlightening course that empowers first years”?: A holistic assessment of the impact of a first-year academic literacy course. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 271, 14–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Friginal, E., Li, M., & Weigle, S.
(2014) Revisiting multiple profiles of learner compositions: A comparison of highly rated NS and NNS essays. Journal of Second Language Writing, 231, 1–14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Friginal, E., & Mustafa, S.
(2017) A comparison of U.S.-based and Iraqi English research article abstracts using corpora. English for Academic Purpose, 251, 45–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, D., & Davies, M.
(2014) A new academic vocabulary list. Applied Linguistics, 35(3), 305–327. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, S.
(2012) Genres and registers of student report writing: An SFL perspective on texts and practices. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(1), 52–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gollin-Kies, S., Hall, D., & Moore, S.
(2015) Language for specific purposes. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gray, B.
(2015) Linguistic variation in research articles: When discipline tells only part of the story. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gries, S.
(2008) Dispersions and adjusted frequencies in corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 13(4), 403–437. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gwiasda, K.
(1984) Of classrooms and contexts: Teaching engineers to write wrong. IEEE Transactions on Education, E-27, 148–150. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M.
(1993) Some grammatical problems in scientific English. In M. Halliday & J. Martin (Eds.), Writing science (pp. 69–85). London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M., & Matthiessen, C.
(2014) An introduction to functional grammar, 3rd ed. London: Edward Arnold. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Handford, M.
(2010) The language of business meetings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, J., & Römer, U.
(2013) Revealing disciplinary variation in student writing: A multi-dimensional analysis of the Michigan Corpus of Upper-level Student Papers (MICUSP). Corpora, 8(2), 183–207. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hirvela, A.
(2013) ESP and reading. In B. Paltridge & S. Starfield (Eds.), The handbook of English for specific purposes (pp. 76–94). Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hunston, S.
(2013) Systemic functional linguistics, corpus linguistics, and the ideology of science. Text & Talk, 331, 617–640. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A.
(1987) English for specific purposes: A learning-centered approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K.
(2005) Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 71, 173–192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
John, P., Brooks, B., & Schriever, U.
(2017) Profiling maritime communication by non-native speakers: A quantitative comparison between the baseline and standard marine communication phraseology. English for Specific Purposes, 471, 1–14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kanoksilapatham, B.
(2007) Rhetorical moves in biochemistry research articles. In D. Biber, U. Connor, & T. Upton (Eds.), Discourse on the move (pp. 73–103). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Knuttson, O., Blåsjö, M., Hållsten, S., Karlström, P.
(2012) Identifying different registers of digital literacy in virtual learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(4), 237–246. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koester, A.
(2006) Investigating workplace discourse. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, D.
(2001) Genres, registers, text types, domains, and styles: Clarifying the concepts and navigating a path through the BNC jungle. Language Learning & Technology, 5(3), 37–72.Google Scholar
Lee, J., & Casal, J.
(2014) Metadiscourse in results and discussion chapters: A cross-linguistic analysis of English and Spanish thesis writers in engineering. System, 461, 39–54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lessard-Clouston, M.
(2010) Theology lectures as lexical environments: A case study of technical vocabulary use. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(4), 308–321. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lillis, T., & Curry, M.
(2006) Professional academic writing by multilingual scholars. Written Communication, 23(1), 3–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matthiessen, C.
(2019) Register in systemic functional linguistics. Register Studies, 1(1), 10–14 (this issue). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mauranen, A.
(2011) English as a lingua franca of the academic world. In D. Belcher, A. Johns, & B. Paltridge (Eds.), New directions in English for specific purposes research (pp. 143–173). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
McGrath, L.
(2016) Self-mentions in anthropology and history research articles: Variation between and within disciplines. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 211, 86–98. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miller, C.
(1984) Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70(2), 151–167. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D., & Biber, D.
(2015) Evaluating reliability in quantitative vocabulary studies: The influence of corpus design and composition. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 20(1), 30–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mudraya, O.
(2006) Engineering English: A lexical frequency instructional model. English for Specific Purposes, 25(2), 235–256. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Myers, G.
(2010) The discourse of blogs and wikis. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Nature
(2017, March). Fake news: Science journalism can be evidence-based and compelling but still get it wrong [Editorial]. Nature, 5431 (7644) 1501.Google Scholar
Nelson, M.
(2006) Semantic associations in Business English: A corpus-based analysis. English for Specific Purposes, 25(2), 217–234. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nesi, H., & Gardner, S.
(2012) Genres across the disciplines: Student writing in higher education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Northcott, J.
(2013) Legal English. In B. Paltridge & S. Starfield (Eds.), The handbook of English for specific purposes (pp. 214–226). Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Paltridge, B., & Starfield, S.
(Eds.) (2013) The handbook of English for Specific Purposes. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Parfitt, M. & Parfitt, E.
(2007) Failures education: The key to better engineering design. Structure Magazine, January 2007, 10–12.Google Scholar
Parkinson, J.
(2013) English for science and technology. In B. Paltridge & S. Starfield (Eds.), The handbook of English for specific purposes (pp. 155–173). Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Parkinson, J., & Musgrave, J.
(2014) Development of noun phrase complexity in the writing of English for Academic Purposes students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 141, 48–59. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pessoa, S., Miller, R., & Kaufer, D.
(2014) Students’ challenges and development in the transition to academic writing at an English-medium university in Qatar. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 52(2), 127–156. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reave, L.
(2004) Technical communication instruction in engineering schools. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 18(4), 452–490. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Research Centre for Professional Communication in English
Römer, U., & O’Donnell, M.
(2011) From student hard drive to web corpus (part 1): The design, compilation and genre classification of the Michigan Corpus of Upper-level Student Papers (MICUSP). Corpora, 6(2), 159–77. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sageev, P., & Romanowski, C.
(2001) A message from recent engineering graduates in the workplace: Results of a survey on technical communication skills. Journal of Engineering Education, 90(4), 685–693. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sales, H.
(2006) Professional communication practices in engineering. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spector, T.
(1994) Writing a scientific manuscript: Highlights for success. Journal of Chemical Education, 71(1), 47–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Staples, S.
(2016) Identifying linguistic features of medical interactions: A register analysis. In L. Pickering, E. Friginal & S. Staples (Eds.), Talking at work: Corpus-based explorations of workplace discourse (pp. 179–208). London: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swales, J.
(1990) Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tardy, C.
(2011) ESP and multi-method approaches to genre analysis. In D. Belcher, A. Johns & B. Paltridge (Eds.), New directions in English for specific purposes research (pp. 143–173). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, S., Tucker, R., & Kelly, W.
(1998) Critical communication variables. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 124(1), 58–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, P., Hunston, S., Murakami, A., & Vajn, D.
(2017) Multi-dimensional analysis, text constellations, and interdisciplinary discourse. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 22(2), 153–186. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, S., Morton, T., & O’Keeffe, A.
(2011) Analysing university spoken interaction: A CL/CA approach. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 16(3), 325–345. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, H.
(1998) Communication and community: The pragmatics of ESP. English for Specific Purposes, 17(1), 3–14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wingate, U.
(2015) Academic literacy and student diversity: The case for inclusive practice. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, J.
(2009) How technical communication textbooks fail engineering students. Technical Communication Quarterly, 18(4), 351–375. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Woodrow, L.
(2017) Introducing course design in English for specific purposes. Abingdon: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Full-text

Register in English for Academic Purposes and English for Specific Purposes
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Jeaco, Stephen
2021. Exploring register with The Prime Machine . Register Studies 3:2  pp. 279 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.