On negative concord in Egyptian and Moroccan Arabic
Hamid Ouali | University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee and Middlebury College
The aim of this paper is threefold: First, we provide a descriptive account of the facts of negative concord (nc) in both Egyptian and Moroccan Arabic, showing how the two dialects are similar, and how they differ in this regard. Second, we discuss previous analyses of nc and how they fare in accounting for the nc facts in both Arabic dialects, pointing out challenges posed to each approach. Finally, we propose an analysis that treats nc as an instance of syntactic agreement between the negative head and the negative concord item, along the lines suggested in Zeijlstra (2008), but where the parametric variation between Egyptian and Moroccan Arabic lies in the lexical properties of the negative concord items of each dialect, rather than in the negative markers themselves, and where conditions of economy on syntactic derivations are appealed to account for the observed nc patterns.
References (33)
References
Aoun, J., Benmamoun, E., & Choueiri, L. (2010).
The syntax of Arabic
. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Baker, M. (2008).
The Syntax of Agreement and Concord
. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Benmamoun, E. (1997). Licensing of negative polarity items in Moroccan Arabic.
Natural Language and Linguistic Theory
, 15, 263–287.
Benmamoun, E. (2000).
The feature structure of functional categories: A comparative study of Arabic dialects
. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Benmamoun, E. (2006). Licensing configurations: The puzzle of head negative polarity items.
Linguistic Inquiry
, 37, 141–149.
Chomsky, N. (1991). Some Notes on the Economy of Derivation and Representation. In R. Freidin (Ed.)
Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar
. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. Also re-published as Chapter 2 in Chomsky (1995).
Chomsky, N. (1993). A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory. In K. Hale & S. J. Keyser (Eds.)
The View from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honour of Sylvain Bromberger
. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1–52. Also re-published as Chapter 3 in Chomsky (1995).
Chomsky, N. (1995).
The Minimalist Program
. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (2000). Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework. In M. Roger, D. Michaels, and J. Uriagereka (Eds.).
Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik
(pp. 89–156). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (2001). Derivation by Phase. In M. Kenstowicz (Ed.),
Ken Hale: A life in language
(pp. 1–52). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Fassi Fehri, A. (1993).
Issues in the Structure of Arabic Clauses and Words
. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Haegeman, L. (1995).
The syntax of negation. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 75
. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haegeman, L., and Zanuttini, R. (1996). Negative Concord in West Flemish. In A. Belletti and L. Rizzi (Eds.)
Parameters and Functional Heads. Essays in Comparative Syntax
(pp. 117–179).Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Herburger, E. (2001). Negative Concord Revisited.
Natural Language Semantics
9, 289–333.
Gelderen, E. van. (2011).
The Linguistic Cycle: Language Change and the Language Faculty
. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Giannakidou, A. (2011). Negative and positive polarity items: Variation, licensing, and compositionality. In C. Maienborn, K. von Heusinger, and P. Portner (Eds.)
Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning
, (pp. 1660–1712). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Higginbotham, J., and May, M. (1981). Questions, quantifiers and crossing.
The Linguistic Review
1, 41–80.
Hoyt, F. (2005). Negative concord in two dialects of Arabic. Ms., University of Texas, Austin.
Hoyt, F. (2010).
Negative Concord in Levantine Arabic
. PhD Dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
Kuno, M. (2007).
Focusing on negative concord and negative polarity: Variations and relations
. Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University.
Ladusaw, W. (1992). Expressing negation. In
Proceedings of SALT II
, C. Barker and D. Dowty (Eds.), (pp. 237–259). Cornell, NY: Cornell Linguistic Circle.
Laka, I. (1990).
Negation in Syntax: on the Nature of Functional Categories and Projections
. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Penka, D. (2011).
Negative Indefinites
. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Soltan, U. (2007).
On Formal Feature Licensing in Minimalism: Aspects of Standard Arabic Morphosyntax
. Ph.D dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park.
Soltan, U. (this volume). On the Distribution and Licensing of Polarity-Sensitive Items in Egyptian Arabic: The Cases of ?ayy and walaa. In S. Farwaneh and H. Ouali (Eds.)
Perspectives of Arabic Linguistics
Vol. 25. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Soltan, U. (to appear). Splitting Neg: The Morphosyntax of Sentential Negation in Cairene Egyptian Arabic Revisited. In K. Froud and R. Khamis-Dakwar (Eds.)
Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics
Vol. 26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
van der Wouden, T. (1997).
Negative contexts: Collocation, polarity and multiple negation
. London: Routledge.
Watanabe, A. (2004). The genesis of negative concord: Syntax and morphology of negative doubling.
Linguistic Inquiry
, 35, 559–612.
Zanuttini, R. (1991).
Syntactic Properties of Sentential Negation
. Ph.D Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Zeijlstra, H. (2004).
Sentential Negation and Negative Concord
. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Zeijlstra, H. (2008). Negative concord is syntactic agreement. Ms., University of Amsterdam.
Zwarts, F. (1996). A hierarchy of negative expressions. In H. Wansing (Ed.)
Negation: A Notion in Focus
, (pp. 169–194). Berlin: De Gruyter.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Mahmoud, Reda Ali Hassan
2016.
Grammatical and Pragmatic Aspects of Polarity in Arabic Seditious Utterances.
Journal of Universal Language 17:2
► pp. 21 ff.
ALBIRINI, ABDULKAFI & ELABBAS BENMAMOUN
2015.
Factors affecting the retention of sentential negation in heritage Egyptian Arabic.
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 18:3
► pp. 470 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.