Cover not available
Part of
Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XXIV–XXV: Papers from the annual symposia on Arabic Linguistics. Texas, 2010 and Arizona, 2011
Edited by Samira Farwaneh and Hamid Ouali
[Studies in Arabic Linguistics 1] 2014
► pp. 207–228

Modes of interrogatives entail modes of sluicing

Evidence from Emirati Arabic

| United Arab Emirates University
Recent studies of sluicing as an elliptical construction are divided with respect to how the bare wh-word in the sluicing clause (i.e. wh-sluice) manifests its expected grammatical properties on the one hand, and receives its semantic interpretation on the other hand. In this paper, I investigate Emirati Arabic (ea) sluicing and conclude that ea sluicing should be analyzed as tp-deletion from an underlying wh-construction, at the level of pf. This supports the pf-deletion approach (Ross 1969, Merchant 2001) and argues against the lf-copying approach (Chung, Ladusaw and McCloskey 1995, 2006, Chung 2005) to sluicing. Moreover, I demonstrate that the ea sluicing source is predetermined by the type of wh-construction in ea. ea allows two types of wh-constructions, namely wh-fronting and wh-clefts. Both wh-strategies, while morphosyntactically distinct, are fully attested in the formation of sluicing. This paper also claims that the typology of wh-constructions has a direct impact on the typology of sluicing.
Published online: 29 August 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sal.1.13leu
References (40)
References
Aoun, J., Benmamoun, E., and Choueiri, L. (2010). The syntax of Arabic . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Aoun, J., and Choueiri, L. (1996). Resumption and last resort . Unpublished manuscript, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
(1999). Modes of Interrogation. In E. Benmamoun (Ed.), Perspectives on Arabic linguistics XII (pp. 7–26). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aoun, J., and Li, A. (2003). Essays on the representational and derivational nature of grammar: The diversity of wh-constructions . Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bayer, Y. (1996). Directionality and logical form . Kluwer: Dordrecht. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benmamoun, E. (2000). The feature structure of functional categories . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boeckx, C. (2003). Islands and chains . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brustad, K. E. (2000). The syntax of spoken Arabic . Washington, D.C: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1973). Conditions on transformations. In S. R. Anderson and P. Kiparsky (Eds.), A festschrift for Morris Halle (pp. 232–286). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
(1995). The minimalist program . Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Choueiri, L. (2002). Re-visiting relatives: issues in the syntax of resumptive restrictive relatives . Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Chung, S. (2005). Sluicing and the lexicon: the point of no return. Proceedings of the 31st meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society , University of California, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Chung, S., Ladusaw, W., and McCloskey, J. (1995). Sluicing and logical form. Natural Language Semantics , 3, 239–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). Sluicing revisited. Paper presented at the annual meeting of Linguistic Society of America . Albuquerque.
Craenenbroeck, J van. (2010). The syntax of ellipsis: evidence from Dutch dialects . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Doron, E. (1982). On the syntax and semantics of resumptive pronouns. Texas Linguistics Forum , 19, 1–48.Google Scholar
Eid, M. (1983). The copula functions of pronouns. Lingua , 59, 197–207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erteshik-Shir, N. (1977). On the nature of island constraints . Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Erteschik-Shir, N. (1992). Resumptive pronouns in islands. In H. Goodluck and M. Rochemont (Eds.), Island constraints (pp. 89–108). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fukaya, T. (2003). Island (in)sensitivity in Japanese sluicing and stripping. Paper presented at 22nd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL-22) . San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
(2007). Stripping and sluicing in Japanese and some implications . Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Fukaya, T., and Hoji, H. (1999). Stripping and sluicing in Japanese and some implications. Proceedings of the 18th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL-18) . Cascadilla Press: Somerville, Mass. 145–158.Google Scholar
Hiraiwa, K., and Ishihara, S. (2002). Missing links: cleft, sluicing, and ‘no da’ construction in Japanese. In T. Ionin, H. Ko, and A. Nevins (Eds.), MIT working papers in linguistics 43 (pp. 35–54). MIT, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Holes, C. (1990). Gulf Arabic . London: Routledge.Google Scholar
McCloskey, J. (1990). Resumptive pronouns, A’-binding and levels of representation in Irish. In R. Hendrick (Ed.), The syntax and the modern Celtic Languages (pp. 199–248). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Merchant, J. (1998). Pseudosluicing: elliptical clefts in English and Japanese. In A. Alexiadou et al. (Eds.), ZAS working papers in linguistics ( volume 10 ) (pp. 88–112). Berlin: Zentrum fur Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
(2001). The syntax of silence . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, C., Nevins, A. I., and Vicente, L. (2009). Cleaving the interactions between sluicing and P-stranding. In D. Torck, and W. L. Itzels (Eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 2006 (pp. 75–198). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ross, J. R. (1967). Constraints on variables in syntax . Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
(1969). Guess who? In R. Binnick, A. Davison, G. Green, and J. Morgan (Eds.), Proceedings of 5th Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS 5 ) (pp. 252–286). Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Sato, Y. (2011). P-stranding under sluicing and repair by ellipsis: why is Indonesian (not) special? Journal of East Asian Linguistics , 20, 339–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sells, P. (1984). Syntax and semantics of resumptive pronouns . Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Sharvit, Y. (1999). Resumptive pronouns in relative clauses.  Natural Language and Linguistic Theory , 17, 587–612. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shlonsky, U. (1992). Resumptive pronouns as a last resort. Linguistic Inquiry , 23, 443–468.Google Scholar
(2002). Constituent questions in Palestinian Arabic. In J. Ouhalla, and U. Shlonsky (Eds.), Themes in Arabic and Hebrew syntax (pp. 137–155). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Takahashi, D. (1994). Sluicing in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 3 , 263–300.Google Scholar
Toosarvandani, M. (2008). Wh-movement and the syntax of sluicing. Journal of Linguistics , 44, 677–722.Google Scholar
Wahba, W. (1984). Wh-constructions in Egyptian Arabic . Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Urbana.Google Scholar
Watson, J. (1993). A syntax of San?ani Arabic . Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar