Cover not available
Part of
Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XXXIII: Papers selected from the Annual Symposium on Arabic Linguistics, Toronto, Canada, 2019
Edited by Abdel-Khalig Ali and Atiqa Hachimi
[Studies in Arabic Linguistics 11] 2022
► pp. 169–198

Tracing the acquisition of definiteness in Emirati Arabic

| United Arab Emirates University
This paper presents initial results on the acquisition trajectory of the definite determiner əl- in Emirati Arabic. It is shown that Emirati children follow a maturational process sporadically producing target-like fully inflected DPs early on, but dropping determiners frequently in obligatory syntactic contexts, including prepositional phrases, after demonstratives, with generic nouns and certain proper names. In addition, children add determiners in contexts where they are illicit in the target language, including new referents and possessive structures. We argue for an intact syntactic D-system in early stages of acquisition but that the DP projection is underspecified, due to pragmatic factors, i.e. the children have not yet fully mastered the complex interplay between syntactic environment and pragmatic/discourse knowledge.
Keywords: L1 acquisition, definiteness, Emirati Arabic, syntax-pragmatics interface, Interface Hypothesis
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Definiteness, specificity, and their realization in EA
    • 2.1The concepts of definiteness and specificity
    • 2.2Realization of definiteness and specificity in EA
  • 3.Theories of acquisition of definiteness
    • 3.1Article omissions and errors
    • 3.2Interface conditions
  • 4.Child data
    • 4.1Determiner omission
    • 4.2Illicit determiner insertion
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 6 December 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sal.11.08nte
References (67)
References
Albirini, A. (2017). The acquisition of Arabic as a first language. In E. Benmamoun & R. Bassiouney (eds.) The Routledge handbook of Arabic linguistics (p.p. 227–248). London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ambridge, B., Rowland, C. F., Theakston, A. L. & Kidd, E. J. (2015). The ubiquity of frequency effects in first language acquisition. Journal of Child Language, 42(2), 239–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Armon-Lotem, S. & Avram, I. . (2005). The autonomous contribution of syntax and pragmatic: The acquisition of the Hebrew definite article. In A.-M. Di Sciullo and R. Delmonte (Eds.) Universal grammar and the external systems (p.p. 169–182). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Avrutin, S. & Brun, D. . (2001). The expression of specificity in a language without determiners: Evidence from child Russian. In A. H.-J. Do, L. Domínguez, and A. Johansen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th Annual Boston University conference on language development (p.p.70–81). Cascadilla Press, Somerville, MA.Google Scholar
Azaz, M. (2016). Crosslinguistic effects in L2 acquisition: The case of Arabic determiner phrase. Al-’Arabiyya, 49, 1–24.Google Scholar
Brustad, K. (2000). The syntax of spoken Arabic: A comprehensive study of Moroccan, Egyptian, Syrian, and Kuwaiti dialects. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Ceolin, A. (2018). Explaining cross-linguistic differences in article omission through an acquisition model. In Bertolini, A. B. & Kaplan, M. G., (Eds.), Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Boston University conference on language development (p.p. 100–113). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Chierchia, G., M. T. Guasti, & A. Gualmini. (1999). Nouns and articles in child grammar and the syntax/semantics map. Manuscript, University of Milano-Bicocca and Maryland. Paper presented at Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition (GALA), Potsdam.
Chierchia, G. (1998). Partitives, reference to kinds and semantic variation, in Proceedings of SALT VII, Cornell University, New York.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., S. Eisenbeiss & Vainikka, A. . (1994). The seeds of structure. In T. Hoekstra and B. D. Schwartz (Eds.) Language acquisition studies in Generative Grammar, 85, John Benjamins, 85–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., Eisenbeiss, S. & Penke, M. (1996). Lexical learning in early syntactic development. In H. Clahsen (Ed.), Generative perspectives on language acquisition: Empirical findings, theoretical considerations and crosslinguistic comparisons, (p.p. 129–159). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crisma, P. & Tomasutti, E. . (2000). Phonological effects on article omission in the acquisition of Italian. In S. C. Howell, S. A. Fish, and T. Keith-Lucas (eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Boston University conference on language development (p.p.220–231). Cascadilla Press, Somerville.Google Scholar
Eisenbeiss, S. (2000). The acquisition of the determiner phrase in German child language. In: M.-A. Friedemann and L. Rizzi (eds.), The acquisition of syntax: studies in comparative developmental linguistics (p.p. 26–62). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Fassi Fehri, A. (1993). Issues in the structure of Arabic clauses and words. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004). Nominal classes, reference, and functional parameters, with particular reference to Arabic. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 4. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fodor, Janet Dean & Sag, Ivan A. . (1982). Referential and quantificational indefinites. Linguistics and Philosophy 5, 355–398. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerken, L. & McIntosh, B. (1993). Interplay of function morphemes and prosody in early language. Developmental Psychology, 29: 448–457. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guasti, M. T., Gavarro, A. , J. De Lange & Caprin, C. . (2008). Article omission across child languages. Language Acquisition 15(2), 89–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gundel, J. K., Ntelitheos, D. & Kowalsky, M. (2007). Children’s use of referring expressions: Some implications for Theory of Mind. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 48, 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N. & Fitch, W. T. (2002). The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, how did it evolve? Science, 298, 1569–1579. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heim, I. (1982). The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts doctoral dissertation.
(1991) Articles and Definiteness. In: A. V. Stechow and D. Wunderlich, (eds.), Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research (pp. 487–535). De Gruyter, Berlin.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, T. & Hyams, N. (1996). Missing heads in child language. In: C. Koster & F. Wijnen (eds), Proceedings of GALA 1995. Groningen: Center for language and cognition.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, T., Hyams, N. & Becker, M. (1999). The role of the specifier and finiteness in early grammar, in D. Adger, S. Pintzuk, B. Plunkett & G. Tsoulas (eds.) Specifiers: Minimalist approaches (pp. 251–270). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hyams, Nina. (1996). The underspecification of functional categories in early grammar. In H. Clahsen and R. Hawkins (eds.), Generative approaches to first and second language acquisition (p.p.91–127), John Benjamins, Amsterdam. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ionin, T. & Wexler, H. Ko K. . (2004). Article semantics in L2 acquisition: The role of specificity. Language Acquisition, 12, 1, 3–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kamp, Hans. (1981). A theory of truth and semantic representation. In Jeroen Groenendijk, Theo M. V. Janssen & Martin Stokhof (eds.), Formal methods in the study of language (p.p. 277–322). Amsterdam: Amsterdam Center.Google Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1979). A functional approach to child language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1985). Language and cognitive processes from a developmental perspective, Language and Cognitive Processes 1, 61–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Khattab, G. & Al-Tamimi, J. (2015). The acquisition of gemination in Lebanese Arabic children. Proceedings of ICPHS 2015.Google Scholar
Kupisch, T. (2007). Testing the effects of frequency on the rate of learning: Determiner use in early French, German and Italian. In Proceedings of the workshop on input frequencies in acquisition, (p.p. 83–113). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lleó, C. & K. Demuth. (1999). Prosodic constraints on the emergence of grammatical morphemes: Crosslinguistic evidence from Germanic and Romance languages. In Proceedings of BUCLD 23, vol. 2, Cascadilla Press Somerville, MA, 407–418.Google Scholar
MacNamara, J. (1982). Names for things. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (1991). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk. Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Maratsos, M. (1974). Preschool children’s use of definite and indefinite articles, Child Development 45, 446–455. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1976). The use of definite and indefinite reference in young children. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Marinis, T. (2003). The acquisition of the DP in Modern Greek. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. F. & Chapman, R. S. (1993). Systematic analysis of language transcripts (SALT, v3.0) [Computer software]. Madison, WI: Language analysis laboratory, Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
Müller, N. (1994). Gender and number agreement within DP. In J. M. Meisel (ed.), Bilingual first language acquisition (p.p.53–88). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ntelitheos, D. (2019). A Corpus study of the distribution of possessives in child and adult Emirati Arabic. In P. Guijarro-Fuentes and C. Suárez-Gómez (eds.) Language acquisition and development, Proceedings of Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition 2017 (p.p 289–306). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Ntelitheos, D. & Idrissi, A. (2017). Language growth in child Emirati Arabic. In H. Ouali (ed.) Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XXIX: Papers from the annual symposium on Arabic linguistics, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 2015 [Studies in Arabic Linguistics 5], (p.p. 229–248). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Omar, M. (1973). The acquisition of Egyptian Arabic as a native language. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Penner, Z. (1993). The earliest stage in the acquisition of the nominal phrase in Bernese Swiss German: Syntactic bootstrapping and the architecture of language learning. Arbeitspapier 30, Universität Bern, Institut für Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
Penner, Z. & Weissenborn, J. . (1996). Strong continuity, parameter setting and the trigger hierarchy: On the acquisition of the DP in Bernese Swiss German and High German. In: H. Clahsen (ed.) Generative perspectives on language acquisition. Empirical findings, theoretical considerations & cross-linguistic comparisons (p.p.161–200). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Leroux, A.-T. & Roeper, T. . (1999). Scope and the structure of bare nominals: Evidence from child language. Linguistics 37, 927–960. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pine, J. M., & Martindale, H. (1996). Syntactic categories in the speech of young children: The case of the determiner. Journal of Child Language, 23, 369–395. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pine, J. M., Freudenthal, D. & Krajewski, G. (2013). Do young children have adult-like syntactic categories? Zipf’s law and the case of the determiner. Cognition 127, 3, 345–360. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poeppel, D. & Wexler, K. . (1993). The Full Competence Hypothesis of clause structure in early German, Language 69, 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Radford, A. (1990). Syntactic theory and the acquisition of English syntax: the nature of early child grammars of English. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
(1996). Towards a structure-building model of acquisition. In H. Clahsen (ed). Generative perspectives on language acquisition (p.p. 43–89). Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, L. (1994). Some notes on linguistic theory and language development: The case of root infinitives. Language Acquisition 3, 371–393. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schaeffer, J. (1997). Direct object scrambling in Dutch and Italian child language. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles, UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics.
(2000). The acquisition of direct object scrambling and clitic placement: Syntax and pragmatics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schafer, J. & Villiers, J. de . (2000). Imagining articles: What a and the can tell us about the emergence of DP. Proceedings of the 24th annual Boston University conference on language development (p.p. 609–620).Google Scholar
Schaeffer, J. & Matthewson, L. . (2005). Grammar and pragmatics in the acquisition of article systems. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 23, 53–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A. (2011). Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1(1), 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, Antonella & Serratrice, Ludovica . (2009). Internal and external interfaces in bilingual language development: Beyond structural overlap. International Journal of Bilingualism 13:2, 195–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A., Serratrice, L. , Filiaci, F. & Baldo, M. . (2009). Discourse conditions on subject pronoun realization: Testing the linguistic intuitions of older bilingual children. Lingua 119, 460–477. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. (1998). Introduction: A cognitive-functional perspective on language structure. In M. Tomasello (ed.) The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure, (p.p. vii–xxiii). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tsimpli, I. M. & Sorace, A. . (2006). Differentiating interfaces: L2 performance in syntax-semantics and syntax-discourse phenomena. In D. Bamman, T. Magnitskaia & C. Zaller (eds.). Proceedings of the 30th annual Boston University conference on language development [BUCLD 30], (p.p. 653–664). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Valian, V., Solt, S., & Stewart, J. (2009). Abstract categories or limited scope formulae? The case of children’s determiners. Journal of Child Language, 36, 743–778. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wexler, K. & Poeppel, D. . (1993). The full competence hypothesis of clause structure in early German. Language, 69, 1: 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, C. (2010). Who’s afraid of George Kingsley Zipf? Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Zehler, A. M. & Brewer, W. F. . (1982). Sequence and principles in article system use: An examination of a, the, and null acquisition, Child Development 53, 1268–1274.Google Scholar