Tracing the acquisition of definiteness in Emirati Arabic
This paper presents initial results on the acquisition trajectory of the definite determiner əl- in Emirati Arabic. It is shown that Emirati children follow a maturational process sporadically producing target-like fully inflected DPs early on, but dropping determiners frequently in obligatory syntactic contexts, including prepositional phrases, after demonstratives, with generic nouns and certain proper names. In addition, children add determiners in contexts where they are illicit in the target language, including new referents and possessive structures. We argue for an intact syntactic D-system in early stages of acquisition but that the DP projection is underspecified, due to pragmatic factors, i.e. the children have not yet fully mastered the complex interplay between syntactic environment and pragmatic/discourse knowledge.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Definiteness, specificity, and their realization in EA
- 2.1The concepts of definiteness and specificity
- 2.2Realization of definiteness and specificity in EA
- 3.Theories of acquisition of definiteness
- 3.1Article omissions and errors
- 3.2Interface conditions
- 4.Child data
- 4.1Determiner omission
- 4.2Illicit determiner insertion
- 5.Discussion
- 6.Conclusion
-
Notes
-
References
References (67)
References
Albirini, A. (2017). The acquisition of Arabic as a first language. In E. Benmamoun & R. Bassiouney (eds.) The Routledge handbook of Arabic linguistics (p.p. 227–248). London: Routledge.
Ambridge, B., Rowland, C. F., Theakston, A. L. & Kidd, E. J. (2015). The ubiquity of frequency effects in first language acquisition. Journal of Child Language,
42
(
2
), 239–73.
Avrutin, S. & Brun, D. . (2001). The expression of specificity in a language without determiners: Evidence from child Russian. In A. H.-J. Do, L. Domínguez, and A. Johansen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th Annual Boston University conference on language development (p.p.70–81). Cascadilla Press, Somerville, MA.
Azaz, M. (2016). Crosslinguistic effects in L2 acquisition: The case of Arabic determiner phrase. Al-’Arabiyya,
49
, 1–24.
Brustad, K. (2000). The syntax of spoken Arabic: A comprehensive study of Moroccan, Egyptian, Syrian, and Kuwaiti dialects. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
Ceolin, A. (2018). Explaining cross-linguistic differences in article omission through an acquisition model. In Bertolini, A. B. & Kaplan, M. G., (Eds.), Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Boston University conference on language development (p.p. 100–113). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Chierchia, G., M. T. Guasti, & A. Gualmini. (1999). Nouns and articles in child grammar and the syntax/semantics map. Manuscript, University of Milano-Bicocca and Maryland. Paper presented at Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition (GALA), Potsdam.
Chierchia, G. (1998). Partitives, reference to kinds and semantic variation, in Proceedings of SALT VII, Cornell University, New York.
Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Clahsen, H., S. Eisenbeiss & Vainikka, A. . (1994). The seeds of structure. In T. Hoekstra and B. D. Schwartz (Eds.) Language acquisition studies in Generative Grammar, 85, John Benjamins, 85–118.
Clahsen, H., Eisenbeiss, S. & Penke, M. (1996). Lexical learning in early syntactic development. In H. Clahsen (Ed.), Generative perspectives on language acquisition: Empirical findings, theoretical considerations and crosslinguistic comparisons, (p.p. 129–159). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Crisma, P. & Tomasutti, E. . (2000). Phonological effects on article omission in the acquisition of Italian. In S. C. Howell, S. A. Fish, and T. Keith-Lucas (eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Boston University conference on language development (p.p.220–231). Cascadilla Press, Somerville.
Eisenbeiss, S. (2000). The acquisition of the determiner phrase in German child language. In: M.-A. Friedemann and L. Rizzi (eds.), The acquisition of syntax: studies in comparative developmental linguistics (p.p. 26–62). London: Longman.
Fassi Fehri, A. (1993). Issues in the structure of Arabic clauses and words. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Fodor, Janet Dean & Sag, Ivan A. . (1982). Referential and quantificational indefinites. Linguistics and Philosophy
5
, 355–398.
Gerken, L. & McIntosh, B. (1993). Interplay of function morphemes and prosody in early language. Developmental Psychology,
29
: 448–457.
Guasti, M. T., Gavarro, A. , J. De Lange & Caprin, C. . (2008). Article omission across child languages. Language Acquisition
15
(
2
), 89–119.
Gundel, J. K., Ntelitheos, D. & Kowalsky, M. (2007). Children’s use of referring expressions: Some implications for Theory of Mind. ZAS Papers in Linguistics
48
, 1–21.
Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N. & Fitch, W. T. (2002). The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, how did it evolve? Science,
298
, 1569–1579.
Heim, I. (1982). The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts doctoral dissertation.
Heim, I. (1991) Articles and Definiteness. In: A. V. Stechow and D. Wunderlich, (eds.), Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research (pp. 487–535). De Gruyter, Berlin.
Hoekstra, T. & Hyams, N. (1996). Missing heads in child language. In: C. Koster & F. Wijnen (eds), Proceedings of GALA 1995. Groningen: Center for language and cognition.
Hoekstra, T., Hyams, N. & Becker, M. (1999). The role of the specifier and finiteness in early grammar, in D. Adger, S. Pintzuk, B. Plunkett & G. Tsoulas (eds.) Specifiers: Minimalist approaches (pp. 251–270). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ionin, T. & Wexler, H. Ko K. . (2004). Article semantics in L2 acquisition: The role of specificity. Language Acquisition,
12
, 1, 3–69.
Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Kamp, Hans. (1981). A theory of truth and semantic representation. In Jeroen Groenendijk, Theo M. V. Janssen & Martin Stokhof (eds.), Formal methods in the study of language (p.p. 277–322). Amsterdam: Amsterdam Center.
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1979). A functional approach to child language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1985). Language and cognitive processes from a developmental perspective, Language and Cognitive Processes
1
, 61–85.
Khattab, G. & Al-Tamimi, J. (2015). The acquisition of gemination in Lebanese Arabic children. Proceedings of ICPHS 2015.
Kupisch, T. (2007). Testing the effects of frequency on the rate of learning: Determiner use in early French, German and Italian. In Proceedings of the workshop on input frequencies in acquisition, (p.p. 83–113).
Lleó, C. & K. Demuth. (1999). Prosodic constraints on the emergence of grammatical morphemes: Crosslinguistic evidence from Germanic and Romance languages. In Proceedings of BUCLD 23, vol. 2, Cascadilla Press Somerville, MA, 407–418.
MacNamara, J. (1982). Names for things. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
MacWhinney, B. (1991). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk. Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
Maratsos, M. (1974). Preschool children’s use of definite and indefinite articles, Child Development
45
, 446–455.
Maratsos, M. (1976). The use of definite and indefinite reference in young children. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Miller, J. F. & Chapman, R. S. (1993). Systematic analysis of language transcripts (SALT, v3.0) [Computer software]. Madison, WI: Language analysis laboratory, Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Ntelitheos, D. (2019). A Corpus study of the distribution of possessives in child and adult Emirati Arabic. In P. Guijarro-Fuentes and C. Suárez-Gómez (eds.) Language acquisition and development, Proceedings of Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition 2017 (p.p 289–306). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Ntelitheos, D. & Idrissi, A. (2017). Language growth in child Emirati Arabic. In H. Ouali (ed.) Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XXIX: Papers from the annual symposium on Arabic linguistics, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 2015 [Studies in Arabic Linguistics 5], (p.p. 229–248). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Omar, M. (1973). The acquisition of Egyptian Arabic as a native language. The Hague: Mouton.
Penner, Z. (1993). The earliest stage in the acquisition of the nominal phrase in Bernese Swiss German: Syntactic bootstrapping and the architecture of language learning. Arbeitspapier 30, Universität Bern, Institut für Sprachwissenschaft.
Pérez-Leroux, A.-T. & Roeper, T. . (1999). Scope and the structure of bare nominals: Evidence from child language. Linguistics
37
, 927–960.
Pine, J. M., & Martindale, H. (1996). Syntactic categories in the speech of young children: The case of the determiner. Journal of Child Language,
23
, 369–395.
Pine, J. M., Freudenthal, D. & Krajewski, G. (2013). Do young children have adult-like syntactic categories? Zipf’s law and the case of the determiner. Cognition
127
, 3, 345–360.
Poeppel, D. & Wexler, K. . (1993). The Full Competence Hypothesis of clause structure in early German, Language
69
, 1–33.
Radford, A. (1990). Syntactic theory and the acquisition of English syntax: the nature of early child grammars of English. Blackwell, Oxford
Rizzi, L. (1994). Some notes on linguistic theory and language development: The case of root infinitives. Language Acquisition
3
, 371–393.
Schaeffer, J. (1997). Direct object scrambling in Dutch and Italian child language. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles, UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics.
Schafer, J. & Villiers, J. de . (2000). Imagining articles: What a and the can tell us about the emergence of DP. Proceedings of the 24th annual Boston University conference on language development (p.p. 609–620).
Schaeffer, J. & Matthewson, L. . (2005). Grammar and pragmatics in the acquisition of article systems. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory,
23
, 53–101.
Sorace, Antonella & Serratrice, Ludovica . (2009). Internal and external interfaces in bilingual language development: Beyond structural overlap. International Journal of Bilingualism
13
:
2
, 195–210.
Sorace, A., Serratrice, L. , Filiaci, F. & Baldo, M. . (2009). Discourse conditions on subject pronoun realization: Testing the linguistic intuitions of older bilingual children. Lingua
119
, 460–477.
Tomasello, M. (1998). Introduction: A cognitive-functional perspective on language structure. In M. Tomasello (ed.) The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure, (p.p. vii–xxiii). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard University Press.
Tsimpli, I. M. & Sorace, A. . (2006). Differentiating interfaces: L2 performance in syntax-semantics and syntax-discourse phenomena. In D. Bamman, T. Magnitskaia & C. Zaller (eds.). Proceedings of the 30th annual Boston University conference on language development [BUCLD 30], (p.p. 653–664). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Valian, V., Solt, S., & Stewart, J. (2009). Abstract categories or limited scope formulae? The case of children’s determiners. Journal of Child Language, 36, 743–778.
Wexler, K. & Poeppel, D. . (1993). The full competence hypothesis of clause structure in early German. Language,
69
,
1
: 1–33.
Yang, C. (2010). Who’s afraid of George Kingsley Zipf? Unpublished manuscript.
Zehler, A. M. & Brewer, W. F. . (1982). Sequence and principles in article system use: An examination of a, the, and null acquisition, Child Development 53, 1268–1274.