Cover not available
Part of
Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XXVI: Papers from the annual symposium on Arabic Linguistics. New York, 2012
Edited by Reem Khamis-Dakwar and Karen Froud
[Studies in Arabic Linguistics 2] 2014
► pp. 285–302

Neurocognitive modeling of the two language varieties in Arabic Diglossia

Diglossia is one distinctive feature of Arabic and other languages, such as Swiss-German (Ferguson 1959). Neurocognitive studies aiming to understand the neural mechanisms of diglossia in general, and Arabic diglossia in particular, are sparse. This paper provides a framework for discussing neurophysiological approaches to questions concerning the representation and processing of languages exhibiting diglossia in the brains of native speakers, as well as understanding the potential contribution of such approaches for applied linguistics and teaching Arabic as a first or second language. The first section introduces electroencephalography (EEG), and some event-related potentials (ERPs) known to correlate with aspects of language processing. The second section reviews neurophysiological studies of language representation and processing in Arabic diglossia to date. Finally, we discuss some potential contributions of neurophysiological studies to the fields of Arabic linguistics, applied linguistics and teaching Arabic. The review points to separateness of the two lexicons in Arabic diglossia and highlights the need for further neurophysoplogiocal and behavioral studies to revisit the suggested model of mental representation in diglossia.
Published online: 30 October 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sal.2.20kha
References (41)
References
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2007).Childhood apraxia of speech[Technical report]. Available from [URL]
Badawi, E. (1973). Mustawayaat al-‘arabiyya al-mu`aasira fi Misr [Levels of contemporary Arabic in Egypt]. Cairo: Dar Al-Ma’aarifGoogle Scholar
Boudelaa, S., Pulvermüller, F., Hauk, O., Shtyrov, Y., & Marslen-Wilson, W.D. (2010). Arabic morphology in the neural language system: A mismatch negativity study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 998–1010. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheour, M., Ceponiene, R., Lehtokoski, A., Luuk, A., Allik, J., Alho, K., & Näätänen, R. (1998). Development of language-specific phoneme representations in the infant brain. Nature Neuroscience, 1, 351–353. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Conboy, B.T., Rivera-Gaxiola, M., Silva-Pereyra, J.F., & Kuhl, P.K. (2008). Event-related potential studies of early language processing at the phoneme, word, and sentence levels. In A.D. Friederici, & G. Thierry (Eds.), Early language development: bridging brain and behavior. Trends in language acquisition research series, (Vol. 5, pp. 23–64). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Dupoux, E., & Gout, A. (2000). Electrophysiological correlates of phonological processing: A cross-linguistic study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 635–647. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dehaene-Lambertz, G. (1997). electrophysiological correlates of categorical phoneme perception in adults. Neuroprt, 8, 919–924.Google Scholar
Eid, M. (1990). Arabic linguistics: The current scene. In M. Eid (Ed.), Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics I (pp. 3–37). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, C. (1959). Diglossia. Word, 15, 325–340.Google Scholar
Friedrici, A.D. (2002). Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 78–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friederici, A.D., Hahne, A., & Saddy, D. (2002). Distinct neurophysiological patterns reflecting aspects of syntactic complexity and syntactic repair. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31, 45–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Froud, K., & Khamis-Dakwar, R. (2012). Mismatch negativity responses in childhood apraxia of speech. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 21, 302–312. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hahne, A., & Friedrici, A.D. (1999). Electrophysiological evidence for two steps in syntactic analysis: Early automatic and late controlled processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 194–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hary, B. (1996). The language continuum in Arabic multiglossia. In: A. Elgibali (Ed.), Understanding Arabic: Essays in contemporary Arabic Linguistics in honor of El-Said Badawi (pp. 69–90). Cairo: American University in Cairo Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, G., Swainson, R., Mullin, A., Cunnington, R., & Jackson, S. (2004). ERP correlates of receptive language-switching tasks. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 223–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackson, G.M., Swainson, R., Cunnington, R., & Jackson, S.R. (2001). ERP correlates of executive control during repeated language switching. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4, 169–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kappenman, E.S., & Luck, S.J. (2012). ERP components: the ups and downs of brainwave recordings. In S.J. Luck, & E.S. Kappenman (Eds.), Oxford handbook of event-related potential components (pp.1–30). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Khamis-Dakwar, R., & Froud, K. (2007). Lexical processing in two language varieties: An event related brain potential study of Arabic native speakers. In M. Mughazy (Eds.), Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XX. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Khamis-Dakwar, R., Froud, K., & Boudelaa, S. (2009). Lexical processing in diglossic codeswitching between Modern Standard Arabic and Palestinian Colloquial Arabic: An event-related brain potential study of Arabic native speakers. Poster presented at Cognitive Neuroscience Symposium . San Francisco, March 2009.
Khamis-Dakwar, R., Froud, K., & Gordon, P. (2012). Acquiring diglossia: Mutual influences of formal and colloquial Arabic on children’s grammaticality judgments. Journal of Child Language, 39, 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Khamis-Dakwar, R., & Makhoul, B. (2014). Arabic diglossia and its implications for language learning disability assessment. In E. Saeigh-Haddad, & M. Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic Literacy: Insights and Perspectives (pp. 279–303). Netherlands. New York, NY: Springer.
Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S.A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207, 203–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kutas, C., Van Petten, C., & Kluender, R. (2006). Psycholinguistics electrified II: 1994–2005. In M. Traxler, & M.A. Gernsbacher (Eds), Handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd edn, pp. 659–724). New York: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lau, E.F., Phillips, C., & Poeppel, D. (2008). A cortical network for semantics: (De)constructing the N400. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9, 920–933. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luck, S.J. (2005). An introduction to the event-related potential technique. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar
Luck, S.J., & Kappenman, E.S. (Eds.). (2012). Oxford handbook of event-related potential components. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Moreno, E., Federmeier, K., & Kutas, M. (2002). Switching languages, switching palabras (words): An electrophysiological study of codeswitching. Brain and Language, 80, 188–207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moreno, E.M., & Kutas, M. (2005). Processing semantic anomalies in two languages: An electrophysiological exploration in both languages of Spanish-English bilinguals. Cognitive Brain Research, 22, 205–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Näätänen, R. (1999). The perception of speech sounds by the human brain as reflected by the mismatch negativity (MMN) and its magnetic equivalent (MMNm). Psychophysiology, 38, 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Näätänen, R., Lehtokoski, A., Lennes, M., Cheour, M., Houtilainen, M., Iivonen, A., Vainio, A., Alku, P., Ilmoneiemi, R.J., Luuk, A., Allik, J., Sinkkonen, J., & Alho, K. (1997). Language specific phoneme representations revealed by electric and magnetic brain responses. Nature, 385, 432–434. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Näätänen, R., Kujala, T., & Winkler, I. (2010). Auditory processing that leads to conscious perception: A unique window to central auditory processing opened by the mismatch negativity and related responses. Psychophysiology, 48(1): 4–22 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Näätänen, R. & Kreegipuu, K. (2012). The Mismatch Negativity (MMN). In S.J Luck, & E.S. Kappenman (Eds.), Oxford handbook of event-related potential components (pp. 143–158). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Ojimas, S., Nakata, H., & Kakigi, R. (2005). An ERP study of second language learning after childhood: Effects of profeciency. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 121–1228.Google Scholar
Osterhout, L., Holcomb, P.J., & Swinney, D.A. (1994). Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: Evidence of the application of verb information during parsing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 786–803. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. Reissued 2002. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pulvermuller, F., Kujala, T., Shtyrov, Y., Simola, J., & Tiitinen, H. (2001). Memory traces for words as revealed by the Mismatch Negativity (MMN). NeuroImage, 14, 607–616. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rugg, M.D. (1997). Cognitive neuroscience. Hove, East Sussex: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Sharma, A., & Dorman, M.F. (2000). Neurophysiological correlates of cross-language phonetic perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 2697–2703. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simon, G., Bernard, C., Lalonde, R., & Rebai, M. (2006). Orthographic transparency and grapheme–phoneme conversion: An ERP study in Arabic and French readers. Brain Research, 1104, 141–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swaab, T.Y., Ledoux, K., Christine, C., & Boudewyn, M. (2012). Language-related ERP components. In S.J. Luck, & E.S. Kappenman, (Eds.), Oxford handbook of event-related potential components (pp. 397–440). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Weber-Fox, C., & Neville, H. (1996). Maturational constraints on functional specializations for language processing: ERP and behavioral evidence in bilingual speakers. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 231–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Leon Guerrero, Sibylla & Gigi Luk
2023. Chapter 2. From the spatial ego to cognitive control. In Understanding Language and Cognition through Bilingualism [Studies in Bilingualism, 64], ► pp. 12 ff. DOI logo
Taha, Haitham, Hanada Taha & Huda Shaheen
2023. The Effect of the Linguistic Status of Text Previewing in Arabic on the Reading Comprehension Outcomes Among Second and Sixth Grade Native Arabs Readers: A Cross-Sectional View. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 52:6 ► pp. 2661 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.