Cover not available
Part of
Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XXXII: Papers selected from the Annual Symposium on Arabic Linguistics, Tempe, Arizona, 2018
Edited by Elly van Gelderen
[Studies in Arabic Linguistics 9] 2020
► pp. 11–34

Stress assignment and foot construction in a Southwestern Saudi Arabic dialect

| King Khalid University
This paper presents and analyzes some aspects of the stress system of a Southwestern Saudi Arabic dialect (SSA). In an Optimality-Theoretic framework, the analysis focuses on issues related to how feet are constructed in this dialect as well as how stress is assigned in the language under the effect of geminates and long vowels. In the presented analysis, I argue that the stress pattern of SSA is a moraic trochee binary stress system in which ternary effects arise as a result of Weak Local Parsing that is responsible for the pre-antepenultimate stress in the language (Hayes, 1995). I also argue that the analysis of stress assignment under the effect of geminates and long vowels is prominence-based in such a way that stress is assigned to the heaviest syllable in the word in a scalar quantity-sensitivity stress system that gives priority to syllables that are inherently bimoraic. The analysis seeks a unified account that interacts with other aspects of the phonology in the investigated dialect such as high vowel deletion and the quality of word-final vowels.
Keywords: optimality theory, moraic theory, metrical theory, quantity, prominence
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Stress pattern
    • 2.1Syllable quantity
    • 2.2Stress shift
  • 3.Analysis
    • 3.1Word-final vowels
    • 3.2High vowel syncope
    • 3.3Geminates and long vowels
    • 3.4Summary
  • 4.Optimality-theoretic analysis
    • 4.1Foot construction and stress assignment
    • 4.2High vowel syncope
    • 4.3Geminate and long vowel effects
    • 4.4Summary
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Published online: 28 August 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sal.9.01ala
References (27)
References
Alahmari, Musa M. (2018). An optimality-theoretic analysis of some aspects of the phonology and morphology in a southwestern Saudi Arabian Arabic dialect. Ph.D. Dissertation. Indiana University Bloomington.Google Scholar
Bamakhramah, Majdi A. (2009). Syllable structure in Arabic varieties with a focus on superheavy syllables. Ph.D. Dissertation. Indiana University Bloomington.Google Scholar
Davis, Stuart. (1989). Stress, syllable weight hierarchies, and moraic phonology. Eastern States Conference on Linguistics, 6, 84–92.Google Scholar
. (2011a). Quantity. In John Goldsmith, Jason Riggle and Alan Yu (eds.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory, 2nd edition (pp. 103–140). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2011b). Geminates. In Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth Hume and Keren Rice (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Phonology (V. 2, pp. 873–897). Malden, MA & Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davis, Stuart and Isao Ueda. (2002). Mora augmentation processes in Japanese. Journal of Japanese Linguistics, 18,1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2006). Prosodic vs. morphological mora augmentation. Lexicon Forum, 2, 121–143.Google Scholar
Elenbaas, Nine. (1999). A unified account of binary and ternary stress. Ph.D. Dissertation. Utrecht University.Google Scholar
Elenbaas, Nine and René Kager. (1999). Ternary rhythm and the *LAPSE constraint. Phonology, 16, 273–330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Matthew. (2002). A factorial typology of quantity-insensitive stress. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 20, 491–552. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Bruce. (1989). Compensatory lengthening in moraic phonology. Linguistic Inquiry, 20, 253–306.Google Scholar
. (1995). Metrical stress theory: Principles and case studies. University of Chicago Press: Chicago.Google Scholar
Kabrah, Rawiah S. (2004). Opacity and transparency in the phonology of Makkan Arabic: A stratal optimality-theoretical approach. Ph.D. Dissertation. Boston University.Google Scholar
Kager, René. (1994). Ternary rhythm in alignment theory. Ms, Utrecht University. Available as ROA-35 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive.Google Scholar
. (1999). Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2001). Rhythmic directionality by positional licensing. Available as ROA-514 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive.Google Scholar
. (2007). Feet and metrical stress. In De Lacy, Paul (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology (pp. 195–227). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2009). Stress. Encyclopedia of Arabic Language and Linguistics (IV, pp. 344–353). Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.Google Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael. (1980). Notes on Cairene Arabic syncope. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, 10, 39–53.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John. (1979). On stress and syllabification. Linguistic Inquiry, 10, 3, 443–465.Google Scholar
. (2005). The length of stem-final vowels in Colloquial Arabic. In Mohammad T. Alhawary, and Elabbas Benmamoun (eds.), Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 267: Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics (pp. 1–26). Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John and Alan Prince. (1993). Generalized alignment. In G. E. Booij and J. van Marle, eds. (pp. 79–153). Yearbook of Morphology. Dordrecht, Kluwer.Google Scholar
Morén, Bruce T. (1999). Distinctiveness, coercion and sonority: A unified theory of weight. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Maryland at College Park.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan and Paul Smolensky. (1993/2004). Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Walker, Rachel. (1997). Mongolian stress, licensing, and factorial Typology. Ms., University of California at Santa Cruz. Available as ROA-172 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive.Google Scholar
Watson, Janet. (2002). The phonology and morphology of Arabic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. (2011). Word stress in Arabic. In Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth Hume and Keren Rice (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Phonology (V. 5, pp. 2990–3018). Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar