Chapter published in:
Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XXXII: Papers selected from the Annual Symposium on Arabic Linguistics, Tempe, Arizona, 2018
Edited by Elly van Gelderen
[Studies in Arabic Linguistics 9] 2020
► pp. 135–152

Sluicing and sprouting in Jordanian Arabic

| University of North Georgia
This paper investigates elliptical constructions sluicing and sprouting in Jordanian Arabic (JA), and describes the structure of the sluice clause, which depends on the type of wh-expressions on the one hand, and whether the preposition at the sluice is pied-piped on the other hand. The central research question is how such constructions are derived: via ordinary sluicing or via pseudosluicing. Cases where a preposition is pied-piped with the wh-word in the remnant require an ordinary sluicing analysis; pied-piped PPs are not otherwise found in wh-clefts in JA. However, in cases where a preposition is not pied-piped, the only possible underlying derivation is pseudosluicing, with a wh-cleft structure. I also discuss sprouting, in which the wh-word has no corresponding overt correlate in the antecedent clause.
Keywords: Jordanian Arabic, preposition stranding generalization, pseudo-sluicing sprouting, sluicing
Published online: 28 August 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/sal.9.06buk
References

References

Algryani, A.
(2010) “Preposition Stranding in Libyan Arabic Sluicing.” Newcastle working papers in Linguistics, 16, 1–22.Google Scholar
(2011a) “VP ellipsis in Libyan Arabic.” Newcastle working papers in Linguistics, 17, 1–22.Google Scholar
(2011b) “Sluicing in Libyan Arabic.” Newcastle working papers in Linguistics, 18, 1–23.Google Scholar
(2013) On the Syntax of Stripping in Libyan Arabic. International Journal of Linguistics, 5(5), 156–173. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Almeida, Diogo A. de A. & Yoshida, M.
(2007) A problem for the Preposition Stranding Generalization. Linguistics Inquiry: 28(2), 349–362. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aoun, J., Benmamoun, E. & Choueiri, L.
(2010) The syntax of Arabic. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.
(1998) Minimalist Inquiries: the Framework. Ms., MIT.Google Scholar
Chung, S.
(2005) ‘Sluicing and the Lexicon: The point of no return. In R. T. Cover, & Y. Kim (Eds.), BLS 31: General Session and Parasesion on Prosodic Variation and Change (pp. 73–91). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics.Google Scholar
Chung, S., Ladusaw, W., & McCloskey, J.
(2011) Sluicing (:) Between structure and inference. In R. Gutiérrez-Bravo, L. Mikkelsen, & E. Potsdam (Eds.), Representing Language: Essays in Honor of Justin Aissen (pp. 31–50). Santa Cruz, CA: Linguistics Research Center.Google Scholar
Craenenbroeck, J. V.
(2010) The syntax of ellipsis: Evidence from Dutch dialects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Culicover, P., & Jackendoff, R.
(2005) Simpler Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eid, M.
(1983) The Copula Function of Pronouns. Lingua 59(2–3), 197–207. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ginzburg, J., & Sag, I.
(2000) Interrogative investigations: The form, meaning, and use of English interrogatives. Stanford, California CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Leung, T.
(2014a) The preposition stranding generalization and conditions on sluicing: Evidence from Emirati Arabic. Linguistic Inquiry, 45(2), 332–340. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014b) Modes of interrogatives entail modes of sluicing-evidence from Emirati Arabic. In S. Farawaneh & H. Ouali (Eds.), Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XXIV-XXV (pp. 207–228). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Merchant, J.
(1998) ‘Pseudosluicing’: Elliptical clefts in Japanese and English. In A. Alexiadou, et al. (Eds.), ZAS working paper in linguistics (volume 10) (pp. 88–112). Berlin: Zentrum fur Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
(2001) The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, C., & Nevins, A., & Vicente, L.
(2009) Cleaving the interactions between sluicing and P-stranding. In D. Torck & W. Leo Wetzels (Eds.), Roman Languages and Linguistic Theory (pp. 175–198). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ross, J.
(1969) Guess who? In R. Binnick, A. Davidson, G. Green, and J. Morgan (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS5) (pp. 252–286). Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Sato, Y.
(2011) P-stranding under sluicing and repair by ellipsis: Why is Indonesian (not) special? Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 20(4), 339–382. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stjepanović, S.
(2008) P-stranding under sluicing in a non P-stranding language? Linguistic Inquiry, 39(1), 179–190. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shlonsky, U.
(1997) Clause structure and word order in Hebrew and Arabic: An essay in comparative Semitic syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Toosarvandani, M.
(2008) Wh-movement and the syntax of sluicing. Journal of Linguistics, 44(3), 677–722. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wahba, W.
(1984) Wh-constructions in Egyptian Arabic. Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL.Google Scholar
Wang, C.
(2006) Sluicing and resumption. In E. Elfner, & M. Walkow (Eds.), Proceedings of the 37th Annual meeting of the North-East Linguistic Society (pp. 239–252). Amherst: GLSA publications.Google Scholar