Cover not available
Article published In:
Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education
Vol. 3:2 (2018) ► pp.220–242

Acquisition of formulaic sequences in a study abroad context

| University of Delaware
Research (e.g., Wood, 2010a) suggests that study abroad (SA) and the use of formulaic language (FL), or sequences of words that tend to go together, aid L2 oral fluency. Nonetheless, there is conflicting evidence regarding whether quantity of L2 use abroad is a predictor of language outcomes. This article examines the acquisition of FL by US L2 learners of Spanish (n = 11) who studied abroad in Spain. The study measures the temporal fluency variables and the formula/run ratio of narrative retell tasks pre- and post-SA by L2 learners and native Spanish speakers. The findings indicate that regardless of program type and length, learners produce more FL post-SA, but they are still far from target-like usage. Moreover, participants’ mean length of run is directly related to the formula/run ratio. Lastly, an analysis of language use shows no direct relationship between L2 use abroad and oral fluency outcomes.
Keywords: formulaic language, formulaic sequences, oral fluency, L2 Spanish, study abroad, L2 use abroad
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Review of previous research
    • 2.1Formulaic language and L2 oral fluency
    • 2.2Acquisition of formulaic sequences and study abroad
  • 3.Method
    • 3.1Participants
    • 3.2Data collection and procedures
      • 3.2.1Narrative retell task
      • 3.2.2Bi-weekly language use survey
    • 3.3Data analysis
      • 3.3.1Oral fluency measures
    • 3.4Identifying formulaic sequences
      • 3.4.1Formula/run ratio
      • 3.4.2N-gram frequency and mutual information (MI)
    • 3.5Statistical analysis
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Pre- and post-SA oral fluency measures and formula/run ratio
    • 4.2L2 learners and NSs
    • 4.3Relationship among oral fluency measures
    • 4.4Relationship among oral fluency measures, FRR, and Spanish use
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 12 October 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sar.17009.qua
References (47)
References
Baker-Smemoe, W., Dewey, D., Bown, J., & Martinsen, R. (2014). Variables affecting L2 gains during study abroad. Foreign Language Annals, 47, (3) 464–486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barlow, M. (2004). Collocate 1.0 Locating collocations and terminology [Computer software]. Houston, TX: Athelstan.Google Scholar
Boers, F., Eyckmans, J., Kappel, J., Stengers, H., & Demecheleer, M. (2006). Formulaic sequences and perceived oral proficiency: Putting a Lexical Approach to the test. Language Teaching Research, 10(3), 245–261. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Conklin, K., & Schmitt, N. (2012). The processing of formulaic language. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 321, 45–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cuetos, F., Glez-Nosti, M., Barbón, A., & Brysbaert, M. (2011). SUBTLEX-ESP: Spanish word frequencies based on film subtitles. Psicológica, 321, 133–143.Google Scholar
De Jong, N. H., & Perfetti, C. A. (2011). Fluency training in the ESL classroom: An experimental study of fluency development and proceduralization. Language Learning, 61(2), 533–568. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Jong, N. H., & Wempe, T. (2009). Praat script to detect syllable nuclei and measure speech rate automatically. Behavior Research Methods, 41(2), 385–390. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M. (2007). Study abroad as foreign language practice. In R. M. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology (pp. 208–226). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ejzenberg, R. (2000). The juggling act of oral fluency: A psycho-sociolinguistic metaphor. In H. Riggenbach (Ed.), Perspectives on fluency (pp. 287–313). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2012). Formulaic language and second language acquisition: Zipf and the phrasal teddy bear. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 321, 17–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Cognitive and social aspects of learning from usage. In T. Cadierno & S. W. Eskildsen (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on second language learning (pp. 49–73). Boston: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Freed, B. F. (1995). What makes us think that students who study abroad become fluent? In B. F. Freed. (Ed.), Second language acquisition in a study abroad context (pp. 123–148). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Freed, B. F., Dewey, D., Segalowitz, N., & Halter, R. (2004). The Language Contact Profile. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(2), 349–356. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Freed, B. F., Segalowitz, N., & Dewey, D. P. (2004). Context of learning and second language and second language fluency in French: Comparing regular classroom, study abroad, and intensive domestic immersion programs. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(2), 275–301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Groom, N. (2009). Effects of L2 immersion on L2 collocational development. In A. Barfield and H. Gyllstad (Eds.), Researching collocations in another language (pp. 21–33). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hernández, T. A. (2010). The relationship among motivation, interaction, and the development of second language oral proficiency in a study-abroad context. Modern Language Journal, 94, (4) 600–617. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kinginger, C. (2009). Language learning and study abroad. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). Enhancing language learning in study abroad. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 311, 58–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lin, P. M. S. (2010). The phonology of formulaic sequences: A review. In D. Wood (Ed.), Perspectives on formulaic language: Acquisition and communication (pp. 174–193). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Mason, L., Powers, C., & Donnelly, S. (2015). The Boren Awards: A report of oral language proficiency gains during academic study abroad: A cumulative report over 15 years and 53 languages. Institute of International Education, (September), 1–25; Appendices A–D.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R., Tracy-Ventura, N., & McManus, K. (2017). Anglophone students abroad: Identity, social relationships, and language learning. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morley, J., & Truscott, S. (2006). Fluency development in advanced language learners. In T. Harden, A. Witte, & D. Köhler, (Eds.), The concept of progression in the teaching and learning of foreign languages (pp. 307–322). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Nattinger, J. R., & DeCarrico, J. S. (1992). Formulaic sequences and language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pawley, A., & Syder, F. H. (1983). Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In J. C. Richards & R. W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 191–226). New York, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
Sanz, C. (2016, April 10). SLA in study abroad contexts: A researcher-practitioner’s perspective. Address presented at American Association for Applied Linguistics, Orlando, FL.
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 111, 129–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, N., Dörnyei, Z., Adolphs, S., & Durow, V. (2004). Knowledge and acquisition of formulaic sequences: A longitudinal study. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), Formulaic sequences (pp. 55–87). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching vocabulary. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). Formulaic language in academic study [Powerpoint slides]. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Segalowitz, N. (2010). Cognitive bases of second language fluency. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Segalowitz, N., & Freed, B. F. (2004). Context, contact, and cognition in oral fluency acquisition: Learning Spanish in at home and study abroad contexts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(2), 173–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Segalowitz, N., Freed, B., Collentine, J., Lafford, B., Lazar, N., & Díaz-Campos, M. (2004). A comparison of Spanish second language acquisition in two different learning contexts: Study abroad and the domestic classroom. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 101, 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Serrano, R., Stengers, H., & Housen, A. (2015). Acquisition of formulaic sequences in intensive and regular EFL programmes. Language Teaching Research, 19, (1) 89–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stengers, H. F., Boers, F., Eyckmans, J., & Housen, A. (2010). Does chunking foster chunk uptake? In S. De Knop, F. Boers & T. De Rycker (Eds.), Fostering language teaching efficiency through cognitive linguistics (pp. 99–117). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Towell, R., Hawkins, R., & Bazergui, N. (1996). The development of fluency in advanced learners of French. Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 84–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trentman, E. (2013). Imagined communities and language learning during study abroad: Arabic learners in Egypt. Foreign Language Annals, 46(4), 545–564. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Valls-Ferrer, M., & Mora, J. C. (2014). L2 fluency development in formal instruction and study abroad. In C. Pérez Vidal (Ed.) Language acquisition in study abroad and formal instruction contexts (pp. 111–136). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Weinert, R. (2010). Formulaicity and usage-based language: Linguistic, psycholinguistic and acquisitional manifestations. In D. Wood (Ed.), Perspectives on formulaic language: Acquisition and communication (pp. 1–22). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Wood, D. (2007). Mastering the English formula: Fluency development of Japanese learners in a study abroad context. JALT Journal, 29(2), 209–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010a). Formulaic language and second language speech fluency: Background, evidence, and classroom applications. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
(Ed.). (2010b). Perspectives on formulaic language. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
(2015). Fundamentals of formulaic language: An introduction. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Wood, D., & Namba, K. (2013, April). Focused instruction of formulaic language: Use and awareness in a Japanese university class. Paper presented at the Asian Conference on Language Learning. <[URL]>
Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008). Formulaic language: Pushing the boundaries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wray, A., & Perkins, M. R. (2000). The functions of formulaic language: An integrated model. Language and Communication, 201, 1–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Güvendir, Emre, Judith Borràs & Meltem Acar Güvendir
2024. The effects of study abroad on L2 vocabulary development. Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education 9:1 ► pp. 26 ff. DOI logo
Tajeddin, Zia & Neda Khanlarzadeh
2024. The Role of Learner Variables in Pragmatic Development during Study Abroad: A Systematic Review. Languages 9:3 ► pp. 96 ff. DOI logo
Pérez-Vidal, Carmen & Cristina Sanz
2023. Chapter 1. Research methods in study abroad. In Methods in Study Abroad Research [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 4], ► pp. 9 ff. DOI logo
Tang, Xiaofei, Naoko Taguchi & Shuai Li
2021. Social contact and speech act strategies in a Chinese study abroad context. Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education 6:1 ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.