Chapter published in:
Corpus-based Approaches to Register Variation
Edited by Elena Seoane and Douglas Biber
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 103] 2021
► pp. 111142
References
Baayen, R. Harald
2008Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics using R. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Balasubramanian, Chandrika
2009Register Variation in Indian English [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 37]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bao, Zhiming & Hong, Huaqing
2006Diglossia and register variation in Singapore English. World Englishes 25(1): 105–114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bates, Douglas, Mächler, Martin & Bolker, Benjamin M.
2013lme4: Linear Mixed-effects Models Using Eigen and S4 (R Package Version 1.1–7). http://​cran​.r​-project​.org​/package​=lme4> (26 May 2021).
Bates, Douglas, Mächler, Martin, Bolker, Benjamin M. & Walker, Steve
2015Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1): 1–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Behaghel, Otto
1909Beziehungen zwischen Umfang und Reihenfolge von Satzgliedern. Indogermanische Forschungen 25: 110–142.Google Scholar
Belsley, David A., Kuh, Edwin & Welsch, Roy E.
1980Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity. New York NY: John Wiley and Sons. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bernaisch, Tobias, Gries, Stefan T. & Mukherjee, Joybrato
2014The dative alternation in South Asian English(es): Modelling predictors and predicting prototypes. English World-Wide 35(1): 7–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas
1988Variation Across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1995Dimensions of Register Variation: A Cross-linguistic Comparison. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Register as a predictor of linguistic variation. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 8(1): 9–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Conrad, Susan
2012Register, Genre and Style. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Gray, Bethany
2013Being specific about historical change: The influence of sub-register. Journal of English Linguistics 41(2): 104–134. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Breiman, Leo
2001Random forests. Machine Learning 45: 5–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, Joan, Cueni, Anna, Nikitina, Tatiana & Baayen, R. Harald
2007Predicting the dative alternation. In Cognitive Foundations of Interpretation, Gerlof Boume, Irene Kraemer & Joost Zwarts (eds), 69–94. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Science.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan & Hay, Jennifer
2008Gradient grammar: An effect of animacy on the syntax of give in New Zealand and American English. Lingua 118(2): 245–259. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan
2006From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language 82(4): 711–733. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan & Hopper, Paul
2001Introduction to frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. In Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure [Typological Studies in Language 45], Joan Bybee & Paul Hopper (eds), 1–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Peter
1995The indirect object construction in English: An informational approach. Linguistics 33(1): 35–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Mark
2013Corpus of Global Web-Based English: 1.9 billion Words from Speakers in 20 Countries. http://​corpus​.byu​.edu​/glowbe/> (26 May 2021).
Davies, Mark & Fuchs, Robert
2015Expanding horizons in the study of World Englishes with the 1.9 billion word Global Web-Based English Corpus (GloWbE). English World-Wide 36(1): 1–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diwersy, Sascha, Evert, Stefan & Neumann, Stella
2014A weakly supervised multivariate approach to the study of language variation. In Aggregating Dialectology, Typology, and Register Analysis: Linguistic Variation in Text and Speech [Linguae & Litterae 28], Benedikt Szmrecsanyi & Bernhard Wälchli (eds), 174–204. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Finegan, Edward & Biber, Douglas
1994Register and social dialect variation: An integrated approach. In Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register, Douglas Biber & Edward Finegan (eds), 315–347. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Fox, John
2003Effect displays in R for generalised linear models. Journal of Statistical Software 8(15): 1–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fox, John & Weisberg, Sanford
2011An R Companion to Applied Regression, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage. http://​socserv​.socsci​.mcmaster​.ca​/jfox​/Books​/Companion> (26 May 2021).
Fuchs, Robert & Gut, Ulrike
2016Register variation in intensifier usage across Asian Englishes. In Discourse-pragmatic Variation and Change in English, Heike Pichler (ed.), 185–210. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garretson, Gregory, O’Connor, M. Catherine, Skarabela, Barbora & Hogan, Marjorie
2004Coding practices used in the project “Optimality Typology of Determiner Phrases”. Ms.Google Scholar
Gelman, Andrew
2008Scaling regression inputs by dividing by two standard deviations. Statistics in Medicine 27(15): 2865–2873. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grafmiller, Jason
2014Variation in English genitives across modality and genres. English Language and Linguistics 18(3): 471–496. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Greenbaum, Sidney
(ed.) 1996Comparing English Worldwide: The International Corpus of English. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan T.
2015The most under-used statistical method in corpus linguistics: Multi-level (and mixed-effects) models. Corpora 10(1): 95–125. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guy, Gregory R.
2005Letters to Language. Language 81(3): 561–563. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013The cognitive coherence of sociolects: How do speakers handle multiple sociolinguistic variables? Journal of Pragmatics 52: 63–71. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guy, Gregory R. & Hinskens, Frans
2016Linguistic coherence: Systems, repertoires and speech communities. Lingua 172–173: 1–9. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heller, Benedikt, Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt & Grafmiller, Jason
2017Stability and fluidity in syntactic variation world-wide: The genitive alternation across varieties of English. Journal of English Linguistics 45(1): 3–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hilbert, Michaela & Krug, Manfred
2012Progressives in Maltese English: A comparison with spoken and written text types of British and American English. In Mapping Unity and Diversity World-wide [Varieties of English around the World G43], Marianne Hundt & Ulrike Gut (eds), 103–136. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hinrichs, Lars & Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt
2007Recent changes in the function and frequency of Standard English genitive constructions: A multivariate analysis of tagged corpora. English Language and Linguistics 11(3): 437–474. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hosmer, David & Lemeshow, Stanley
2000Applied Logistic Regression. New York NY: Wiley. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hothorn, Torsten, Hornik, Kurt & Zeileis, Achim
2006Unbiased recursive partitioning: A conditional inference framework. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 15(3): 651–674. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hundt, Marianne & Mair, Christian
1999 “Agile” and “uptight” genres: The corpus-based approach to language change in progress. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 4(2): 221–242. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hundt, Marianne, Röthlisberger, Melanie & Seoane, Elena
2021Predicting voice alternation across academic Englishes. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory. 17(1): 189–222. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Janitza, Silke, Strobl, Carolin & Boulesteix, Anne-Laure
2013An AUC-based permutation variable importance measure for random forests. BMC Bioinformatics 14(119): 1–11. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koch, Peter & Oesterreicher, Wulf
1985Sprache der Nähe – Sprache der Distanz: Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit im Spannungsfeld von Sprachtheorie und Sprachgeschichte. Romanistisches Jahrbuch 36: 15–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William
1972Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia PA: University of Philadelphia Press.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth
1993English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lohmann, Arne
2011Help vs help to: A multifactorial, mixed-effects account of infinitive marker omission. English Language and Linguistics 15(3): 499–521. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Loureiro-Porto, Lucía
2017ICE vs. GloWbE: Big data and corpus compilation. World English 36(3): 448–470. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McDonough, Kim
2006Interaction and syntactic priming: English L2 speakers’ production of dative constructions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28(2): 179–207. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Menard, Scott
2010Logistic Regression: From Introductory to Advanced Concepts and Applications. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mesthrie, Rajend & Bhatt, Rakesh M.
2008World Englishes: The Study of New Linguistic Varieties. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, Stella
2012Applying register analysis to varieties of English. In Anglistentag 2011 Freiburg: Proceedings, Monika Fludernik & Benjamin Kohlmann (eds), 75–94. Trier: WVT.Google Scholar
2013Contrastive Register Variation: A Quantitative Approach to the Comparison of English and German. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, Stella & Fest, Jennifer
2016Cohesive devices across registers and varieties: The role of medium in English. In Variational Text Linguistics: Revisiting Register in English, Christoph Schubert & Christina Sanchez-Stockhammer (eds), 195–220. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oushiro, Livia
2016Social and structural constraints in lectal cohesion. Lingua 172–173: 113–130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pinheiro, José C. & Bates, Douglas M.
2000Mixed-effects Models in S and S-PLUS. New York NY: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team
2018R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://​www​.R​-project​.org/> (26 May 2021).
Röthlisberger, Melanie
2018aRegional Variation in Probabilistic Grammars: A Multifactorial Study of the English Dative Alternation. PhD dissertation, KU Leuven.Google Scholar
2018bThe dative dataset of World Englishes (Version v1) [Data set]. KU Leuven. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Röthlisberger, Melanie, Grafmiller, Jason & Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt
2017Cognitive indigenization effects in the English dative alternation. Cognitive Linguistics 28(4): 673–710. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schaub, Steffen
2016The influence of register on noun phrase complexity in varieties of English. In Variational Text Linguistics: Revisiting Register in English, Christoph Schubert & Christina Sanchez-Stockhammer (eds), 251–271. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schilk, Marco, Mukherjee, Joybrato, Nam, Christopher & Mukherjee, Sach
2013Complementation of ditransitive verbs in South Asian Englishes: A multifactorial analysis. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 9(2): 187–225. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W.
2007Postcolonial English: Varieties around the world. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schubert, Christoph
2016Introduction: Current trends in register research. In Variational Text Linguistics: Revisiting Register in English, Christoph Schubert & Christina Sanchez-Stockhammer (eds), 1–15. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scott-Phillips, Thomas C. & Kirby, Simon
2010Language evolution in the laboratory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14(9): 411–417. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Seoane, Elena
2006Changing styles: On the recent evolution of scientific British and American English. In Syntax, Style and Grammatical Norms: English from 1500–2000, Christiane Dalton-Puffer, Dieter Kastovsky, Nikolaus Ritt & Herbert Schendl (eds), 191–211. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Strobl, Carolin, Boulesteix, Anne-Laure, Kneib, Thomas, Augustin, Thomas & Zeileis, Achim
2008Conditional variable importance for random forests. BMC Bioinformatics 9(307). http://​www​.biomedcentral​.com​/1471​-2105​/9​/307> (26 May 2021) Crossref
Strobl, Carolin, Boulesteix, Anne-Laure, Zeileis, Achim & Hothorn, Torsten
2007Bias in random forest variable importance measures: Illustrations, sources and a solution. BMC Bioinformatics 8(25). http://​www​.biomedcentral​.com​/1471​-2105​/8​/25> (26 May 2021) Crossref
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt
2006Morphosyntactic Persistence in Spoken English [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 177]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017Variationist sociolinguistics and corpus-based variationist linguistics: Overlap and cross-pollination potential. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue Canadienne de Linguistique 42(4): 685–701. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2019Register in variationist linguistics. Register Studies 1(1): 76–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt, Grafmiller, Jason, Heller, Benedikt & Röthlisberger, Melanie
2016Around the world in three alternations: Modeling syntactic variation in varieties of English. English World-Wide 37(2): 109–137. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt, Grafmiller, Jason, Bresnan, Joan, Rosenbach, Anette, Tagliamonte, Sali A. & Todd, Simon
2017Spoken syntax in a comparative perspective: The dative and genitive alternation in varieties of English. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 2(1). 86: 1–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt, Grafmiller, Jason & Rosseel, Laura
2019Variation-based distance and similarity modeling: A case study in World Englishes. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 2. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A.
2012Variationist Sociolinguistics: Change, Observation, Interpretation. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. & Baayen, R. Harald
2012Models, forests and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice. Language Variation and Change 24(2): 135–178. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tamaredo, Iván, Röthlisberger, Melanie, Grafmiller, Jason & Heller, Benedikt
2019Probabilistic indigenization effects at the lexis-syntax interface. English Language and Linguistics. 24(2): 413–440 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Rooy, Bertus, Terblanche, Lize, Haase, Christoph & Schmied, Joseph
2010Register differentiation in East African English: A multidimensional study. English World-Wide 31(3): 311–349. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wälchli, Bernhard & Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt
2014Introduction: The text-feature-aggregation pipeline in variation studies. In Aggregating Dialectology, Typology, and Register Analysis: Linguistic Variation in Text and Speech [Linguae & Litterae 28], Benedikt Szmrecsanyi & Bernhard Wälchli (eds), 1–25. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wolk, Christoph, Bresnan, Joan, Rosenbach, Anette & Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt
2013Dative and genitive variability in Late Modern English: Exploring cross-constructional variation and change. Diachronica 30(3): 382–419. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Xiao, Richard
2009Multidimensional analysis and the study of World Englishes. World Englishes 28(4): 421–450. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zaenen, Annie, Carletta, Jean, Garretson, Gregory, Bresnan, Joan, Koontz-Garboden, Andrew, Nikitina, Tatiana, O’Connor, Mary Catherine & Wasow, Thomas
2004Animacy encoding in English: Why and how. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACL Workshop on Discourse Annotation, Barcelona, July 2004, Donna Byron & Bonnie Webber (eds), 118–125. East Strouddsburg PA: Association for Computational Linguistics. CrossrefGoogle Scholar