Part of
Complexity, Accuracy and Fluency in Learner Corpus Research
Edited by Agnieszka Leńko-Szymańska and Sandra Götz
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 104] 2022
► pp. 5180
References
Adams, Rebecca, Alwi, Nik M., Aloesnita, Nik & Newton, Jonathan
2015Task complexity effects on the complexity and accuracy of writing via text chat. Journal of Second Language Writing 29: 64–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexopoulou, Theodora, Michel, Marije, Murakami, Akira & Meurers, Detmar
2017Task effects on linguistic complexity and accuracy: A large-scale corpus analysis employing natural language processing techniques. Language Learning 67(S1): 180–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alsufieva, Anna A., Kisselev, Olesya V. & Freels, Sandra G.
2012Results 2012: Using flagship data to develop a Russian learner corpus of academic writing. Russian Language Journal/Русский зяык 62: 79–105.Google Scholar
Bachman, Lyle F.
1988Problems in examining the validity of the ACTFL oral proficiency interview. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 10(2): 149–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bailyn, John F.
2012The Syntax of Russian. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ballier, Nicolas, Gaillat, Thomas, Simpkin, Andrew, Stearns, Bernardo, Bouyé, Manon & Zrrouk, Manel
2019A supervised model for the automatic assessment of language levels based on learner errors. In Transforming Learning with Meaningful Technologies, Maren Scheffel, Julien Broisin, Viktoria Pammer-Schindler, Andri Ioannou & Jan Schneider (eds), 308–320. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barkaoui, Khaled & Hadidi, Ali
2020Assessing Change in English Second Language Writing Performance. New York NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barykina, Alevtina N., Burmistrova, Valentina P. & Dobrovol’skaia, Valeria V.
1978Posobie po razvitiiu navykov pis’mennoi rechi. Moscow: Russkii iazyk.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Gray, Bethany & Poonpon, Kornwipa
2011Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development? TESOL Quarterly 45(1): 5–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bulté, Bram & Housen, Alex
2012Defining and operationalising L2 complexity. In Dimensions of L2 Performance and Proficiency: Complexity, Accuracy and Fluency in SLA [Language Learning & Language Teaching 32], Alex Housen, Folkert Kuiken & Ineke Vedder (eds), 21–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014Conceptualizing and measuring short-term changes in L2 writing complexity. Journal of Second Language Writing 26: 42–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Callies, Marcus & Götz, Sandra
2015Learner corpora in language testing and assessment: Prospects and challenges. In Learner Corpora in Language Testing and Assessment [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 70], Marcus Callies & Sandra Götz (eds), 1–10. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, Yu-Hua & Baker, Paul
2014Investigating criterial discourse features across second language development: Lexical bundles in rated learner essays, CEFR B1, B2 and C1. Applied Linguistics 37(6): 849–880. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crossley, Scott A. & McNamara, Danielle S.
2014Does writing development equal writing quality? A computational investigation of syntactic complexity in L2 learners. Journal of Second Language Writing 26: 66–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dengub, Evgeny
2012Investigating Syntactic and Lexical Complexity, Accuracy, and Fluency in the Writing of Heritage Speakers of Russian. PhD dissertation, Bryn Mawr College.
de Marneffe, Marie-Catherine, Dozat, Timothy, Silveira, Natalia, Haverinen, Katri, Ginter, Filip, Nivre, Joakim & Manning, Christopher D.
2014Universal Stanford dependencies: A cross-linguistic typology. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’14), 4585–4592. Reykjavik: European Language Resources Association (ELRA). [URL] (15 December 2021).
Diessel, Holger
2004The Acquisition of Complex Sentences [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 105]. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friginal, Eric & Weigle, Sandra
2014Exploring multiple profiles of L2 writing using multi-dimensional analysis. Journal of Second Language Writing 26: 80–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Freels, Sandra, Kisselev, Olesya & Alsufieva, Anna
2016Adding breadth to the undergraduate curriculum. Flagship approaches to interdisciplinary language learning. In Exploring the US Language Flagship Program: Professional Competence in a Second Language by Graduation [New Perspectives on Language and Education 50], Dianna Murphy & Karen Evans-Romaine (eds), 51–69. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guo, Liang, Crossley, Scott A. & McNamara, Danielle S.
2013Predicting human judgments of essay quality in both integrated and independent second language writing samples: A comparison study. Assessing Writing 18(3): 218–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2007Coordination. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 1–51. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, John A. & Buttery, Paula
2010Criterial features in learner corpora: Theory and illustrations. English Profile Journal 1: e5. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Housen, Alex, De Clercq, Bastien, Kuiken, Folkert & Vedder, Ineke
2019Multiple approaches to complexity in second language research. Second Language Research 35(1): 3–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, Ting, Steinkrauss, Rasmus & Verspoor, Marjolijn
2021Variability as predictor in L2 writing proficiency. Journal of Second Language Writing 52: 100787. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karlsson, Frank
2010Syntactic recursion and iteration. In Recursion and Human Language, Harry van der Hulst (ed.), 43–67. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kisselev, Olesya & Alsufieva, Anna
2017The development of syntactic complexity in the writing of Russian language learners: A longitudinal corpus study. Russian Language Journal/Русский язык 67: 27–54.Google Scholar
Kisselev, Olesya & Comer, William
2019Interdepartmental collaboration and curriculum design: Creating a Russian environmental sustainability course for advanced study. In Foreign Language Teaching and the Environment: Theory, Curricula, Institutional Structures, Charlotte Melin (ed.), 180–196. New York NY: Modern Language Association.Google Scholar
Kisselev, Olesya, Dubinina, Irina & Polinsky, Maria
2020Form-focused instruction in the heritage language classroom: Toward research-informed heritage language pedagogy. Frontiers in Education 5: 53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kisselev, Olesya, Klimov, Alexandr, & Kopotev, Mikhail
2021Syntactic complexity measures as indices of language proficiency in writing: Focus on heritage learners of Russian. Heritage Language Journal 18(3): 1–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Khimik, Vasilij. V.
2003Osnovy naučnoi reči: Učebnoe posobie dlia studentov nefilologičeskih vysših zavedenij. Moscow: Akademiia.Google Scholar
Kuiken, Folkert & Vedder, Ineke
2019Syntactic complexity across proficiency and languages: L2 and L1 writing in Dutch, Italian and Spanish. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 29(2): 192–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kyle, Kristopher & Crossley, Scott A.
2018Measuring syntactic complexity in L2 writing using fine-grained clausal and phrasal indices. The Modern Language Journal 102(2): 333–349. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lan, Ge, Liu, Qiandi & Staples, Shelley
2019Grammatical complexity: ‘What Does It Mean’ and ‘So What’ for L2 writing classrooms? Journal of Second Language Writing 46: 100673. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lissón, Paula & Ballier, Nicolas
2018Investigating lexical progression through lexical diversity metrics in a corpus of French L3. Discours. Revue de linguistique, psycholinguistique et informatique. A Journal of Linguistics, Psycholinguistics and Computational Linguistics 23: 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lobanova, Natalja A. & Slesareva, Irma P.
1980Uchebnik russkogo iazyka dlia inostrannykh studentov-filologov. Sistematiziruiushchii kurs [Russian Language Handbook for Foreign Students of Philology: A Systematizing Course]. Moscow: Russkii iazyk.Google Scholar
Long, Michael H., Gor, Kira & Jackson, Scott
2012Linguistic correlates of second language proficiency: Proof of concept with ILR 2–3 in Russian. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 34(1): 99–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lu, Xiaofei
2011A corpus-based evaluation of syntactic complexity measures as indices of college-level ESL writers’ language development. TESOL Quarterly 45(1): 35–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lu, Xiaofei & Ai, Haiyang
2015Syntactic complexity in college-level English writing: Differences among writers with diverse L1 backgrounds. Journal of Second Language Writing 29: 16–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mazgutova, Diane & Kormos, Judit
2015Syntactic and lexical development in an intensive English for academic purposes programme. Journal of Second Language Writing 29: 3–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Menke, Mandy R. & Strawbridge, Tripp
2019The writing of Spanish majors: A longitudinal analysis of syntactic complexity. Journal of Second Language Writing 46: 100665. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Michel, Marije, Murakami, Akira, Alexopoulou, Theodora & Meurers, Detmar
2019Effects of task type on morphosyntactic complexity across proficiency: Evidence from a large learner corpus of A1 to C2 writings. Instructed Second Language Acquisition 3(2): 124–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montrul, Silvina
2016The Acquisition of Heritage Languages. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mostafa, Tamanna & Crossley, Scott A.
2020Verb argument construction complexity indices and L2 writing quality: Effects of writing tasks and prompts. Journal of Second Language Writing 49: 100730. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norris, John M. & Ortega, Lourdes
2009Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics 30(4): 555–578. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortega, Lourdes
2003Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A research synthesis of college-level L2 writing. Applied Linguistics 24(4): 492–518. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Osborne, Timothy
2006Syntax gapping vs. non-gapping coordination. Linguistische Berichte 207: 307–337.Google Scholar
Pallotti, Gabriele
2009CAF: Defining, refining and differentiating constructs. Applied Linguistics 30(4): 590–601. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Petrov, Slav, Das, Dipanjan & McDonald, Ryan
2011A universal part-of-speech tagset. arXiv preprint arXiv:1104.2086.Google Scholar
Polat, Nihat, Mahalingappa, Laura & Mancilla, Rae L.
2020Longitudinal growth trajectories of written syntactic complexity: The case of Turkish learners in an intensive English program. Applied Linguistics 41(5): 688–711. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Polio, Charlene & Park, Ji-Hyun
2016Language development in second language writing. In Handbook of Second and Foreign Language Writing, Rosa M. Manchón & Paul Kei Matsuda (eds), 287–306. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prokhorova, Kira V.
1998Naučnyj stil’: učebno-metodičeskoe posobie dlja studentov-žurnalistov. Sankt-Peterburg: Sankt-Peterburg State University.Google Scholar
Reich, Peter & Schütze, Carson
1991Syntactic embedding: What can people really do? Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 11: 91–97.Google Scholar
Sag, Ivan A., Gazdar, Gerald, Wasow, Thomas & Weisler, Steven
1985Coordination and how to distinguish categories. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 3(2): 117–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Staples, Shelley, Adriana Picoral, Aleksey Novikov, and Bruna Sommer-Farias
2019Directions for Future Use of Using Existing Corpora in the Study of L2 Writing. In The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition and Writing, 356–369. Routledge.Google Scholar
Straka, Milan & Straková, Jana
2017Tokenizing, POS tagging, lemmatizing and parsing UD 2.0 with UDPipe. In Proceedings of the CoNLL 2017 Shared Task: Multilingual Parsing from Raw Text to Universal Dependencies, 88–99. Vancouver: Association for Computational Linguistics. [URL] (15 December 2022). DOI logo
Tack, Anaïs, François, Thomas, Roekhaut, Sophie & Fairon, Cédrick
2017Human and automated CEFR-based grading of short answers. In Proceedings of the 12th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications. Joel Tetreault, Jill Burstein, Claudia Leacock & Helen Yannakoudakis (eds), 169–179. Copenhagen: Association of Computational Linguistics. [URL] (15 December 2021). DOI logo
Testelets, Yakov G.
2001Vvedenie v Obščij Sintaksis [Introduction to General Syntax]. Mocsow: Rossijskij Gosudarstviennyj Gumanitarnyj Universitet (RGGU).Google Scholar
Treffers-Daller, Jeanine, Parslow, Patrick & Williams, Shirley
2018Back to basics: How measures of lexical diversity can help discriminate between CEFR levels. Applied Linguistics 39(3): 302–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tschirner, Erwin, Bärenfänger, Olaf & Wanner, Irmgard
2012Assessing Evidence of Validity of Assigning CEFR Ratings to the ACTFL Oral Proficiency Interview (OPI) and the Oral Proficiency Interview by Computer (OPIc). Leipzig: Universität Leipzig, Herder-Institut.Google Scholar
UDPipe 1 Models
2021 <[URL] (30 June 2021).
Verspoor, Marjolijn, Schmid, Monika S., Xu, Xiaoyan
2012A dynamic usage based perspective on L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 21(3): 239–263. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Vries, Mark
2005Coordination and syntactic hierarchy. Studia Linguistica 59(1): 83–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vyatkina, Nina
2012The development of second language writing complexity in groups and individuals: A longitudinal learner corpus study. The Modern Language Journal 96(4): 576–598. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013Specific syntactic complexity: Developmental profiling of individuals based on an annotated learner corpus. The Modern Language Journal 97(1): 11–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, Weiwei, Lu, Xiaofei & Weigle, Sara C.
2015Different topics, different discourse: Relationships among writing topic, measures of syntactic complexity, and judgments of writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing 28: 53–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yoon, Hyung-Jo & Polio, Charlene
2017The linguistic development of students of English as a second language in two written genres. TESOL Quarterly 51(2): 275–301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolfe-Quintero, Kate, Inagaki, Shunji & Kim, Hae-Young
1998Second Language Development in Writing: Measures of Fluency, Accuracy, & Complexity. Honolulu HI: Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center, University of Hawai’i at Manoa. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zeman, Daniel & Resnik, Philip
2008Cross-language parser adaptation between related languages. In Proceedings of the IJCNLP-08 Workshop on NLP for Less Privileged Languages, 35–42. Hyderabad: Asian Federation of Natural Language Processing. [URL] (15 December 2021).
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Hwang, Haerim & Hyunwoo Kim
2024. Korean Syntactic Complexity Analyzer (KOSCA): An NLP application for the analysis of syntactic complexity in second language production. Language Testing DOI logo
Kopotev, Mikhail, Aleksandr Klimov & Olesya Kisselev
2023. Exploring collocational complexity in L2 Russian: A corpus-driven contrastive analysis. International Journal of Bilingualism DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.