Cover not available
Part of
Broadening the Spectrum of Corpus Linguistics: New approaches to variability and change
Edited by Susanne Flach and Martin Hilpert
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 105] 2022
► pp. 173–195

Recent changes in spoken British English in verbal and nominal constructions

| University of Zurich
Starting from a data-driven approach, the current paper compares the BNC1994 spoken to the BNC2014. We first narrow down possible research questions due to differences in the compilation and transcription of the two BNC generations. Then we investigate three robustly detectable changes at the level of lexis and morphosyntax: (1) gender and class differences, (2) the increase of be- and get-passive constructions and -ing forms from the verbal domain, and (3) the increase of noun compounds from the nominal domain. We also focus on the social context in which linguistic changes are embedded: which noun compounds particularly increase; which words are overused by which gender or social class? Technology seems to be a driver in the further advance of the construction of noun compounds, and strong swearing seems to have decreased between 1994 and 2014.
Keywords: spoken language, construction grammar, data-driven analysis, lexis, language and society, diachronic linguistics, gender, social class, passive forms, compound nouns
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction and motivation
    • 1.1Motivation
    • 1.2Opportunities and limitations
    • 1.3Our research questions
  • 2.Data and method
  • 3.Related approaches
  • 4.Analysis and results
    • 4.1Gender differences
    • 4.2Social class differences
    • 4.3Changes in the verbal system
    • 4.4Changes in the nominal system
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 10 November 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.105.06sch
References (30)
References
Ajmer, Karin. 2018. ‘That’s well bad’: Some new intensifiers in spoken British English. In Corpus Approaches to Contemporary British Speech: Sociolinguistic Studies of the Spoken BNC2014, Vaclav Brezina, Robbie Love & Karin Ajmer (eds), 60–95. New York NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aston, Guy & Burnard, Lou. 1998. The BNC Handbook. Exploring the British National Corpus with SARA. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Axelsson, Karin. 2018. Canonical tag questions in Contemporary British English. In Corpus Approaches to Contemporary British Speech: Sociolinguistic Studies of the Spoken BNC2014, Vaclav Brezina, Robbie Love & Karin Aijmer (eds), 96–119. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 1998. When is a sequence of two nouns a compound in English? English Language and Linguistics 2(1): 65–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 2003. Compressed noun-phrase structures in newspaper discourse: The competing demands of popularization vs. economy. In New Media Language, Jean Aitchison & Diana Lewis (eds), 169–181. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brezina, Vaclav, Love, Robbie, & Aijmer, Karin. 2018. Corpus Approaches to Contemporary British Speech: Sociolinguistic Studies of the Spoken BNC2014. New York NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caines, Andrew, McCarthy, Michael & Buttery, Paula. 2018. ‘You still talking to me?’: The zero auxiliary progressive in spoken British English twenty years on. In Corpus Approaches to Contemporary British Speech: Sociolinguistic Studies of the Spoken BNC2014, Vaclav Brezina, Robbie Love & Karin Aijmer (eds), 209–234. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Curry, Niall, Love, Robbie & Goodman, Olivia. 2022. Adverbs on the move: Investigating publisher application of corpus research on recent language change to ELT coursebook development. Corpora 17:1: 1–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evert, Stefan. 2009. Corpora and collocations. Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook, Vol. II, Anke Lüdeling & Merja Kytö, 1212–1248. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Evert, Stefan & Hoffmann, Sebastian. 2006. BNCweb (CQP-edition): The marriage of two corpus tools. In Corpus Technology and Language Pedagogy: New Resources, New Tools, New Methods, Sabine Braun, Kurt Kohn & Joybrato Mukherjee (eds), 177–195. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Robert. 2017. Do women (still) use more intensifiers than men? Recent change in the sociolinguistics of intensifiers in British English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 22(3): 345–374. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garside, Roger. 1987. The CLAWS word-tagging system. In The Computational Analysis of English: A Corpus-Based Approach, Roger Garside, Geoffrey Leech & Geoffrey Sampson (eds), 30–41. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 2006. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Grieve, Jack. 2021. Observation, experimentation, and replication in linguistics. Linguistics 59(5): 1343–1356. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hilpert, Martin. 2014. Construction Grammar and its Application to English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Hundt, Marianne, Mair, Christian, & Smith, Nicholas. 2009. Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Love, Robbie, Dembry, Claire, Hardie, Andrew, Brezina, Vaclav & McEnery, Tony. 2017. The Spoken BNC2014: Designing and building a spoken corpus of everyday conversations. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 22(3): 319–344.Google Scholar
Love, Robbie. 2020. Overcoming Challenges in Corpus Construction: The Spoken British National Corpus 2014. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lüdeling, Anke & Kytö, Merja. 2008. Introduction. In Corpus linguistics: An International Handbook, Anke Lüdeling & Merja Kytö (eds), v–xii. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Master, Peter. 2003. Noun compounds and compressed definitions. English Teaching Forum 41(3): 2–25. <[URL]> (3 April 2022).
McEnery, Tony, Love, Robbie, & Brezina, Vaclav. 2017. Compiling and analysing the Spoken British National Corpus 2014. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 22(3): 311–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, Jon F. 1981. Assessing Language Production: Experimental Procedures. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Mohamed, Arif. 2009. A history of cloud computing. ComputerWeekly.com 4/2009.Google Scholar
Nelson, Gerry, Wallis, Sean, & Aarts, Bas. 2002. Exploring Natural Language: Working with the British Component of the International Corpus of English [Varieties of English around the World G29]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rayson, Paul, Leech, Geoff, & Hodges, Mary. 1997. Social differentiation in the use of English vocabulary: Some analyses of the conversational part of the British National Corpus. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 2(1): 133–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Gerold & Lauber, Max. (2019). Introduction to Statistics for Linguists. Pressbooks. <[URL]> (3 April 2022).
Schwarz, Sarah. 2018. Passive Voices: Be-, Get- and Prepositional Passives in Recent American English. PhD dissertation, Uppsala University.
Schwartz, H. Andrew & Ungar, Lyle H. 2015. Data-driven content analysis of social media: A systematic overview of automated methods. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 659(1): 78–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Säily, Tanja, Gonzalez-Diaz, Victorina & Suomela, Jukka. 2018. Variation in the productivity of adjective comparison in Present-Day English. In Corpus Approaches to Contemporary British Speech: Sociolinguistic Studies of the Spoken BNC2014, Vaclav Brezina, Robbie Love & Karin Aijmer (eds), 159–184. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. 1991. You Just Don’t Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. London: Virago Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.