Cover not available
Part of
Exploring Language and Society with Big Data: Parliamentary discourse across time and space
Edited by Minna Korhonen, Haidee Kotze and Jukka Tyrkkö
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 111] 2023
► pp. 166–193

Chapter 6
From masters and servants to employers and employees

Exploring democratisation with big data

| University of Helsinki
| University of Helsinki
This chapter explores how societal democratisation can be studied by using linguistic big data. More specifically, we are interested in establishing whether it is possible to see how the gradual democratisation of society affected the employment relationship in nineteenth-century Britain by examining changes in the frequency of constructions where different referential terms for both employers and employees were used in the British parliament. We pay particular attention to the gradual waning of the master–servant institution, whose demise can be directly linked to the increased independence of labourers from their employers. We will also briefly explore how data anomalies or outliers can potentially be used as a heuristic when identifying events of historical interest and importance.
Keywords: democratisation, employment, masters, servants, possessive determiners
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Societal and legal developments and the master–servant institution
  • 3.Data and methods
    • 3.1The Hansard Corpus as a source for linguistic analysis
    • 3.2Constructions studied
  • 4.Exploring the employment relationship in the Hansard Corpus
    • 4.1General trends
    • 4.2Masters and servants in the Hansard Corpus
      • 4.2.1Masters in the Hansard Corpus
      • 4.2.2Servants in the Hansard Corpus
    • 4.3Using linguistic outliers to draw attention to historical events
      • 4.3.1The Pains and Penalties Bill of 1820
      • 4.3.2The 1823 slave rebellion in Demerara
  • 5.Discussion and conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 13 November 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.111.06var
References (31)
References
Alexander, Marc & Davies, Mark. 2015. The Hansard Corpus 1803–2005. <[URL]> (1 May 2019).
Altink, Henrice. 2001. Slavery by another name: Apprenticed women in the Jamaican workhouses in the period 1834–1838. Social History 26(1): 40–59.Google Scholar
Atkinson, Evelyn. 2013. Out of the household: Master–servant relations and employer liability law. Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities 25(2): 205–270.Google Scholar
Blackstone, William. 1758. An Analysis of the Laws of England (3rd edn). Oxford: Clarendon Press. <[URL]> (1 May 2019).
Davies, Mark. 2018. Corpus-based studies of lexical and semantic variation: The importance of both corpus size and corpus design. In From Data to Evidence in English Language Research, Carla Suhr, Terttu Nevalainen & Irma Taavitsainen (eds), 66–87. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Farrelly, Michael & Seoane, Elena. 2012. Democratisation. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth Closs Traugott (eds), 392–401. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frank, Christopher. 2004. Britain, the defeat of the 1844 Master and Servants Bill. In Masters, Servants, and Magistrates in Britain and the Empire, 1562–1955, Douglas Hay & Paul Craven (eds), 402–421. Chapel Hill NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
. 2016 [2010]. Master and Servant Law: Chartists, Trade Unions, Radical Lawyers and the Magistracy in England, 1840–1865. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garrard, John. 2002. Democratisation in Britain: Elites, Civil Society, and Reform since 1800. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenfield, Patricia M. 2013. The changing psychology of culture from 1800 through 2000. Psychological Science 24(9): 1722–1731. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hay, Douglas. 2004. England, 1562–1875: The law and its uses. In Masters, Servants, and Magistrates in Britain and the Empire, 1562–1955, Douglas Hay & Paul Craven (eds), 59–116. Chapel Hill NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Higgs, Edward. 1982. The tabulation of occupations in the nineteenth-century census, with special reference to domestic servants. Local Population Studies 28: 58–66.Google Scholar
. 1983. Domestic servants and households in Victorian England. Social History 8(2): 201–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hilpert, Martin. 2020. The great temptation: What diachronic corpora do and do not reveal about social change. In Corpora and the Changing Society. Studies in the Evolution of English [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 96], Paula Rautionaho, Arja Nurmi & Juhani Klemola (eds), 3–27. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hiltunen, Turo, Räikkönen, Jenni & Tyrkkö, Jukka. 2020. Investigating colloquialization in the British parliamentary record in the late 19th and early 20th century. In New Perspectives on Democratization: Evidence from English(es), Turo Hiltunen & Lucía Loureiro-Porto (eds). Special issue of Language Sciences 79: 101270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holt, Thomas C. 1992. The Problem of Freedom: Race, Labor, and Politics in Jamaica and Britain, 1832–1938. Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Huber, Magnus, Nissel, Magnus, Maiwald, Patrick & Widlitzki, Bianca. 2012. The Old Bailey Corpus: Spoken English in the 18th and 19th centuries. <[URL]> (1 May 2019).
Langacker, Ronald W. 1995. Possession and possessive constructions. In Language and the Cognitive Construal of the World, John R. Taylor & Robert E. MacLaury (eds), 51–80. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Hundt, Marianne, Mair, Christian & Smith, Nicholas. 2009. Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leek, Martyn. 2013. NAMB to be called Craft Bakers’ Association. British Baker. <[URL]> (7 November 2019).
Macdonagh, Michael. 1903 [1886]. The Life of Daniel O’Connell. London: Cassell & Company.Google Scholar
Meek, Fiona. 2021. History of Employment Law. Morton Fraser Lawyers. <[URL]> (28 August 2021).
Meldrum, Tim. 2000. Domestic Service and Gender 1660–1750: Life and Work in the London Household. Harlow: Longman Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Michel, Jean-Baptiste, Shen, Yuan Kui, Aiden, Aviva Presser, Veres, Adrian, Gray, Matthew K., The Google Books Team, Pickett, Joseph P., Hoiberg, Dale, Clancy, Dan, Norvig, Peter, Orwant, Jon, Pinker, Steven, Nowak, Martin A. & Aiden, Erez Lieberman. 2011. Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books. Science 331(6014): 176–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mollin, Sandra. 2007. The Hansard hazard: Gauging the accuracy of British parliamentary transcripts. Corpora 2(2): 187–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
OED Online. 2000–. Oxford English Dictionary. OUP <[URL]> (1 May 2019).
Rix, Kathryn. 2014. “Whatever passed in Parliament ought to be communicated to the public”: Reporting the proceedings of the Reformed Commons, 1833–1850. Parliamentary History 33(3): 453–474. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slembrouck, Stef. 1992. The parliamentary Hansard ‘verbatim’ report: The written construction of spoken discourse. Language and Literature 1(2): 101–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steinfeld, Robert J. 1991. The Invention of Free Labor: The Employment Relation in English and American Law and Culture, 1350–1870. Chapel Hill NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Vartiainen, Turo. 2017. The portrayal of infanticide victims in the Proceedings of the Old Bailey, 1674–1775. Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 3(2): 173–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vartiainen, Turo, Hiltunen, Turo & Palander-Collin, Minna. 2021. Linguistic contexts of social change: Tracing the decline of the master–servant institution in three historical corpora. In The Role of Context in the Production and Reception of Historical News Discourse, Nicholas Brownlees (ed.), 129–153. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Hiltunen, Turo & Turo Vartiainen
2024. A corpus-pragmatic analysis of linguistic democratisation in the British Hansard. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 25:2 ► pp. 245 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.