Cover not available
Part of
Exploring Language and Society with Big Data: Parliamentary discourse across time and space
Edited by Minna Korhonen, Haidee Kotze and Jukka Tyrkkö
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 111] 2023
► pp. 166–193

Chapter 6
From masters and servants to employers and employees

Exploring democratisation with big data

| University of Helsinki
| University of Helsinki
This chapter explores how societal democratisation can be studied by using linguistic big data. More specifically, we are interested in establishing whether it is possible to see how the gradual democratisation of society affected the employment relationship in nineteenth-century Britain by examining changes in the frequency of constructions where different referential terms for both employers and employees were used in the British parliament. We pay particular attention to the gradual waning of the master–servant institution, whose demise can be directly linked to the increased independence of labourers from their employers. We will also briefly explore how data anomalies or outliers can potentially be used as a heuristic when identifying events of historical interest and importance.
Keywords: democratisation, employment, masters, servants, possessive determiners
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Societal and legal developments and the master–servant institution
  • 3.Data and methods
    • 3.1The Hansard Corpus as a source for linguistic analysis
    • 3.2Constructions studied
  • 4.Exploring the employment relationship in the Hansard Corpus
    • 4.1General trends
    • 4.2Masters and servants in the Hansard Corpus
      • 4.2.1Masters in the Hansard Corpus
      • 4.2.2Servants in the Hansard Corpus
    • 4.3Using linguistic outliers to draw attention to historical events
      • 4.3.1The Pains and Penalties Bill of 1820
      • 4.3.2The 1823 slave rebellion in Demerara
  • 5.Discussion and conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 13 November 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.111.06var
References
Alexander, Marc & Davies, Mark
2015 The Hansard Corpus 1803–2005. [URL] (1 May 2019).
Altink, Henrice
2001 Slavery by another name: Apprenticed women in the Jamaican workhouses in the period 1834–1838. Social History 26(1): 40–59.Google Scholar
Atkinson, Evelyn
2013 Out of the household: Master–servant relations and employer liability law. Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities 25(2): 205–270.Google Scholar
Blackstone, William
1758 An Analysis of the Laws of England (3rd edn). Oxford: Clarendon Press. [URL] (1 May 2019).
Davies, Mark
2018 Corpus-based studies of lexical and semantic variation: The importance of both corpus size and corpus design. In From Data to Evidence in English Language Research, Carla Suhr, Terttu Nevalainen & Irma Taavitsainen (eds), 66–87. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Farrelly, Michael & Seoane, Elena
2012 Democratisation. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth Closs Traugott (eds), 392–401. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frank, Christopher
2004 Britain, the defeat of the 1844 Master and Servants Bill. In Masters, Servants, and Magistrates in Britain and the Empire, 1562–1955, Douglas Hay & Paul Craven (eds), 402–421. Chapel Hill NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
2016 [2010] Master and Servant Law: Chartists, Trade Unions, Radical Lawyers and the Magistracy in England, 1840–1865. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garrard, John
2002 Democratisation in Britain: Elites, Civil Society, and Reform since 1800. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenfield, Patricia M.
2013 The changing psychology of culture from 1800 through 2000. Psychological Science 24(9): 1722–1731. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hay, Douglas
2004 England, 1562–1875: The law and its uses. In Masters, Servants, and Magistrates in Britain and the Empire, 1562–1955, Douglas Hay & Paul Craven (eds), 59–116. Chapel Hill NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Higgs, Edward
1982 The tabulation of occupations in the nineteenth-century census, with special reference to domestic servants. Local Population Studies 28: 58–66.Google Scholar
1983 Domestic servants and households in Victorian England. Social History 8(2): 201–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hilpert, Martin
2020 The great temptation: What diachronic corpora do and do not reveal about social change. In Corpora and the Changing Society. Studies in the Evolution of English [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 96], Paula Rautionaho, Arja Nurmi & Juhani Klemola (eds), 3–27. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hiltunen, Turo, Räikkönen, Jenni & Tyrkkö, Jukka
2020 Investigating colloquialization in the British parliamentary record in the late 19th and early 20th century. In New Perspectives on Democratization: Evidence from English(es), Turo Hiltunen & Lucía Loureiro-Porto (eds). Special issue of Language Sciences 79: 101270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holt, Thomas C.
1992 The Problem of Freedom: Race, Labor, and Politics in Jamaica and Britain, 1832–1938. Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Huber, Magnus, Nissel, Magnus, Maiwald, Patrick & Widlitzki, Bianca
2012 The Old Bailey Corpus: Spoken English in the 18th and 19th centuries. [URL] (1 May 2019).
Langacker, Ronald W.
1995 Possession and possessive constructions. In Language and the Cognitive Construal of the World, John R. Taylor & Robert E. MacLaury (eds), 51–80. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Hundt, Marianne, Mair, Christian & Smith, Nicholas
2009 Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leek, Martyn
2013 NAMB to be called Craft Bakers’ Association. British Baker. [URL] (7 November 2019).
Macdonagh, Michael
1903 [1886] The Life of Daniel O’Connell. London: Cassell & Company.Google Scholar
Meek, Fiona
2021 History of Employment Law. Morton Fraser Lawyers. [URL] (28 August 2021).
Meldrum, Tim
2000 Domestic Service and Gender 1660–1750: Life and Work in the London Household. Harlow: Longman Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Michel, Jean-Baptiste, Shen, Yuan Kui, Aiden, Aviva Presser, Veres, Adrian, Gray, Matthew K., The Google Books Team, Pickett, Joseph P., Hoiberg, Dale, Clancy, Dan, Norvig, Peter, Orwant, Jon, Pinker, Steven, Nowak, Martin A. & Aiden, Erez Lieberman
2011 Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books. Science 331(6014): 176–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mollin, Sandra
2007 The Hansard hazard: Gauging the accuracy of British parliamentary transcripts. Corpora 2(2): 187–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
OED Online
2000– Oxford English Dictionary. OUP [URL] (1 May 2019).
Rix, Kathryn
2014 “Whatever passed in Parliament ought to be communicated to the public”: Reporting the proceedings of the Reformed Commons, 1833–1850. Parliamentary History 33(3): 453–474. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slembrouck, Stef
1992 The parliamentary Hansard ‘verbatim’ report: The written construction of spoken discourse. Language and Literature 1(2): 101–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steinfeld, Robert J.
1991 The Invention of Free Labor: The Employment Relation in English and American Law and Culture, 1350–1870. Chapel Hill NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Vartiainen, Turo
2017 The portrayal of infanticide victims in the Proceedings of the Old Bailey, 1674–1775. Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 3(2): 173–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vartiainen, Turo, Hiltunen, Turo & Palander-Collin, Minna
2021 Linguistic contexts of social change: Tracing the decline of the master–servant institution in three historical corpora. In The Role of Context in the Production and Reception of Historical News Discourse, Nicholas Brownlees (ed.), 129–153. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar