Cover not available
Part of
Textbook English: A multi-dimensional approach
Elen Le Foll
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 116] 2024
► pp. 252–289

References

Abello-Contesse, Christián & López-Jiménez, María Dolores. 2010. The treatment of lexical collocations in EFL textbooks. In Exploring New Paths in Language Pedagogy: Lexis and Corpus-based Language Teaching [Equinox English Linguistics and ELT], María Moreno Jaén, Fernando Serrano & María Calzada Pérez (eds), 95–109. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Achard, Michel & Niemeier, Susanne (eds). 2004. Cognitive Linguistics, Second Language Acquisition, and Foreign Language Teaching [Studies on Language Acquisition 18]. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ahmad, Hamdi & Millar, Robert McColl. 2020. Review of Text Authenticity Relationship with Language Learner Motivation and Communicative Competence. International Journal of English Linguistics 10(5): 89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alejo González, Rafael, Piquer Píriz, Ana & Reveriego Sierra, Guadalupe. 2010. Phrasal verbs in EFL course books. In Fostering Language Teaching Efficiency through Cognitive Linguistics [Applications of Cognitive Linguistics 17], Sabine De Knop, Frank Boers & Antoon De Rycker (eds), 59–78. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alemi, Minoo & Isavi, Ebrahim. 2012. Evaluation of interactional metadiscourse in EFL textbooks. Advances in Asian Social Science 2(1): 422–430.Google Scholar
Al-Hoorie, Ali H. & Marsden, Emma. 2024. Open scholarship and transparency in applied linguistics research. OSF. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Altenberg, Bengt. 1989. Review of Douglas Biber (1988) Variation across speech and writing. Studia Linguistica 43(2). 167–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Altenberg, Bengt & Granger, Sylviane. 2001. The grammatical and lexical patterning of MAKE in native and non-native student writing. Applied Linguistics 22(2): 173–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anthony, Laurence. 2020. Programming for corpus linguistics. In A Practical Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, Magali Paquot & Stefan Th. Gries (eds), 181–207. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anton, Daniela. 2017. Inter- und transkulturelles Lernen im Englischunterricht: Eine didaktische Analyse einschlägiger Lehrbücher [Anglistische Forschungen 456]. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.Google Scholar
Argamon, Shlomo. 2019. Register in computational language research. Register Studies 1(1): 100–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Atkins, Sue, Clear, Jeremy & Ostler, Nicholas. 1992. Corpus design criteria. Literary and Linguistic Computing 7(1): 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ballier, Nicolas, Díaz Negrillo, Ana & Thompson, Paul (eds). 2013. Automatic Treatment and Analysis of Learner Corpus Data [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 59]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Barbieri, Federica. 2005. Quotative use in American English: A corpus-based, cross-register comparison. Journal of English Linguistics 33(3): 222–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barbieri, Federica & Eckhardt, Suzanne E. B. 2007. Applying corpus-based findings to form-focused instruction: The case of reported speech. Language Teaching Research 11(3): 319–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barlow, Michael. 2003. Corpora and language teaching. KATE Forum 27(1): 6–9.Google Scholar
Barlow, Michael & Kemmer, Suzanne (eds). 2000. Usage-Based Models of Language. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Baroni, Marco & Bernardini, Silvia. 2005. A new approach to the study of translationese: Machine-learning the difference between original and translated text. Literary and Linguistic Computing 21(3): 259–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baroni, Marco & Evert, Stephanie. 2009. Statistical methods for corpus exploitation. In Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook, Merja Kytö & Anke Lüdeling (eds), Ch. 36, 777–803. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baroni, Marco, Kilgarriff, Adam, Pomikálek, Jan & Rychlý, Pavel. 2006. WebBootCaT: A web tool for instant corpora. In Elisa Corino, Carla Marello & Onesti Cristina (eds), Proceedings of the 12th Euralex International Congress, 123–132. Torino: European Association for Lexicography.Google Scholar
Bates, Douglas, Mächler, Martin, Bolker, Ben & Walker, Steve. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1): 1–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bausch, Karl-Richard (ed.). 2005. Bildungsstandards für den Fremdsprachenunterricht auf dem Prüfstand: Arbeitspapiere der 25. Frühjahrskonferenz zur Erforschung des Fremdsprachenunterrichts [Giessener Beiträge Zur Fremdsprachendidaktik]. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Behrens, Heike. 2006. The input–output relationship in first language acquisition. Language and Cognitive Processes 21(1–3): 2–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bell, Jan & Gower, Roger. 2011. Writing course materials for the world: A great compromise. In Materials Development in Language Teaching, Brian Tomlinson (ed.), 135–150. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belz, Anya, Agarwal, Shubham, Shimorina, Anastasia & Reiter, Ehud. 2021. A systematic review of reproducibility research in natural language processing. arXiv:2103.07929 [cs]. 〈[URL]〉 (26 July 2021). DOI logo
Bendix, Regina. 1997. In Search of Authenticity: The Formation of Folklore Studies. Madison WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Benhamou, Émile & Dominique, Philippe. Speak English : 6e série verte. Paris: Fernand Nathan.
Bennett, Gena. 2010. Using Corpora in the Language Learning Classroom: Corpus Linguistics for Teachers. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berber Sardinha, Tony & Veirano Pinto, Marcia (eds). 2014. Multi-Dimensional Analysis, 25 Years on: A Tribute to Douglas Biber [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 60]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(eds). 2019. Multi-Dimensional Analysis: Research Methods and Current Issues. London: Bloomsbury Academic. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berber Sardinha, Tony, Veirano Pinto, Marcia, Mayer, Cristina, Zuppardi, Maria Carolina & Kauffmann, Carlos Henrique. 2019. Adding registers to a previous multi-dimensional analysis. In Multi-Dimensional Analysis: Research Methods and Current Issues, Tony Berber Sardinha & Marcia Veirano Pinto (eds), 165–188. London: Bloomsbury. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berez-Kroeker, Andrea L., Gawne, Lauren, Kung, Susan Smythe, Kelly, Barbara F., Heston, Tyler, Holton, Gary, Pulsifer, Peter, et al. 2018. Reproducible research in linguistics: A position statement on data citation and attribution in our field. Linguistics 56(1): 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berns, Margie S., de Bot, Kees & Hasebrink, Uwe (eds). 2007. In the Presence of English: Media and European Youth [Language Policy 7]. New York, NY: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bezemer, Jeff & Kress, Gunther. 2016. The textbook in a changing multimodal landscape. In Handbuch Sprache im multimodalen Kontext, Nina-Maria Klug & Hartmut Stöckl (eds), 476–498. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 1984. A Model of Textual Relations within the Written and Spoken Modes. PhD dissertation, University of Southern California.
. 1988. Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1990. Methodological issues regarding corpus-based analyses of linguistic variation. Literary and Linguistic Computing 5(4): 257–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995. Dimensions of Register Variation. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. University Language: A Corpus-Based Study of Spoken and Written Registers [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Register as a predictor of linguistic variation. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 8(1): 9–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. Multi-dimensional analysis: A historical synopsis. In Multi-Dimensional Analysis: Research Methods and Current Issues, Tony Berber Sardinha & Marcia Veirano Pinto (eds), 11–26. London: Bloomsbury Academic. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021. Corpus linguistics is for text-lovers. Linguistics with a Corpus (blog), 22 December 2021. 〈[URL]〉 (28 December 2021).
Biber, Douglas & Barbieri, Federica. 2007. Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers. English for Specific Purposes 26(3): 263–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Conrad, Susan. 2001. Quantitative corpus-based research: Much more than bean counting. TESOL Quarterly 35(2): 331–336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Corpus Linguistics and Grammar Teaching. Pearson Longman Education. [URL]. (7 March, 2017).
. 2019. Register, Genre, and Style, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Conrad, Susan, Reppen, Randi, Byrd, Pat & Helt, Marie. 2002. Speaking and writing in the university: A multidimensional comparison. TESOL Quarterly 36(1): 9. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Conrad, Susan, Reppen, Randi, Byrd, Pat, Helt, Marie, Clark, Victoria, Cortes, Viviana, Csomay, Eniko & Urzua, Alfredo. 2004. Representing Language Use in the University: Analysis of the TOEFFL 2000 Spoken and Written Academic Language Corpus [TOEFL Monograph Series]. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Egbert, Jesse. 2016. Register variation on the searchable web: A multi-dimensional analysis. Journal of English Linguistics 44(2): 95–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. Register Variation Online. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Egbert, Jesse, Gray, Bethany, Oppliger, Rahel & Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2016. Variationist versus text-linguistic approaches to grammatical change in English: Nominal modifiers of head nouns. In The Cambridge Handbook of English Historical Linguistics, Merja Kyto & Paivi Pahta (eds), 351–375. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Finegan, Edward. 1994. Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Gray, Bethany. 2013. Discourse characteristics of writing and speaking task types on the TOEFL IBT test: A lexico-grammatical analysis. ETS Research Report Series 2013(1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Grammatical Complexity in Academic English: Linguistic Change in Writing [Studies in English Language]. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey N., Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward. 2021. Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Quirk, Randolph (eds). 2012. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English, 10th edn. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Reppen, Randi. 2002. What does frequency have to do with grammar teaching? Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24(2): 199–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biebighäuser, Katrin, Zibelius, Marja & Schmidt, Torben. 2012. Aufgaben 2.0: Konzepte, Materialien und Methoden für das Fremdsprachenlehren und -lernen mit digitalen Medien. BoD – Books on Demand.Google Scholar
Bieswanger, Markus. 2008. Varieties of English in current English language teaching. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics 38: 22–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Birkland, Annie, Block, Adeli, Craft, Justin, Sedarous, Yourdanis, Wang, Sky, Gou, Wu & Namboodiripad, Savithry. 2022. Problematizing the “native speaker” in linguistic research: History of the term and ways forward. Presented at the Linguistic Society of America, January 8, 〈[URL]〉 (16 January 2022).
Blau, Eileen K. 1990. The effect of syntax, speed, and pauses on listening comprehension. TESOL Quarterly 24(4): 746. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blighe, Kevin & Lun, Aaron. 2020. PCAtools: Everything principal components analysis, 〈[URL]〉 (22 April 2021).
Blume, Carolyn. 2020. German teachers’ digital habitus and their pandemic pedagogy. Postdigital Science and Education 2(3): 879–905. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blumenthal-Dramé, Alice. 2012. Entrenchment in Usage-based Theories: What Corpus Eata do and do not Reveal about the Mind [Topics in English Linguistics 83]. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blyth, Carl. 2003. Playing games with literacy: The poetic function in the age of communicative language teaching. In Reading between the Lines: Perspectives on Foreign Language Literacy [Yale Language Series], Peter Charles Patrikis (ed.), 60–73. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
. 2009. From textbook to online materials: The changing ecology of foreign language publishing in the era of ICT. In Foreign Language Learning with Digital Technology, Michael J. Evans (ed.), 174–202. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
BNC Consortium. 2007. The British National Corpus. Oxford Text Archive, 〈[URL]〉 (28 August 2023).
Bochynska, Agata, Keeble, Liam, Halfacre, Caitlin, Casillas, Joseph V., Champagne, Irys-Amélie, Chen, Kaidi, Röthlisberger, Melanie, Buchanan, Erin M. & Roettger, Timo B. 2023. Reproducible research practices and transparency across linguistics. Glossa Psycholinguistics 2(1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bohmann, Axel. 2017. Variation in English World-wide: Varieties and Genres in a Quantitative Perspective. PhD dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
. 2019. Variation in English Worldwide: Registers and Global Varieties. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021. Register in World Englishes research. In Bloomsbury World Englishes, Vol. 1: Paradigms, Britta Schneider, Theresa Heyd & Mario Saraceni (eds), 80–96. London: Bloomsbury Academic. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boulton, Alex & Cobb, Tom. 2017. Corpus use in language learning: A meta-analysis. Language Learning 67(2): 348–393. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boulton, Alex & Tyne, Henry. 2015. Corpus-based study of language and teacher education. In The Routledge Handbook of Educational Linguistics, Martha Bigelow & Johanna Ennser-Kananen (eds), 301–312. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Boulton, Alex & Vyatkina, Nina. 2021. Thirty years of data-driven learning: Taking stock and charting new directions over time. Language Learning 25(3): 66–89.Google Scholar
Bragger, Jeannette D. & Rice, Donald B. 2000. Foreign language materials: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. In Agents of Change in a Changing Age, Robert M. Terry (ed.), 107–40. Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Company.Google Scholar
Brezina, Vaclav. 2018. Statistics in Corpus Linguistics: A Practical Guide. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brezina, Vaclav & Gablasova, Dona. 2015. Is there a core general vocabulary? Introducing the new general service list. Applied Linguistics 36(1): 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brezina, Vaclav, Hawtin, Abi & McEnery, Tony. 2021. The Written British National Corpus 2014 – Design and comparability. Text & Talk 41(5–6): 595–615. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Dale. 2014. The power and authority of materials in the classroom ecology. The Modern Language Journal 98(2): 658–661.Google Scholar
Bruyn, Bert Le & Paquot, Magali. 2021. Learner Corpus Research Meets Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Burnard, Lou (ed.). 2007. Reference Guide for the British National Corpus, XML edn. 〈[URL]〉 (17 September 2021).
Burnard, Lou & Bauman, Syd. 2021. TEI P5: Guidelines for electronic text encoding and interchange v. 4.3.0. TEI consortium. 〈[URL]〉 (2 January 2022).
Burton, Graham. 2012. Corpora and coursebooks: Destined to be strangers forever? Corpora 7(1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. The Canon of Pedagogical Grammar for ELT: A Mixed Methods Study of its Evolution, Development and Comparison with Evidence on Learner Output. PhD dissertation, University of Limerick.
. 2020. Grammar. ELT Journal 74(2): 198–201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2023. Grammar in ELT and ELT Materials. Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2007. Frequency of Use and the Organization of Language. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan & Hopper, Paul (eds). 2001. Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure [Typological Studies in Language 45]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Callies, Marcus. 2019. Integrating corpus literacy into language teacher education: The case of learner corpora. In Learner Corpora and Language Teaching [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 92], Sandra Götz & Joybrato Mukherjee (eds), 245–63. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Canale, Germán. 2021. The language textbook: Representation, interaction & learning: Conclusions. Language, Culture and Curriculum 34(2): 199–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carrie, Erin. 2017. “British is professional, American is urban”: Attitudes towards English reference accents in Spain. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 27(2): 427–447. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carter, Ronald & McCarthy, Michael 1996. Correspondence. ELT Journal 50(4): 369–371. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carter, Ronald. 2014. Grammar and spoken English. In Applying English Grammar: Corpus and Functional Approaches, Caroline Coffin, Ann Hewings & Kieran O’Halloran (eds), 25–39. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carter, Ronald, Hughes, Rebecca & McCarthy, Michael. 1998. Telling tails: Grammar, the spoken language and materials development. In Materials Development in Language Teaching, Brian Tomlinson (ed.), 67–86. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Carter, Ronald & McCarthy, Michael. 1995. Grammar and the spoken language. Applied linguistics 16(2): 141–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006a. Cambridge Grammar of English: A Comprehensive Guide: Spoken and Written English Grammar and Usage. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
. 2006b. Cambridge Grammar of English: A Comprehensive Guide: Spoken and Written English Grammar and Usage. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
. 2017. Spoken grammar: Where are we and where are we going? Applied Linguistics 38(1): 1–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Catalán, Rosa Maria Jiménez & Mancebo Francisco, Rocío. 2008. Vocabulary input in EFL textbooks. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada (RESLA) 21: 147–166.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1982. Integration and involvement in speaking, writing, and oral literature. In Spoken and Written Language: Exploring Orality and Literacy [Advances in Discourse Processes 9], Deborah Tannen (ed.), 35–54. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Chambers, Angela. 2019. Towards the corpus revolution? Bridging the research–practice gap. Language Teaching 52(4): 460–475. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chapelle, Carol A. 2010. The spread of computer-assisted language learning. Language Teaching 43(1): 66–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, Alvin Cheng-Hsien. 2016. A critical evaluation of text difficulty development in ELT textbook series: A corpus-based approach using variability neighbor clustering. System 58: 64–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. Assessing text difficulty development in ELT textbooks series using n-gram language models based on BNC. Presented at the Corpus Linguistics Conference 2017, Birmingham. 〈[URL]〉 (21 January 2019).
Chen, Lin. 2010. An investigation of lexical bundles in ESP textbooks and electrical engineering introductory textbooks. In Perspectives on Formulaic Language: Acquisition and Communication, David Wood (ed.), 107–125. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Cheng, Winnie. 2007. Sorry to interrupt, but…: Pedagogical implications of a spoken corpus. In Spoken Corpora in Applied Linguistics [Linguistic Insights 51], Mari Carmen Campoy & María José Luzón (eds), 199–216. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Cheng, Winnie, Greaves, Christopher & Warren, Martin. 2005. The creation of a prosodically transcribed intercultural corpus: The Hong Kong Corpus of Spoken English (prosodic). ICAME journal 29: 47–68.Google Scholar
Cheng, Winnie & Warren, Martin. 2005. // → Well I Have a DIFferent // ↘ THINking You Know //: A corpus-driven study of disagreement in Hong Kong business discourse. In Asian Business Discourse(s), Francesca Bargiela-Chiappini & Maurizio Gotti (eds), 241–70. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2006. I would say be very careful of…: Opine markers in an intercultural business corpus of spoken English. In Managing Interaction in Professional Discourse: Intercultural and Interdiscoursal Perspectives, Julia Bamford & Marina Bondi (eds), 46–57. Rome: Officina Edizioni.Google Scholar
. 2007. Checking understandings: Comparing textbooks and a corpus of spoken English in Hong Kong. Language Awareness 16(3): 190–207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chien, Chu Ying & Young, Kathie. 2007. The centrality of textbooks in teachers’ work: Perceptions and use of textbooks in a Hong Kong primary school. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher 16(2): 155–163.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. Language and nature. Mind 104(413): 1–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. On Nature and Language, ed. by Adriana Belletti & Luigi Rizzi. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chong, Chia Suan. 2012. The teach-off – My reaction to coursebooks & uncount nouns. chiasuanchong.com (blog), 26 April 2012, 〈[URL]〉 (17 September 2020).
Clark, Eve V. & Casillas, Marisa. 2016. First language acquisition. In The Routledge Handbook of Linguistics, Keith Allan (ed.), 311–28. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Clarke, Isobelle. 2019. Functional linguistic variation in Twitter trolling. International Journal of Speech Language and the Law 26(1): 57–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020. Linguistic Variation across Twitter and Twitter Trolling. PhD dissertation, University of Birmingham. 〈[URL]〉
. 2022. A multi-dimensional analysis of English tweets. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 31(2): 124–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Isobelle & Grieve, Jack. 2017. Dimensions of abusive language on Twitter. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Abusive Language Online, 1–10, 〈[URL]〉 (11 February 2021). DOI logo
Coats, Steven. 2016. Grammatical feature frequencies of English on Twitter in Finland. In English in Computer-Mediated Communication, Lauren Squires (ed.), 179–210. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Henri & Lefebvre, Claire. 2017. Handbook of Categorization in Cognitive Science, 2nd edn. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Condon, Nora. 2008. How cognitive linguistic motivations influence the learning of phrasal verbs. In Cognitive Linguistic Approaches to Teaching Vocabulary and Phraseology, Frank Boers & Seth Lindstromberg (eds), 133–58. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Conrad, Susan. 2000. Will corpus linguistics revolutionize grammar teaching in the 21st century? TESOL Quarterly 34(3): 548–560. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. Corpus variety: Corpus linguistics, language variation, and language teaching. In How to Use Corpora in Language Teaching [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 12], John McH. Sinclair (ed.), 67–85. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Conrad, Susan & Biber, Douglas (eds). (2001) 2013. Variation in English: Multi-Dimensional Studies [Studies in Language and Linguistics]. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Conrad, Susan, Biber, Douglas & Leech, Geoffrey N. 2011. Longman Student Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Workbook. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Conseil supérieur des programmes. 2015. Projet de programme de cycle 4. 〈[URL]〉 (1 January 2018).
Consejería de Educación, Juventud y Deporte de Madrid. 2015. Decreto 48/2015 Curriculo de educación secundaria obligatoria. Boletín Oficial de la Comunidad de Madrid. 〈[URL]〉 (12 January 2022).
Cook, Guy. 2000. Language Play, Language Learning. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Cook, Vivian. 2002. The functions of invented sentences: A reply to Guy Cook. Applied Linguistics 23(2): 262–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cools, Dorien & Sercu, Lies. 2006. Die Beurteilung von Lehrwerken an Hand des Gemeinsamen Europäischen Referenzrahmens für Sprachen: Eine empirische Untersuchung von zwei kürzlich erschienenen Lehrwerken für Deutsch als Fremdsprache. Zeitschrift für interkulturellen Fremdsprachenunterricht 11(3): 1–20.Google Scholar
Costello, Anna B. & Osborne, Jason. 2005. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation 10(7): 1–9. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe (ed.). 2001. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment (CEFR). Modern Languages Division, Strasbourg. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
(ed.). 2020. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Companion Volume. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, 〈[URL]〉 (6 February 2022).
Cowie, Anthony P. (ed.). 1998. Phraseology: Theory, Analysis, and Applications [Oxford Studies in Lexicography and Lexicology]. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crawford, William J. & Zhang, Meixiu. 2021. How can register analysis inform task-based language teaching? Register Studies 3(2): 180–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William & Cruse, D. Alan. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crossley, Scott, Allen, Laura & McNamara, Danielle. 2014. A multi-dimensional analysis of essay writing: What linguistic features tell us about situational parameters and the effects of language functions on judgments of quality. In Multi-Dimensional Analysis, 25 Years on: A Tribute to Douglas Biber [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 60], Tony Berber Sardinha & Marcia Veirano Pinto (eds), 197–238. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crossley, Scott, Kyle, Kristopher & Römer, Ute. 2019. Examining lexical and cohesion differences in discipline-specific writing using multi-dimensional analysis. In Multi-Dimensional Analysis: Research Methods and Current Issues, Tony Berber Sardinha & Marcia Veirano Pinto (eds), 189–216. Bloomsbury Academic. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crosthwaite, Peter (ed.). 2020. Data-driven Learning for the next Generation: Corpora and DDL for Pre-tertiary Learners. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Crowley, Tony. 2003. Standard English and the Politics of Language, 2nd edn. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crystal, David. 2018. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crystal, David & Davy, Derek. 1969. Investigating English Style [English Language Series 1]. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Cullen, Richard & Kuo, I-Chun (Vicky). 2007. Spoken grammar and ELT course materials: A missing link? TESOL Quarterly 41(2): 361–386. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Curry, Niall, Love, Robbie & Goodman, Olivia. 2022. Adverbs on the move: Investigating publisher application of corpus research on recent language change to ELT coursebook development. Corpora 17(1): 1–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dat, Bao. 2008. ELT materials used in Southeast Asia. In English Language Learning Materials: A Critical Review, Brian Tomlinson (ed.), 263–280. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
. 2013. Developing materials for speaking skills. In Developing Materials for Language Teaching, 2nd edn, 407–428. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2009. The 385+ million word Corpus of Contemporary American English (1990–2008+): Design, architecture, and linguistic insights. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14(2): 159–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. The Corpus of Contemporary American English as the first reliable monitor corpus of English. Literary and Linguistic Computing 25(4): 447–464. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. The Movie Corpus. 〈[URL]〉 (28 February 2022).
Day, Richard R. & Bamford, Julian. 1998. Extensive Reading in the Second Language Classroom. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
de Bot, Kees, Lowie, Wander & Verspoor, Marjolijn. 2007. A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 10(1): 7–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Knop, Sabine & Gilquin, Gaëtanelle. 2016. Applied Construction Grammar. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Derwing, T. 2001. What speaking rates do non-native listeners prefer? Applied Linguistics 22(3): 324–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Derwing, Tracey M. 1990. Speech rate is no simple matter: Rate adjustment and NS–NNS communicative success. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 12(3): 303–313. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Derwing, Tracey M., Thomson, Ron I., Foote, Jennifer A. & Munro, Murray J. 2012. A longitudinal study of listening perception in adult learners of English: Implications for teachers. The Canadian Modern Language Review 68(3): 247–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diehr, Bärbel (ed.). 2018. Universitäre Englischlehrerbildung: Wege zu mehr Kohärenz im Studium und Korrespondenz mit der Praxis. Berlin: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020. Kohärenz und Korrespondenz: Die fachdidaktische Perspektive auf die universitäre Englischlehrerbildung. In Die Stimmen der Fächer hören: Fachprofil und Bildungsanspruch in der Lehrerbildung, Michaela Heer & Ulrich Heinen (eds), 325–342. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh.Google Scholar
Diepenbroek, Lori G. & Derwing, Tracey M. 2014. To what extent do popular ESL textbooks incorporate oral fluency and pragmatic development. TESL Canada Journal 30(7): 1. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dinh, Thuy Ngoc & Siregar, Fenty Lidya. 2021. Intercultural competence and parsnip: Voices from teachers of English in Australia. In Intercultural Competence Past, Present and Future: Respecting the Past, Problems in the Present and Forging the Future [Intercultural Communication and Language Education], María Dolores López-Jiménez & Jorge Sánchez-Torres (eds), 255–274. Singapore: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dirven, René. 1990. Pedagogical grammar. Language Teaching 23(1): 1. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diwersy, Sascha, Evert, Stephanie & Neumann, Stella. 2014. A weakly supervised multivariate approach to the study of language variation. In Aggregating Dialectology, Typology, and Register Analysis: Linguistic Variation in Text and Speech, Benedikt Szmrecsanyi & Bernhard Wälchli (eds), 174–204. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diz-Otero, Mario, Portela-Pino, Iago, Domínguez-Lloria, Sara & Pino-Juste, Margarita. 2022. Digital competence in secondary education teachers during the COVID-19-derived pandemic: Comparative analysis. Education + Training 65(2): 181–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Zoltán, Durow, Valerie & Zahran, Khawla. 2004. Individual differences and their effects on formulaic sequence acquisition. In Formulaic Sequences: Acquisition, Processing, and Use [Language Learning and Language Teaching 9], Norbert Schmitt (ed.), 87–106. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duffley, Patrick J. 2006. The English Gerund-Participle: A Comparison with the Infinitive [Berkeley Insights in Linguistics and Semiotics 61]. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Dumont, Amandine. 2018. Fluency and Disfluency: A Corpus Study of Non-native and Native Cpeaker (dis)Fluency Profiles. PhD dissertation, Université catholique de Louvain. 〈[URL]〉 (12 April 2024).
Eckhardt, Suzanne. 2001. Reported Speech: Empirical Corpus Findings Compared with EFL/ESL Textbook Presentations. MA thesis, Iowa State University, Ames. DOI logo
Edwards, Alison. 2016. English in the Netherlands: Functions, Forms and Attitudes [Varieties of English Around the World G56]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Egbert, Jesse. 2019. Corpus design and representativeness. In Multi-Dimensional Analysis: Research Methods and Current Issues, Tony Berber Sardinha & Marcia Veirano Pinto (eds), 27–42. London: Bloomsbury Academic. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Egbert, Jesse & Biber, Douglas. 2018. Do all roads lead to Rome? Modeling register variation with factor analysis and discriminant analysis. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 14(2): 233–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Egbert, Jesse, Biber, Douglas & Davies, Mark. 2015. Developing a bottom-up, user-based method of web register classification. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 66(9): 1817–1831. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Egbert, Jesse, Biber, Douglas & Gray, Bethany. 2022. Designing and Evaluating Language Corpora: A Practical Framework for Corpus Representativeness. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Egbert, Jesse, Larsson, Tove & Biber, Douglas. 2020. Doing Linguistics with a Corpus: Methodological Considerations for the Everyday User. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Egbert, Jesse & Mahlberg, Michaela. 2020. Fiction – One register or two? Speech and narration in novels. Register Studies 2(1): 72–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Egbert, Jesse & Staples, Shelley. 2019. Doing multi-dimensional analysis in SPSS, SAS, and R. In Multi-Dimensional Analysis: Research Methods and Current Issues, Tony Berber Sardinha & Marcia Veirano Pinto (eds), 125–144. Bloomsbury Academic. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elio, Renee & Anderson, John R. 1981. The effects of category generalizations and instance similarity on schema abstraction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory 7(6): 397–417.Google Scholar
1984. The effects of information order and learning mode on schema abstraction. Memory & Cognition 12(1): 20–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Nick C. 1998. Emergentism, connectionism and language learning. Language Learning 48(4): 631–664. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002. Frequency effects in language processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24(2): 143–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006. Language acquisition as rational contingency learning. Applied Linguistics 27(1): 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008. Usage-based and form-focused language acquisition: The associative learning of constructions, learned attention, and the limited L2 endstate. In Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition, Peter Robinson & Nick C. Ellis (eds), 372–405. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2019. Essentials of a theory of language cognition. The Modern Language Journal 103(S1): 39–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Nick C. & Ferreira-Junior, Fernando. 2009a. Constructions and their acquisition: Islands and the distinctiveness of their occupancy. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 7(1): 188–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009b. Construction learning as a function of frequency, frequency distribution, and function. The Modern Language Journal 93(3): 370–385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Nick C. & Larsen-Freeman, D. 2006. Language emergence: Implications for applied linguistics--Introduction to the special issue. Applied Linguistics 27(4): 558–589. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Nick C. & Larsen-Freeman, Diane. 2009. Constructing a second language: Analyses and computational simulations of the emergence of linguistic constructions from usage. Language Learning 59: 90–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Nick C., Römer, Ute & O’Donnell, Matthew Brook. 2016. Usage-based Approaches to Language Acquisition and Processing: Cognitive and Corpus Investigations of Construction Grammar [Language Learning Monograph Series]. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ellis, Rod. 1989. Are classroom and naturalistic acquisition the same? A study of the classroom acquisition of German word order rules. Studies in second language Acquisition 11(3): 305–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997. The empirical evaluation of language teaching materials. ELT Journal 51(1): 36–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elman, Jeffrey L., Bates, Elizabeth A., Johnson, Mark H., Karmiloff-Smith, Annette, Parisi, Domenico & Plunkett, Kim. 1996. Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
European Commission, EACEA, & Eurydice. 2017. Key data on teaching languages at school in Europe: Eurydice Report. Luxemburg: Publications Office of the European Union. 〈[URL]〉 (15 October 2018).
Evert, Stephanie. 2018. Statistics for linguists with R – A SIGIL course: Unit 7: A multivariate approach to linguistic variation. FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg, September. 〈[URL]〉 (4 November 2021).
Fankhauser, Anna. In preparation. Formulaic language in the EFL classroom: A corpus-based study of phraseological items in British English and American English conversation with implications for EFL teaching. Osnabrück University.
. Forthcoming. Suggestions for a new model of functional phraseme categorization for applied purposes. In Recent Advances in Multiword Units in Machine Translation and Translation Technology, Johanna Monti, Ruslan Mitkov & Gloria Corpas Pastor (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Farr, Fiona & Leńko-Szymańska, Agnieszka. 2023. Corpora in English language teacher education: Research, integration, and resources. TESOL Quarterly. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feierabend, Sabine, Rathgeb, Thomas, Kheredmand, Hediye & Glöckler, Stephan. 2020. JIM-Studie 2020: Jugend, Information, Medien. Basisuntersuchung zum Medienumgang 12- bis 19-Jähriger. Medienpädagogischer Forschungs- verbund Südwest (mpfs). 〈[URL]〉 (20 January 2022).
Fogal, Gary G. & Verspoor, Marjolijn H. (eds). 2020. Complex Dynamic Systems Theory and L2 Writing Development [Language Learning & Language Teaching 54]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fominykh, Mikhail, Shikhova, Elizaveta, Soule, Maria Victoria, Perifanou, Maria & Zhukova, Daria. 2021. Digital competence assessment survey for language teachers. In Learning and Collaboration Technologies: New Challenges and Learning Experiences, Panayiotis Zaphiris & Andri Ioannou (eds), 264–282. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forsberg, Julia, Mohr, Susanne & Jansen, Sandra. 2019. “The goal is to enable students to communicate”: Communicative competence and target varieties in TEFL practices in Sweden and Germany. European Journal of Applied Linguistics 7(1): 31–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
forum discussions on neoprofs.org. 2016. [Anglais] La question des manuels: Les utilisez-vous? Vous appuyez-vous sur celui de votre établissement? 〈[URL]〉 (6 January 2022).
Fournier, Yann, Gaudry-Lachet, Anne & DEPP-MIREI. 2017. L’apprentissage des langues vivantes étrangères dans l’Union européenne: Parcours des élèves. Note d’information N° 17.15. Ministère de l’Education Nationale. 〈[URL]〉 (1 August 2018).
Frazier, Stefan. 2003. A corpus analysis of would-clauses without adjacent if-clauses. TESOL Quarterly 37(3): 443–466. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Freeman, David & Holden, Susan. 1986. Authentic listening materials. Techniques of Teaching, 67–69. London: Modern English Publications.Google Scholar
Freudenstein, Reinhold. 2002. Was morgen geschah... Schulischer Fremdsprachenunterricht gestern, heute – und in Zukunft? In Perspektiven für die zukünftige Fremdsprachendidaktik, Christiane Neveling (ed.), 45–62. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Friederici, Luisa. 2019. Vorschlag für eine pluriperspektivische Analyse der Zielgruppe zur Auswahl eines neuen Lehrwerks oder: Vergesst die Lehrer nicht! Pandaemonium Germanicum 22: 281–301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friginal, Eric. 2018. Corpus Linguistics for English Teachers: New Tools, Online Resources, and Classroom Activities. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friginal, Eric & Hardy, Jack. 2019. From factors to dimensions: Interpreting linguistic co-occurrence patterns. In Multi-Dimensional Analysis: Research Methods and Current Issues, Tony Berber Sardinha & Marcia Veirano Pinto (eds), 145–64. London: Bloomsbury Academic. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friginal, Eric & Hardy, Jack A. 2014. Conducting multi-dimensional analysis using SPSS. In Multi-Dimensional Analysis, 25 Years on: A Tribute to Douglas Biber [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 60], Tony Berber Sardinha & Marcia Veirano Pinto (eds), 297–316. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friginal, Eric & Roberts, Jennifer. 2022. Corpora for materials design. In The Routledge Handbook of Corpora and English Language Teaching and Learning, Reka R. Jablonkai & Eniko Csomay (eds), 131–46. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friginal, Eric & Weigle, Sara. 2014. Exploring multiple profiles of L2 writing using multi-dimensional analysis. Journal of Second Language Writing 26: 80–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fujimoto, Kazuko. 2017. Do English textbooks reflect the actual use of English? The present perfect and temporal adverbials. Presented at the The 9th International Corpus Linguistics Conference, University of Birmingham, July 25. 〈[URL]〉 (9 January 2017).
Gabrielatos, Costas. 1994. Collocations: Pedagogical Implications, and Their Treatment in Pedagogical Materials. PhD dissertation, Research Centre for English and Applied Linguistics, Cambridge University, UK. 〈[URL]〉 (12 April 2024).
. 2003. Conditional sentences: ELT typology and corpus evidence. Presented at the BAAL 36th Annual Meeting. 〈[URL]〉 (12 April 2024).
. 2006. Corpus-based analysis of pedagogical materials: If-conditionals in ELT coursebooks and the BNC. Presented at the 7th Teaching and Language Corpora Conference. 〈[URL]〉 (6 February 2020).
. 2013. If-conditionals in ICLE and the BNC: A success story for teaching or learning? In Twenty Years of Learner Corpus Research: Looking Back, Moving Ahead, Sylviane Granger, Gaëtanelle Gilquin & Fanny Meunier (eds), 155–166. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
. 2019. If -Conditionals and modality: Frequency patterns and theoretical explanations. Journal of English Linguistics 47(4): 301–334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gardner, Dee & Davies, Mark. 2007. Pointing out frequent phrasal verbs: A corpus-based analysis. TESOL Quarterly 41(2): 339–359. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gardner, Sheena, Nesi, Hilary & Biber, Douglas. 2019. Discipline, level, genre: Integrating situational perspectives in a new MD analysis of university student writing. Applied Linguistics 40(4): 646–674. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garinger, Dawn. 2002. Textbook selection for the ESL classroom. Center for Applied Linguistics Digest. 〈[URL]〉 (12 January 2017).
Garton, Sue & Graves, Kathleen (eds). 2014. International Perspectives on Materials in ELT. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gass, Susan M. 1997. Input, Interaction, and the Second Language Learner. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk. 2006. Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Readings. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geeslin, Kimberly L. 2014. Sociolinguistics and Second Language Acquisition: Learning to Use Language in Context. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gehring, Wolfgang. 2013. Can’t judge a book by its cover: An analytical approach to textbook innovations. In Basic Issues in EFL Teaching and Learning, Maria Eisenmann & Theresa Summer (eds), 2nd edn, 357–370. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Ghanbari, Nasim, Esmaili, Fatemeh & Shamsaddini, Mohammad Reza. 2015. The effect of using authentic materials on Iranian EFL learners’ vocabulary learning. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 5(12): 2459–2468. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ghosn, Irma K. 2013. Talking like texts and talking about texts: How some primary school coursebook tasks are realized in the classroom. In Developing Materials for Language Teaching, 2nd edn, 291–305. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Gilmore, Alex. 2004. A comparison of textbook and authentic interactions. ELT Journal 58(4): 363–374. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Authentic materials and authenticity in foreign language learning. Language Teaching 40(2): 97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “I prefer not text”: Developing Japanese learners’ communicative competence with authentic materials. Language Learning 61(3): 786–819. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. Materials and authenticity in language teaching. In The Routledge Handbook of English Language Teacher Education, Steve Walsh & Steve Mann (eds), 1st edn, 299–318. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle. 2016. Discourse markers in L2 English: From classroom to naturalistic input. In New Approaches to English Linguistics: Building Bridges [Studies in Language Companion Series 177], Olga Timofeeva, Anne-Christine Gardner, Alpo Honkapohja & Sarah Chevalier (eds), 213–249. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. American and/or British influence on L2 Englishes – Does context tip the scale(s)? In Varieties of English Around the World [Varieties of English Around the World G61], Sandra C. Deshors (ed.), 187–216. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle & Laporte, Samantha. 2021. The use of online writing tools by learners of English: Evidence from a process corpus. International Journal of Lexicography 34(4): 472–492. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle & Paquot, Magali. 2008. Too chatty: Learner academic writing and register variation. English Text Construction 1(1): 41–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gnutzmann, Claus & Intemann, Frauke (eds). 2008. The Globalisation of English and the English Language Classroom. Tübingen: Narr Francke.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2006. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E., Casenhiser, Devin M. & Sethuraman, Nitya. 2004. Learning argument structure generalizations. Cognitive Linguistics 15(3): 289–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gomes, Dylan G. E., Pottier, Patrice, Crystal-Ornelas, Robert, Hudgins, Emma J., Foroughirad, Vivienne, Sánchez-Reyes, Luna L., Turba, Rachel, et al. 2022. Why don’t we share data and code? Perceived barriers and benefits to public archiving practices. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 289(1987): 20221113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goretzko, David. 2022. Factor retention in exploratory factor analysis with missing data. Educational and Psychological Measurement 82(3): 444–464. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gorsuch, Richard L. 2014. Factor Analysis, 2nd edn. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Götz, Sandra. 2013. Fluency in Native And Nonnative English Speech [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 53]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goulart, Larissa, Gray, Bethany, Staples, Shelley, Black, Amanda, Shelton, Aisha, Biber, Douglas, Egbert, Jesse & Wizner, Stacey. 2020. Linguistic perspectives on register. Annual Review of Linguistics 6(1): 435–455, DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goulart, Larissa & Wood, Margaret. 2021. Methodological synthesis of research using multi-dimensional analysis. Journal of Research Design and Statistics in Linguistics and Communication Science 6(2): 107–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gouverneur, Céline. 2008. The phraseological patterns of high-frequency verbs in advanced English for general purposes: A corpus-driven approach to EFL textbook analysis. In Phraseology in Foreign Language Learning and Teaching, Fanny Meunier & Sylviane Granger (eds), 223–243. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grabowski, Łukasz. 2015. Keywords and lexical bundles within English pharmaceutical discourse: A corpus-driven description. English for Specific Purposes 38: 23–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Granger, Sylviane. 1998. The computer learner corpus: A versatile new source of data for SLA research. In Learner English on Computer [Studies in Language and Linguistics], Sylviane Granger (ed.), 3–18. London: Longman.Google Scholar
. 2004. Computer learner corpus research: Current status and future prospects. Language and Computers 52(1): 123–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. The contribution of learner corpora to reference and instructional materials design. In The Cambridge Handbook of Learner Corpus Research, Sylviane Granger, Gaetanelle Gilquin & Fanny Meunier (eds), 485–510. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. Has lexicography reaped the full benefit of the (learner) corpus revolution? In Proceedings of the XVIII EURALEX International Congress: Lexicography in Global Contexts, Simon Krek, Jaka Čibej, Vojko Gorjanc & Iztok Kosem (eds), 17–24. Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Granger, Sylviane, Hung, Joseph & Petch-Tyson, Stephanie (eds). 2002. Computer Learner Corpora, Second Language Acquisition, and Foreign Language Teaching [Language Learning & Language Teaching 6]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Granger, Sylviane & Tyson, Stephanie. 1996. Connector usage in the English essay writing of native and non-native EFL speakers of English. World Englishes 15(1): 17–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grau, Maike. 2009. Worlds apart? English in German youth cultures and in educational settings. World Englishes 28(2): 160–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graves, Kathleen & Garton, Sue. 2019. Materials use and development. In The Routledge Handbook of English Language Teacher Education, Steve Walsh & Steve Mann (eds), 417–431. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gray, Bethany. 2015. Linguistic Variation in Research Articles: When Discipline Tells Only Part of the Story [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 71]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. Tagging and counting linguistic features for multi-dimensional analysis. In Multi-Dimensional Analysis: Research Methods and Current Issues, Tony Berber Sardinha & Marcia Veirano Pinto (eds), 43–66. London: Bloomsbury Academic. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gray, Bethany & Egbert, Jesse. 2019. Editorial: Register and register variation. Register Studies 1(1): 1–9. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021. Register in L1 and L2 language development. Register Studies 3(2): 177–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gray, John. 2000. The ELT coursebook as cultural artefact: How teachers censor and adapt. ELT Journal 54(3): 274–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. The global coursebook in English language teaching. In Globalization and Language Teaching, David Block & Deborah Cameron (eds), 151–167. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2010. The Construction of English: Culture, Consumerism and Promotion in the Elt Global Coursebook. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th. 2005. Null-hypothesis significance testing of word frequencies: A follow-up on Kilgarriff. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1(2). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Statistical tests for the analysis of learner corpus data. In Automatic Treatment and Analysis of Learner Corpus Data [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 59], Ana Díaz-Negrillo, Nicolas Ballier & Paul Thompson (eds), 287–310. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. The most under-used statistical method in corpus linguistics: Multi-level (and mixed-effects) models. Corpora 10(1): 95–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. On over- and underuse in learner corpus research and multifactoriality in corpus linguistics more generally. Journal of Second Language Studies 1(2): 276–308. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th. & Deshors, Sandra C. 2020. Statistical analyses of learner corpus data. In Routledge Handbook of SLA and Corpora, Nancy Tracy-Ventura & Magali Paquot (eds), 119–132. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grieve-Smith, Angus B. 2007. The envelope of variation in multidimensional register and genre analyses. In Corpus Linguistics Beyond the Word: Corpus Research from Phrase to Discourse, Eileen Fitzpatrick (ed.), 21–42. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, Roger. 1990. Speech rate and NNS comprehension: A preliminary study in time-benefit analysis. Language Learning 40(3): 311–336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1991. Language classroom speech rates: A descriptive study. TESOL Quarterly 25(1): 189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gurzynski-Weiss, Laura, Geeslin, Kimberly L., Daidone, Danielle, Linford, Bret, Long, Avizia Yim, Michalski, Ian & Solon, Megan. 2018. Examining multifaceted sources of input. Variationist and usage-based approaches to understanding the L2 classroom. In Usage-Inspired L2 Instruction: Researched Pedagogy [Language Learning & Language Teaching 49], Andrea E. Tyler, Lourdes Ortega, Mariko Uno & Hae In Park, 291–311. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hair, Joseph F., Black, William C., Babin, Barry J. & Anderson, Rolph E. 2019. Multivariate Data Analysis, 8th edn. Andover, Hampshire: Cengage.Google Scholar
Hall, Christopher J., Wicaksono Rachel, Liu Shu, Qian Yuan & Xu Xiaoqing. 2017. Exploring teachers’ ontologies of English: Monolithic conceptions of grammar in a group of Chinese teachers. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 27(1): 87–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hallet, Wolfgang & Legutke, Michael K. 2013. Task-approaches revisited: New orientations, new perspectives. The European Journal of Applied Linguistics and TEFL 2(2): 139–159.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. 1988. On the language of physical science. In Registers of written English: Situational Factors and Linguistic Features, Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), 162–172. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Hardie, Andrew. 2014. Modest XML for corpora: Not a standard, but a suggestion. ICAME Journal 38(1): 73–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harel, Idit & Papert, Seymour. 1991. Constructionism: Research Reports and Essays, 1985–1990. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Harwood, Nigel. 2005. What do we want EAP teaching materials for? Journal of English for Academic Purposes 4(2): 149–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hausmann, Franz Josef. 2005. Isotopie, scénario, collocation et exemple lexicographique. In L’exemple lexicographique dans les dictionnaires français contemporains, Michaela Heinz (ed.), 283–292. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Henry, Alastair. 2014. Swedish students’ beliefs about learning English in and outside of school. In Motivation and Foreign Language Learning: From theory to practice [Language Learning & Language Teaching 40], David Lasagabaster, Aintzane Doiz & Juan Manuel Sierra (eds), 93–116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Henson, Robin K. & Roberts, J. Kyle. 2006. Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research: Common errors and some comment on improved practice. Educational and Psychological Measurement 66(3): 393–416. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herbst, Thomas. 1996. What are collocations: Sandy beaches or false teeth? English Studies 77(4): 379–393. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. Foreign language learning is construction learning–What else? Moving towards Pedagogical Construction Grammar. In Applied Construction Grammar, Sabine De Knop & Gaëtanelle Gilquin (eds), 32:56–96. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herbst, Thomas, Schmid, Hans-Jörg & Faulhaber, Susen (eds). 2014. Constructions Collocations Patterns [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 282]. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hermes, Liesel. 2009. “Reading can be fun if…”: Lektüren in der Sekundarstufe I. In Literaturdidaktik und Literaturvermittlung im Englischunterricht der Sekundarstufe, I, Jan Hollm (ed.), 7–22. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.Google Scholar
Hessisches Kultusministerium. 2010. Lehrplan Englisch – Gymnasialer Bildungsgang – Jahrgangsstufen 5G bis 9G. 〈[URL]〉 (6 February 2022).
Hoey, Michael. 2005. Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Holliday, Adrian. 2005. The Struggle to Teach English as an International Language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet. 1988. Doubt and certainty in ESL textbooks. Applied Linguistics 9(1): 21–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hu, Chieh-Fang & Maechtle, Cheyenne. 2021. Construction learning by child learners of foreign language: Input distribution and learner factors. The Modern Language Journal 105(1): 335–354. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, Pingping. 2019. Textbook interaction: A study of the language and cultural contextualisation of English learning textbooks. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 21: 87–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hughes, Rebecca. 2010. What a corpus tells us about grammar teaching materials. In The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, Anne O’Keeffe & Michael McCarthy (eds), 401–412. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hundt, Marianne, Sand, Andrea & Siemund, Rainer. 1998. Manual of information to accompany the Freiburg-LOB Corpus of British English (‘FLOB’). Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg. 〈[URL]〉 (23 January 2022).
Hundt, Marianne, Sand, Andrea & Skandera, Paul. 1999. Manual of information to accompany the Freiburg-Brown Corpus of American English. Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg. 〈[URL]〉 (23 January 2022).
Hunston, Susan. 2002. Corpora in Applied Linguistics [The Cambridge Applied Linguistics Series]. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hunston, Susan & Francis, Gill. 2000. Pattern Grammar: A Corpus-Driven Approach to the Lexical Grammar of English [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 4]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Husson, François, Cornillon, Pierre-André, Guyader, Arnaud, Jégou, Nicolas, Josse, Julie, Klutchnikoff, Nicolas, Le Pennec, Erwan, Matzner-Løber, Eric, Rouvière, Laurent & Thieurmel, Benoît. 2018. R pour la statistique et la science des données. Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar
Husson, François, Lê, Sébastien & Pagès, Jérôme. 2017. Exploratory Multivariate Analysis by Example Using R, 2nd edn. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 1994. Hedging in academic writing and EAP textbooks. English for Specific Purposes 13(3): 239–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Materials for developing writing skills. In Developing Materials for Language Teaching, Brian Tomlinson (ed.), 2nd edn, 391–406. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell. 1984. Sociolinguistics: Stability and consolidation. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 45: 39–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ide, Nancy. 1996. Corpus encoding standard. v. 1.5 (last updated March 2020). Expert Advisory Group on Language Engineering Standards (EAGLES). 〈[URL]〉 (2 January 2022).
Jablonkai, Reka R. & Csomay, Eniko. 2022. The Routledge Handbook of Corpora and English Language Teaching and Learning. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, George M. & Ball, Jessica. 1996. An investigation of the structure of group activities in ELT coursebooks. ELT Journal 50(2): 99–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jansen, Sandra, Mohr, Susanne & Forsberg, Julia. 2021. Standard language ideology in the English language classroom: Suggestions for EIL-informed teacher education. In Glocalising Teaching English as an International Language, Marcus Callies, Stefanie Hehner, Philipp Meer & Micahel Westphal (eds). London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, Jennifer. 1998. Which pronunciation norms and models for English as an International Language? ELT Journal 52(2): 119–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. The Phonology of English as an International Language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2003. World Englishes: A Resource Book for Students [Routledge English Language Introductions]. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jiang, Xiangying. 2006. Suggestions: What should ESL students know? System 34(1): 36–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johns, Tim. 1986. Micro-concord: A language learner’s research tool. System 14(2): 151–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1993. Data-driven learning: An update. TELL & CALL 3: 23–32.Google Scholar
. 2002. Data-driven learning: The perpetual challenge. In Teaching and Learning by Doing Corpus Analysis, Bernhard Kettemann & Georg Marko (eds), 105–117. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Contexts: The background, development and trialling of a concordance-based CALL program. In Teaching and Language Corpora, Anne Wichmann & Steven Fligelstone (eds), 100–115. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jolliffe, Ian T. 2002. Principal Component Analysis [Springer Series in Statistics], 2nd edn. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Kachru, Yamuna & Smith, Larry E. 2008. Cultures, Contexts and World Englishes [ESL & Applied Linguistics Professional Series]. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, Henry F. & Rice, John. 1974. Little Jiffy, Mark IV. Educational and Psychological Measurement 34(1): 111–117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karlsen, Petter Hagen & Monsen, Marte. 2020. Corpus literacy and applications in Norwegian upper secondary schools: Teacher and learner perspectives. Nordic Journal of English Studies 19(1): 118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kavanagh, Barry. 2021. Norwegian in-service teachers’ perspectives on language corpora in teaching English. Nordic Journal of Language Teaching and Learning 9(2): 90–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kerres, Michael. 2020. Against all odds: Education in Germany coping with Covid-19. Postdigital Science and Education 2(3): 690–694, DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kilgarriff, Adam, Baisa, Vít, Bušta, Jan, Jakubíček, Miloš, Kovář, Vojtěch, Michelfeit, Jan, Rychlý, Pavel & Suchomel, Vít. 2014. The Sketch Engine: Ten years on. Lexicography 1(1): 7–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, Daejin & Hall, Joan Kelly. 2002. The role of an interactive book reading program in the development of second language pragmatic competence. The Modern Language Journal 86(3): 332–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koch, Peter & Oesterreicher, Wulf. 1985. Language of immediacy – Language of distance: Orality and literacy from the perspective of language theory and linguistic history. In Communicative Spaces. Variation, Contact, and Change: Papers in Honour of Ursula Schaefer, Claudia Lange, Beatrix Weber & Göran Wolf (eds), 441–73. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2011. Gesprochene Sprache in der Romania: Französisch, Italienisch, Spanisch [Romanistische Arbeitshefte 31]. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koprowski, Mark. 2005. Investigating the usefulness of lexical phrases in contemporary coursebooks. ELT Journal 59(4): 322–332, DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kosmas, Panagiotis, Parmaxi, Antigoni, Perifanou, Maria & Economides, Anastasios A. 2021. Open educational resources for language education: Towards the development of an e-toolkit. In Learning and Collaboration Technologies: New Challenges and Learning Experiences. 8th International Conference, LCT 2021, Held as Part of the 23rd HCI International Conference, HCII 2021, Virtual Event, July 24–29, 2021, Proceedings, Part I [Lecture Notes in Computer Science], Panayiotis Zaphiris & Andri Ioannou (eds), 65–79. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krashen, Stephen. 1982. Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition [Language Teaching Methodology Series]. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
. 1985. Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning [Language Teaching Methodology Series]. Reprinted. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Kruger, Haidee & van Rooy, Bertus. 2018. Register variation in written contact varieties of English: A multidimensional analysis. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 39(2): 214–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuhl, Patricia K. & Meltzoff, Andrew N. 1996. Infant vocalizations in response to speech: Vocal imitation and developmental change. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 100(401): 2425–2438. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kultusministerkonferenz. 2003. Bildungsstandards für die erste Fremdsprache (Englisch/Französisch) für den Mittleren Schulabschluss. Sekretariat der Ständigen Konferenz der Kultusminister der Länder in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. 〈[URL]〉 (21 January 2017).
. 2012. Bildungsstandards für die fortgeführte Fremdsprache (Englisch/Französisch) für die Allgemeine Hochschulreife. Beschluss der Kultusministerkonferenz vom 18.10.2012. Sekretariat der Ständigen Konferenz der Kultusminister der Länder in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. 〈[URL]〉 (26 November 2018).
Kurtz, Jürgen. 2019. Lehrwerkgestütztes Fremdsprachenlernen im digitalen Wandel. In Das Lehren und Lernen von Fremd- und Zweitsprachen im digitalen Wandel: Arbeitspapiere der 39. Frühjahrskonferenz zur Erforschung des Fremdsprachenunterrichts [Gießener Beiträge zur Fremdsprachendidaktik], Eva Burwitz-Melzer, Claudia Riemer & Lars Schmelter (eds), 114–25. Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 2004. Quantitative analysis of linguistic variation. In Sociolinguistics / Soziolinguistik [Handbücher Zur Sprach- Und Kommunikationswissenschaft / Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science [HSK]], Vol. 1, 6–21. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George & Johnson, Mark. 2003. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Landesregierung Nordrhein-Westfalen. 2016. Lernen im digitalen Wandel. Unser Leitbild 2020 für Bildung in Zeiten der Digitalisierung. 〈[URL]〉 (22 January 2022).
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
2001. Cognitive linguistics, language pedagogy, and the English present tense. In Applied Cognitive Linguistics, Vol. I: Theory and Language Acquisition, Martin Pütz, Susanne Niemeier & René Dirven (eds), 3–39. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008. Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, Diane. 1997. Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics 18(2): 141–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English. Applied Linguistics 27(4): 590–619. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. Looking ahead: Future directions in, and future research into, second language acquisition. Foreign Language Annals 51(1): 55–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lavi-Rotbain, Ori & Arnon, Inbal. 2022. The learnability consequences of Zipfian distributions in language. Cognition 223: 105038. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Le Foll, Elen. 2017. Textbook English: A corpus-based analysis of language use in German and French EFL textbooks. Poster presented at the Corpus Linguistics 2017 Conference, University of Birmingham, July. 〈[URL]〉 (20 October 2017).
. 2018a. “They were walking in a corridor when suddenly the mummy appeared.” A corpus-based study of narrative texts in secondary school EFL textbooks. Presented at the 13th Teaching Language and Corpora (TaLC) Conference, Cambridge, UK. DOI logo
. 2018b. Raising, *discovering and *exploiting awareness: Using the Internet as a source of collocational knowledge. Presented at the OLLReN Annual Online Conference: Research into using Technology for Language Learning, October. 〈[URL]〉 (13 April 2024)
. 2020a. Development and evaluation of a corpus linguistics seminar in pre-service teacher training. Presented at the Teaching and Language Corpora Conference (TaLC) 2020, Perpignan, July. 〈[URL]〉 (13 April 2024).
. 2020b. Issues in compiling and exploiting textbook corpora. Presented at the Japanese Association for English Corpus Studies 2020, Tokyo, October. DOI logo
. 2021a. A New Tagger for the Multi-Dimensional Analysis of Register Variation in English. M.Sc. thesis, Osnabrück University.
. 2021b. About the project. In Creating Corpus-Informed Materials for the English as a Foreign Language Classroom: A Step-by-Step Guide for (Trainee) Teachers Using Online Resources [Open Educational Resource], 3rd edn. 〈[URL]〉 (30 July 2021).
. 2021c. Register variation in school EFL textbooks. Register Studies 3(2): 207–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021d. Introducing the multi-feature tagger of English (MFTE). Perl. Osnabrück University. 〈[URL]〉 (5 January 2022).
. 2022a. “I’m putting some salt in my sandwich.” The use of the progressive in EFL textbook conversation. In Broadening the Spectrum of Corpus Linguistics: New Approaches to Variability and Change [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 105], Susanne Flach & Martin Hilpert (eds), 93–132. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2022b. Making tea and mistakes: The functions of make in spoken English and textbook dialogues. In Multifunctionality in English: Corpora, Language and Academic Literacy Pedagogy [Routledge Advances in Corpus Linguistics], Zihan Yin & Elaine Vine (eds), 157–78. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2022c. Textbook English: A Corpus-based Analysis of the Language of EFL Textbooks Used in Secondary Schools in France, Germany and Spain. PhD dissertation, Osnabrück University. [URL]. DOI logo
Le Foll, Elen. 2023a. “Opening up” corpus linguistics: An open education approach to developing corpus literacy among pre-service language teachers. Journal of Second Language Teacher Education 2(2): 161–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Le Foll, Elen. 2023b. The potential impact of EFL textbook language on learner English: A triangulated corpus study. In Demystifying Corpus Linguistics for English Language Teaching, Kieran Harrington & Patricia Ronan (eds), 259–287. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2023c. A conceptual replication of the Multi-dimensional Model of General Spoken and Written English (Biber 1988): Challenges, limitations and potential solutions. Presented at the ICAME44, NWU Vanderbijlpark (South Africa), May. 〈[URL]〉 (13 April 2024).
. 2024a. Schulenglisch: A multi-dimensional model of the variety of English taught in German secondary schools. AAA: Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik / Agenda: Advancing Anglophone Studies 49(1): 15–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2024b. Why we need Open Science and Open Education to bridge the corpus research–practice gap. In Corpora for Language Learning: Bridging the Research-Practice Divide, Peter Crosthwaite (ed.), 142–156. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. forthcoming. “To me, authenticity means credibility and correctness”: A data-driven learning approach to encouraging pre-service teachers to re-evaluate their understanding of “authentic English”. In Multiliteracies-aligned Teaching and Learning in Digitally-mediated Second Language Teacher Education, Carolyn Blume (ed.). London: Routledge. Preprint: [URL] (5 April 2024)
Le Foll, Elen & Brezina, Vaclav. 2023. Is multi-dimensional analysis replicable? Variables, parameters and transparency. Presented at CL2023, Lancaster University (UK), July.
Lê, Sébastien, Josse, Julie & Husson, François. 2008. FactoMineR: An R package for multivariate analysis. Journal of Statistical Software 25(1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leacock, Claudia, Chodorow, Martin, Gamon, Michael & Tetreault, Joel. 2010. Automated Grammatical Error Detection for Language Learners [Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies 10]. San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, David YW. 2001. Genres, registers, text types, domain, and styles: Clarifying the concepts and navigating a path through the BNC jungle. Language Learning & Technology 5(3): 37–72.Google Scholar
Lee, Hansol, Warschauer, Mark & Lee, Jang Ho. 2019. The effects of corpus use on second language vocabulary learning: A multilevel meta-analysis. Applied Linguistics 40(5): 721–753. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Yong Wey David. 2000. Modelling Variation in Spoken and Written Language: TheMmulti-dimensional Approach Revisited. PhD dissertation, Lancaster University.
Leńko-Szymańska, Agnieszka. 2017. Training teachers in data-driven learning: Tackling the challenge. Language Learning & Technology 21(3): 217–241.Google Scholar
Leńko-Szymańska, Agnieszka & Boulton, Alex. 2015. Introduction: Data-driven learning in language pedagogy. In Multiple affordances of Language Corpora for Data-driven Learning [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 69], Agnieszka Leńko-Szymańska & Alex Boulton (eds), 1–14. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lenth, Russell. 2020. emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. Manual. 〈[URL]〉 (12 July 2020).
Leroy, Michel. 2012. Les manuels scolaires: Situation et perspectives. n° 2012–036. Inspection générale de l’éducation nationale. 〈[URL]〉 (1 August 2018).
Levshina, Natalia. 2015. How to Do Linguistics with R: Data Exploration and Statistical Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Michael. 1993. The Lexical Approach. Hove: Language Teaching Publications.Google Scholar
. 1997. Implementing the Lexical Approach: Putting Theory into Practice. Hove: Language Teaching Publications.Google Scholar
. 2009. The Lexical Approach: The State of ELT and a Way Forward. London: Heinle.Google Scholar
Liedke, Martina. 2013. Mit Transkripten Deutsch lernen. In Gesprochene Sprache im DaF-Unterricht: Grundlagen – Ansätze – Praxis, Sandro M. Moraldo & Federica Missaglia (eds), 243–266. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Limberg, Holger. 2016. “Always remember to say Please and Thank You”: Teaching politeness with German EFL textbooks. In Pragmatics & Language Learning, Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig & César Félix-Brasdefer (eds), 265–292. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
Little, David, Devitt, Sean & Singleton, David. 1989. Learning Foreign Languages from Authentic Texts: Theory and Practice. Dublin: Authentik.Google Scholar
Little, David, Devitt, Seán & Singleton, David. 2002. The communicative approach and authentic texts. In Teaching Modern Languages, Ann Swarbrick (ed.), 51–55. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Littlejohn, Andrew. 2011. The analysis of language teaching materials: Inside the Trojan horse. In Materials Development in Language Teaching, Brian Tomlinson (ed.), 179–211. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, Dilin. 2011. The most frequently used English phrasal verbs in American and British English: A multicorpus examination. Tesol Quarterly 45(4): 661–688. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, Eric T. K. & Shaw, Philip M. 2001. Investigating learner vocabulary: A possible approach to looking at EFL/ESL learners’ qualitative knowledge of the word. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 39(3): 171–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ljung, Magnus. 1990. A Study of TEFL Vocabulary [Stockholm Studies in English 78]. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.Google Scholar
. 1991. Swedish TEFL meets reality. In English Computer Corpora: Selected Papers and Research Guide, Stig Johansson & Anna-Brita Stenström (eds), 245–256. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Loewen, Shawn & Gonulal, Talip. 2015. Exploratory factor analysis and principal components analysis. In Advancing Quantitative Methods in Second Language Research [Second Language Acquisition Research Series], Luke Plonsky (ed.), 182–211. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Love, Robbie, Dembry, Claire, Hardie, Andrew, Brezina, Vaclav & McEnery, Tony. 2017. The Spoken BNC2014. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 22(3): 319–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Love, Robbie, Hawtin, Abi & Hardie, Andrew. 2018. The British National Corpus 2014: User manual and reference guide. 〈[URL]〉 (15 November 2018).
Lüdecke, Daniel. 2020. sjPlot: Data visualization for statistics in social science. Manual. 〈[URL]〉 (12 July 2020).
Luke, Steven G. 2017. Evaluating significance in linear mixed-effects models in R. Behavior Research Methods 49(4): 1494–1502. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B. 2006. Emergentism--Use often and with care. Applied Linguistics 27(4): 729–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Madlener, Karin. 2018. Do findings from artificial language learning generalize to second language classrooms? In Usage-inspired L2 Instruction: Researched Pedagogy [Language Learning & Language Teaching 49], Andrea Tyler, Lourdes Ortega, Mariko Uno, & Hae In Park (eds), 211–234. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manning, Christopher D. 2011. Part-of-speech tagging from 97% to 100%: Is it time for some linguistics? In Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing [Lecture Notes in Computer Science], Alexander F. Gelbukh (ed.), 171–89. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, James R. & Rose, David. 2008. Genre Relations: Mapping Culture [Equinox Textbooks and Surveys in Linguistics]. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Martin, James R. 2009. Genre and language learning: A social semiotic perspective. Linguistics and Education 20(1): 10–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martinez, Ron & Schmitt, Norbert. 2012. A phrasal expressions list. Applied Linguistics 33(3): 299–320. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. 2019. Register in systemic functional linguistics. Register Studies 1(1): 10–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mauranen, Anna. 2003. The corpus of English as lingua franca in academic settings. TESOL Quarterly 37(3): 513–527. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004a. Speech corpora in the classroom. In Corpora and Language Learners [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 17], Guy Aston, Silvia Bernardini & Dominic Stewart (eds), 195–211. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004b. Spoken – General. Spoken corpus for an ordinary learner. In How to Use Corpora in Language Teaching [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 12], John McH. Sinclair (ed.), 89–108. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mauranen, Anna, Hynninen, Niina & Ranta, Elina. 2010. English as an academic lingua franca: The ELFA project. English for Specific Purposes 29(3): 183–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mayring, Philipp. 2010. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken [Beltz Pädagogik]. Weinheim: Beltz.Google Scholar
McCarthy, Michael. 1998. Spoken Language and Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
McCarthy, Michael & Carter, Ronald. 1995. Spoken grammar: What is it and how can we teach it? ELT journal 49(3): 207–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. Size isn’t everything: Spoken English, corpus, and the classroom. Tesol Quarterly 35(2): 337–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, Michael, McCarten, Jeanne & Sandiford, Helen. 2005. Touchstone. First edition. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
McEnery, Tony & Hardie, Andrew. 2011. Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McEnery, Tony & Xiao, Richard. 2011. What corpora can offer in language teaching and learning. In Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning [ESL & Applied Linguistics Professional Series], Eli Hinkel (ed.), 364–380. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
McManus, Kevin. In press. Replication and open science in applied linguistics Research. In Open Science in Applied Linguistics, Luke Plonsky (ed.). 〈Preprint: [URL]〉 (29 October 2021). DOI logo
Meunier, Fanny & Gouverneur, Céline. 2007. The treatment of phraseology in ELT textbooks. In Corpora in the Foreign Language Classroom, Encarnación Hidalgo, Luis Quereda & Juan Santana (eds), 119–139. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. New types of corpora for new educational challenges: Collecting, annotating and exploiting a corpus of textbook material. In Corpora and Language Teaching [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 33], Karin Aijmer (ed.), 179–201. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meunier, Fanny & Reppen, Randi. 2015. Corpus versus non-corpus-informed pedagogical materials: Grammar as the focus. In The Cambridge Handbook of English Corpus Linguistics [Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics], Douglas Biber & Randi Reppen (eds), 498–514. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meurers, Detmar. 2015. Learner corpora and natural language processing. In The Cambridge Handbook of Learner Corpus Research, Sylviane Granger, Gaetanelle Gilquin & Fanny Meunier (eds), 537–566. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meurers, Detmar, De Kuthy, Kordula, Nuxoll, Florian, Rudzewitz, Björn & Ziai, Ramon. 2019. Scaling up intervention studies to investigate real-life foreign language learning in school. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 39: 161–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meurers, Detmar, Ziai, Ramon, Amaral, Luiz, Boyd, Adriane, Dimitrov, Aleksandar, Metcalf, Vanessa & Ott, Niels. 2010. Enhancing authentic web pages for language learners. In Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications, 9. Los Angeles, CA. 〈[URL]〉 (21 January 2022).
Miekley, Joshua. 2005. ESL textbook evaluation checklist. The Reading Matrix 5(2).Google Scholar
Miller, Don. 2011. ESL reading textbooks vs. university textbooks: Are we giving our students the input they may need? Journal of English for Academic Purposes 10(1): 32–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milroy, James & Milroy, Lesley. 2012. Authority in Language: Investigating Standard English [Routledge Linguistics Classics]. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mindt, Dieter. 1987. Sprache, Grammatik, Unterrichtsgrammatik: Futurischer Zeitbezug im Englischen [Schule und Forschung]. Frankfurt: Diesterweg.Google Scholar
. 1992. Zeitbezug im Englischen: Eine didaktische Grammatik des Englischen Futurs [Tübinger Beiträge Zur Linguistik]. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
. 1995a. An Empirical Grammar of the English Verb: Modal Verbs. Berlin: Cornelsen.Google Scholar
. 1995b. Schulgrammatik vs. Grammatik der englischen Sprache. In Perspektiven des Grammatikunterrichts, Claus Gnutzmann & Frank G. Königs (eds), 47–68. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
. 1996. English corpus linguistics and the foreign language teaching syllabus. In Using Corpora for Language Research, Jenny Thomas & Mick Short (eds), 232–247. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
. 1997. Corpora and the teaching of English in Germany. In Teaching and Language Corpora [Applied Linguistics and Language Study], Anne Wichmann (ed.), 40–50. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Mishan, F. 2005. Designing Authenticity into Language Learning Materials [Play Text Series]. Portland, OR: Intellect Books.Google Scholar
Mishra, Punya & Koehler, Matthew J. 2006. Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record 108(6): 1017–1054. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mizumoto, Atsushi & Plonsky, Luke. 2016. R as a lingua franca: Advantages of using R for quantitative research in applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics 37(2): 284–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mohr, Susanne, Jansen, Sandra & Forsberg, Julia. 2019. European English in the EFL classroom? Teacher attitudes towards target varieties of English in Sweden and Germany. English Today, 37(2): 85–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Möller, Stefan. 2016. Sourcebook rather than coursebook. Lernerorientiert mit dem Lehrwerk arbeiten. Der fremdsprachliche Unterricht Englisch 50(143): 12–18.Google Scholar
Möller, Verena. 2017. A statistical analysis of learner corpus data, experimental data and individual differences: Monofactorial vs. multifactorial approaches. In Language, Learners and Levels: Progression and Variation, Pieter de Haan, Rina de Vries & Sanne van Vuuren (eds), 409–439. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Moreno, Ana I. 2003. Matching theoretical descriptions of discourse and practical applications to teaching: The case of causal metatext. English for Specific Purposes 22(3): 265–295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moyer, Alene. 2008. Input as a critical means to an end: Quantity and quality of experience in L2 phonological attainment. In Input Matters in SLA, Thorsten Piske & Martha Young-Scholten (eds), 159–174. Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Foreign Accent: The Phenomenon of Non-Native Speech. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mukherjee, Joybrato. 2004. Bridging the gap between applied corpus linguistics and the reality of English language teaching in Germany. In Applied Corpus Linguistics: A Multidimensional Perspective, Ulla Connor & Thomas Upton (eds), 239–250. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mukundan, Jayakaran. 2010. Retrotext- E 1.0: The beginnings of computer-based ELT textbook evaluation. Advances in Language and Literary Studies 1(2): 270–280.Google Scholar
Mukundan, Jayakaran & Ahour, Touran. 2010. A review of textbook evaluation checklists across four decades (1970–2008). In Research for Materials Development in Language Learning: Evidence for Best Practice, Brian Tomlinson & Hitomi Masuhara (eds), 336–352. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Mukundan, Jayakaran, Leong Chiew Har, Amelia & Nimehchisalem, Vahid. 2012. Distribution of articles in Malaysian secondary school English language textbooks. English Language and Literature Studies 2(2): 62–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mukundan, Jayakaran & Roslim, Norwati. 2009. Textbook representation of prepositions. English Language Teaching 2(4): 13–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, Simone. 2005. Discourse Markers in Native and Non-Native English Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 138]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mundry, Roger & Sommer, Christina. 2007. Discriminant function analysis with nonindependent data: Consequences and an alternative. Animal Behaviour 74(4): 965–976. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Munro, Murray J. & Derwing, Tracey M. 1998. The effects of speaking rate on listener evaluations of native and foreign-accented speech. Language Learning 48(2): 159–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murphy, M. Lynne. 2003. Semantic Relations and the Lexicon: Antonymy, Synonymy and Other Paradigms. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nakagawa, Shinichi, Johnson, Paul C. D. & Schielzeth, Holger. 2017. The coefficient of determination R2 and intra-class correlation coefficient from generalized linear mixed-effects models revisited and expanded. Journal of The Royal Society Interface 14(134): 20170213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Mike. 2022. Corpora for English Language Learning Textbook Evaluation. In The Routledge Handbook of Corpora and English Language Teaching and Learning [Routledge Handbooks in Applied Linguistics], Reka R. Jablonkai & Eniko Csomay (eds). London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nesselhauf, Nadja. 2005. Collocations in a Learner Corpus [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 14]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neumann, Stella & Evert, Stefan. 2021. A register variation perspective on varieties of English. In Corpus-based Approaches to Register Variation [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 103], Elena Seoane & Douglas Biber (eds), 144–78. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nini, Andrea. 2014. Multidimensional Analysis Tagger (MAT), 〈[URL]〉 (18 September 2019).
. 2019. The multi-dimensional analysis tagger. In Multi-Dimensional Analysis: Research Methods and Current Issues, Tony Berber Sardinha & Marcia Veirano Pinto (eds), 67–96. London: Bloomsbury. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ninio, Anat. 1999. Pathbreaking verbs in syntactic development and the question of prototypical transitivity. Journal of Child Language 26(3): 619–653. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nold, Günter. 1998. Die Arbeit mit dem Lehrwerk. In English lernen und lehren – Didaktik des Englischunterrichts, Johannes P. Timm (ed.), 127–36. Berlin: Cornelsen.Google Scholar
Nordlund, Marie. 2016. EFL textbooks for young learners: A comparative analysis of vocabulary. Education Inquiry 7(1): 47–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Novakova, Iva & Siepmann, Dirk (eds). 2020. Phraseology and Style in Subgenres of the Novel: A Synthesis of Corpus and Literary Perspectives. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
OECD, European Union, UNESCO Institute for Statistics. 2015. ISCED 2011 Operational Manua : Guidelines for Classifying National Education Programmes and Related Qualifications. Paris: OECD Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oelkers, Jürgen. 2008. Lehrplanentwicklung, Lehrmittel und Bildungsstandards. presented at the Klausurtagung der Leitungskonferenz des Staatsinstituts für Schulentwicklung und Bildungsforschung, St. Quirin. 〈[URL]〉 (8 February 2022).
O’Keeffe, Anne, McCarthy, Michael & Carter, Ronald. 2007. From Corpus to Classroom: Language Use and Language Teaching. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Osborne, Jason W. & Fitzpatrick, David C. 2005. Replication analysis in exploratory factor analysis: What it is and why it makes your analysis better. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation 17(7): 1–9.Google Scholar
Papert, Seymour A. 2020. Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. New York, NY: Hachette.Google Scholar
Paquot, Magali & Plonsky, Luke. 2017. Quantitative research methods and study quality in learner corpus research. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 3(1): 61–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parsons, Sam, Azevedo, Flávio, Elsherif, Mahmoud M., Guay, Samuel, Shahim, Owen N., Govaart, Gisela H., Norris, Emma et al. 2022. A community-sourced glossary of open scholarship terms. Nature Human Behaviour 6(3): 312–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peacock, Matthew. 1997. The effect of authentic materials on the motivation of EFL learners. ELT Journal 51(2): 144–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Paredes, Pascual & Abad, Malena. Forthcoming. Integrating language teachers’ voices in the design and exploitation of Spanish corpora in the UK. In Applying Corpora in Teaching and Learning Romance Languages, Henry Tyne & Stefania Spina (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Pérez-Paredes, Pascual & Mark, Geraldine (eds). 2021. Beyond Concordance Lines: Corpora in Language Education [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 102]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Paredes, Pascual, Mark, Geraldine & O’Keeffe, Anne. 2020. The impact of usage-based approaches on second language learning and teaching [Cambridge Education Research Reports]. Cambridge: CUP. 〈[URL]〉 (9 July 2021).
Phakiti, Aek & Plonsky, Luke. 2018. Reconciling beliefs about L2 learning with SLA theory and research. RELC Journal 49(2): 217–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Piaget, Jean. 2013. The Construction of Reality in the Child. Oxon: Taylor & Francis. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Picoral, Adriana, Staples, Shelley & Reppen, Randi. 2021. Automated annotation of learner English: An evaluation of software tools. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 7(1): 17–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, Manfred. 1984. Psychological constraints on the teachability of languages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 6(2): 186–214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Popescu, Marius. 2011. Studying translationese at the character level. In Proceedings of Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, 634–639. Hissar, Bulgaria.Google Scholar
Porte, Graeme & McManus, Kevin. 2018. Doing Replication Research in Applied Linguistics. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Posner, Michael I. & Keele, Steven W. 1968. On the genesis of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology 77(3, Pt.1): 353–363. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1970. Retention of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology 83(2, Pt. 1): 304–308. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prabhu, Nagore Seshagiri. 1989. Materials as support; Materials as constraint. Guidelines: A Periodical for Classroom Language Teachers 11(1): 66–74.Google Scholar
Prodromou, Luke. 1992. What culture? Which culture? Cross-cultural factors in language learning. ELT journal 46(1): 39–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1996. Correspondence. ELT Journal 50(1): 88–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. In search of the successful user of English How a corpus of non-native speaker language could impact on EFL teaching. Modern English Teacher 12(2): 5–15.Google Scholar
Prowse, Philip. 1998. How writers write: Testimony from authors. In Materials Development in Language Teaching, Brian Tomlinson (ed.), 130–145. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Quaglio, Paulo. 2009. Television Dialogue: The Sitcom Friends vs. Natural Conversation [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 36]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph. 1995. Grammatical and Lexical Variance in English. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
R Core Team. 2022. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Manual. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. 〈[URL]〉 (29 January 2021).
Ramjattan, Vijay A. 2019. The white native speaker and inequality regimes in the private English language school. Intercultural Education 30(2): 126–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ranalli, James M. 2003. The treatment of key vocabulary learning strategies in current ELT course books: Repetition, resource use, recording. MA thesis, University of Birmingham. 〈[URL]〉 (10 August 2017).
Rankin, Tom. 2010. Advanced learner corpus data and grammar teaching: Adverb placement. In Corpus-Based Approaches to English Language Teaching, Mari Carmen Campoy Cubillo, Begoña Bellés-Fortuño & Maria Lluïsa Gea-Valor (eds), 205–2015. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Rasch, Björn, Friese, Malte, Hofmann, Wilhelm & Naumann, Ewald. 2014. Einfaktorielle Varianzanalyse. In Quantitative Methoden, 2: Einführung in die Statistik für Psychologen und Sozialwissenschaftler [Springer-Lehrbuch], Björn Rasch, Malte Friese, Wilhelm Hofmann & Ewald Naumann (eds), 1–34. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rautionaho, Paula & Deshors, Sandra C. 2018. Progressive or not progressive? Modeling the constructional choices of EFL and ESL writers. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4(2): 225–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reda, Ghsoon. 2003. English coursebooks: Prototype texts and basic vocabulary norms. ELT Journal 57(3): 260–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reder, Stephen, Harris, Kathryn & Setzler, Kristen. 2003. The multimedia adult ESL learner corpus. TESOL Quarterly 37(3): 546–557. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reinders, Hayo & Ellis, Rod. 2009. The effects of two types of input on intake and the acquisition of implicit and explicit knowledge. In Implicit and Explicit Knowledge in Second Language Learning, Testing and Teaching, Rod Ellis, Shawn Loewen, Catherine Elder, Hayo Reinders, Rosemary Erlam & Jenefer Philp (eds), 281–302. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reppen, Randi. 1994. Variation in Elementary Student Writing. PhD dissertation, Northern Arizona University.
. (2001) 2013. Register variation in student and adult speech and writing. In Variation in English: Multi-dimensional Studies, Susan Conrad & Douglas Biber (eds), 187–99. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Revelle, William. 2020. psych: Procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality research. Evanston, IL. 〈[URL]〉 (20 April 2021).
Révész, Andrea & Brunfaut, Tineke. 2013. Text characteristics of task input and difficulty in second language listening comprehension. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 35(1): 31–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richards, Jack C. 2001. Curriculum Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015. Key Issues in Language Teaching. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richardson, Leonard. 2015. Beautiful Soup 4.4.0 documentation, 2015. 〈[URL]〉 (7 January 2022).
Roberts, Celia & Cooke, Melanie. 2009. Authenticity in the adult ESOL classroom and beyond. TESOL Quarterly 43(4): 620–642. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Peter J. & Ellis, Nick C. (eds). 2008. Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rohleder, Bernhard. 2019. Smart school – Auf dem Weg zur digitalen Schule. presented at the Bitkom Research GmbH, Berlin, March 12. 〈[URL]〉 (29 September 2020).
Römer, Ute. 2004a. A corpus-driven approach to modal auxiliaries and their didactics. In How to Use Corpora in Language Teaching [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 12], John McH. Sinclair (ed.), 185–99. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004b. Comparing real and ideal language learner input: The use of an EFL textbook corpus in corpus linguistics and language teaching. In Corpora and Language Learners [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 17], Guy Aston, Silvia Bernardini & Dominic Stewart (eds), 151–168. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Progressives, Patterns, Pedagogy: A Corpus-Driven Approach to English Progressive Forms, Functions, Contexts, and Didactics [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 18]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Pedagogical applications of corpora: Some reflections on the current scope and a wish list for future developments. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 54(2): 121–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Learner language and the norms in native corpora and EFL teaching materials: A case study of English conditionals. In Proceedings of the Anglistentag 2006, Sabine Volk-Birke & Julia Lippert (eds), 355–363. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.Google Scholar
. 2010. Using general and specialized corpora in English language teaching: Past, present and future. In Mari Carmen Campoy Cubillo, Begoña Bellés Fortuño & Maria Lluïsa Gea-Valor (eds.), Corpus-based approaches to English language teaching, 18–38. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Römer, Ute & Berger, Cynthia M. 2019. Observing the emergence of constructional knowledge: Verb patterns in German and Spanish learners of English at different proficiency levels. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 41(5): 1089–1111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rose, David & Martin, James R. 2012. Learning to Write, Reading to Learn: Genre, Knowledge and Pedagogy in the Sydney School. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Rösler, Dietmar & Schart, Michael. 2016. Die Perspektivenvielfalt der Lehrwerkanalyse und ihr weißer Fleck: Einführung in zwei Themenhefte. Info DaF 5(43): 483–493. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rühlemann, Christoph. 2008. A register approach to teaching conversation: Farewell to standard English? Applied Linguistics 29(4): 672–693. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rundell, Michael. 2008. The corpus revolution revisited. English Today 24(1): 23–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Runte, Maren. 2015. Lernerlexikographie und Wortschatzerwerb. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rüschoff, Bernd & Wolff, Dieter. 1999. Fremdsprachenlernen in der Wissensgesellschaft: zum Einsatz der neuen Technologien in Schule und Unterricht. Munich: Hueber Verlag.Google Scholar
Scales, Julie, Wennerstrom, Ann, Richard, Dara & Wu, Su Hui. 2006. Language learners’ perceptions of accent. TESOL Quarterly 40(4): 715. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schaer, Ursula. 2007. Source books rather than course books – Die Bildungsreform im Fremdsprachenunterricht und die neue Rolle für die Lehr-mittel. Beiträge zur Lehrerbildung 25(2): 255–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schäfer, Werner. 2003. Unterrichten ohne Lehrbuch? Einige unzeitgemäße Bemerkungen. Praxis des neusprachlichen Unterrichts 50(3): 305–311.Google Scholar
Schauer, Gila A. & Adolphs, Svenja. 2006. Expressions of gratitude in corpus and DCT data: Vocabulary, formulaic sequences, and pedagogy. System 34(1): 119–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1993. Reflections on quantification in the study of conversation. Research on Language & Social Interaction 26(1): 99–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scheiwe, Lisa. 2022. Evaluating accents of English in ELT textbooks used at German secondary schools. Anglistik 33(2): 61–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schildhauer, Peter, Schulte, Marion & Zehne, Carolin. 2020. Global Englishes in the classroom. PFLB. Zeitschrift für Schul- und Professionsentwicklung 2(4): 26–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schlüter, Norbert. 2002. Present Perfect: Eine Korpuslinguistische Analyse des Englischen Perfekts mit Vermittlungsvorschlägen für den Sprachunterricht [Language in Performance 25]. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Schönbrodt, Felix D. 2016. p-hacker: Train your p-hacking skills! 〈[URL]〉 (28 January 2022).
Schweinberger, Martin. 2020. Best practices in corpus linguistics. Presented at the ICAME41, Heidelberg University, May. 〈[URL]〉 (26 July 2021).
Scott, Mike. 2011. WordSmith Tools. Stroud: Lexical Analysis Software.Google Scholar
Segermann, Krista. 2000. Eine neue Lehrwerk-Konzeption: Lehrbuch für Lehrer–Lernmaterialien für Schüler. Praxis des neusprachlichen Unterrichts 47(4): 339–348.Google Scholar
Seidlhofer, Barbara. 2001. Closing a conceptual gap: The case for a description of English as a lingua franca. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 11(2): 133–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Séré, Alain & Bassy, Alain-Marie. 2010. Le manuel scolaire à l’heure du numérique : Une ‘nouvelle donne’ de la politique de ressources pour l’enseignement. n° 2010–087. Inspection générale de l’éducation nationale. 〈[URL]〉 (6 January 2022).
Siegel, A. 2014. What should we talk about? The authenticity of textbook topics. ELT Journal 68(4): 363–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siepmann, Dirk. 2004. Discourse Markers across Languages: A Contrastive Study of Second-Level Discourse Markers in Native and Non-Native Text with Implications for General and Pedagogic Lexicography. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Wortschatz und Grammatik: Zusammenbringen, was zusammengehört. Beiträge zur Fremdsprachenvermittlung 46: 59–80.Google Scholar
. 2011. Any chance of a bloody drink sometime this century? Generische Strukturen einer Gesprächssituation analysieren. Der fremdsprachliche Unterricht Englisch 45(114): 22–26.Google Scholar
. 2014. Zur Repräsentation von Mehrwortausdrücken in deutschen Lehrwerken des Englischen. In Sprachwissenschaft und Fremdsprachenunterricht: Spracherwerb und Sprachkompetenzen im Fokus, Dirk Siepmann & Christoph Bürgel (eds). Baltmannsweiler: Schneider Verlag Hohengehren.Google Scholar
. 2018a. A Grammar of Spoken and Written French, Vol. 5: Prepositions. Leipzig: Independently published.Google Scholar
. 2018b. Zum Verhältnis von Fachwissenschaften, Fachdidaktik und Sprachpraxis in der universitären Lehrerausbildung: Theoretische Überlegungen und Anregungen für eine kohärentere Praxis. In Universitäre Englischlehrerbildung: Wege zu mehr Kohärenz im Studium und Korrespondenz mit der Praxis, Bärbel Diehr (ed.), 103–121. Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2019. Grammatik des gesprochenen und geschriebenen Französisch, Bd. 3: Das Adjektiv. Leipzig: Amazon Distribution.Google Scholar
Siepmann, Dirk & Bürgel, Christoph. 2022. Band 2: Das Nomen [Grammatik des gesprochenen und geschriebenen Französisch]. Leipzig: Independently published.Google Scholar
Siepmann, Dirk, Gallagher, John D., Hannay, Mike & Mackenzie, J. Lachlan. 2011. Writing in English: A Guide for Advanced Learners, 2nd, rev. & ext. edn. Tübingen: Francke. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sigley, Robert J. 1997. Text categories and where you can stick them: A crude formality index. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 2(2): 199–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simmons, Joseph P., Nelson, Leif D. & Simonsohn, Uri. 2011. False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science 22(11): 1359–1366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, John McH. 1983. Naturalness in language. In Corpus Linguistics: Recent Developments in the Use of Computer Corpora in English Language Research [Costerus 45], Jan Aarts & Willem Meijs (eds), 203–210. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
1991. Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
1992. The automatic analysis of corpora. In Directions in Corpus Linguistics, Jan Svartvik (ed.), 379–400. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.). 2004. How to Use Corpora in Language Teaching [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 12]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, John McH., Fox, Gwyneth, Bullon, Stephen, Krishnamurthy, Ramesh, Manning, Elisabeth & Todd, John (eds). 1990. Collins Cobuild English Grammar: Helping Learners with Real English. Glasgow: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John McH. & Renouf, Antoinette. 1988. A lexical syllabus for language learning. In Vocabulary and Language Teaching, Ronald Carter & Michael McCarthy (eds), 140–158. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Singapore Wala, Duriya Aziz. 2013. The instructional design of a coursebook is as it is because of what it has to oo–An application of systemic functional theory. In Developing Materials for Language Teaching, Brian Tomlinson (ed), 2nd edn, 119–138. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Skehan, Peter. 2014. Individual Differences in Second-Language Learning. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Christopher Arnold. 2020. A Triangulated Accounting of Top Notch 2: Negotiating Ideologies in the Multimodal Discourse of an EFL Textbook in Korean University Classrooms. PhD dissertation, Carleton University. 〈[URL]〉 (13 February 2022).
Sommer, Roy. 2020. Lehrerbildung aus fachwissenschaftlicher Perspektive: Beispiel Anglistik. In Die Stimmen der Fächer hören: Fachprofil und Bildungsanspruch in der Lehrerbildung, Michaela Heer & Ulrich Heinen (eds), 307–324. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh.Google Scholar
Spada, Nina & Lightbown, Patsy M. 1999. Instruction, first language influence, and developmental readiness in second language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal 83(1): 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spoustová, Drahomíra, Hajič, Jan, Raab, Jan & Spousta, Miroslav. 2009. Semi-supervised training for the averaged perceptron POS tagger. In Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on – EACL ’09, 763–771. Athens, Greece: Association for Computational Linguistics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spring, Ryan. 2018. Teaching phrasal verbs more efficiently: Using corpus studies and cognitive linguistics to create a particle list. Advances in Language and Literary Studies 9(5): 121–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Starkey, Louise, Shonfeld, Miri, Prestridge, Sarah & Cervera, Mercè Gisbert. 2021. Special issue: Covid-19 and the Role of Technology and Pedagogy on School Education during a Pandemic. Technology, Pedagogy and Education 30(1): 1–5. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol. 2020. Corpus Linguistics: A Guide to the Methodology [Textbooks in Language Science 7]. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Stein, Marcy, Stuen, Carol, Carnine, Douglas & Long, Roger M. 2001. Textbook evaluation and adoption. Reading & Writing Quarterly 17(1): 5–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stranks, Jeff. 2013. Materials for the teaching of grammar. In Developing Materials for Language Teaching, 2nd edn, 337–350. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Sun, Zhuomin. 2010. Language teaching materials and learner motivation. Journal of Language Teaching and Research 1(6): 889–892. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swaffar, Janet K. 1985. Reading authentic texts in a foreign language: A cognitive model. The Modern Language Journal 69(1): 15–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Syndicat national de l’édition. 2021. Chiffres clés de l’édition. Syndicat national de l’édition, 21 July 2021. 〈[URL]〉 (2 January 2022).
Tabachnick, Barbara G. & Fidell, Linda S. 2014. Using Multivariate Statistics [Always Learning]. 6th edn. Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar
Tan, Melinda. 2003. Language corpora for language teachers. Journal of Language and Learning 1(2): 98–105.Google Scholar
Tateyama, Yumiko. 2019. Pragmatics in a language classroom. In The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition and Pragmatics, Naoko Taguchi (ed.), 400–413. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charlotte. 2008. What is corpus linguistics? What the data says. ICAME Journal 32: 179–200.Google Scholar
Tesch, Felicitas. 1990. Die Indefinitpronomina Some und Any im Authentischen Englischen Sprachgebrauch und in Lehrwerken: Eine Empirische Untersuchung [Tübinger Beiträge zur Linguistik 345]. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Thompson, Paul, Hunston, Susan, Murakami, Akira & Vajn, Dominik. 2017. Multi-dimensional analysis, text constellations, and interdisciplinary discourse. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 22(2): 153–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Paul & Sealey, Alison. 2007. Through children’s eyes? Corpus evidence of the features of children’s literature. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 12(1): 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thornbury, Scott. 2000. Plenary: Deconstructing grammar. In IATEFL 2000: Dublin Conference Selections, Alan Pulverness (ed.), 59–67. Faversham: IATEFL.Google Scholar
. 2002. Training in instructional conversation. In Language in Language Teacher Education [Language Learning & Language Teaching 4], Hugh Trappes-Lomax & Gibson Ferguson (eds), 95–106. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Timmis, Ivor. 2003. Corpora, Classroom and Context: The Place of Spoken Grammar in English Language Teaching. PhD dissertation, University of Nottingham.
. 2013. Corpora and materials: Towards a working relationship. In Developing Materials for Language Teaching, Brian Tomlinson (ed.), 2nd edn, 461–474. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
. 2015. Corpus Linguistics for ELT: Research and Practice [Routledge Corpus Linguistics Guides]. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. Humanising coursebook dialogues. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 10(2): 144–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tognini-Bonelli, Elena. 2001. Corpus Linguistics at Work [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 6]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, Michael. 2005. Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomlinson, Brian. 2001. Materials development. In The Cambridge Guide to Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages, David Nunan & Ronald Carter (eds), 66–71. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.). 2008. English Language Learning Materials: A Critical Review. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
. 2012. Materials development for language learning and teaching. Language Teaching 45(2): 143–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.). 2013a. Applied Linguistics and Materials Development. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
(ed.). 2013b. Developing Materials for Language Teaching. 2nd edn. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Tomlinson, Brian, Dat, Bao, Masuhara, Hitomi & Rugdy, Rani. 2001. Survey review. EFL courses for adults. ELT Journal 55(1): 80–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tono, Yukio. 2004. Multiple comparisons of IL, L1 and TL corpora: The case of L2 acquisition of verb subcategorization patterns by Japanese learners of English. In Corpora and Language Learners [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 17], Guy Aston, Silvia Bernardini & Dominic Stewart (eds), 45–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tony, Bex. 1999. Standard English: The Widening Debate. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Torres-Martínez, Sergio. 2019. Applied Cognitive Construction Grammar: A Cognitive Guide to the Teaching of Phrasal Verbs. Medellín: Lulu.com.Google Scholar
Toutanova, Kristina, Klein, Dan, Manning, Christopher D. & Singer, Yoram. 2003. Feature-rich part-of-speech tagging with a cyclic dependency network. In Proceedings of the 2003 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Human Language Technology, Vol. 1, 173–80. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Toutanova, Kristina & Manning, Christopher D. 2000. Enriching the knowledge sources used in a maximum entropy part-of-speech tagger. In Proceedings of the 2000 Joint SIGDAT Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Very Large Corpora Held in Conjunction with the 38th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Vol. 13, 63–70. Hong Kong: Association for Computational Linguistics, DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trabelsi, Soufiane, Tomlinson, Brian & Masuhara, Hitomi. 2010. Developing and trialling authentic materials for business English students at a Tunisian university. In Research for Materials Development in Language Learning: Evidence for Best Practice, Brian Tomlinson & Hitomi Masuhara (eds), 103–120. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Tracy-Ventura, Nicole & Paquot, Magali. 2020. The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition and Corpora. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsaroucha, Efthymia. 2018. A Cognitive Linguistics Approach to English Phrasal Verbs. PhD dissertation, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki. 〈[URL]〉 (14 April 2024).
Tyler, Andrea. 2012. Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Learning: Theoretical Basics and Experimental Evidence. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Andrea E. & Ortega, Lourdes. 2018. Usage-inspired L2 instruction: An emergent, researched pedagogy. In Usage-Inspired L2 Instruction: Researched Pedagogy [Language Learning & Language Teaching 49], Andrea E. Tyler, Lourdes Ortega, Mariko Uno & Hae In Park (eds), 3–26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Andrea, Ortega, Lourdes, Uno, Mariko & Park, Hae In (eds). 2018. Usage-Inspired L2 Instruction: Researched Pedagogy [Language Learning & Language Teaching 49]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ur, Penny. 2011. Research, theory, and practice. In Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning [ESL & Applied Linguistics Professional Series], Eli Hinkel (ed.), Vol. 2, 507–22. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Usó-Juan, Esther. 2008. A pragmatic-focused evaluation of requests and their modification devices in textbook conversations. In Learning How to Request in an Instructed Language Learning Context, Eva Alcón Soler (ed.), 65–90. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Usó-Juan, Esther & Martínez-Flor, Alicia. 2010. The teaching of speech acts in second and foreign language instructional contexts. In Pragmatics across Languages and Cultures, 423–442. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Valero Garcés, Carmen. 1998. Some pedagogical and practical implications of contrastive studies in ELT. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada 13: 27–36.Google Scholar
van de Werfhorst, Herman, Kessenich, Emma & Geven, Sara. 2020. The digital divide in online education. Inequality in digital preparedness of students and schools before the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. Pre-print published on OSF. 〈[URL]〉 (1 February 2022).
van Lier, Leo. 2013. Interaction in the Language Curriculum: Awareness, Autonomy and Authenticity. Hoboken, NJ: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Van Rossum, Guido & Drake, Fred L. 2009. Python 3 Reference Manual. Python Software Foundation, 〈[URL]〉 (4 January 2019).
Varmış Kiliç, Zerhan & Genç İlter, Binnur. 2015. The effect of authentic materials on 12th grade students’ attitudes in EFL Classes. ELT Research Journal 4(1): 2–15.Google Scholar
Veirano Pinto, Marcia. 2019. Using discriminate function analysis in multi-dimensional analysis. In Multi-Dimensional Analysis: Research Methods and Current Issues, Tony Berber Sardinha & Marcia Veirano Pinto (eds), 217–230. London: Bloomsbury Academic. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Velicer, Wayne F. & Jackson, Douglas N. 1990. Component analysis versus common factor analysis: Some issues in selecting an appropriate procedure. Multivariate Behavioral Research 25(1): 1–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vellenga, Heidi. 2004. Learning pragmatics from ESL & EFL textbooks: How likely? TESL-EJ Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language 8(2).Google Scholar
Verspoor, Marjolijn. 2017. Complex dynamic systems theory and L2 pedagogy. In Complexity Theory and Language Development: In Celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman [Language Learnung & Language Teaching 48], Lourdes Ortega & Han ZhaoHong (eds), 143–162. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verspoor, Marjolijn, Lowie, Wander & van Dijk, Marijn. 2008. Variability in second language development from a dynamic systems perspective. The Modern Language Journal 92(2): 214–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Viana, Vander (ed.). 2023. Teaching English with Corpora: A Resource Book. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Vielau, Axel. 2005. Lehrwerk, quo vadis? Einflüsse auf die Lehrwerkentwicklung. In Niemals Zu Früh und Selten Zu Spät: Fremdsprachenunterricht in Schule und Erwachsenenbildung. Festschrift für Jürgen Quetz, Eva Burwitz-Melzer & Gert Solmecke (eds), 137–147. Berlin: Cornelsen.Google Scholar
Vine, Elaine W. 2013. Corpora and coursebooks compared: Category ambiguous words. In Twenty Years of Learner Corpus Research. Looking Back, Moving Ahead: Proceedings of the First Learner Corpus Research Conference (LCR 2011), Vol. 1, 463–78. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Vogt, Karin. 2011. Fremdsprachliche Kompetenzprofile: Entwicklung und Abgleichung von GeR-Deskriptoren für Fremdsprachenlernen mit einer beruflichen Anwendungsorientierung. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Volansky, Vered, Ordan, Noam & Wintner, Shuly. 2015. On the features of translationese. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 30(1): 98–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Volkmann, Laurenz. 2010. Fachdidaktik Englisch: Kultur und Sprache. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Vyatkina, Nina. 2020. Corpora as open educational resources for language teaching. Foreign Language Annals 53(2): 359–370, DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waibel, Birgit. 2005. Corpus-based approaches to learner interlanguage: Case studies based on the “International Corpus of Learner English”. AAA: Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik 30(1–2): 143–176.Google Scholar
Wallis, Sean. 2020. Statistics in Corpus Linguistics Research: A New Approach. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weninger, Csilla & Kiss, Tamas. 2013. Culture in English as a foreign language (EFL) textbooks: A semiotic approach. TESOL Quarterly 47(4): 694–716. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Werner, Valentin. 2021. Text-linguistic analysis of performed language: Revisiting and re-modeling Koch and Oesterreicher. Linguistics 59(3): 541–575. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whitelaw, Casey & Argamon, Shlomo. 2004. Systemic functional features in stylistic text classification. AAAI Technical Report (7).Google Scholar
Widdowson, Henry G. 1978. Teaching Language as Communication. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
1984. Explorations in Applied Linguistics, 2nd edn. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
1989. Knowledge of language and ability for use. Applied Linguistics 10(2): 128–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003. Defining Issues in English Language Teaching [Oxford Applied Linguistics]. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Wieling, Martijn, Rawee, Josine & van Noord, Gertjan. 2018. Reproducibility in computational linguistics: Are we willing to share? Computational Linguistics 44(4): 641–649. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiese, Heike, Mayr, Katharina, Krämer, Philipp, Seeger, Patrick, Müller, Hans-Georg & Mezger, Verena. 2017. Changing teachers’ attitudes towards linguistic diversity: Effects of an anti-bias programme. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 27(1): 198–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, Mark D., Dumontier, Michel, Aalbersberg, IJsbrand Jan, Appleton, Gabrielle, Axton, Myles, Baak, Arie, Blomberg, Niklas et al. 2016. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data 3(1): 160018. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Willis, Dave. 2009. Rules, Patterns and Words: Grammar and Lexis in English Language Teaching [Cambridge Language Teaching Library]. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Winter, Bodo. 2019. Statistics for Linguists: An Introduction Using R. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winter, Tatjana & Le Foll, Elen. 2022. Testing the pedagogical norm: Comparing if-conditionals in EFL textbooks, learner writing and English outside the classroom. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 8(1): 31–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolff, Dieter. 1984. Lehrbuchtexte und Verstehensprozesse in einer zweiten Sprache. Neusprachliche Mitteilungen aus Wissenschaft und Praxis 37(1): 4–11.Google Scholar
Wolk, Christoph, Götz, Sandra & Jäschke, Katja. 2021. Possibilities and drawbacks of using an online application for semi-automatic corpus analysis to investigate discourse markers and alternative fluency variables. Corpus Pragmatics 5: 7–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wood, David. 2010. Lexical clusters in an EAP textbook corpus. In Perspectives on Formulaic Language: Acquisition and Communication, David Wood (ed.), 88–106. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Wood, David & Appel, Randy. 2014. Multiword constructions in first year business and engineering university textbooks and EAP textbooks. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 15: 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wulff, Stefanie, Ellis, Nick C., Römer, Ute, Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen & Leblanc, Chelsea J. 2009. The acquisition of tense-aspect: Converging evidence from corpora and telicity ratings. The Modern Language Journal 93(3): 354–369. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wulff, Stefanie & Gries, Stefan Th. 2021. Exploring individual variation in learner corpus research: Methodological suggestions. In Learner Corpus Research Meets Second Language Acquisition [Cambridge Applied Linguistics], Bert Le Bruyn & Magali Paquot (eds), 191–213. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xiao, Richard. 2009. Theory-driven corpus research: Using corpora to inform aspect theory. In Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook [Handbücher Zur Sprach- Und Kommunikationswissenschaft = Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science], Anke Lüdeling & Merja Kytö (eds), Vol. 2, 987–1007. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yoo, Isaiah WonHo. 2009. The English definite article: What ESL/EFL grammars say and what corpus findings show. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 8(4): 267–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yoo, Soyung. 2013. Hypothetical Would-Clauses in Korean EFL Textbooks: An Analysis Based on a Corpus Study and Focus on Form Approach. Portland State University M.A. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Zarifi, Abdolvahed & Mukundan, Jayakaran. 2012. Phrasal verbs in Malaysian ESL textbooks. English Language Teaching 5(5): 9–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zipf, George Kingsley. 1935. The Psycho-Biology of Language: An Introduction to Dynamic Philology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1949. Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort: An Introduction to Human Ecology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar