Cover not available
Part of
Investigating Wikipedia: Linguistic corpus building, exploration and analysis
Edited by Céline Poudat, Harald Lüngen and Laura Herzberg
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 121] 2024
► pp. 205–234

Chapter 8
Disagreements and conflicts in Wikipedia talk pages

| Côte d’Azur University, CNRS, BCL
| Côte d’Azur University, CNRS, BCL
Collaborative situations inevitably generate disagreements and even conflicts. Over the last decade, Wikipedia has been extensively studied, but mostly from the perspective of social sciences. Conflicts have been described in great detail, along with phenomena such as quality, coordination, or in relation to maintenance work. However, most of the studies available did not define, nor measure conflicts from a linguistic perspective. The following chapter concentrates on two types of speech acts, which we consider to be of particular significance, namely speech acts expressing disagreement on the one hand, and a set of clearly offensive speech acts, such as insults or derogatory language, on the other hand. Our approach is corpus-based: the two typologies which are presented in our chapter were developed based on an annotation of speech acts in a corpus of Wikipedia discussions in French, partly extracted from the WikiDemoCorpus. The chapter then expands on the annotation which was carried out, and on the specific features of conflicts and disagreements in Wikipedia.
Keywords: Wikipedia talk pages, pragmatics, conflicts, disagreements, annotation
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.A corpus representative of conflicts in Wikipedia talks
    • 2.1Conflict regulation in Wikipedia
    • 2.2Page selection
  • 3.Conflicts in Wikipedia talks: Categories of disagreement and verbal attacks
    • 3.1Thread-level annotation
    • 3.2Disagreements
    • 3.3Verbal attacks
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Disagreements
    • 4.2Verbal attacks
      • 4.2.1Reproaches
      • 4.2.2Insults
      • 4.2.3Threats
  • 5.Discussion and future perspectives
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 31 October 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.121.08pou
References (58)
References
Adler, Thomas B., De Alfaro, Luca, Mola-Velasco, Santiago M., Rosso, Paolo, & West, Andrew G. 2011. Wikipedia vandalism detection: Combining natural language, metadata, and reputation features. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing, Volume 1 Part II, 277–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Angouri, Jo & Locher, Miriam A. 2012. Theorising disagreement. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(12): 1549–1553. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arazy, Ofer, Yeo, Lisa & Nov, Oded. 2013. Stay on the Wikipedia task: When task-related disagreements slip into personal and procedural conflicts. Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology 64(8): 1634–1648. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Auray, Nicolas, Hurault-Plantet, Martine, Poudat, Céline & Jacquemin, Bernard. 2009. La négociation des points de vue. Une cartographie sociale des conflits et des querelles dans le Wikipédia francophone. Réseaux 154(2): 15–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Austin, John L. 1962. How to do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Borillo, Andrée. 2004. Les ‘Adverbes d’opinion forte’ selon moi, à mes yeux, à mon avis,… : Point de vue subjectif et effet d’atténuation. Langue Française 142(2): 31–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bousfield, Derek. 2008. Impoliteness in Interaction [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 167].  Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Researching impoliteness and rudeness: Issues and definitions. In Interpersonal Pragmatics, Miriam A. Locher & Sage L. Graham (eds), 101–136. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brandes, Ulrik & Lerner, Jürgen. 2007. Revision and co-revision in Wikipedia detecting clusters of interest. In Proceedings of International Workshop Bridging the Gap Between Semantic Web and Web 2.0, 4th European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC´07). Konstanz: University of Kontanz. 〈[URL]〉 (2 June 2024).
Brown, Penelope & Levinson, Stephen C. 1978. Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction, Esther N. Goody (ed.), 56–311. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardon, Dominique & Levrel, Julien. 2009. La vigilance participative. Une interprétation de la gouvernance de Wikipédia. Réseaux 154: 51–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Justin, Faris, Robert, Gasser, Urs, Holland, Adam, Ross, Hilary & Tilton, Casey. 2019. Content and Conduct: How English Wikipedia Moderates Harmful Speech. The Social Science Research Network Electronic Paper Collection, Research Publication 2019(5).Google Scholar
Clemen, Gudrun. 1997. The concept of hedging: Origins, approaches and definitions. Research in text theory, 235–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. 1996. Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics, 25(3): 349–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Delkhissi, Laurie. 2016. Qu’est-ce t’as été te mêler de ça ?! Une ‘nouvelle’ structure pour les questions rhétoriques conflictuelles. Journal of French Language Studies 26(3): 279–298. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Denis, Alexandre, Quignard, Matthieu, Fréard, Dominique, Détienne, Françoise, Baker, Michael & Barcellini, Flore. 2012. Détection de conflits dans les communautés épistémiques en ligne. TALN — Actes de la Conférence sur le Traitement Automatique des Langues Naturelles — 2012.Google Scholar
Doury, Marianne & Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine. 2011. La place de l’accord dans l’argumentation polémique: Le cas du débat Sarkozy/Royal (2007). A Contrario 2: 63–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dummett, Michael. 1975. What is a theory of meaning? In Mind and Language, Samuel Guttenplan (ed.), 97–138. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce. 2010. Hedging in political discourse: The Bush 2007 press conferences. In Perspectives in Politics and Discourse [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 36], Urszula Okulska & Piotr Cap (ed.), 201–214. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giles, Jim. 2005. Internet encyclopaedias go head to head. Nature 438(7070): 900–901. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1955. On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry: Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Processes 18: 213–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1967. Interaction Ritual. Essays on Face to Face Behaviour. Piscataway NJ: Aldine Transaction.Google Scholar
Han, Chung-hye. 2002. Interpreting interrogatives as rhetorical questions. Lingua 112(3): 201–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hardaker, Claire. 2010. Trolling in asynchronous computer-mediated communication: From user discussions to academic definitions. Journal of Politeness Research 6(2), 215–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 1998. Hedging in Scientific Research Articles [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 54]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jemielniak, Dariusz. 2014. Common Knowledge? An Ethnography of Wikipedia. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Keck, Ana Claudia. 2022. Le marquage du doute exprime-t-il vraiment l’incertitude? Une approche énonciative, interactionnelle et multimodale de je suis pas certain. SHS Web of Conferences 146, ICODOC 2021: Le savoir au prisme du langage. Acquisition, transmission, manifestations.
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine. 1998. Les interactions verbales, Tome 1, 3e éd. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
. 2008. Les actes de langage dans le discours: Théories et fonctionnement. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
. 2012. L’implicite, 2e éd. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
. 2016. Le désaccord, réaction “non préférée”? Le cas des débats présidentiels. Cahiers de Praxématique 67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kittur, Aniket, Chi, Ed H., & Suh, Bongwon. 2009. What’s in Wikipedia? Mapping topics and conflict using socially annotated category structure. In CHI ’09: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1509–1512. New York NY: ACM. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kittur, Aniket, & Kraut, Robert E. 2008. Harnessing the wisdom of crowds in Wikipedia: Quality through coordination. In CSCW ’08: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 37–46. New York NY: ACM. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010. Beyond Wikipedia: Coordination and conflict in online production groups. In CSCW ’10: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 215–224. New York NY: ACM. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kittur, Aniket, Suh, Bongwon, Pendleton, Bryan A., & Chi, E. H. 2007. He Says, She Says : Conflict and Coordination in Wikipedia. In CHI ’07: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 453–462. New York NY: ACM. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laforest, Marty, & Moïse, Claudine. 2013. Entre reproche et insulte, comment définir les actes de condamnation ? In Violences verbales. Analyses, enjeux et perspectives, Béatrice Fracchiolla, Claudine Moïse & Nathalie Auger (eds), 85–105. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar
Lagorgette, Dominique & Larrivée, Pierre. 2004. Introduction. Langue Française 144(1): 3–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Margutti, Piera. 2011. Teachers’ reproaches and managing discipline in the classroom: When teachers tell students what they do ‘wrong’. Linguistics and Education 22(4): 310–329. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mateo, José & Yus, Francisco Ramos. 2013. Towards a cross-cultural pragmatic taxonomy of insults . Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 1(1): 87–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moeschler, Jacques & de Spengler, Nina. 1982. La concession ou la réfutation interdite. Cahiers de Linguistique Française 4: 7–36.Google Scholar
Padilla García, Xose A. & Alvarado Ortega, Belén. 2010. Being polite through irony. In Dialogue in Spanish: Studies in Functions and Contexts [Dialogue Studies 7], Dale Koike & Lidia Rodríguez-Alfano (eds), 55–68. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perelman, Chaïm & Olbrechts-Tyteca, Lucie. 1958. La nouvelle rhétorique. Traité de l’argumentation. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita. 1984. Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, Atkinson, Maxwell & Heritage, John (eds), 57–101. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Poudat, Céline. 2018. Explorer les désaccords dans les fils de discussion du Wikipédia francophone. In Proceedings of the JADT 2018, Rome, Vol. 2: 602–610.Google Scholar
Poudat, Céline, Grabar, Natalia, Paloque-Berges, Camille, Chanier, Thirry & Kun, Jin. 2017. Wikiconflits: Un corpus de discussions éditoriales conflictuelles du Wikipédia francophone. In Corpus de communication médiée par les réseaux: Construction, structuration, analyse, Ciara R. Wigham & Gudrun Ledegen (eds), 19–36. Paris: l’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Poudat, Céline & Ho-Dac, Lydia-Mai. 2019. Désaccords et conflits dans le Wikipédia francophone. In Accord et désaccord [Travaux linguistiques du Cerlico 29], Gilles Col & Sylvie Hanote (eds), 155–176. Poitiers: Universté de Poitiers.Google Scholar
Rott, Hans. 2007. Disagreement and misunderstanding across cultures. In Cultures: Conflict – Analysis – Dialogue, Proceedings of the 29th International Wittgenstein Symposium, Christian Kanzian & Edmund Runggaldier (eds), 261–275. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schneider, Stefan & Glikman, Julie. 2015. Origin and development of French parenthetical verbs. In Parenthetical Verbs [Linguistische Arbeiten 557], Stefan Schneider, Julie Glikman & Mathieu Avanzi (eds), 163–188. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R. 1979. Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stvilia, Besiki, Twidale, Michael B., Smith, Linda C., & Gasser, Les. 2008. Information quality work organization in Wikipedia. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59(6), 983–1001. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suh, Bongwon, Chi, Ed H., Pendleton, Bryan A., & Kittur, Aniket. 2007. Us vs. them: Understanding social dynamics in Wikipedia with revert graph visualizations. IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology, 2007, 163–170. IEEE. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Viégas, Fernanda B., Wattenberg, Martin & Dave, Kushal. 2004. Studying cooperation and conflict between authors with history flow isualizations. In CHI ’04: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 575–582. New York NY: ACM. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Viégas, Fernanda B., Wattenberg, Martin, Kriss, Jesse & van Ham, Frank. 2007. Talk before you type: Coordination in Wikipedia. In 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2007, 78–78. IEEE. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vuong, Ba-Quy, Lim, Ee-Peng, Sun, Aixin, Le, Minh-Tam, Lauw, Hady W. & Chang, Kuiyu. 2008. On ranking controversies in Wikipedia: Models and evaluation. In Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, 171–182. New York NY: ACM. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watts, Richard J. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yasseri, Taha, Sumi, Robert, Rung, Andràs, Kornai, A. & Kertész, Jànos. 2012. Dynamics of conflicts in Wikipedia. PLoS ONE, 7(6): e38869. DOI logoGoogle Scholar