Linear Unit Grammar
Integrating speech and writing
| Tuscan Word Centre
| University of Helsinki
People have a natural propensity to understand language text as a succession of smallish chunks, whether they are reading, writing, speaking or listening. Linguists have found that this propensity can shed light on the nature and structure of language, and there are many studies which attempt to harness the potential of natural chunking.
This book explores the role of chunking in the description of discourse, especially spoken discourse. It appears that chunking offers a sound but flexible platform on which can be built a descriptive model which is more open and comprehensive than more familiar approaches to structural description. The model remains linear, in that it avoids hierarchies, and it concentrates on the combinatorial patterns of text.
The linear approach turns out to have many advantages, bringing together under one descriptive method a wide variety of different styles of speech and writing. It is complementary to established grammars, but it raises pertinent questions about many of their assumptions.
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 25] 2006. xxii, 185 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
|
Dedication
|
vii
|
|
Acknowledgements
|
ix
|
|
Preamble
|
xi–xiii
|
|
Introduction
|
xv–xxi
|
|
Section A: Preliminaries
|
1
|
|
Setting the scene
|
3–22
|
|
Background
|
23–40
|
|
Data description
|
41–45
|
|
Section B: Analysis
|
47
|
|
System of analysis
|
49–54
|
|
Provisional Unit Boundaries
|
55–58
|
|
Types of chunks
|
59–70
|
|
Types of organisational elements
|
71–78
|
|
Types of increments to shared experience
|
79–89
|
|
Synthesis
|
91–103
|
|
Section C: Theory and follow-up
|
105
|
|
The example texts analysed |
107–127
|
|
Theoretical synopsis
|
129–144
|
|
Looking ahead
|
145–166
|
|
Appendix
|
167–173
|
|
Bibliography
|
175–179
|
|
Index of names
|
181–182
|
|
Index of subjects
|
183–185
|
Cited by
Cited by 38 other publications
No author info given
2014.
In Letters as Loot [Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics, 2],
No author info given
2016.
In Discourse Reflexivity in Linear Unit Grammar [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 76],
No author info given
2016.
In Intonation Units Revisited [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 29],
No author info given
2018.
In How to Do Corpus Pragmatics on Pragmatically Annotated Data [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 84],
Bondi, Marina
2018.
In From Pragmatics to Dialogue [Dialogue Studies, 31],
► pp. 137 ff.
Cheng, Winnie, Chris Greaves, John McH. Sinclair & Martin Warren
2009. Uncovering the Extent of the Phraseological Tendency: Towards a Systematic Analysis of Concgrams.
Applied Linguistics 30:2 ► pp. 236 ff.
Cislaru, Georgeta, Thierry Olive, F. Neveu, G. Bergounioux, M.-H. Côté, J.-M. Fournier, L. Hriba & S. Prévost
2016. Les automatismes du scripteur : Jets textuels spontanés dans le processus de production écrite, le cas des constructions coordinatives.
SHS Web of Conferences 27 ► pp. 06003 ff.
Clarke, Ben & Jorge Arús Hita
2016. The dynamicity of communication below, around and above the clause.
English Text Construction 9:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Hoey, Michael & Juan Shao
2015.
In Corpus Linguistics in Chinese Contexts,
► pp. 15 ff.
Hopper, Paul J.
2015.
In Temporality in Interaction [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 27],
► pp. 123 ff.
Hopper, Paul J.
2015.
In The Handbook of Language Emergence,
► pp. 314 ff.
Ishikawa, Shin’ichiro
2015. A CONSIDERATION OF THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE SPOKEN AND WRITTEN ENGLISH OF NATIVE SPEAKERS AND JAPANESE LEARNERS: A CORPUS-BASED STUDY.
Discourse and Interaction 8:1 ► pp. 37 ff.
Kopotev, Mikhail, Olesya Kisselev & Maria Polinsky
2020. Collocations and near-native competence: Lexical strategies of heritage speakers of Russian.
International Journal of Bilingualism ► pp. 136700692092159 ff.
Lam, Phoenix W. Y.
2010. Discourse Particles in Corpus Data and Textbooks: The Case of Well.
Applied Linguistics 31:2 ► pp. 260 ff.
Lam, Phoenix W.Y.
2009. The effect of text type on the use of so as a discourse particle.
Discourse Studies 11:3 ► pp. 353 ff.
Laury, Ritva, Marja Etelämäki & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
2014. Introduction.
Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 24:3 ► pp. 435 ff.
Mackenzie, J. Lachlan
2016. Dynamicity and dialogue.
English Text Construction 9:1 ► pp. 56 ff.
Mauranen, Anna
2012.
In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
Mauranen, Anna
2016. Temporality in speech – Linear Unit Grammar.
English Text Construction 9:1 ► pp. 77 ff.
Nicoladis, Elena & Pui Ting Chan
2021. Literacy within a language affects bilinguals’ spoken language processing: evidence from grammaticality judgments.
International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism ► pp. 1 ff.
Pang, Priscilla
2019. Directives in Professional Kitchens and Potential Learning Opportunities.
Applied Linguistics 40:5 ► pp. 754 ff.
Saridakis, Ioannis E.
2017.
In Greece in Crisis [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 70],
► pp. 375 ff.
Schneider, Gerold & Gintare Grigonyte
2018.
In Applications of Pattern-driven Methods in Corpus Linguistics [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 82],
► pp. 15 ff.
Stubbs, Michael
2009. Memorial Article: John Sinclair (1933–2007).
Applied Linguistics 30:1 ► pp. 115 ff.
Stubbs, Michael
2012.
In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
Sánchez Rufat, Anna & Francisco Jiménez Calderón
2015. New perspectives on the acquisition and teaching of Spanish vocabulary/Nuevas perspectivas sobre la adquisición y la enseñanza del vocabulario del español.
Journal of Spanish Language Teaching 2:2 ► pp. 99 ff.
Tantucci, Vittorio & Aiqing Wang
2021. Resonance as an Applied Predictor of Cross-Cultural Interaction: Constructional Priming in Mandarin and American English Interaction.
Applied Linguistics
Thomas, James
2015.
In Multiple Affordances of Language Corpora for Data-driven Learning [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 69],
► pp. 85 ff.
Tománková, Veronika
2016. LEXICAL BUNDLES IN LEGAL TEXTS CORPORA – SELECTION, CLASSIFICATION AND PEDAGOGICAL IMPLICATIONS.
Discourse and Interaction 9:2 ► pp. 75 ff.
Tribble, Christopher
2019.
In Novice Writers and Scholarly Publication,
► pp. 53 ff.
Tyrkkö, Jukka & Joanna Kopaczyk
2018.
In Applications of Pattern-driven Methods in Corpus Linguistics [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 82],
► pp. 1 ff.
VAN ROOY, BERTUS
2008. An alternative interpretation of tense and aspect in Black South African English.
World Englishes 27:3-4 ► pp. 335 ff.
Vetchinnikova, Svetlana
2019.
In Phraseology and the Advanced Language Learner,
Wang, Qian
2020. A corpus-based contrastive analysis of I think in spoken Hong Kong English: Research from the International Corpus of English (ICE).
Australian Journal of Linguistics 40:3 ► pp. 319 ff.
Wilcock, Graham & Kristiina Jokinen
2013.
In 2013 IEEE 4th International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom),
► pp. 413 ff.
Willis, Dave
2015.
In Issues in Teaching, Learning and Testing Speaking in a Second Language [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ],
► pp. 3 ff.
Xiao, Richard & Tony McEnery
2013.
In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
► pp. 1 ff.
Čermáková, Anna, Zuzana Komrsková, Marie Kopřivová & Petra Poukarová
2017. Between Syntax and Pragmatics: The Causal Conjunction Protože in Spoken and Written Czech.
Corpus Pragmatics 1:4 ► pp. 393 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 october 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects & Metadata
Linguistics
BIC Subject: CF – Linguistics
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General