Linear Unit Grammar

• Dedication | p. vii
• Acknowledgements | p. ix
• Preamble | pp. xi–xiii
• Introduction | pp. xv–xxi
• Section A: Preliminaries
• Setting the scene | pp. 3–22
• Background | pp. 23–40
• Data description | pp. 41–45
• Section B: Analysis
• System of analysis | pp. 49–54
• Provisional Unit Boundaries | pp. 55–58
• Types of chunks | pp. 59–70
• Types of organisational elements | pp. 71–78
• Types of increments to shared experience | pp. 79–89
• Synthesis | pp. 91–103
• Section C: Theory and follow-up
• The example texts analysed | pp. 107–127
• Theoretical synopsis | pp. 129–144
• Looking ahead | pp. 145–166
• Appendix | pp. 167–173
• Index of names | pp. 181–182
• Index of subjects | pp. 183–185

Cited by 46 other publications

No author info given

2014.  In Letters as Loot [Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics, 2],

No author info given

2016.  In Discourse Reflexivity in Linear Unit Grammar [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 76],

No author info given

2016.  In Intonation Units Revisited [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 29],

No author info given

2018.  In How to Do Corpus Pragmatics on Pragmatically Annotated Data [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 84],

Anurova, Irina, Svetlana Vetchinnikova, Aleksandra Dobrego, Nitin Williams, Nina Mikusova, Antti Suni, Anna Mauranen & Satu Palva

2022. Event-related responses reflect chunk boundaries in natural speech. NeuroImage 255 ► pp. 119203 ff.

Bondi, Marina

2018.  In From Pragmatics to Dialogue [Dialogue Studies, 31], ► pp. 137 ff.

Cheng, Winnie, Chris Greaves, John McH. Sinclair & Martin Warren

2009. Uncovering the Extent of the Phraseological Tendency: Towards a Systematic Analysis of Concgrams. Applied Linguistics 30:2 ► pp. 236 ff.

Cislaru, Georgeta & Thierry Olive

2017. Segments répétés, jets textuels et autres routines.Quel niveau de pré-construction ?. Corpus :17

Cislaru, Georgeta, Thierry Olive, F. Neveu, G. Bergounioux, M.-H. Côté, J.-M. Fournier, L. Hriba & S. Prévost

2016. Les automatismes du scripteur : Jets textuels spontanés dans le processus de production écrite, le cas des constructions coordinatives. SHS Web of Conferences 27 ► pp. 06003 ff.

Clarke, Ben & Jorge Arús Hita

2016. The dynamicity of communication below, around and above the clause. English Text Construction 9:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

Dobrego, Aleksandra, Alena Konina & Anna Mauranen

2022. Continuous speech segmentation by L1 and L2 speakers of English: the role of syntactic and prosodic cues. Language Awareness ► pp. 1 ff.

Feltgen, Quentin, Georgeta Cislaru, Christophe Benzitoun, F. Neveu, S. Prévost, A. Steuckardt, G. Bergounioux & B. Hamma

2022. Étude linguistique et statistique des unités de performance écrite : le cas de et. SHS Web of Conferences 138 ► pp. 10001 ff.

Gledhill, Christopher, Stéphane Patin & Maria Zimina

2017. Lexico-grammaire et textométrie : identification et visualisation de schémas lexico-grammaticaux caractéristiques dans deux corpus juridiques comparables en français. Corpus :17

Hoey, Michael & Juan Shao

2015.  In Corpus Linguistics in Chinese Contexts, ► pp. 15 ff.

Hopper, Paul J.

2015.  In Temporality in Interaction [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 27], ► pp. 123 ff.

Hopper, Paul J.

2015.  In The Handbook of Language Emergence, ► pp. 314 ff.

Ishikawa, Shin’ichiro

2015. A CONSIDERATION OF THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE SPOKEN AND WRITTEN ENGLISH OF NATIVE SPEAKERS AND JAPANESE LEARNERS: A CORPUS-BASED STUDY. Discourse and Interaction 8:1 ► pp. 37 ff.

Kopotev, Mikhail, Olesya Kisselev & Maria Polinsky

2020. Collocations and near-native competence: Lexical strategies of heritage speakers of Russian. International Journal of Bilingualism ► pp. 136700692092159 ff.

Krishnamurthy, Ramesh

2019.  In International Handbook of Modern Lexis and Lexicography, ► pp. 1 ff.

Lam, Phoenix W. Y.

2010. Discourse Particles in Corpus Data and Textbooks: The Case of Well. Applied Linguistics 31:2 ► pp. 260 ff.

Lam, Phoenix W.Y.

2009. The effect of text type on the use of so as a discourse particle. Discourse Studies 11:3 ► pp. 353 ff.

Laury, Ritva, Marja Etelämäki & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen

2015. Introduction. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 435 ff.

MacKenzie, Ian

2016.  In The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Multi-Competence, ► pp. 478 ff.

Mackenzie, J. Lachlan

2016. Dynamicity and dialogue. English Text Construction 9:1 ► pp. 56 ff.

Mauranen, Anna

2012.  In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,

Mauranen, Anna

2016. Temporality in speech – Linear Unit Grammar. English Text Construction 9:1 ► pp. 77 ff.

Mauranen, Anna

2022.  In Handbook of Pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics, ], ► pp. 865 ff.

Nicoladis, Elena & Pui Ting Chan

2022. Literacy within a language affects bilinguals’ spoken language processing: evidence from grammaticality judgments. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 25:7 ► pp. 2412 ff.

Pang, Priscilla

2019. Directives in Professional Kitchens and Potential Learning Opportunities. Applied Linguistics 40:5 ► pp. 754 ff.

Saridakis, Ioannis E.

2017.  In Greece in Crisis [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 70], ► pp. 375 ff.

Schneider, Gerold & Gintare Grigonyte

2018.  In Applications of Pattern-driven Methods in Corpus Linguistics [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 82], ► pp. 15 ff.

Stubbs, Michael

2009. Memorial Article: John Sinclair (1933–2007). Applied Linguistics 30:1 ► pp. 115 ff.

Stubbs, Michael

2012.  In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,

Sánchez Rufat, Anna & Francisco Jiménez Calderón

2015. New perspectives on the acquisition and teaching of Spanish vocabulary/Nuevas perspectivas sobre la adquisición y la enseñanza del vocabulario del español. Journal of Spanish Language Teaching 2:2 ► pp. 99 ff.

Tantucci, Vittorio & Aiqing Wang

2022. Resonance as an Applied Predictor of Cross-Cultural Interaction: Constructional Priming in Mandarin and American English Interaction. Applied Linguistics 43:1 ► pp. 115 ff.

Thomas, James

2015.  In Multiple Affordances of Language Corpora for Data-driven Learning [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 69], ► pp. 85 ff.

Tománková, Veronika

2016. LEXICAL BUNDLES IN LEGAL TEXTS CORPORA – SELECTION, CLASSIFICATION AND PEDAGOGICAL IMPLICATIONS. Discourse and Interaction 9:2 ► pp. 75 ff.

Tribble, Christopher

2019.  In Novice Writers and Scholarly Publication, ► pp. 53 ff.

Tyrkkö, Jukka & Joanna Kopaczyk

2018.  In Applications of Pattern-driven Methods in Corpus Linguistics [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 82], ► pp. 1 ff.

VAN ROOY, BERTUS

2008. An alternative interpretation of tense and aspect in Black South African English. World Englishes 27:3-4 ► pp. 335 ff.

Vetchinnikova, Svetlana

2019.  In Phraseology and the Advanced Language Learner,

Wang, Qian

2020. A corpus-based contrastive analysis ofI thinkin spoken Hong Kong English: Research from the International Corpus of English (ICE). Australian Journal of Linguistics 40:3 ► pp. 319 ff.

Wilcock, Graham & Kristiina Jokinen

2013.  In 2013 IEEE 4th International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom), ► pp. 413 ff.

Willis, Dave

2015.  In Issues in Teaching, Learning and Testing Speaking in a Second Language [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ], ► pp. 3 ff.

Xiao, Richard & Tony McEnery

2013.  In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ► pp. 1 ff.

Čermáková, Anna, Zuzana Komrsková, Marie Kopřivová & Petra Poukarová

2017. Between Syntax and Pragmatics: The Causal Conjunction Protože in Spoken and Written Czech. Corpus Pragmatics 1:4 ► pp. 393 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 03 january 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.