Corpus, Cognition and Causative Constructions
English causative constructions with cause, get, have and make are often mistakenly presented as (quasi-)synonymous and more or less interchangeable. This book demonstrates the value of corpus linguistics in identifying the syntactic, semantic, lexical and stylistic features that are distinctive for each of these constructions. It also underlines the usefulness of providing corpus studies with a solid theoretical foundation by showing how corpus linguistics can be fruitfully combined with cognitive linguistics, which is used both as a starting point for the analysis (top-down approach) and as a framework within which to interpret the corpus results (bottom-up approach). From a methodological point of view, the study illustrates the complementarity of corpus and elicitation data, and offers tools and methods that could be used to investigate other syntactic structures. Finally, the book also has a pedagogical dimension in that it examines how the research findings can be applied to foreign language teaching.
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 39] 2010. xvii, 326 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
List of tables | pp. xi–xv
-
List of figures | p. xvi
-
Acknowledgements | p. xvii
-
1. Introduction | pp. 1–4
-
2. Corpus linguistics and theory | pp. 5–24
-
3. English causative constructions: Collecting the data | pp. 25–59
-
4. Causative constructions in action: The realisation of the action chain | pp. 61–96
-
5. The syntax and semantics of causative constructions: The Principle of No Synonymy | pp. 97–144
-
6. Defining the causative prototype | pp. 145–168
-
7. Lexical co-occurrence in causative constructions | pp. 169–192
-
8. Collexemes in the effect slot | pp. 193–222
-
9. The influence of register on causative constructions | pp. 223–250
-
10. Causative constructions and foreign language teaching | pp. 251–276
-
11. Conclusion | pp. 277–284
-
-
Appendix 1. Elicitation test | pp. 305–310
-
Appendix 2. Distinctive syntactic and semantic features of causative constructions | pp. 311–314
-
Appendix 3. Most frequent syntactic and semantic features of causative constructions | pp. 315–316
-
Author index | pp. 317–320
-
Subject index | pp. 321–326
Cited by (52)
Cited by 52 other publications
Breed, Adri
2024. Revisiting the aspectual BUSY
in (South African) English. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 45:2 ► pp. 155 ff.
Liao, Shengyu, Stefan Th. Gries & Stefanie Wulff
Liu, Na & Fuyin Thomas Li
Pandey, Krishna, Rahul Joshi & Maithili Ganjoo
Le Foll, Elen
Liu, Yingying & Kevin McManus
Torres Soler, Julio & Renata Enghels
Wijaya, David & Evelyn Winstin
Krawczak, Karolina
2022. Chapter 11. Modeling constructional variation. In Analogy and Contrast in Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 73], ► pp. 341 ff.
Moretti, Lorenzo
Sharif, Ahmad Naveed
徐, 文倩
Flach, Susanne
Janebová, Markéta, Michaela Martinková, Jaroslav Macháček & Irena Pauková
Johannsen, Berit
Johannsen, Berit
Laporte, Samantha, Tove Larsson & Larissa Goulart
2021. Testing the Principle of No Synonymy across levels of abstraction. Constructions and Frames 13:2 ► pp. 230 ff.
Schneider, Ulrike
Schneider, Ulrike
Schneider, Ulrike
2022. They’re proing it up hardcore. In Extravagant Morphology [Studies in Language Companion Series, 223], ► pp. 208 ff.
SCHNEIDER, ULRIKE
Danylchenko, Iryna
Hilpert, Martin
2020. The great temptation. In Corpora and the Changing Society [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 96], ► pp. 3 ff.
Viimaranta, Johanna & Arto Mustajoki
Bach, Matthieu
Bermejo, Víctor Lara
Larnyo, Phillips Kofi Atsu & Nathaniel Glover-Meni
Rabadán, Rosa
2019. Working with parallel corpora. In Parallel Corpora for Contrastive and Translation Studies [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 90], ► pp. 57 ff.
Duffley, Patrick J.
2018. Talk into vs convince to. In Changing Structures [Studies in Language Companion Series, 195], ► pp. 15 ff.
Nesset, Tore & Anastasia Makarova
Schanding, Brian & Hye K. Pae
2018. Shell noun use in English argumentative essays by native speakers of Japanese, Turkish, and English. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4:1 ► pp. 54 ff.
Breed, Adri, Frank Brisard & Ben Verhoeven
Ioannou, Georgios
2017. A corpus-based analysis of the verb pleróo in Ancient Greek. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 15:1 ► pp. 253 ff.
Lara, Victor
Bernolet, Sarah & Timothy Colleman
2016. Sense-based and lexeme-based alternation biases in the Dutch dative alternation. In Corpus-based Approaches to Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 19], ► pp. 165 ff.
Levshina, Natalia
Levshina, Natalia
Uhrig, Peter
Glynn, Dylan
2014. Techniques and tools. In Corpus Methods for Semantics [Human Cognitive Processing, 43], ► pp. 307 ff.
Glynn, Dylan
2014. The many uses of run. In Corpus Methods for Semantics [Human Cognitive Processing, 43], ► pp. 117 ff.
Granvik, Anton & Susanna Taimitarha
Luk, Zoe Pei-sui
2014. Investigating the transitive and intransitive constructions in English and Japanese. Studies in Language 38:4 ► pp. 752 ff.
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle
Flowerdew, Lynne
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Main BIC Subject
CFX: Computational linguistics
Main BISAC Subject
LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General