Corpus, Cognition and Causative Constructions

Author

Gaëtanelle Gilquin | Université catholique de Louvain

Hardbound – Available

ISBN 9789027223135 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00

e-Book –

ISBN 9789027288493 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00

English causative constructions with cause, get, have and make are often mistakenly presented as (quasi-)synonymous and more or less interchangeable. This book demonstrates the value of corpus linguistics in identifying the syntactic, semantic, lexical and stylistic features that are distinctive for each of these constructions. It also underlines the usefulness of providing corpus studies with a solid theoretical foundation by showing how corpus linguistics can be fruitfully combined with cognitive linguistics, which is used both as a starting point for the analysis (top-down approach) and as a framework within which to interpret the corpus results (bottom-up approach). From a methodological point of view, the study illustrates the complementarity of corpus and elicitation data, and offers tools and methods that could be used to investigate other syntactic structures. Finally, the book also has a pedagogical dimension in that it examines how the research findings can be applied to foreign language teaching.

[Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 39] 2010. xvii, 326 pp.

Publishing status: Available

https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.39

Table of Contents

List of tables | pp. xi–xv

List of figures | p. xvi

Acknowledgements | p. xvii

1. Introduction | pp. 1–4

2. Corpus linguistics and theory | pp. 5–24

3. English causative constructions: Collecting the data | pp. 25–59

4. Causative constructions in action: The realisation of the action chain | pp. 61–96

5. The syntax and semantics of causative constructions: The Principle of No Synonymy | pp. 97–144

6. Defining the causative prototype | pp. 145–168

7. Lexical co-occurrence in causative constructions | pp. 169–192

8. Collexemes in the effect slot | pp. 193–222

9. The influence of register on causative constructions | pp. 223–250

10. Causative constructions and foreign language teaching | pp. 251–276

11. Conclusion | pp. 277–284

Appendix 1. Elicitation test | pp. 305–310

Appendix 2. Distinctive syntactic and semantic features of causative constructions | pp. 311–314

Appendix 3. Most frequent syntactic and semantic features of causative constructions | pp. 315–316

Author index | pp. 317–320

Subject index | pp. 321–326

Cited by

Cited by 49 other publications

Order by:

Bach, Matthieu

2019. Sensorial discourse and corpus in the digital humanities era: The example of the wine language. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities

Bermejo, Víctor Lara

2019. Lability in Western Peninsular Spanish. Studia Linguistica 73:2 ► pp. 203 ff.

Bernolet, Sarah & Timothy Colleman

2016. Sense-based and lexeme-based alternation biases in the Dutch dative alternation. In Corpus-based Approaches to Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 19], ► pp. 165 ff.

Breed, Adri, Frank Brisard & Ben Verhoeven

2017. Periphrastic Progressive Constructions in Dutch and Afrikaans: A Contrastive Analysis. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 29:4 ► pp. 305 ff.

Danylchenko, Iryna

2020. CAUSAL RELATIONS IN ENGLISH NEWS MAGAZINE DISCOURSE: JOURNALISTS’ AGE PERSPECTIVE. Discourse and Interaction 13:1 ► pp. 25 ff.

Duffley, Patrick J.

2018. Talk into vs convince to. In Changing Structures [Studies in Language Companion Series, 195], ► pp. 15 ff.

Flach, Susanne

2021. From movement into action to manner of causation: changes in argument mapping in the into-causative. Linguistics 59:1 ► pp. 247 ff.

Flowerdew, Lynne

2012. Approaches to Corpus Linguistics. In Corpora and Language Education, ► pp. 53 ff.

Gilquin, Gaëtanelle

2013. Making sense of collostructional analysis. Constructions and Frames 5:2 ► pp. 119 ff.

Gilquin, Gaëtanelle

2015. Contrastive Collostructional Analysis: Causative Constructions in English and French. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 63:3 ► pp. 253 ff.

Gilquin, Gaëtanelle

2021. Using corpora to foster L2 construction learning: A data‐driven learning experiment. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 31:2 ► pp. 229 ff.

Gilquin, Gaëtanelle

2022. Cognitive corpus linguistics and pedagogy. Pedagogical Linguistics 3:2 ► pp. 109 ff.

Gilquin, Gaëtanelle

2023. Causative constructions in process: How do they come into existence in learner writing?. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 11:1 ► pp. 105 ff.

Gilquin, Gaëtanelle

2024. Transfer of collostructions: the case of causative constructions. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 0:0

Glynn, Dylan

2014. Techniques and tools. In Corpus Methods for Semantics [Human Cognitive Processing, 43], ► pp. 307 ff.

Glynn, Dylan

2014. The many uses of run. In Corpus Methods for Semantics [Human Cognitive Processing, 43], ► pp. 117 ff.

Granvik, Anton & Susanna Taimitarha

2014. Topic-marking prepositions in Swedish: A corpus-based analysis of adpositional synonymy. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 37:2 ► pp. 257 ff.

Hilpert, Martin

2020. The great temptation. In Corpora and the Changing Society [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 96], ► pp. 3 ff.

Ioannou, Georgios

2017. A corpus-based analysis of the verb pleróo in Ancient Greek. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 15:1 ► pp. 253 ff.

Janebová, Markéta, Michaela Martinková, Jaroslav Macháček & Irena Pauková

2021. Ivan Poldauf: Sebrané spisy. Svazek III (English papers),

Johannsen, Berit

2021. Between Causative and Passive: Agentivity in the Affactive Construction. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 69:3 ► pp. 321 ff.

Johannsen, Berit

2022. She has a stadium named after her . Constructions and Frames 14:1 ► pp. 41 ff.

Krawczak, Karolina

2022. Chapter 11. Modeling constructional variation. In Analogy and Contrast in Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 73], ► pp. 341 ff.

Laporte, Samantha, Tove Larsson & Larissa Goulart

2021. Testing the Principle of No Synonymy across levels of abstraction. Constructions and Frames 13:2 ► pp. 230 ff.

Lara, Victor

2017. Patrones de ergatividad en el español peninsular. Dialectologia et Geolinguistica 25:1 ► pp. 93 ff.

Larnyo, Phillips Kofi Atsu & Nathaniel Glover-Meni

2019. Causality related to coreferential and reciprocal structures in Ewe. Dil ve Dilbilimi Çalışmaları Dergisi 15:3 ► pp. 1188 ff.

Le Foll, Elen

2023. The Potential Impact of EFL Textbook Language on Learner English: A Triangulated Corpus Study. In Demystifying Corpus Linguistics for English Language Teaching, ► pp. 259 ff.

Levshina, Natalia

2015. How to do Linguistics with R,

Levshina, Natalia

2017. Measuring iconicity. Functions of Language 24:3 ► pp. 319 ff.

Liu, Na & Fuyin Thomas Li

2023. Event integration as a driving force of language change: evidence from Chinese 使-shǐ-make. Language and Cognition ► pp. 1 ff.

Liu, Yingying & Kevin McManus

2023. Investigating the psychological reality of argument structure constructions and N1 of N2 constructions: a comparison between L1 and L2 speakers of English. Cognitive Linguistics 34:3-4 ► pp. 503 ff.

Luk, Zoe Pei-sui

2014. Investigating the transitive and intransitive constructions in English and Japanese. Studies in Language 38:4 ► pp. 752 ff.

Moretti, Lorenzo

2022. A multivariate analysis of causativedoand causativemakein Middle English. Linguistics Vanguard 8:1 ► pp. 165 ff.

Nesset, Tore & Anastasia Makarova

2018. The decade construction rivalry in Russian. Diachronica 35:1 ► pp. 71 ff.

Rabadán, Rosa

2019. Working with parallel corpora. In Parallel Corpora for Contrastive and Translation Studies [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 90], ► pp. 57 ff.

Schanding, Brian & Hye K. Pae

2018. Shell noun use in English argumentative essays by native speakers of Japanese, Turkish, and English. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4:1 ► pp. 54 ff.

Schneider, Ulrike

2021. Loss of intersective gradience as the lifeboat of a dying construction. An analysis of the diachronic change of causativebring. Folia Linguistica 55:s42-s2 ► pp. 429 ff.

Schneider, Ulrike

2021. The syntax of metaphor. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 9:1 ► pp. 47 ff.

Schneider, Ulrike

2022. They’re proing it up hardcore. In Extravagant Morphology [Studies in Language Companion Series, 223], ► pp. 208 ff.

SCHNEIDER, ULRIKE

2023. Reflexive analytic causatives: a diachronic analysis of transitivity parameters. English Language and Linguistics 27:4 ► pp. 789 ff.

Sharif, Ahmad Naveed

2022. Data sharpening and linguistic theorizing: a case study of the causative derivation of Urdu change-of-state verbs. Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 9:1-2 ► pp. 29 ff.

Torres Soler, Julio & Renata Enghels

2023. From Motion to Causation: The Diachrony of the Spanish Causative Constructions with traer (‘Bring’) and llevar (‘Take’). Languages 8:2 ► pp. 122 ff.

Uhrig, Peter

2015. Why the Principle of No Synonymy is Overrated. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 63:3 ► pp. 323 ff.

Valetopoulos, Freiderikos

2023. Avant-propos. Syntaxe & Sémantique N° 23:1 ► pp. 11 ff.

Viimaranta, Johanna & Arto Mustajoki

2020. What Can Science, Religion, Politics, Culture and the Economy Do? A Corpus Study of Metonymical Conceptualization Combined with Personification. Scando-Slavica 66:1 ► pp. 71 ff.

Wijaya, David & Evelyn Winstin

2023. Investigating Indonesian EFL learners’ knowledge and use of English causative constructions. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 61:2 ► pp. 361 ff.

徐, 文倩

2022. Review and Prospect of Semantic Research Methods of Synonyms at Home and Abroad. Modern Linguistics 10:03 ► pp. 366 ff.

[no author supplied]

2021. Corpora, Constructions, New Englishes [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 100],

[no author supplied]

2021. Conjunctive Markers of Contrast in English and French [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 99],

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects