Article published in:
Multi-Dimensional Analysis, 25 years on: A tribute to Douglas Biber
Edited by Tony Berber Sardinha and Marcia Veirano Pinto
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 60] 2014
► pp. 297–316

Chapter 4.2 Conducting Multi-Dimensional analysis using SPSS

| Georgia State University
| Georgia State University
Published online: 31 July 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.60.10fri
References

References

Al-Surmi, M.
(2012) Authenticity and TV shows: A multidimensional analysis perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 46(3), 472-495. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Argyrous, G.
(2005) Statistics for research: With a guide to SPSS. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Biber, D.
(1988) Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1995) Dimensions of register variation: A cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) Variation among university spoken and written registers: A new multi-dimensional analysis. In C.F. Meyer & P. Leistyna (Eds.), Corpus analysis: Language structure and language use (pp. 47-70). New York, NY: Rodopi.Google Scholar
(2006) University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Using multi-dimensional analysis to investigate cross-linguistic patterns of register variation. Paper presented at the Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Reppen, R.
(1998) Corpus linguistics: Investigating language structure and use. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., & Finegan, E.
(2001) Diachronic relations among speech-based and written registers in English. In S. Conrad & D. Biber (Eds.), Variation in English: Multi-dimensional studies (pp. 66-83). Harlow, England: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E.
(1999) Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow, UK: Pearson.Google Scholar
Bryant, F., & Yarnold. P.
(1995) Principal components analysis and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. In L. Grimm & P. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding multivariate statistics (pp. 99-136). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Cao, Y., & Xiao, R.
(2013) A multi-dimensional contrastive study of English abstracts by native and non-native writers. Corpora, 8(2),209-234. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Conrad, S.
(2001) Variation among disciplinary texts: A comparison of textbooks and journal articles in biology and history. In S. Conrad, & D. Biber (Eds.), Variation in English: Multi-dimensional studies (pp. 94-107). Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar
Conrad, S., & Biber, D.
(Eds.) (2001) Variation in English: Multi-dimensional studies. Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar
Forchini, P.
(2012) Movie language revisited. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Friginal, E.
(2009) The language of outsourced call centers: A corpus-based study of cross-cultural interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gray, B.E.
(2011) Exploring academic writing through corpus linguistics: When discipline tells only part of the story. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ.Google Scholar
Grieve, J., Biber, D., Friginal, E., & Nekrasova, T.
(2010). Variation among blogs: A multi-dimensional analysis. In A. Mehler, S. Sharoff, & M. Santini (Eds.), Genres on the web: Corpus studies and computational models (pp. 45-71). New York, NY: Springer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, J., & Friginal, E.
(2012). Filipino and American online communication and linguistic variation, World Englishes, 31, 143-161. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, J., & Römer, U.
(2013) Revealing disciplinary variation in student writing: A multi-dimensional analysis of the Michigan Corpus of Upper-level Student Papers (MICUSP). Corpora, 8(2), 183-207. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Horn, R., & Martin, W.
(2008) EPS 624/725: Exploratory factor analysis. [Class Tutorial/Handout]. Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ.Google Scholar
Huber, D.
(2004) Exploratory factor analysis training manual. [Class Handout]. College of Education Faculty Research Center, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ.Google Scholar
Levesque, R.
(2007) SPSS programming and data management: A guide for SPSS and SAS users (4th Ed.). Chicago IL: SPSS.Google Scholar
Kaiser, H.F.
(1974) An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrica, 39, 31-36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norusis, M.J.
(2003) SPSS 12.0 Statistical Procedures Companion. Upper Saddle, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, M.B., & Römer, U.
(2012) From student hard drive to web corpus (part 2): The annotation and online distribution of the Michigan Corpus of Upper-level Student Papers (MICUSP). Corpora, 7(1), 1-18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Osterlind, S., & Tabachnick, B.
(2001) SPSS for Windows workbook (4th Ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Precht, K.
(2003) Great versus lovely: Stance differences in American and British English. In C. Meyer & P. Leistyna (Eds.), Corpus analysis: Language structure and language use, pp. 133-152. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Quaglio, P.
(2009) Television dialogue. The sitcom Friends vs. natural conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rayson, P.
(2003) Wmatrix: A statistical method and software tool for linguistic analysis through corpus comparison. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.Google Scholar
Römer, U., & O'Donnell, M.B.
(2011). From student hard drive to web corpus (part 1): the design, compilation and genre classification of the Michigan Corpus of Upper-level Student Papers (MICUSP). Corpora, 6(2), 159-177. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rummel, R.J.
(1970) Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Scott, S.
(1998) Patterns of language use in adult, face-to-face disagreements. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ.Google Scholar
Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S.
(2007) Using multivariate statistics (5th Ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Veirano Pinto, M.
(2013) A linguagem dos filmes norte-americanos ao longo dos anos: Uma abordagem multidimensional [The language of North-American movies over the years: A multi-dimensional study]. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Catholic University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.Google Scholar
White, M.
(1994) Language in job interviews: Differences relating to success and socioeconomic variables. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ.Google Scholar
Xiao, R.
(2009) Multidimensional analysis and the study of world Englishes. World Englishes, 28(4), 421-450. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Xiao, Z., & McEnery, A.
(2005) Two approaches to genre analysis. Journal of English Linguistics, 33(1), 62-82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 11 other publications

No author info given
2019.  In Learning the Language of Dentistry [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 93], Crossref logo
Asención‐Delaney, Yuly
2020. Writing in Spanish as a heritage language: A multidimensional analysis. Foreign Language Annals 53:4 ► pp. 877 ff. Crossref logo
Berber Sardinha, Tony
2018. Dimensions of variation across Internet registers. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 23:2 ► pp. 125 ff. Crossref logo
Berber Sardinha, Tony & Marcia Veirano Pinto
2019. Dimensions of variation across American television registers. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 24:1 ► pp. 3 ff. Crossref logo
Berber Sardinha, Tony & Marcia Veirano Pinto
2021. A linguistic typology of American television. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 26:1 ► pp. 127 ff. Crossref logo
Brezina, Vaclav
2018.  In Statistics in Corpus Linguistics, Crossref logo
Friginal, Eric, Lucy Pickering & Carrie Bruce
2016.  In Talking at Work, ► pp. 27 ff. Crossref logo
Hardy, Jack A.
2015.  In Corpora and Discourse Studies, ► pp. 155 ff. Crossref logo
Jin, Bixi
2018. A Multidimensional Analysis of Research Article Discussion Sections in the Field of Chemical Engineering. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 61:3 ► pp. 242 ff. Crossref logo
Kim, Jeong-eun & Hosung Nam
2019. How do textual features of L2 argumentative essays differ across proficiency levels? A multidimensional cross-sectional study. Reading and Writing 32:9 ► pp. 2251 ff. Crossref logo
Zuppardi, Maria Carolina & Tony Berber Sardinha
2020.  In Advances in Corpus-based Research on Academic Writing [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 95], ► pp. 334 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 04 may 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.