Cover not available
Part of
Spoken Corpora and Linguistic Studies
Edited by Tommaso Raso and Heliana Mello
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 61] 2014
► pp. 27–68

Methodological issues for spontaneous speech corpora compilation

The case of C-ORAL-BRASIL

Spontaneous Speech Corpus Compilation has been going through a growing period in the past 20 years. This is due majorly to technological advances that have been achieved allowing for highly accurate recording in vivo, new insights coming from empirically-based linguistic theory, concerns for the documentation of threatened languages and the high degree of relevance of findings to speech recognition applications. This paper discusses methodologies associated to spontaneous speech corpus compilation which shed light on specific aspects of relevance to the understanding of linguistic phenomena that pertain to spoken language. The compilation process of C-ORAL-BRASIL I, an informal spontaneous speech Brazilian Portuguese corpus, among other examples, is used as the basis for the discussion carried.
Published online: 14 November 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.61.01mel
References (75)
Allwood, Jens. 2002. Bodily communications. Dimensions of expression and content. In Multimodality in Language and Speech Systems, Björn Granström, David House & Inger Karlsson (eds), 7–26. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Austin, John L. 1962. How to do Things with Words. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Berruto, Gaetano. 1987. Sociolinguistica dell’italiano contemporaneo. Roma: La Nuova Italia Scientifica.Google Scholar
. 1993a. Le varietà del repertorio. In Introduzione all’italiano contemporaneo, Alberto A. Sobrero (ed.). Roma-Bari: Laterza 2: 3–36.Google Scholar
. 1993b. Varietà diamesiche, diastratiche, diafasiche. In Introduzione all’italiano contemporaneo, Alberto A. Sobrero (ed.). Roma-Bari: Laterza 2: 37–92.Google Scholar
. 2011. Registri, stili: Alcune considerazioni su categorie mal definite. In La variazione di registro nella comunicazione elettronica, Massimo Cerruti, Elisa Corino & Christina Onesti (eds), 15–35. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Conrad, Susan. 2009. Register variation: A corpus approach. In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen & Heidi E. Hamilton (eds), 175–196. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Conrad, Susan & Reppen, Randi. 1998. Corpus linguistics: Investigating language structure and use. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward. 1999. The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1970. Remarks on nominalization. In Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Roderick A. Jacobs & Peter S. Rosenbaum (eds), 184–221. Waltham MA: Blaisdell.Google Scholar
Cresti, Emanuela. 2000. Corpus di italiano parlato, 2 Vols. Firenze: Accademia della Crusca.Google Scholar
. 2001. Per una nuova definizione di frase. In Studi di storia della lingua italiana offerti a Ghino Ghinassi, Paolo Bongrani, Andrea Dardi, Massimo Fanfani & Riccardo Tesi (Eds.), 511–550. Firenze: Le Lettere.Google Scholar
Cresti, E. 2005a. Notes on lexical strategy, structural strategy and surface clause indexes in the C-ORAL-ROM spoken corpora. In Cresti & Moneglia (eds), 209–256.Google Scholar
Cresti, Emanuela. 2005b. Enunciato e frase: Teoria e verifiche empiriche. In Italia linguistica: Discorsi di scritto e di parlato. Nuovi studi di linguistica italiana per Giovanni Nencioni, Marco Biffi, Omar Calabrese & Luciana Salibra (eds), 249–260. Siena: Protagon.Google Scholar
Cresti, Emanuela & Gramigni, Paola. 2004. Per una linguistica corpus based dell’italiano parlato: Le unità di riferimento. In Atti del Convegno ‘L’italiano parlato’, Federico Leoni Albano, Francesco Cutugno, Massimo Pettorino & Renata Savy (eds). Napoli: D’Auria.Google Scholar
Cresti, Emanuela & Moneglia, Massimo (eds). 2005. C-ORAL-ROM. Integrated Reference Corpora for Spoken Romance Languages [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 15]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cresti, Emanuela & Raso, Tommaso. 2012. Text annotation of information units through IPIC. LABLITA [URL]
Dittmar, Norbert. 2004. Register. In Handbuch der Soziolinguistik / Handbook of Sociolinguistics, Vol.1, Ulrich Ammon, Norbert Dittmar, Klaus J. Mattheier & Peter Trudgill (eds), 2016–226. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W., Chafe, Wallace L., Meyer, Charles, Thompson, Sandra A., Englebretson, Robert & Martey, Nii. 2000–2005. Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, Parts 1–4. Philadelphia PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar
EAGLES Standards. 1996. [URL]
Edwards, Jane A. 1993. Principles and contrasting systems of discourse transcription. In Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse research. Jane A. Edwards & Martin D. Lampert (eds), 3–31. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Firenzuoli, Valentina. 2003. Le forme intonative di valore illocutivo dell’italiano parlato: Analisi sperimentale di un crpus di parlato spontaneo (LABLITA). PhD dissertation, University of Florence.Google Scholar
Fleiss, Joseph L. 1971. Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin 76(5): 378–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fogassi, Leonardo & Ferrari Pier Francesco. 2005. Mirror neurons, gestures and language evolution. Interaction Studies 5(3): 345–363. Special issue Vocalize to Localize, Christina Abry, Anne Vilain & Jean-Luc Schwartz (eds). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gadet, F. 2000. Vers une sociolinguistique des locuteurs. Sociolinguististica 14: 99–103.Google Scholar
Gadet, Françoise. 2003. La variation sociale en français. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Gregori, Lorenzo & Panunzi, Allesandro. 2012. DB-IPIC: An XML database for informational patterning analysis . In Proceedings of the 7th GSCP International Conference. Speech and Corpora , Heliana Mello, Massimo Pettorino & Tommaso Raso (eds), 121–127. Florence: Firenze University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A.K. 1989. Spoken and Written Languages. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
van den Heuvel, Henk, Boves, Louis, Choukri, Khalid, Goddijn, Simo & Sanders, Eric 2000. SLR validation: Present state of affairs and prospects. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Language Resource and Evaluation (LREC 2000) , 435–440. Paris: ELRA.Google Scholar
Izre’el, Shlomo, Hary, Benjamin & Rahav, Giora. 2001. Designing C0SIH: The Corpus of Spoken Israeli Hebrew. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 6: 171–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johansson, Stig. 1995a. The approach of the Text Encoding Initiative to the encoding of spoken discourse. In Leech, Meyers & Thomas (eds), 82–98.Google Scholar
. 1995b. The encoding of spoken texts. Computers and the Humanities 29(1): 149–158. Also in Ide, Nancy & Véronis, Jean. 1995. The Text Encoding Initiative. Background and Context, 149–158. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karcevsky, Serge. 1931. Sur la phonologie de la phrase. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague IV: 188–228.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1966. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, William & Waletzky, Joshua. 1967. Narrative analysis. In Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts, June Helm (ed.), 12–44. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Myers, Greg & Thomas, Jenny (eds). 1995. Spoken English on Computer. Transcription, Markup and Applications. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Llisterri, Joaquim. 1996. Preliminary recommendations on spoken texts. EAGLES Documents EAG-TCWG-STP/P. [URL]
MacWhinney, Brian J. 2000. The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Martin, Philippe. 2005. WinPitch Corpus: A text-to-speech analysis and alignment tool. In C-ORAL-ROM. Integrated Reference Corpora for Spoken Romance Languages [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 15], Emanuela Cresti & Massimo Moneglia (eds), Section 1.4 of Ch. 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mc Neill, David (ed.). 2000. Language and Gesture. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. How Language Began. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mello, Heliana & Raso, Tommaso. 2009. Para a transcrição da fala espontânea: O caso do C-ORAL-BRASIL. Revista Portuguesa de Humanidades – Estudos Linguísticos 13(1): 153–178.Google Scholar
Mello, Heliana, Raso, Tommaso, Mittmann, Maryualê M., Vale, Heloisa P. & Côrtes, Priscila O. 2012. Transcrição e segmentação prosodic do corpus C-ORAL-BRASIL: Critérios de implementação e validação. In C-ORAL – Brasil I: Corpus de referência do português brasileiro falado informal, Tommaso Raso & Heliana Mello (eds), 125–176. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG.Google Scholar
Mello, Heliana, Raso, Tommaso, Mittmann, Maryualê M. & Furtado, D. DBCom: C-ORAL-BRASIL search engine platform. Forthcoming.
Mettouchi, Amina, Lacheret-Dujour, Anne, Silber-Varod, Vered, Izre’el, Shlomo. 2007. Only prosody? Perception of speech segmentation in Kabyle and Hebrew. Nouveaux Cahiers de Linguistique Française 28: 207–218.Google Scholar
Mettouchi, Amina, Caubet, Dominique, Vanhove, Martine, Tosco, Mauro, Comrie, Bernard & Izre’el, Shlomo. 2010. CORPAFROAS. A corpus for spoken Afroasiatic languages: Morphosyntactic and prosodic analysis. In CAMSEMUD 2007, Frederick Mario Fales & Giulia Francesca Grassi (eds), 177–180. Padova: SARGON.Google Scholar
Moneglia, Massimo. 2005. The C-ORAL-ROM Resource. In Cresti & Moneglia, 1–70.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Spoken corpora and pragmatics. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada 11(2): 479–519.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moneglia, Massimo & Cresti, Emanuela. 1997. L’intonazione e I criteri di trascrizione del parlato adulto e infantile. In Il progettto CHILDES Italia, Umberta Bortolini & Elen Pizzuto (eds), 57–90. Pisa: Del Cerro.Google Scholar
Moneglia, Massimo, Scaarano, Antonietta & Spinu, Marius. 2005. The multilingual corpus of spontaneous speech C-ORAL-ROM: Validation of the prosodic annotation by expert transcribers. In Atti della Conferenza CLiP 2003 , Carlotta Nicolas Martinez & Massimo Moneglia (eds), 127–142. Firenze: Firenze University Press.Google Scholar
Moneglia, Massimo & Scarano, Antonietta. 2008. Il Corpus Stammerjohann. Il primo corpus di italiano parlato, in rete nella base dati di LABLITA. In Atti del convegno internazionale ‘La comunicazione parlata’, Tomo III, Massimo Pettorino (ed.), 1650–1685. Napoli: Liguori.Google Scholar
Moneglia, Massimo & Cresti, Emanuela. Forthcoming. The cross-linguistic comparison of information patterning in spontaneous speech corpora: Data from C-ORAL-ROM ITALIAN and C-ORAL-BRASIL. In Linguistique interactionnelle contrastive. Grammaire et interaction dans les langues romanes, Sabine Diao-Klaeger & Britta Thörle (eds). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
Nencioni, Giovanni. 1976. Parlato-parlato, parlato-scritto, parlato-recitato. Strumenti Critici 10: 1–56. Also in Nencioni, Giovanni. 1983. Di scritto e parlato. Discorsi linguistici, 126–179. Bologna: Zanichelli.Google Scholar
Oostdijk, Nelleke, Goedertier, Wim, Van Eynde, Frank, Boves, Louis, Martens, Jean-Pierre, Moortgat, Michael, Baayen, R. Harald. 2002. Experiences from the Spoken Dutch Corpus Project. In Proceedings from the Third International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluations , Manuel Gonzalez-Rodriguez & Carmen Paz Suárez Araujo (eds), 330–347. Las Palmas de Gran Canaria.
Panunzi, Allesandro & Gregori, Lorenzo. 2012. DB-IPIC. An XML database for the representation of information structure in spoken language. In Pragmatics and Prosody. Illocution, Modality, Attitude, Information Structure and Speech Annotation, Heliana Mello, Allesandro Panunzi & Tommaso Raso (eds), 19–37. Florence: Firenze University Press.Google Scholar
Poggi, Isabella. 2007. Mind, Hands, Face and Body. A Goal and Belief View of Multimodal Communication. Berlin: Werdler.Google Scholar
Raso, Tommaso. 2012a. O corpus C-ORAL-BRASIL. In Raso & Mello (eds), 55–90.Google Scholar
. 2012b. O C-ORAL-BRASIL e a teoria da língua em ato. In Raso & Mello (eds), 91–124.Google Scholar
. 2012c. Specifications. In Mello & Raso (eds).Google Scholar
. In press. Fala e escrita: Meio, canal, consequências pragmáticas e linguísticas. Domínios da Linguagem.DOI logo
Raso, Tommaso & Mello, Heliana (eds). 2012. C-ORAL – Brasil I: Corpus de referência do português brasileiro falado informal. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG.Google Scholar
Raso, Tommaso & Mittmann, Maryualê M. 2009. Validação estatística dos critérios de segmentação da fala espontânea no corpus C-ORAL-BRASIL. Revista de Estudos da Linguagem 17(2): 73–91.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. As principais medidas da fala. In Raso & Mello (eds).Google Scholar
Rocha, Bruno. 2013. Metodologia emírica para o estudo de ilocuções no PB. Domínios de Linguagem 14: 109–148.Google Scholar
Rossi, Fabio. 2001. Varietà diamesica. In Enciclopedia dell’italiano, 1540–1542. Roma: Treccani.Google Scholar
Rossini, Nicla. 2012. Language ‘in action’: Reinterpreting Gesture as Language. Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
Scarano, Antonietta. 2004. Enunciati nominali in un corpus di italiano parlato. Appunti per una grammatica corpus based. In Atti del Convegno ‘L’italiano parlato’, Federico Leoni Albano, Francesco Cutugno, Massimo Pettorino & Renata Savy (eds). Napoli: D’Auria.Google Scholar
Schiel, Florian, Baumann, Angela, Draxler, Christoph, Ellbogen, Tania, Hoole, Phil & Steffen, Alexander. 2004. The Validation of Speech Corpora. Munich: University of Munich.Google Scholar
Signorini, Sabrina & Tucci, Ida. 2004. Il restauro e l’ archiviazione elettronica del primo corpus di italiano parlato: Il corpus Stammerjohann. In Costituzione, Gestione e restauro di corpora vocali, Atti delle XIV Giornate del GFS, Collana degli atti dell’associazione italiana di acustica. Viterbo, 4–6 dicembre 2003, Amedeo De Dominicis, Laura Mori & Marianna Stefani (eds), 119–126. Roma: Esagrafica. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, John. 1996. Preliminary recommendations on corpus typology. EAGLES Document EAG-TCWG-CTYP/P. [URL]
Stam, Gale & Ishino, Mika (eds). 2011. Integrating Gestures: The Interdisciplinary Nature of Gesture[Gesture Studies 4]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Teubert, Wolfgang. 1993. Phonetic / Phonemic and Prosodic Annotation. NERC-WP 8-171. Mannheim: IDS.Google Scholar
Thompson, Paul. 2005. Spoken language corpora. In Developing Linguistic Corpora: A Guide to Good Practice, Martin Wynne (ed.), 59–70. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Winski, Richard, Moore, Roger & Gibbon, Dafydd. 1995. EAGLES Spoken Language Working Group: Overview and results. In Eurospeech’95. Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on Speech Communication and Speech Technology , 18–21 September, Vol 1, 841–844. Madrid, Spain.
Woodbury, A. 2003. Defining documentary linguistics. In Language Documentation and Description, 1: HRELP, Peter Austin (ed.). London: SOAS.Google Scholar
audio

Example 1

Example 2

Example 3

Example 4

Example 5

Example 6

Example 7

Example 8

Example 9

Example 10

Example 11

Example 12

Example 13

Example 14

Example 15

Example 16

Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Bossaglia, Giulia, Heliana Mello & Tommaso Raso
2020. Chapter 7. Illocution as a unit of reference for spontaneous speech. In In Search of Basic Units of Spoken Language [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 94], ► pp. 221 ff. DOI logo
Cresti, Emanuela
2020. Chapter 6. The pragmatic analysis of speech and its illocutionary classification according to the Language into Act Theory. In In Search of Basic Units of Spoken Language [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 94], ► pp. 181 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.