Cover not available
Part of
Spoken Corpora and Linguistic Studies
Edited by Tommaso Raso and Heliana Mello
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 61] 2014
► pp. 411–467

Prosodic constraints for discourse markers

ORCID logo

This article aims to show how a corpus driven theory that analyses speech through information units can better account for Discourse Markers (DM) identification and analysis. We propose that the speech flow can only be properly analyzed if segmented into utterances and tone units through prosodic parameters. Utterances correspond to speech acts and tone units to information units (IU); therefore, it is possible for DMs to be identified since they correspond to dialogic information units (DU). Each IU is submitted to different prosodic conditions in order to carry their function. This allows for: (i) identifying DUs; (ii) distinguishing different DUs, thus recognizing the specific function of each DM. We present data from comparable corpora from different Romance languages. The DM data are studied focusing on their functions, frequency, distribution and lexical fillers.

Published online: 14 November 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.61.14ras
References
Acciardi, Daniela
2009 Congiunzioni frasali e connettori testuali (C-ORAL-ROM e GRITTEXT). In Sintassi storica e sincronica dell’italiano, Angela Ferrari (ed.). Basilea: Fondo Nazionale Svizzero per la Ricerca Scientifica.Google Scholar
2010 I focalizzatori in un corpus di italiano parlato (C-ORAL-ROM Italia). In Atti del Convegno Internazionale G.S.C.P. “La comunicazione parlata”, Napoli 23–25 febbraio 2009, Massimo Pettorino, Antonella Giannini & Francesca M. Dovetto (eds).Google Scholar
2010 La subordinazione causale esplicita in un corpus di italiano parlato spontaneo (C-ORAL-ROM Italia). In Atti del XLII Congresso Internazionale SLI, “Scuola Normale Superiore ”, Pisa , 25–27 settembre 2008, Pier Marco Bertinetto, Valentina Bambini & Irene Ricci et al. (eds).
Arruda, Adriellen
2013 A unidade informacional de comentários múltiplos no português do Brasil: Um trabalho baseado em corpus, Monografia Final. Belo Horizonte: Faculdade de Letras, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.Google Scholar
Austin, John Langshaw
1962 How To Do Things With Words. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Barbosa, Plinio Almeida
1999 Pela integração de ciência e tecnologia de fala. In Estudos de Prosódia, Ester Scarpa (ed.), 21–52. Campinas: Editora da Unicamp.Google Scholar
2013 Semi-automatic and automatic tools for generating prosodic descriptors for prosody research. In Proceedings from TRASP 2013, Tools and Resources for the Analysis of Speech Prosody , August 30, 2013, Brigitte Bigi & Daniel Hirst (eds), 86–90. Aix-en-Provence: Laboratoire Parole et Langage.Google Scholar
Bazzanella, Carla, Bosco, Cristina, Gili Fivela, Barbara, Mieznikowski, Johanna, & Brunozzi, Francesca Tini
2008 Polifunzionalità dei segnali discorsivi, sviluppo conversazionale e ruolo dei tratti fonetici e fonologici. In La comunicazione parlata, Vol. II, Massimo Pettorino, Alessandra Giannini, Marianna Vallone & Renata Savy (eds), 934–963. Napoli: Liguori.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, Daniel
2013 Praat. [URL]. DOI: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cresti, Emanuela
2000 Corpus di Italiano parlato, 2 Vols. Firenze: Accademia della Crusca.Google Scholar
2002 Illocuzione e modalit�. In: Gian Luigi Beccaria and Carla Marello, (Eds.). La parola al testo. Scritti in onore di Bice Mortara Garavelli. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
2012 Topic-Focus and Comment-Focus in the Language into Act Theory. In Illocution, Modality, Attitude, Information Patterning and Speech Annotation, Heliana Mello, Alessandro Panunzi & Tommaso Raso (ed.). Florence: Firenze University Press. [URL]Google Scholar
Cresti, Emanuela & Moneglia, Massimo
(eds) 2005 C-ORAL-ROM: Integrated Reference Corpora for Spoken Romance Languages [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 15]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crystal, David
1975 The English Tone of Voice. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Firenzuoli, Valentina
2003 Le forme intonative di valore illocutivo dell’italiano parlato: Analisi sperimentaledi un corpus di parlato spontaneo (LABLITA). PhD dissertation, Università di Firenze.Google Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin
(ed.) 2006 Approaches to Discourse Particles [Studies in Pragmatics 1]. Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar
Fleiss, Joseph L
1971 Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin 76: 378–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Bruce
2006 Towards a theory of discourse markers. In Fischer (ed.), 189–205.
Frosali, Fabrizio
2008 L’unità di informazione di ausilio dialogico: Valori percentuali, caratteri intonativi, lessicali e morfo-sintattici in un corpus di italiano parlato (C-ORAL-ROM). In Prospettive nello studio del lessico italiano, Emanuela Cresti (ed.), 417–424. Florence: Firenze University Press. [URL].Google Scholar
Gregori, Lorenzo & Panunzi, Alessandro
2012 DBIPIC: An XML database for information patterning analysis. In. Proceedings of the GSCP 2012. Speech and Corpora. Heliana Mello, Massimo Pettorino & Tommaso Raso (eds). [URL]
Maia Rocha, Bruna & Raso, Tommaso
2011 A unidade informacional de Introdutor Locutivo no português do Brasil: uma primeira descrição baseada em corpus. In: Domínios de Lingu@agem, 327–343. [URL]
Martin, Philippe
2005 WinPitch Corpus. A text-to-speech analysis and alignment tool. In Cresti & Moneglia (eds), 40–51.
2012 WinPitch. [URL].Google Scholar
Mello, Heliana & Raso, Tommaso
2012 Illocution, modality, attitude: Different names for different categories. In Illocution, Modality, Attitude, Information Patterning and Speech Annotation, Heliana Mello, Alessandro Panunzi & Tommaso Raso (eds). Firenze: FUP. [URL]Google Scholar
Mello, Heliana, Raso, Tommaso, Mittmann, Maryualê M., Vale, Heloísa P. & Cõrtes, Priscila O
2012 Transcrição e segmentação prosódica do corpus C-ORAL-BRASIL: Critérios de implementação e validação. In C-ORAL-BRASIL I: Corpus de referência do português brasileiro falado informal, Tommaso Raso & Heliana Mello (eds). Belo Horizonte: UFMG.Google Scholar
Mettouchi, Amina, Caubet, Dominique, Vanhove, Martine, Tosco, Mauro, Comrie, Bernard & Izre’el, Shlomo
2010 CORPAFROAS. A corpus for spoken Afroasiatic languages: Morphosyntactic and prosodic analysis. In CAMSEMUD2007 Proceedings of the 13th Italian Meeting of Afro-Asiatic Linguistics , Frederick M. Fales & Giulia F. Grassi (eds), 177–180. Padova: Sargon.Google Scholar
Mittmann, Maryualê
2012 O C-ORAL-BRASIL e o estudo da fala informal: um novo olhar sobre o Tópico no Português Brasileiro. PhD Dissertation. Belo Horizonte: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.
Mittmann, Maryualê M., Panunzi, Alessandro, Cresti, Emanuela, Moneglia, Massimo, Mello, Heliana & Raso, Tommaso
2012 Information patterning strategies in spontaneous speech: A cross-linguistic study. In Proceedings of the GSCP 2012. Speech and Corpora , Heliana Mello, Massimo Pettorino & Tommaso Raso (eds). [URL]
Mittmann, Maryualê M. & Raso, Tommaso
2012 The C-ORAL-BRASIL informationally tagged minicorpus . In Illocution, Modality, Attitude, Information Patterning and Speech Annotation, Heliana Mello & Alessandro Panunzi & Tommaso Raso (eds). Florence: Firenze University Press. [URL]Google Scholar
Moneglia, Massimo
2005 The C-ORAL-ROM resource. In Cresti & Moneglia (eds), 1–70.DOI logo
2011 Spoken corpora and pragmatics. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada, 479–519. [URL]Google Scholar
Moneglia, Massimo, Scarano, Antonietta & Spinu, Marius
2002 Validation by expert transcribers of the CORAL-ROM prosodic tagging criteria on Italian, Spanish, Portuguese corpora of spontaneous speech. [URL]
Moneglia, Massimo, Fabbri, Marco, Quazza, Silvia, Panizza, Andrea, Danieli, Morena, Garrido, Juan Maríia & Swerts, Marc
2005 Evaluation of consensus on the annotation of terminal and non-terminal prosodic breaks in the C-ORAL-ROM corpus . In Cresti & Moneglia (eds), 257–276.
Moneglia, Massimo, Raso, Tommaso, Mittmann, Maryualê M. & Mello, Heliana
2010 Challenging the perceptual relevance of prosodic breaks in multilingual spontaneous speech corpora: C-ORAL-BRASIL/C-ORAL-ROM. Prosodic prominence perceptual and automatic identification. In Proceedings of the Speech Prosody International Conference Satellite Workshop , Chicago, IL . [URL]
Panunzi, Alessandro & Gregori, Lorenzo
2012 An XML model for multi-layer representation of spoken Language. In Illocution, Modality, Attitude, Information Patterning and Speech Annotation, Heliana Mello, Alessandro Panunzi & Tommaso Raso (eds). Florence: Firenze University Press. [URL]Google Scholar
Raso, Tommaso
2012 O C-ORAL-BRASIL e a Teoria da Língua em Ato. In C-ORAL-BRASIL I: Corpus de referência do português brasileiro falado informal, Tommaso Raso & Heliana Mello (eds). Belo Horizonte: UFMG.Google Scholar
Raso, Tommaso & Leite, Flávia
2010 Estudo contrastivo do uso de alocutivos em italiano, português e espanhol europeus e português brasileiro. Domínios de Lingu@gem. [URL]Google Scholar
Raso, Tommaso & Mello, Heliana
2009 Parâmetros de compilação de um corpus oral: O caso do C-ORAL—BRASIL. Veredas, 20–35. [URL]Google Scholar
2010 The C-ORAL-BRASIL corpus. In Bootstrapping Information from Corpora in a Cross-Linguistic Perspective, Massimo Moneglia & Alesseandro Panunzi (eds). Florence: Firenze University Press. [URL]Google Scholar
(eds) 2012a C-ORAL-BRASIL I. Corpus de referência do português brasileiro falado informal. Belo Horizonte: UFMG.Google Scholar
2012b. The C-ORAL-BRASIL corpus . In Proceedings of the GSCP 2012. Speech and Corpora . Heliana Mello, Massimo Pettorino & Tommaso Raso. Firenze: Firenze University Press. [URL]
Raso, Tommaso & Mittmann, Maryualê M
2009 Validação estatística dos critérios de segmentação da fala espontânea no corpus C-ORAL-BRASIL. Revista de Estudos da Linguagem, 73–91. [URL]Google Scholar
Rocha, Bruno
2013 Metodologia empírica para o estudo de ilocuções naturais do PB. Domínios de Lingu@agem. [URL]
Schourup, Lawrence
1999 Discourse markers. Lingua 107: 227–265. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C
2007 Discourse markers, modal particles, and contrastive analysis, synchronic and diachronic. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 6: 139–157.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 9 other publications

Bossaglia, Giulia, Heliana Mello & Tommaso Raso
2020. Chapter 7. Illocution as a unit of reference for spontaneous speech. In In Search of Basic Units of Spoken Language [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 94], ► pp. 221 ff. DOI logo
Cavalcante, Frederico Amorim, Tommaso Raso, Giulia Bossaglia, Maryualê Mittmann & Bruno Rocha
2020. Topic unit detection in spontaneous speech. CHIMERA: Revista de Corpus de Lenguas Romances y Estudios Lingüísticos 7 ► pp. 69 ff. DOI logo
Cresti, Emanuela
2020. Chapter 6. The pragmatic analysis of speech and its illocutionary classification according to the Language into Act Theory. In In Search of Basic Units of Spoken Language [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 94], ► pp. 181 ff. DOI logo
Cresti, Emanuela & Massimo Moneglia
2018. The definition of the TOPIC within Language into Act Theory and its identification in spontaneous speech corpora. Revue Romane. Langue et littérature. International Journal of Romance Languages and Literatures 53:1 ► pp. 30 ff. DOI logo
Cresti, Emanuela & Massimo Moneglia
2020. Chapter 7. Some notes on the Hearts and Navy excerpts according to the Language into Act Theory. In In Search of Basic Units of Spoken Language [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 94], ► pp. 383 ff. DOI logo
Degand, Liesbeth
2019. Chapter 5. Causal relations between discourse and grammar. In Empirical Studies of the Construction of Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 305], ► pp. 131 ff. DOI logo
Haselow, Alexander
2020. Chapter 8. Local and global structures in discourse and interaction. In Grammar and Cognition [Human Cognitive Processing, 70], ► pp. 267 ff. DOI logo
Raso, Tommaso, Bruno Neves Rati de Melo Rocha, João Vinícius Salgado, Breno Fiuza Cruz, Lucas Machado Mantovani & Heliana Mello
2023. The C-ORAL-ESQ project: a corpus for the study of spontaneous speech of individuals with schizophrenia. Language Resources and Evaluation DOI logo
Čermáková, Anna, Zuzana Komrsková, Marie Kopřivová & Petra Poukarová
2017. Between Syntax and Pragmatics: The Causal Conjunction Protože in Spoken and Written Czech. Corpus Pragmatics 1:4 ► pp. 393 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

audio

Example 1

Example 1a

Example 2

Example 2a

Example 3

Example 3a

Example 4

Example 4a

Example 4b

Example 5

Example 5a

Example 5b

Example 6

Example 6a

Example 6b

Example 6c

Example 7

Example 7a

Example 7b

Example 7c

Example 8

Example 8a

Example 9

Example 10

Example 11

Example 12

Example 13

Example 14

Example 15

Example 16

Example 16a

Example 17

Example 18

Example 19

Example 20

Example 22

Example 23

Example 24

Example 25

Example 26

Example 27

Example 28

Example 29

Example 30