Part of
Corpus Interrogation and Grammatical Patterns
Edited by Kristin Davidse, Caroline Gentens, Lobke Ghesquière and Lieven Vandelanotte
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 63] 2014
► pp. 131149
Bolinger, D
1967Adjectives in English: Attribution and predication. Lingua 18: 1–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, W.L
1970Meaning and the Structure of Language. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
De Smet, H
2012The course of actualization. Language 88: 601–633. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Donner, M
1991Adverb form in Middle English. English Studies 72: 1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferris, C
1993The Meaning of Syntax: A Study in the Adjectives of English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Fischer, O
2001The position of the adjective in (Old) English from an iconic perspective. In The Motivated Sign [Iconicity in Language and Literature 2], O. Fischer & M. Nänny (eds), 249–276. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011Review of Mondorf (2009). Language 87: 416–420. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, T
Mondorf, B
2002The effect of prepositional complements on the choice of synthetic or analytic comparatives. In Perspectives on Prepositions, H. Cuyckens & G. Radden (eds), 66–78. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
2003Support for more-support. In Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English, G. Rohdenburg & B. Mondorf (eds), 251–304. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007Recalcitrant problems of comparative alternation and new insights emerging from internet data. In Corpus Linguistics and the Web, M. Hundt, N. Nesselhauf & C. Biewer (eds), 211–232. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, T
1994Aspects of adverbial change in Early Modern English. In Studies in Early Modern English, D. Kastovsky (ed.), 243–259. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2008Social variation in intensifier use: Constraint on –ly adverbialization in the past? English Language and Linguistics 12: 289–315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peters, H
1994Degree adverbs in Early Modern English. In Studies in Early Modern English, D. Kastovsky (ed.), 269–288. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rohdenburg, G
1996Cognitive complexity and increased grammatical explicitness in English. Cognitive Linguistics 7: 149–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998Attributive adjectives like similar and different involving prepositional complements. In Language as Structure and Language as Process. In Honour of Gerhard Nickel on the Occasion of his 70th Birthday, W. Kühlwein (ed.), 63–79. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.Google Scholar
2004Comparing grammatical variation phenomena in non-standard English and Low German dialects from a typological perspective. In Dialectology Meets Typology. Dialect Grammar from a Cross-Linguistic Perspective, B. Kortmann (ed.), 335–366. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rohdenburg, G. & Schlüter, J
2009New departures. In One Language, Two Grammars? Differences between British and American English, G. Rohdenburg & J. Schlüter (eds), 364–423. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Schlüter, J
2002Morphology recycled: The principle of rhythmic alternation at work in Early and Late Modern English grammatical variation. In English Historical Syntax and Morphology. Selected Papers from 11 ICEHL, Santiago de Compostela, 7–11 September 2000 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 223], T. Fanego, J. Pérez-Guerra & M.J. López-Couso (eds), 255–281. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005Rhythmic Grammar: The Influence of Rhythm on Grammatical Variation and Change in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, S. & Ito, R
2002Think really different: Continuity and specialization in the English dual form adverbs. Journal of Sociolinguistics 6: 236–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ungerer, F
1988Syntax der englischen Adverbialen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar