Article published in:
Grammatical Change in English World-Wide
Edited by Peter Collins
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 67] 2015
► pp. 6586
References

References

Bauer, Laurie
1989The verb have in New Zealand English. English World Wide 10: 69–83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994English in New Zealand. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. V: English in Britain and Overseas: Origins and Development, Robert Burchfield (ed.), 382–429. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Finegan, Edward & Atkinson, Dwight
1994ARCHER and its challenges: Compiling and exploring a representative corpus of historical English registers. In Creating and Using English Language Corpora: Papers from the Fourteenth International Conference on English Language Research and Computerized Corpora. Zürich 1993, Udo Fries, Gunnel Tottie & Peter Schneider (eds), 1–13. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Denison, David
1993English Historical Syntax. Verbal Constructions. London: Longman.Google Scholar
1998Syntax. In Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. IV: 1776-1997, Suzanne Romaine (ed.), 92–329. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Dollinger, Stefan
2008New-dialect Formation in Canada: Evidence from the English Modal Auxiliaries [Studies in Language Companion Series 97]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellegård, Alvar
1953The Auxiliary ‘do’: The Establishment and Regulation of Its Use in English. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Fritz, Clemens W.A.
2007From English in Australia to Australian English. 1788-1900. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey
2002The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Hundt, Marianne
1998New Zealand English Grammar. Fact or Fiction? [Varieties of English around the World G23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Colonial lag, colonial innovation, or simply language change? In One Language, Two Grammars: Morphosyntactic Differences between British and American English, Günter Rohdenburg & Julia Schlüter (eds), 13–37. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012aTowards a corpus of early written New Zealand English – news from Erewhon? Te Reo 55: 51–74.Google Scholar
2012bVarieties of English: Australian/New Zealand English. In English Historical Linguistics: An International Handbook [HSK 34.2], Alexander Bergs & Laurel J. Brinton (eds), 1995–2012. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2015Heterogeneity vs homogeneity. In Letter Writing and Language Change, Anita Auer, Daniel Schreier & Richard J. Watts (eds), 72–100. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Hundt, Marianne & Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt
2012Animacy in Early New Zealand English. English World-Wide 33(3): 241–263. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1909-49A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, 7 vols. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Johansson, Stig
1979American and British English grammar. An elicitation experiment. English Studies 60: 195–215. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kytö, Merja
1991Variation and Diachrony, with Early American English in Focus: Studies on CAN/MAY and SHALL/WILL. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
1993Third-person singular verb inflection in early British and American English. Language Variation and Change 5: 113–139. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William
1969Contraction, deletion, and inherent variability of the English copula. Language 45(4): 715–762. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Hundt, Marianne, Mair, Christian & Smith, Nicholas
2009Change in Contemporary English. A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mair, Christian
2014 Do we got a difference? Divergent developments of semi-auxiliary (have) got (to) in British and American English. In Late Modern English Syntax, Marianne Hundt (ed.), 56–76. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nurmi, Arja
2000The rise and regulation of periphrastic do in negative declarative sentences: A sociolinguistic study. In The History of English in a Social Context, Dieter Kastovsky & Arthur Mettinger (eds), 339–362. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peters, Pam, Collins, Peter & Smith, Adam
eds. 2009Comparative Studies in Australian and New Zealand English. Grammar and Beyond [Varieties of English around the World G39]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rosenbach, Anette
2002Genitive Variation in English. Conceptual Factors in Synchronic and Diachronic Studies. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid
1987The Auxiliary Do in Eighteenth-century English. A Sociohistorical-linguistic Approach. Dordrecht: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter, Nevalainen, Terttu & Wischer, Ilse
2002Dynamic have in North American and British Isles English. English Language and Linguistics 6(1): 1–15. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Turner, George W.
1994English in Australia. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. V: English in Britain and Overseas: Origins and Development, Robert Burchfield (ed.), 277–327. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Valera Pérez, José Ramón
2007Negation of main verb have: Evidence of a change in progress in spoken and written British English. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 108: 223–246.Google Scholar
Visser, Fredericus Theodorus
1963-73An Historical Syntax of the English Language. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Hirota, Tomoharu
2020.  In Late Modern English [Studies in Language Companion Series, 214],  pp. 118 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 september 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.