Article published in:
Grammatical Change in English World-Wide
Edited by Peter Collins
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 67] 2015
► pp. 437–464

Recent quantitative changes in the use of modals and quasi-modals in the Hong Kong, British and American printed press

Exploring the potential of Factiva® for the diachronic investigation of World Englishes

| The University of Hong Kong
| University of Antwerp
This chapter uses Factiva® to examine recent evolution in the occurrence of verbal modal expressions in the Hong Kong newspaper South China Morning Post, in contrast with American and British newspapers. Previous research established that the frequency of the modals is decreasing in both British and American English generally, but increasing within the pages of TIME Magazine. The present research found that American newspaper data on the recent quantitative evolution of the modals parallel the TIME data to a degree, while British newspaper data correspond with data considered to be representative of BrE in its entirety. The quantitative evolutions of both the modals and the quasi-modals in the Hong Kong newspaper resemble the ones in the British newspapers. Keywords: modals and quasi-modals; constructional attrition; newspaper language; HKE; British and American English; Factiva®
Published online: 24 February 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.67.18noe
References

References

Aarts, Bas, Close, Joanne, Leech, Geoffrey & Wallis, Sean
(eds) 2013 The Verb Phrase in English: Investigating Recent Language Change with Corpora. Cambridge:CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Gray, Bethany
2013 Being specific about historical change: The influence of sub-register. Journal of English Linguistics 41(2): 104–134. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bolton, Kingsley
(ed) 2002 Hong Kong English: Autonomy and Creativity. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
Bowie, Jill, Wallis, Sean & Aarts, Bas
2013 Contemporary change in modal usage in spoken British English: Mapping the impact of “genre”. In English Modality: Core, Periphery and Evidentiality, Juana I. Marín-Arrese, Marta Carretero Lapeyre, Jorge Arús Hita & Johan Van der Auwera (eds), 57–94. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chesley, Paula & Baayen, R. Harald
2010 Predicting new words from newer words: Lexical borrowings in French. Linguistics 48(4): 1343–1374. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Peter
2009a Modals and quasi-modals in world Englishes. World Englishes 28: 281–292. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009b Modals and Quasi-modals in English. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Collins, Peter & Yao, Xinyue
2012 Modals and quasi-modals in New Englishes. In Mapping Unity and Diversity World-wide: Corpus-based Studies of New Englishes [Varieties of English around the World G43], Marianne Hundt & Ulrike Gut (eds), 35–53. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan T.
2008 Dispersions and adjusted frequencies in corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 13(4): 403–437. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 Dispersions and adjusted frequencies in corpora: Further explorations. In Corpus-linguistic Applications: Current Studies, New Directions, Stefan T. Gries, Stefanie Wulff & Mark Davies (eds), 197–212. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Hakutani, Yoshinobu & Hargis, Charles H.
1972 The syntax of modal constructions in English. Lingua 30: 301–332. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krug, Manfred
2000 Emerging English Modals: A Corpus-based Study of Grammaticalization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N.
2003 Modality on the move: The English modal auxiliaries 1961-1992. In Modality in Contemporary English, Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred Krug & Frank R. Palmer (eds), 223–240. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
2011 The modals ARE declining: Reply to Neil Millar’s “Modal verbs in TIME: Frequency changes 1923–2006”, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14:2 (2009), 191–220. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 16(4): 547–564. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 Where have all the modals gone? An essay on the declining frequency of core modal auxiliaries in recent standard English. In English Modality: Core, Periphery and Evidentiality, Juana I. Marín-Arrese, Marta Carretero Lapeyre, Jorge Arús Hita & Johan Van der Auwera (eds), 95–115. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Hundt, Marianne, Mair, Christian & Smith, Nicholas
2009 Change in Contemporary English. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mair, Christian & Leech, Geoffrey N.
2006 Current changes in English syntax. In Handbook of English Linguistics, Bas Aarts & April McMahon (eds), 318–342. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Millar, Neil
2009 Modal verbs in TIME: Frequency changes 1923–2006. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14(2): 191–220. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mukherjee, Joybrato & Schilk, Marco
2012 Exploring variation and change in New Englishes: Looking into the International Corpus of English (ICE) and beyond. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth Closs Traugott (eds), 189–199. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
(eds) 2012 The Oxford Handbook of the History of English. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Setter, Jane, Wong, Cathy S.P. & Chan, Brian H.S.
2010 Hong Kong English. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Smith, Nicholas
2003 Changes in the modals and semi-modals of strong obligation and epistemic necessity in recent British English. In Modality in Contemporary English, Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred Krug & Frank R. Palmer (eds), 241–267. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Nicholas & Leech, Geoffrey
2013 Verb structures in twentieth-century British English. In The Verb Phrase in English: Investigating Recent Language Change with Corpora, Bas Aarts, Joanne Close, Geoffrey Leech &Sean Wallis (eds), 68–98. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar