References (68)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2002. Typological parameters for the study of clitics, with special reference to Tariana. In Word: A Cross-linguistic Typology, Robert M.W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds), 42–78. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Amir, Noam, Silber-Varod, Vered & Izre'el, Shlomo. 2004. Characteristics of intonation unit boundaries in spontaneous spoken Hebrew: Perception and acoustic correlates. In Speech Prosody 2004, Nara, Japan, March 23-26, 2004: Proceedings, Bernard Bel & Isabelle Marlien (eds), 677–680. <[URL]>
Anderson, Stephen R. 2005. Aspects of the Theory of Clitics [Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 11]. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Avanzi, Mathieu, Benzitoun, Christophe & Glikman, Julie. 2007. Comment se comprendre sans se méprendre? L'exemple de trois termes problématiques: Période, parataxe et subordination inverse. In Actes du 4ème Colloque Doctorants et Jeunes Chercheurs en Sciences du Langage (Coldoc’07) : Le vocabulaire scientifique et technique en Sciences du Langage, Nanterre, 20-21 juin 2007. <[URL]>
Barontini, Alexandrine. 2012. Moroccan Arabic Corpus. Corpus recorded, transcribed and annotated by Alexandrine Barontini. In Amina Mettouchi & Christian Chanard (eds). The CorpAfroAs Corpus of Spoken Afro-Asiatic Languages. [URL]. Accessed on 10 January 2012. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barth-Weingarten Dagmar, Dehé, Nicole & Wichmann, Anne (eds). 2009. Where Prosody Meets Pragmatics [Studies in Pragmatics 8]. Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar
Basebøl, Hans. 2000. Word boundaries. In Morphologie: ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung = Morphology: An International Handbook on Inflection and Word-formation [Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft – Janbooks of Linguistics and communication Science 17(1)], Gert Booij, Christian Lehmann & Joachim Mugdan, in collaboration with Wolfgang Kesselheim & Stavros Skopeteas (eds), #40, 377–388. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Beckman, Mary E. & Pierrehumbert, Janet B. 1986. Intonational structure in Japanese and English. Phonology Yearbook 3: 255–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beckman, Mary E. & Venditti, Jeniffer J. 2010. Tone and intonation. In The Handbook of Phonetic Sciences, 2nd edn [Blackwell Handbooks in Linguistics], William J. Hardcastle, John Laver & Fiona E. Gibbon (eds), 603–650. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blanche-Benveniste, Claire, Bilger, Mirelle, Rouget, Christine & Karel van den Eynde. 1990. Le français parlé: Études grammaticales, Participation de Piet Mertens [Sciences du Language]. Paris: CNRS Éditions.Google Scholar
Brazil, David. 1997. The Communicative Value of Intonation in English. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Brown, Gillian. 1977. Listening to Spoken English [Applied Linguistics and Language Study]. London: Longman.Google Scholar
. 1990. Listening to Spoken English, 2nd edn [Applied Linguistics and Language Study]. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Brown, Gillian, Currie, Karen L. & Kenworthy, Joanne. 1980. Questions of Intonation. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Brown, Gillian & Yule, George. 1983. Discourse Analysis [Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics]. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caink, Andrew D. 2006. Clitics. In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd edn, Keith Brown (ed.), 491–495. Oxford: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1994. Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cheng, Winnie, Chris Greaves & Martin Warren. 2005. A Corpus-driven Study of Discourse Intonation: The Hong Kong Corpus of Spoken English [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 32]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
CoSIH: The Corpus of Spoken Israeli Hebrew (CoSIH): <[URL]>
Cresti, Emanuela & Moneglia, Massimo (eds). 2005. C-ORAL-ROM: Integrated Reference Corpora for Spoken Romance Languages [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 15]. Amsterdam: John Bejnamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cruttenden, Alan. 1997. Intonation, 2nd edn [Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics]. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crystal, David. 2008. A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics, 6th edn. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Danieli, Morena, Garrido, Juan María, Moneglia, Massimo, Panizza, Andrea Quazza, Silvia & Swerts, Marc . 2004. Evaluation of consensus on the annotation of prosodic breaks in the Romance corpus of spontaneous speech ‘C-ORAL-ROM’. In Speech Corpus Production and Validation, LREC 2004: Fourth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, 24th May, 2004, Lisbon, Christoph Draxler, Henk van den Heuvel & Florian Schiel (eds). 1513–1516. < [URL] >
Debaisieux, Jeanne-Marie & Martin, Philippe. 2010. Les parenthèses: Étude macrosyntaxique et prosodique sur corpus. In La parataxe, Tome 1: Entre dépendance et intégration, Tome 2: Structures, marquages et exploitations discursives, Marie-José Béguelin, Mathieu Avanzi & Gilles Corminboeuf (eds). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W. & Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (eds). Word: A Cross-linguistic Typology. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logo
Du Bois, John W., Cumming, Susanna, Schuetze-Coburn, Stephan & Paolino, Danae. 1992. Discourse Transcription [Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics 4]. Santa Barbara CA: Department of Linguistics, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
. 1993. Outline of discourse transcription. In Talking Data: Transcription and Coding in Discourse Research, Jane A. Edwards, & Martin D. Lampert (eds), 45–89. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 2004. Representing Discourse. Part 2: Appendices and Projects. Santa Barbara CA: Linguistics Department, University of California. <[URL]>Google Scholar
Esling, John H. 2010. Phonetic Notation. In The Handbook of Phonetic Sciences, 2nd edn [Blackwell Handbooks in Linguistics], William J. Hardcastle, John Laver & Fiona E. Gibbon (eds), 678–702. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, Janet. 2010. The Prosody of Speech: Timing and Rhythm. In The Handbook of Phonetic Sciences, 2nd edn [Blackwell Handbooks in Linguistics], William J. Hardcastle, John Laver & Fiona E. Gibbon (eds), 523–602. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fox, Anthony. 1973. Tone sequels in English. In Archivum Linguisticum 4 (new series): 17–26.Google Scholar
. 2000. Prosodic Features and Prosodic Structure: The Phonology of Suprasegmentals. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A.K. 1989. Spoken and Written Language, 2nd edn. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 3rd edn revised by Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Hirst, Daniel & Di Cristo, Albert (eds). 1998. Intonation Systems: A Survey of Twenty Languages. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Izre'el, Shlomo. Forthcoming. Basic units of language: Prosody, discourse and syntax. In Researching Spoken Hebrew, Einat Gonen (ed.). <[URL]> (In Hebrew; English version in preparation).
Julien, Marit. 2006. Word. In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd edn, Keith Brown (ed.), 617–624. Oxford: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kibrik, Andrej A. & Podlesskaya, Vera I. 2006. Problema segmentacii ustnogo diskursa i kognitivnaja sistema govorjashchego (Segmentation of spoken discourse and the speaker’s cognitive system). In Kognitivnye issledovanija, Vol. 1, Valerij D. Solovyev (ed.), 138–158. Moscow: Institut psixologii RAN. <[URL]>; English summary: Discourse as a kind of cognitive activity: The principles of segmentation. In The Second Biennial Conference on Cognitive Science, June 9-13, 2006, St. Petersburg, Russia, Abstracts, Vol. 2, 501–503.Google Scholar
Lacheret, Anne & Victorri, Bernard. 2002. La période intonative comme unité d'analyse pour l'étude du français. In Verbum 24/1-2: Y a-t-il une syntaxe au-delà de la phrase?, Michel Charolles, Pierre Le Goffic & Mary-Annick Morel (eds), 55–72.Google Scholar
Lerner, Gene H. 1996. On the ‘semi-permeable’ character of grammatical units in conversation: Conditional entry into the turn space of another speaker. In Interaction and Grammar, Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 238–276. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. Collaborative Turn Sequences. In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 125], Gene H. Lerner (ed.), 225–256. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malibert-Yatziv, II -II. 2012. ‘Hebrew Corpus’. Corpus recorded, transcribed and annotated by II-II Malibert-Yatziv. In Amina Mettouchi & Christian Chanard (eds). The CorpAfroAs Corpus of Spoken AfroAsiatic Languages. Accessed on 10 January 2012. DOl: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manfredi, Stefano. 2012. ‘Juba Arabic Corpus’, Corpus recorded, transcribed and annotated by Stefano Manfredi. In Amina Mettouchi & Christian Chanard (eds). The CorpAfroAs Corpus of Spoken AfroAsiatic Languages. Accessed on 10 January 2012. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, Philippe. 2009. Intonation du français [Collection U • Linguistique]. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Matthews, Peter. H. 2007. Oxford Concise Dictionary of Linguistics, 2nd edn [Oxford Paperback Reference]. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Mettouchi, Amina. 2012. ‘Kabyle Corpus’. Corpus recorded, transcribed and annotated by Amina Mettouchi. In Amina Mettouchi & Christian Chanard (eds). The CorpAfraAs Corpus of Spoken AfroAsiatic Languages. Accessed on 10 January 2012. DOl: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. To appear. The Interaction of State, Prosody and Linear Order in Kabyle (Berber): Grammatical relations and information structure. In Data and Perspectives in Afroasiatic, Alessandro Mengozzi & Mauro Tosco (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Mettouchi, Amina & Chanard, Christian. 2010. From fieldwork to annotated corpora: The CorpAfroAs project. Faits de Langues – Les Cahiers 2: 255–266.Google Scholar
Mettouchi, Amina, Lacheret-Dujour, Anne, Silber-Varod, Vered & Izre'el, Shlomo. 2007. Only prosody? Perception of speech segmentation. In Nouveauz cahiers de linguistique française 28: Interfaces discours – prosodie: Actes du 2ème Symposium international and Colloque Charles Bally, 207–218. <[URL]>; sound files and transcriptions: <[URL]>
Palmer, Harold E. 1922. English Intonation; with Systematic Exercises. Cambridge: Heffer & Sons.Google Scholar
. 1924. A Grammar of Spoken English: On a Strictly Phonetic Basis. Cambridge: Heffer & Sons.Google Scholar
Pereira, Christophe. 2012. ‘Tripolinian Arabic Corpus’. Corpus recorded, transcribed and annotated by Christophe Pereira. In Amina Mettouchi & Christian Chanard (eds). The CorpAfroAs Corpus of Spoken AfroAsiatic Languages. Accessed on 10 January 2012. DOl: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet & Hirschberg, Julia. 1990. The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. In Intentions in Communications [Systems Development Foundation Benchmark Series], Philip R. Cohen, Jerry Morgan & Martha E. Pollak (eds), 271–311. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Savà, Graziano. 2012. ‘Ts’amakko Corpus’. Corpus recorded, transcribed and annotated by Graziano Savà. In Amina Mettouchi & Christian Chanard (eds). The CorpAfroAs Corpus of Spoken AfroAsiatic Languages. Accessed on 10 January 2012. DOl: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiering, René, Bickel, Balthasar & Hildebrandt, Kristine A. 2010. The prosodic word is not universal, but emergent. Journal of Linguistics 46: 657–709. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1984. Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanie & Turk, Alice E. 1996. A prosody tutorial for investigators of auditory sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 25: 193–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silber-Varod, Vered. 2010. Phonological aspects of hesitation disfluencies. Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2010, Chicago. < [URL] >Google Scholar
. 2011. The SpeeCHain Perspective: Prosodic-Syntactic Interface in Spontaneous Spoken Hebrew. PhD dissertation, Tel-Aviv University. <[URL]>
Tao, Hongyin. 1996. Units in Mandarin Conversation: Prosody, Discourse, and Grammar [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 5]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tosco, Mauro. 2012. ‘Gawwada Corpus’. Corpus recorded, transcribed and annotated by Mauro Tosco. In Amina Mettouchi & Christian Chanard (eds). The CorpAfroAs Corpus of Spoken AfroAsiatic Languages. Accessed on 10 January 2012. DOl: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vanhove, Martine. 2012. ‘Beja Corpus’. Corpus recorded, transcribed and annotated by Martine Vanhove. In Amina Mettouchi & Christian Chanard (eds). The CorpAfroAs Corpus of Spoken AjraAsiatic Languages. Accessed on 10 January 2012. DOl: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vogel, Irene. 2006. Phonological words. In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd edn, Keith Brown (ed.), 531–534. Oxford: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wells, John C. 2006. Phonetic transcription and analysis. In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd edn, Keith Brown (ed.), 386–396. Oxford: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wichmann, Anne. 2000. Intonation in Text and Discourse: Beginnings, Middles and Ends [Studies in Language and Linguistics]. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Yule, George. 1980. Speakers’ topics and major paratones. Lingua 52: 33–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M. 1977. On Clitics. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
. 1995. What is a clitic? In Clitics: A Comprehensive Bibliography, 1892-1991 [Library & Information Sources in Linguistics Series 22], Joel Ashmore Nevis, Brian D. Joseph, Dieter Wanner & Arnold M. Zwicky (eds), xii–xx. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (11)

Cited by 11 other publications

Cresti, Emanuela
Inbar, Anna
2020. Chapter 17. List constructions. In Usage-Based Studies in Modern Hebrew [Studies in Language Companion Series, 210],  pp. 623 ff. DOI logo
Kibrik, Andrej A., Nikolay A. Korotaev & Vera I. Podlesskaya
2020. Chapter 6. The Moscow approach to local discourse structure. In In Search of Basic Units of Spoken Language [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 94],  pp. 367 ff. DOI logo
Cresti, Emanuela & Massimo Moneglia
2018. The definition of the TOPIC within Language into Act Theory and its identification in spontaneous speech corpora. Revue Romane. Langue et littérature. International Journal of Romance Languages and Literatures 53:1  pp. 30 ff. DOI logo
Izre'el, Shlomo
2018. Unipartite clauses. In Afroasiatic [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 339],  pp. 235 ff. DOI logo
Izre'el, Shlomo
Izre'el, Shlomo
2022. The syntax of existential constructions. Journal of Speech Sciences 11  pp. e022001 ff. DOI logo
Mettouchi, Amina
Mettouchi, Amina
2021. From a corpus-based to a corpus-driven definition of clefts in Kabyle (Berber): Morphosyntax and prosody. Faits de Langues 52:1  pp. 207 ff. DOI logo
Shor, Leon
2016. Cognitive and interactional motivations for prosodic phrasing: A corpus-based analysis of the clause in spoken Israeli Hebrew. CHIMERA: Revista de Corpus de Lenguas Romances y Estudios Lingüísticos 3:2  pp. 325 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2020. INEL Corpora General Transcription and Annotation Principles [Working Papers in Corpus Linguistics and Digital Technologies: Analyses and Methodology, 5], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.